J14 NHIC, Corp CAC Meeting The Price of Non-Engagement: When Pay for Performance Programs Develop Penalties Andy Finnegan Health Insurance Specialist Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Medicaid and Meaningful Use – The “Other” EHR Incentive Program: What Hospital Leaders Should Know About the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Wisconsin Hospital.
Advertisements

Presentation before the Missouri Bar’s Health and Hospital Law Committee November 18, 2011 Markus P. Cicka, J.D., L.L.M. (Health Law) Director – Missouri.
Denise B. Webb State Health IT Coordinator May 9, 2013.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Summary of Anti-Fraud Provisions in the Affordable Care Act Michael F. Ruggio Partner Michael F. Ruggio Partner.
HIT “Ask the Experts” Roundtable: CMS Updates Thursday, April 25, ; Access Code #
1 Avoiding the Medicare e-Prescribing “Adjustment” (penalty)
1 Medicare Only EPs, Subsection (d) Hospitals and CAHs EHR Payment Adjustments & Hardship Exceptions.
Physician Quality Reporting System & the Electronic Prescribing (eRx) Incentive Program 2011 Overview December 9,
Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.
JOHN W BARCH, MHA SR. DIRECTOR OF CLINICAL OPERATIONS JANET M RIVERA MANAGER, PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS OFFICE BRIANNE E PORCHE, BBA SUPERVISOR OF.
National Fraud Prevention Program: Analytics in Medicare and Medicaid Center for Program Integrity Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department.
MO PC May 2011 This material was prepared by Primaris, the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization for Missouri, under contract with the Centers.
Slide 1 Regional Care Collaborative March 26, 2015.
Bill Finerfrock Executive Director
Physician Value- Based Payment Modifier under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule 1 Physician Feedback and Value-Based Modifier Program American Medical.
PQRS NYeC Practice Quality Resources & Registry June 8, 2015.
1 Dinetia M. Newman Balch & Bingham LLP MEANINGFUL USE: HISTORY AND TIPS ON IMPLICATIONS FOR FORREST GENERAL HOSPITAL Presented.
Montana Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Program for Eligible Hospitals This presentation will focus on information related to your registration.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Nancy B. O’Connor Regional Administrator, CMS June 2, 2011
Provider Revalidation & Application Fees. Agenda Objectives Revalidation of Enrollment Overview Application Fees How to Complete the Process Session Review.
MaineHealth ACO in Context W 5 Who? What? Why? When? HoW? 1.
Hospital Presumptive Eligibility AHCCCS Training July 2014.
J14 NHIC, Corp CAC Meeting The Price of Non-Engagement: When Pay for Performance Programs Develop Penalties Andy Finnegan Health Insurance Specialist Division.
The Use of Health Information Technology in Physician Practices
Health Insurance in New York Laura Dillon, Principal Examiner New York Insurance Department Consumer Services Bureau One Commerce Plaza Albany NY
INFLUENCE OF MEANINGFUL USE AMONG HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS Neely Duffey, Olivia Mire, Mallory Murphy, and Dana Sizemore.
HIT “Ask the Experts” Roundtable: CMS Payment Adjustments & ROI Andy Finnegan Thursday, November 14, Access Code #
HP Provider Relations October 2011 Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program.
Blue Cross of Idaho Medicare Advantage Provider Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training Fall 2009.
MIPPA Update. MIPPA Incentives Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA)
AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) Regina.
Medicare E-prescribing (eRx) Incentive Program: Getting the 2011 Incentive and Avoiding the 2012 Reduction Mary Patton Wheatley Senior Specialist Health.
Medicaid HIT Program Jon Barley, Ph.D., Chief Bureau of Health Services Research Office of Ohio Health Plans
Discussion with BEACON Council ODJFS/OHP Medicaid Provider Incentive Program.
Accounting for Electronic Health Record Payments July 25, 2012 Draffin & Tucker, LLP
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
Meaningful Use and Merit Based Incentive Payment in 2019.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Updates eHealth Services and Support September 24, 2014 Today’s presenter: Nicole Bennett, Provider Enrollment and Verification.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
Procurement Sensitive Medicare’s 2009 ePrescribing Program Daniel Green, MD, FACOG Medical Officer, Quality Measurement Health Assessment Group Office.
By: Rebecca Cameron Amie Dennis Amy Everson Debborah Stokes.
MIPS Quality Component
MACRA and Physician Reimbursement
EHR Coding and Reimbursement
Chapter 9 Medicare.
MEDICAL REVIEW, PROGRAM INTEGRITY
Value Based Payment Programs Quality Payment Program
MACRA UPDATE Presented by Judella Haddad-Lacle MD
Alternative Payment Models in the Quality Payment Program
AGENDA Participating in MIPS in 2017 MIPS Performance Categories
Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Psychiatric Clinical Nurse Specialists: Patient Volume Threshold (PVT) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program August 2, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Oregon’s Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
Stage 3 and ACI’s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher.
Rural Health Summit June 11, 2010.
Introduction to the Quality Payment Program & MIPS
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
2017 LRHA Rural Health Care Conference October 23, 2017
Praxis EMR Training Seminar
Physician Feedback and Value-Based Modifier Program
EHR Incentive Program 2018 Program Requirements
An Overview of Meaningful Use Proposed Rules in 2015
Meaningful use Financial Incentives for Eligible Professionals and Hospitals.
Secrets to Beating the Curve
2019 Improvement Activities
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S.
MIPS Reporting - Quality
Presentation transcript:

J14 NHIC, Corp CAC Meeting The Price of Non-Engagement: When Pay for Performance Programs Develop Penalties Andy Finnegan Health Insurance Specialist Division of Medicare Financial Management

NHIC J14 CAC Value of Engagement Combined Physician Quality Reporting/eRx Incentive Program Paid $662,531,035 in incentives 72% increase from 2009 ($384,704,248) Over 64,000 individual eligible professionals (National Provider Identifiers or NPIs) and almost 13,000 practices (Tax ID Number or TIN) participated in both programs 52% of those individual eligible professionals participating in both programs were incentive eligible in both programs 125,000 EPs and Hospitals have received more than $4 billion in HITECH incentive payments

eRx Payment Incentive Schedule Established in 2009, the eRx Incentive Program encourages the use of electronic prescribing by providing incentives and payment adjustments based on whether eligible professionals, or CMS-selected group practices participating in eRx Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO) meet the criteria for being successful electronic prescribers The applicable eRx incentive amounts are as follows: 2.0 % - 2009, 2.0% - 2010 1.0% - 2011 1.0% - 2012 .5% - 2013 The applicable eRx payment adjustment amounts are: 1.0 % - 2012 1.5% - 2013 2.0% - 2014

eRx Avoiding the 2013 eRx Payment Adjustment – Individual Eligible Professionals 2013 eRx Payment Adjustment – Overview (cont.) Reporting Period Reporting Mechanism Reporting Criteria 12-month (Jan 1, 2011-Dec 31, 2011)* Claims* Reports on the 2011 electronic prescribing measure’s numerator code at least 25 times for encounters associated with at least 1 of the denominator codes (CMS-1500 type claim form)* (Jan 1, 2011-Dec 31, 2011)* Qualified Registry* Reports on the 2011 electronic prescribing measure’s numerator code at least 25 times for encounters associated with at least 1 of the denominator codes* (Jan 1, 2011-Dec 31, 2011)* Qualified EHR* Reports on the 2011 electronic prescribing measure’s numerator code at least 25 times for encounters associated with at least 1 of the denominator codes* 6-month (Jan 1, 2012-Jun 30, 2012) Claims Report the electronic prescribing measure's numerator code at least 10 times on any payable Medicare PFS service

eRx 2013 eRx Payment Adjustment Hardship Exemptions 2013 eRx payment adjustment hardship exemption requests, and lack of prescribing privileges, must be submitted on or before June 30, 2012 Unable to electronically prescribe due to local, state, or federal law, or regulation Has or will prescribe fewer than 100 prescriptions during the 6-month reporting period Practices in a rural area without sufficient high-speed Internet access (G8642) Practices in an area without sufficient available pharmacies for electronic prescribing (G8643) Does not have prescribing privileges during the 6-month reporting period (G8644)

eRx 2010 Data eRx Incentive Program 113,074 participants 65,857 individual eligible professionals/NPIs and 18,713 practices/TINs earned incentive payments totaling $270,895,540 Total incentive payments increased 83% from 2009 ($148,007,816) Average incentive amount was $3,836 per eligible professional/NPI and $14,476 per practice/TIN

PQRS Physician Quality Reporting System

PQRS 2012 Physician Quality Reporting – Individual Measures The 2012 Physician Quality Reporting now consists of 210 quality measures. This includes 28 new measures for claims and registry. Nine measures from the 2011 program were retired for 2012.

PQRS 2012 Physician Quality Reporting – Measures Groups For 2012, there are a total of 22 measures groups. Fourteen measures groups were retained from 2011 and 8 new measures groups were added for 2012

PQRS The 6-month reporting period beginning (July 1, 2012 – December 31, 2012) is only available to those eligible professionals reporting measures groups via registry.

PQRS Physician Quality Reporting System – Medicare EHR Incentive Pilot For the 2012 program year, CMS implemented the Physician Quality Reporting System-Medicare EHR Incentive Pilot. Successful participation in the pilot will allow receipt of the 2012 Physician Quality Reporting Incentive and demonstrate meaningful use of the clinical quality measure (CQM) component of the EHR Incentive Program. 44 CQMs

PQRS Incentive Payment Schedule 2007 PQRS – 1.5% subject to a cap 2008 PQRS – 1.5% 2009 PQRS – 2.0% 2010 PQRS – 2.0% 2011 PQRS – 1.0% 2012 PQRS – 0.5% 2013 PQRS – 0.5% 2014 PQRS – 0.5%  

PQRS Payment Adjustment Schedule 2015 – 1.5% 2016 - (AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS), 2 %

PQRS Reporting Options 2012 Program Reporting Options 1. Claims-based reporting of individual measures (12 months) 2. Claims-based reporting of at least one measures group for 30 unique Medicare Part B FFS patients (12 months) 3. Claims-based reporting of at least one measures group for 50% or more of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients of each eligible professional (with a minimum of 15 patients) (12 months) 4. Registry-based reporting of at least 3 individual Physician Quality Reporting measures for 80% or more of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients of each eligible professional (12 months) 5. Registry-based reporting of at least one measures group for 30 unique Medicare Part B FFS patients (12 months) 6. Registry-based reporting of at least one measures group for 80% or more of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients of each eligible professional (with a minimum of 15 patients) (12 months) 7. Registry-based reporting of at least one measures group for 80% or more of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients of each eligible professional (with a minimum of 8 patients) (6 months) 8. Direct EHR-based reporting of at least 3 individual Physician Quality Reporting measures for 80% or more of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients of each eligible professional (12 months) 9. Direct EHR-based reporting of a total of 3 HITECH core or alternate core measures AND at least 3 additional HITECH measures (12 months) 10. EHR Data Submission Vendor reporting of at least 3 individual Physician Quality Reporting measures for 80% or more of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients of each eligible professional (12 months) 11. EHR Data Submission Vendor reporting of a total of 3 HITECH core or alternate core measures AND at least 3 additional HITECH measures (12 months) 12. GPRO-based reporting (25-99 eligible professionals) of all applicable measures included in the submission web interface provided by CMS for consecutive, confirmed, and completed patients for each disease module and preventive care measures (12 months) 13. GPRO-based reporting (100+ eligible professionals) of all applicable measures included in the submission web interface provided by CMS for consecutive, confirmed, and completed patients for each disease module and preventive care measures (12 months)

PQRS 2010 Data Physician Quality Reporting 244,145 participants (compared to 100,000 in 2007) 168,843 individual eligible professionals/NPIs, representing 19,232 practices/TINs, earned incentive payments totaling $391,635,495 Total incentive payments increased 65% from 2009 ($236,696,432) Number of practices/TINs qualified for incentive (19,232) increased 50% from 2009 (12,781) Average incentive amount $2,157 for individual eligible professionals/NPIs and $20,364 per practice/TIN Compared to $1,962 and $18,519, respectively, in 2009 Participation rate increased from 15% to 24% between 2007-2010 Most common reporting option continued to be individual measures through claims

HITECH The Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs provide incentive payments to eligible professionals, eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals (CAHs) as they adopt, implement, upgrade or demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology. Eligible professionals can receive up to $44,000 through the Medicare EHR Incentive Program and up to $63,750 through the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program.

HITECH More than 120,000 eligible health care professionals and more than 3,300 hospitals have qualified to participate in the program and receive an incentive payment since it began in January 2011. That exceeds a 100,000 goal set earlier this year. Payments exceed $4 Billion. That includes more than half of all eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals and 1 out of every 5 eligible health care professionals. 

Incentive Payments for Medicare EPs First Calendar Year (CY) for which the EP Receives an Incentive Payment CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013 CY2014 CY 2015 and later $18,000 $12,000 $8,000 $15,000 CY 2014 $4,000 CY 2015 $2,000 $0 CY 2016 TOTAL $44,000 $39,000 $24,000 2011 - First Calendar Year for which the EP receives an Incentive Payment CY 2011 - $18,000 CY 2012 - $12,000 CY 2013 - $8,000 CY 2014 - $4,000 CY 2015 - $2,000 Total - $44,000 2012 - First Calendar Year for which the EP receives an Incentive Payment CY 2012 - $18,000 CY 2013 - $12,000 CY 2014 - $8,000 CY 2015 - $4,000 CY 2016 - $2,000 2013 - First Calendar Year for which the EP receives an Incentive Payment CY 2013 - $15,000 CY 2014 - $12,000 CY 2015 - $8,000 CY 2016 - $4,000 Total - $39,000 2014 - First Calendar Year for which the EP receives an Incentive Payment CY 2015 – $8,000 Total - $24,000 2015 or later - First Calendar Year for which the EP receives an Incentive Payment CY 2015 - $0 CY 2016 - $0 Total - $0 Additional 10% Incentive Payment for Medicare EPs Practicing in HPSAs

Incentive Payments for Medicaid EPs First Calendar Year (CY) for which the EP Receives an Incentive Payment CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013 CY 2014 CY 2015 CY 2016 $21,250 $8,500 CY 2017 CY 2018 CY 2019 CY 2020 CY 2021 TOTAL $63,750 2011 – First Calendar Year for which the EP receives an Incentive Payment CY 2011 - $21,250 CY 2012 - $8,500 CY 2013 - $8,500 CY 2014 - $8,500 CY 2015 - $8,500 CY 2016 - $8,500 Total - $63,750 2012 - First Calendar Year for which the EP receives an Incentive Payment CY 2012 - $21,250 CY 2017 - $8,500 2013 - First Calendar Year for which the EP receives an Incentive Payment CY 2013 - $21,250 CY 2018 - $8,500 2014 - First Calendar for in which the EP receives an Incentive Payment CY 2014 - $21,250 CY 2019 - $8,500 2015 - First Calendar Year for which the EP receives an Incentive Payment CY 2015 - $21,250 CY 2020 - $8,500 2016 - First Calendar Year for which the EP receives an Incentive Payment CY 2016 - $21,250 CY 2021 - $8,500

HITECH Payment Adjustments 2015 – 1% 2016 – 2% 2017 – 3% 2018 – 4% 2019 – 5%

Cost of Non-Engagement Program 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 eRx TBD PQRS 1.5% 2% HITECH 1% 3% 4% 5% 2.5% 6% 7%

Lost Revenue Opportunities PQRS eRx EMR Medicare EMR Medicaid 2012 .5% 1.% $12,000 $8,500. 2013 $8,000 $8,500 2014 ---- $4,000

Medicare Program Integrity

Medicare Overview Each Work Day Monthly Yearly 5.4 million claims processed From 1.5 million providers Worth $1.1 billion 19,000 Part A and Part B provider and 900 durable medical equipment enrollment applications received Over $497 billion in claims paid Over 47 million beneficiaries Each working day Medicare processes over 5.4 million claims, to 1.5 million providers, worth $1.1 billion. Each month, Medicare receives almost 19,000 Part A & B provider enrollment applications and 900 durable medical equipment applications. Every year Medicare pays over $497 billion for more than 47 million beneficiaries.

Spectrum of Fraud and Abuse Results in improper payments Targeting causes of improper payments From honest mistakes to intentional deception 3–10% of health care funds lost due to fraud Spectrum of Fraud and Abuse CMS enforcement activities target the causes of improper payments. They are designed to ensure that correct payments are made to legitimate providers and suppliers for appropriate and reasonable services and supplies for eligible beneficiaries. The CMS spectrum of improper payments runs from error to waste to abuse to fraud. It is estimated that 3-10% of health care funds are lost due to fraud. Errors Waste Abuse Fraud

When Fraud is Detected Administrative actions imposed include Auto-denials, payment suspensions, prepayment edits, civil monetary penalties Improper payments must be paid back Providers/companies barred from program Can’t bill Medicare, Medicaid or CHIP Fines are levied Law enforcement gets involved Arrests and convictions When fraud is detected, the appropriate administrative action is imposed.  Administrative actions include automatic denials, payment suspensions, prepayment edits, identification of overpayments, and civil monetary penalties. Prepayment edits are coded system logic that either automatically pays all or part of a claim, automatically denies all or part of a claim, or suspends all or part of a claim so that a trained analyst can review the claim and associated documentation in order to make determinations about coverage and payment.   Improper payments must be paid back. Providers/companies are barred from doing business , and they can’t bill Medicare, Medicaid or CHIP. Fines are levied. Law enforcement gets involved, which may lead to arrests and convictions.

CMS Fraud and Abuse Strategies Prevention Screen providers and suppliers effectively Spot fraudulent practices before claims are paid Detection Strategic use of tools and techniques to detect fraud, waste and abuse Recovery Identify and recover overpayments Reporting Share key information with internal and external stakeholders CMS uses four strategies to fight program fraud and abuse: Prevention - Screen providers and suppliers effectively and spot fraudulent practices before claims are paid Detection - Strategic use of tools and techniques to detect fraud, waste and abuse Recovery - Identify and recover overpayments Reporting - Share key information with internal and external stakeholders

Prevention CMS Center for Program Integrity Consolidates CMS anti-fraud components New authorities from the Affordable Care Act More rigorous screenings for health care providers Cross-termination among Federal and state health programs Temporarily stop enrollment of new category of providers and suppliers Temporarily stop payments in cases of suspected fraud CMS formed the Center for Program Integrity, pulling together existing CMS anti-fraud components and forming new ones. This centralized approach has enabled CMS to pursue a more strategic and coordinated set of policies, as well as enhanced collaboration on anti-fraud initiatives with law enforcement partners. New rules will help the Medicare, Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance (CHIP) programs do less “paying and chasing” of fraudulent health care claims and perform more proactive and transparent fraud protection, including Creating a rigorous screening process for providers and suppliers enrolling in Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP. Require a cross-termination among Federal and state health programs, so providers and suppliers that have had their Medicare billing privileges revoked or whose participation has been terminated by a state Medicaid or CHIP program will be barred or terminated from all other Medicaid and CHIP programs. Temporarily stop enrollment of new providers and suppliers. Medicare and state agencies will be watching for trends that may indicate a significant potential for health care fraud, and can temporarily stop enrollment of a category of providers or suppliers, or enrollment of new providers or suppliers in a geographic area that has been identified as high risk. CMS can temporarily stop payments to providers and suppliers in cases of suspected fraud if there has been credible fraud allegation. Payments can be suspended while an action or investigation is underway.

URLs https://pecos.cms.hhs.gov https://PQRS.cms.gov https://nppes.cms.hhs.gov qnetsupport@sdps.org https://ehrincentives.cms.gov www.medicarenhic.com www.ngsmedicare.com

NHIC J14 CAC Questions andrew.finnegan@cms.hhs.gov 617-565-1696