Super-c-tau factory in Novosibirsk

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
Advertisements

1 The project of Super-ct-factory with Crab Waist in Novosibirsk E.Levichev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk Tau-08 Satellite Meeting,
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Beam-Beam Optimization for Fcc-ee at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk 11 December 2014, CERN.
G.N. Kulipanov, N.A.Mezentsev, A.V. Philipchenko, K.V. Zolotarev
June 14th 2005 Accelerator Division Overview of ALBA D. Einfeld Vacuum Workshop Barcelona, 12 th -13 th September 2005 General 10 th September 2005.
January 13, 2004D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c BESIII/CLEO-c Workshop, IHEP January 13, 2004 D.Rubin for the CESR operations group.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Permanent magnet wiggler based on NdFeB material. This wiggler type uses the same design principles as the wigglers which have been developed for PETRA.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Source of longitudinally polarized electrons I.A.Koop BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia Tau-2008 satellite meeting Novosibirsk
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.
Study and Optimization of Dynamic Aperture for the SuperKEKB LER E.Levichev and P.Piminov, BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Plan for Review of FCC- ee Optics and Beam Dynamics Frank Zimmermann FCC-ee Design Meeting 31 August 2015.
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
FCC-ee booster: preliminary design study Dmitry Shwartz BINP
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Please check out: K. Ohmi et al., IPAC2014, THPRI003 & THPRI004 A. Bogomyagkov, E. Levichev, P. Piminov, IPAC2014, THPRI008 Work in progress FCC-ee accelerator.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
Beam Polarization I. Koop BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia Workshop on Physics at HIEPA, Hefei, China January 2015.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
The project of Super-ct-factory with Crab Waist in Novosibirsk
Round beams experience at BINP … and other ideas
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
LOW EMITTANCE CELL WITH LARGE DYNAMIC APERTURE
Dynamic Aperture Studies with Acceleraticum
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
Baseline of Super-c-tau in Novosibirsk
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
Large Booster and Collider Ring
The 13th Symposium on Accelerator Physics
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Injection facility for Novosibirsk Super Charm Tau Factory
Status of the VEPP-2000 Collider Project at Novosibirsk
CEPC Booster Design Dou Wang, Chenghui Yu, Tianjian Bian, Xiaohao Cui, Chuang Zhang, Yudong Liu, Na Wang, Daheng Ji, Jiyuan Zhai, Wen Kang, Cai Meng, Jie.
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
BINP Tau-Charm Project
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
The design of interaction region
The project of t-charm factory with crab waist in Novosibirsk
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Comparison of the final focus design
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
SuperB CDR Machine P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team Paris, May 9, 2007.
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Accelerator and Interaction Region
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
CEPC optics and booster optics
BINP Tau-Charm Project Update E.Levichev, BINP, Novosibirsk
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Super-c-tau factory in Novosibirsk E.Levichev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, RUSSIA Future High Intensity e+e- Collider @ 2-7 GeV in China January 14-16, 2015, Hefei

Budker Institute Founded by G.Budker in 1958, ~3000 staff (scientists 500, engineers 400, lab technicians 400, workshop personnel 1000, administrative, support personnel). Main activities: HEP, colliders, accelerator science and technology, SR and FEL, thermonuclear researches. E.Levichev (BINP)

Super c-tau requirements Beam energy from 1.0 GeV to 2.5 GeV Peak luminosity is 1035 cm-2s-1 at 2 GeV Electrons are polarized longitudinally at IP Energy calibration by Compton backscattering (~(5  10)10-5) E.Levichev (BINP)

Details Two rings with Crab Waist collision scheme and single interaction point Sub-mm y at IP Preserving of emittance and damping times through the whole energy range to optimize the luminosity 5 Siberian snakes to obtain the longitudinally polarized electrons for the whole energy range Highly effective positron source (50 Hz top-up injection) Polarized electron source 2.5 GeV full energy linac as injector E.Levichev (BINP)

Crab Waist (P.Raimondi 2006) Large Piwinski’s angle (z/x∙/2) – to decrease the overlapping area Low y – luminosity increase Crab waist – to suppress betatron resonances (sextupoles in phase with IP) E.Levichev (BINP)

Main ring scheme E.Levichev (BINP)

Facility scheme E.Levichev (BINP)

Parameters Energy 1.0 GeV 1.5 GeV 2.0 GeV 2.5 GeV Circumference 780 m Emittance hor/ver 8 nm/0.04 nm @ 0.5% coupling Damping time hor/ver/long 30/30/15 ms Bunch length 16 mm 11 mm 10 mm Energy spread 10.1·10-4 9.96·10-4 8.44·10-4 7.38·10-4 Momentum compaction 1.00·10-3 1.06·10-3 Synchrotron tune 0.007 0.010 0.009 0.008 RF frequency 508 MHz Harmonic number 1300 Particles in bunch 7·1010 Number of bunches 390 (10% gap) Bunch current 4.4 mA Total beam current 1.7 A Beam-beam parameter 0.15 0.12 0.095 Luminosity 0.63·1035 0.95·1035 1.00·1035 E.Levichev (BINP)

Optical functions IP: y=0.8 mm, x=40 mm E.Levichev (BINP)

Final focus e+ e- Compensation Solenoid Cryostat Detector Yoke Anti Solenoid e+ e- QD0 QF1 E.Levichev (BINP)

Final focus trajectories E.Levichev (BINP)

QD0 quadrupole SC iron yoke twin aperture magnet Excitation current 8.5 kA·turns Single aperture 2 cm Gradient 10.7 kGs/cm Length 20 cm Prototype production in progress. A pole with the coil wound General view Manufactured yoke E.Levichev (BINP)

Radiation parameters 4x1.5m Wigglers @ 50 kGs λ=20cm Energy 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 GeV Horizontal Emittance 8 nm·rad Damping time 30 msec Energy spread 1.01 0.99 0.85 0.74 ·10-3 Wiggler field 45 33 22 kGs Energy loss 170 256 343 434 keV SR Power @ Bends 19 96 304 743 kW SR Power @ Wiggs 272 342 282 Total SR Power 291 438 586 E.Levichev (BINP)

Damping wiggler Wiggler field amplitude vs energy Field amplitude at 1.5 GeV 5 T Period length 0.2 m Total length 5.5 m Damping integral i2 at 1.5 GeV 2.76 m-1 Excitation integral i5 at 1.5 GeV 0.01 m-1 Wiggler field amplitude vs energy Wiggler prototype is ready E.Levichev (BINP)

Polarized electron source Beam polarization 90% Polarization lifetime 3000 – 4500 s Cathode voltage (pulsed mode) 100 kV Photocathode type Strained InGaAsP Laser type Ti – Sapphire Light wavelength 700 – 850 nm Laser energy per pulse 10 mkJ Pulse duration 2 ns Repetition rate 50 Hz Number of electrons/pulse 21010 Photocathode quantum efficiency 1% Photocathode recesiation time 190 – 560 hours In 1995 this kind of PES was developed by BINP for NIKHEF (Amsterdam). Proven technology. E.Levichev (BINP)

Polarization scheme Arrows show the electrons spin direction Electrons come from polarized source and 2.5 GeV linac E.Levichev (BINP)

Polarization degree versus energy 5 snakes 1 snake 3 snakes E.Levichev (BINP)

Luminosity tune scan CW advantage: BB coupling resonances are suppressed Wide red area corresponds to 1035 cm-2s-1 E.Levichev (BINP)

Beam-Beam simulation Working BB parameter CW advantage: even for y = 0.2 there is no large beam blow-up and luminosity degradation. Safety margin for BB effects. E.Levichev (BINP)

Energy acceptance Energy bandwidth 2% with chromaticity corrected and all main nonlinearities (including the crab sextupoles) is obtained. E.Levichev (BINP)

Dynamic aperture ΔE/E = 0 ΔE/E = -0.5% ΔE/E = +0.5% E.Levichev (BINP)

Injection facility E.Levichev (BINP) Image of the first positron beam in 2013 Linear accelerator 500 MeV damping ring Beam transfer line E.Levichev (BINP)

SR source (optional) High-current low-emittance storage ring can operate as an effective SR source (almost free of charge). Small-period ( 0.2 m) strong-field (up to 5 T) damping wigglers generate high flux high brightness radiation for SR experiments. At the Novosibirsk Super C-tau factory we have planned the following SR research areas: Protein macro-molecular crystallography and other bio- and medical applications. Fast processes study (X-ray movie) of detonation processes. X-ray trace element analysis in chemistry, geology, ecology, archeology and technology. Technological application (LIGA-technology, EUV-lithography). Experimental stations from damping wigglers E.Levichev (BINP)

Conclusion Five years ago our project (+ other 5) was selected by Russian government in the “mega-science” program. However until now there is no clear decision on its realization. We have suspended the c-tau factory at the level of CDR which shows that the collider with specified parameters can be developed. We continue working under our new injection facility because we need it for other projects. We continue to develop the FF quadrupole under the CERN FCCee project. Experience in accelerator science and technology we have gained since the c-tau factory suspension allows us not only to restart the project when/if it will be cleared but also improve it. Critical points (for any crab-waist collider) are: FF quadrupoles, complicated MDI, high current with extremely low emittance (especially, the vertical one), sub-mm vertical beta at the IP, etc. E.Levichev (BINP)