32 HoS won’t commit to funding tutors to support 31

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Practice for e-Learning: A Learning Technologists Perspective Alice Bird Learning Technology Manager Liverpool John Moores University.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
Elements of an Online Syllabus Contact: Melody Buckner Instructional Designer.
Educational Teams: Variation at McGill Teaching in a different way Lynn McAlpine McGill University Canada
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
E-content Generation and Delivery Management for Student Centric Learning CONTROL NUMBER : DE Dr DVLN Somayajulu Professor, PI and Institute.
Course Outline Process Overview for Course Convenors.
Title of presentation in grey 15pt Date in grey 15pt Supported Open Learning Open University Business School.
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
Centre for Lifelong Learning. Buddy Project Bill Steele Education Guidance Advisor University of the West of Scotland.
Schools’ Data Collection for National Partnerships Agreements (NPA) Educational Measurement and School Accountability Directorate (EMSAD)
Quality Matters : Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning Teaching with New Technologies May 2007.
Using the BLASST Sessional Staff Standards Framework to sustainably support sessional dental educators Good Practice at the BLASST National Leadership.
FOLLOW UP SITE VISIT Dr Robert Schofield Dr Arthur Brown Advisors to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Midlands Pal: Planning and concept. Where did this come from.
Implementing Change: A Holistic Approach to Developmental Education Sue Cain, Director Transition and University Services Eastern Kentucky University.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
1. Proposal deadline 2. Timeline  A grant opportunity announcement will include a sponsor deadline for receipt of the proposal.  The instructions will.
1 Customized Employment Strategic Service Delivery Component Disability Employment Initiative.
Who wants to be a professor? Cesar D. Guerrero Computer Science and Engineering.
1 Overview of Issues and Activities of the Planning Committee of Council Presented to University Council October 19, 2006.
Blugold Commitment Differential Tuition Reviewer Professional Development Workshop October 18, 19, 20, 2010 Stephanie Jamelske Jeremy Miner Mike.
Dakota State University.
An Equal Opportunity University Overview: eLearning Innovation Initiative (eLII) Patsy Carruthers, MA Ed. Director, Academic Technology Group UK Analytics.
Community-University Exchange Academic-based program out of the Morgridge Center for Public Service.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units Wednesday, October 31, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.
+ using Integrated Planning & Budget In a Participatory Governance Context Realizing our Foothill Vision 20/20.
Course Rep Induction Welcome to the Course Representatives’ Induction
July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.
IDEA Ad Hoc Committee Report Submitted by: Andreas Veh, Diane Erickson, Nelta Edwards, Kerri Morris UAA Faculty Senate, Dec. 7, 2007.
WP6 – Dissemination Project Name: Enhancing Students Participation in Quality Assurance in Armenian HE- ESPAQ Ref TEMPUS BE-TEMPUS-SMGR.
WELCOME!! What is your college currently doing to support, develop and mentor Adjunct Faculty? What is missing?
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
Recruiting and Retaining People Lecture 1: Introduction to the Module.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
CATS Self Review and Planning Tool An Introduction and Overview Alison Poot and Melody West, CATS Project Team (University of Tasmania)
Frosh Graduation Rates

Implementing QM towards Program Certification
Course Director’s Strategy Day
Phase One: Re-inventing the Flagship University, Fall 2006-Fall 2007
The Vertically-Integrated Projects (VIP) Program: Integrating Undergraduate Education and Graduate Research Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational.
Development of Quality Initiatives on a Less-Travelled Path: The Online Fellows Program Judith A. Giering, Ph.D. Karyn E. Holt, Ph.D. Drexel University.
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Academic partnerships Course Rep Training
Writing Competitive Research Funding Applications: Tips and Advice Early-Career Researchers Information Session Friday, 26th October, 2012 Dr Barry Dixon.
Grant Writing Workshop
Assigning evaluators Deans (Education) appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching Dean (Education)
Sequencing Writing Assignments
Sequencing Writing Assignments
Owning the rubric in first year at UTS
OEI ONLINE COURSE EXCHANGE
Office of Grant Resources
Teaching Excellence Development Fund
Fall 2017 edTPA Performance
Providing Customized Training on Quality Online Design and Delivery
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
Academic Partnerships Course Rep Training University of Plymouth
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2018.
Leanne Havis, Ph.D., Neumann University
OLT Information session
Shared Governance Territorial Act (1889): The faculty, the president, and the regents are jointly responsible for governing the university. NWCCU, Standard.
Proposal Development Support & Planning
Universal Design for Instruction
Trying to get the Horse in Front of the Buggy
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
AT RISK STUDENTS.
UQ Course Site Design Guidelines
Step 3. Initiate Proposal
Presentation transcript:

32 HoS won’t commit to funding tutors to support 31 This board game was originally designed as a tool to raise awareness of the process behind developing Breadth Units at UTAS. The ‘Snakes & Ladders’ format has potential to facilitate other staff development discussions, but it is time-consuming to create and position images and text elements. This PowerPoint image has been created for re-use: Snakes are grouped, Ladders are grouped, Numbered squares and text are in an editable table, Other images (dollar signs, arrows) are individually placed so can be selected, moved or deleted as required. It is recommended that all items be re-grouped before printing, or convert image to PDF. This image is scaled to be printed on A3 paper. Becoming Expert at B-r-e-a-d-t-h A board game on the development process for Breadth Units @UTAS 36 You have a really good idea for another Breadth Unit… (you wouldn’t be the first!) 35 Have you completed the online Quality Matters* course? It is a breadth unit team requirement – and the three-year unit review will follow the formal rubric … so you may just want to find out what this is! 34 Critical teaching member leaves the team. Sad but true - this is not uncommon and may be unpredictable. It emphasises the need for robust design and flexible delivery. 33 In a review you will be advised to plan for unit sustainability for scalability without incentive funds. Time for rational consolidation (what worked well?) ahead of adventurous change. 32 HoS won’t commit to funding tutors to support teaching in subsequent semesters. This will require an inventive restructure of unit assessment requirements. 31 Capitalise on your unit development achievement: record it against TPEs; use peer review to improve teaching skills; be a mentor to others starting off on the breadth unit experience. 25 The Cross Faculty L&T Committee approves your completed Unit Outline; you have confirmed teaching support and MyLO unit content is ready. $$ 26 27 Semester starts! You can of course choose to make MyLO content available earlier, but keep requirements for on- and off-campus students equitable. 28 Students can’t find the readings; off-campus students are confused about assessed discus- sions; you receive a welter of emails asking for help. What went wrong? 29 After delivery, the one-year-on unit review conducted by TILT looks at lecturer and student feedback, making suggestion for improvement. Your unit has good reviews! 30 No surprise! Any change to Unit Learning Outcomes or assessment will naturally need to be approved by the Cross Faculty L&T Committee. 24 Spend some of your development fund wisely in engaging Ed Tech support. Even if you are familiar with MyLO tools this will improve continuity and quality assurance of the product. 23 Content development time! What open resources can you access? What can you create and share? 22 21Congratulations! $$ Your Learning Design has been approved by the Cross Faculty L&T Committee. This represents the major requirement for unit development to proceed 20 Identify staff skills and development needs. Match team roles to their strengths. 19 Difficulty in keeping the academic team on task can make it feel like you (as Unit Coordinator) are doing all the work! 13 Your delivery mix is an important decision. All breadth units must be fully online; you can provide on-campus delivery too. So – at how many campuses? What f2f will meet student needs? 14 15 Your teaching team meets with the TILT Academic Developer to workshop a complete unit Learning Design. This will template all your unit development and keep elements aligned. 16 17 18 12 From 2016 breadth unit approval is now a 3-step process: EoI; Learning Design, budget and assessment plan; Unit Outline completion and content readiness to teach. 11 Hooray! First stage approval from Cross Faculty L&T Committee results in first-stage incentivisation payment to the team to advance with unit development. $$ 10 Submission of the completed unit proposal requires a signature from the Faculty Dean or Institute Director of each partner participating in the development. 9 Falling behind with dead-lines! The completed proposal (template on the website) must go to the Cross Faculty L&T Committee by the set date. 8 Important! Check your Faculties’ deadlines for new unit proposals. You need to meet internal requirements too. 7 You read the web- site directions, the MyLO ‘Breadth Unit’ advice and consult with the Academic Developer in TILT at an early stage. A great start to good preparation! 1 START HERE There is a call for EoI for new breadth units… 2 A good idea for a breadth unit is based on a ‘complex challenge’ which can be tackled from different disciplinary contexts. 3 First check that there are no similar units under development – contact TILT and look at the website: http://www.utas.edu.au/dvc-students-education/ introduction/breadth-units 4 5 You have established a committed cross-disciplinary team to work on the proposal. Representation from more than one Faculty is a requirement. 6 Crisis of self-doubt: consult Philosophy team member about the nature of ‘Width’ vs ‘Breadth’… and what truly constitutes a ‘wicked problem’. RETURN TO START Jo Osborne jo.osborne@utas.edu.au December 2016 *Quality Matters online course: www.qualitymatters.org Snake illustrations from: www.wpclipart.com