Laws, Clause, Cases Review Please define the following to a peer Title IX of Education Act Welfare Reform Act Due Process of the 5th Amendment Free Exercise Clause Griswold v. Connecticut Loving v. Virginia

Freedom of Speech April 3, 2017 Objective: what can you say and still be protected?

"I know a man who is firm - he's firm in his pants, he's firm in his shirt, his character is firm - but most [of] all, his belief in you the students of Bethel, is firm. Jeff Kuhlman is a man who takes his point and pounds it in. If necessary, he'll take an issue and nail it to the wall. He doesn't attack things in spurts - he drives hard, pushing and pushing until finally - he succeeds. Jeff is a man who will go to the very end - even the climax, for each and every one of you. So please vote for Jeff Kuhlman, as he'll never come [long pause] between us and the best our school can be. He is firm enough to give it everything."

I. Intro Belief, Speech, Action, Hate Speech

II. Courts is speech protected Bad (dangerous) doctrine (Hate speech v. Hate crime) http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/andrean-high-school-basketball-border-wall-trump-chants Clear and present danger doctrine (Fire!) Prior Restraint doctrine Before it’s given(WBC) Least drastic means test Ashcroft v. ACLU, 2002

III. Other Areas of Speech Political speech less restricteddemocracy “Fighting words” not protected (violence)

III. Other areas of speech Symbolic Speech US v. O’Brien, 1968 Texas v. Johnson, 1989 Sedition Smith Act, 1940=banned advocacy SC: Imminent dangeroverthrow Doing vs. Believe! Obscenity