Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QoS Strategy in DiffServ aware MPLS environment Teerapat Sanguankotchakorn, D.Eng. Telecommunications Program, School of Advanced Technologies Asian Institute.
Advertisements

1 Network Telecommunication Group University of Pisa - Information Engineering department January Speaker: Raffaello Secchi Authors: Davide Adami.
Nicolas Simar – DANTE : Premium IP and LBE transparency on GEANT QoS on GÉANT Premium IP and Less than Best Effort.
RED Enhancement Algorithms By Alina Naimark. Presented Approaches Flow Random Early Drop - FRED By Dong Lin and Robert Morris Sabilized Random Early Drop.
Pathload A measurement tool for end-to-end available bandwidth Manish Jain, Univ-Delaware Constantinos Dovrolis, Univ-Delaware Sigcomm 02.
CSIT560 Internet Infrastructure: Switches and Routers Active Queue Management Presented By: Gary Po, Henry Hui and Kenny Chong.
Transport Layer3-1 TCP AIMD multiplicative decrease: cut CongWin in half after loss event additive increase: increase CongWin by 1 MSS every RTT in the.
Tiziana Ferrari Differentiated Services Test: Report1 Differentiated Service Test REPORT TF-TANT Tiziana Ferrari Frankfurt, 1 Oct.
Tiziana Ferrari Diffserv testing in the wide area (TF-TANT task force)1 Diffserv testing in the wide area TF-TANT task force Tiziana Ferrari Italian National.
Playback-buffer Equalization For Streaming Media Using Stateless Transport Prioritization By Wai-tian Tan, Weidong Cui and John G. Apostolopoulos Presented.
IPv6 Technology and Advanced Services 19/10/2004 IPv6 Technology and Advanced Services IPv6 Quality of Service Dimitris Primpas
XENMON: QOS MONITORING AND PERFORMANCE PROFILING TOOL Diwaker Gupta, Rob Gardner, Ludmila Cherkasova 1.
1 Secure Detection and Isolation of TCP-unfriendly Flows Shuo Chen (Summer Intern) Jose C. Brustoloni (Mentor) Network Software Research Department Bell.
The War Between Mice and Elephants Presented By Eric Wang Liang Guo and Ibrahim Matta Boston University ICNP
Differentiated Services. Service Differentiation in the Internet Different applications have varying bandwidth, delay, and reliability requirements How.
AQM for Congestion Control1 A Study of Active Queue Management for Congestion Control Victor Firoiu Marty Borden.
Modeling TCP Throughput Jeng Lung WebTP Meeting 11/1/99.
Metrics for Performance Evaluation Nelson Fonseca State University of Campinas.
Receiver-Driven Bandwidth Sharing for TCP and its Application to Video Streaming Puneet Mehra, Christophe De Vleeschouwer, and Avideh Zakhor IEEE Transactions.
Ns Simulation Final presentation Stella Pantofel Igor Berman Michael Halperin
Modelli di differenziazione delle prestazioni per il supporto del traffico LHC1 Modelli di differenziazione delle prestazioni per il supporto del traffico.
Tiziana FerrariQuality of Service for Remote Control in the High Energy Physics Experiments CHEP, 07 Feb Quality of Service for Remote Control in.
Bell Labs Advanced Technologies EMEAAT Proprietary Information © 2004 Lucent Technologies1 Overview contributions for D27 Lucent Netherlands Richa Malhotra.
CSE QoS in IP. CSE Improving QOS in IP Networks Thus far: “making the best of best effort”
LBE TF-NGN Budapest October Agenda GÉANT D9.9 deliverable summary Test reports for LBE on GÉANT (Nicolas) Tests for LBE at the edge Limerick.
Tiziana Ferrari Diffserv deployment in the wide area: network design and testing1 Diffserv deployment in the wide area: network design and testing Tiziana.
Performance Evaluation of L3 Transport Protocols for IEEE (2 nd round) Richard Rouil, Nada Golmie and David Griffith National Institute of Standards.
Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr 02 1 Discussion on Less-than Best-Effort Services T.Ferrari.
1 On Class-based Isolation of UDP, Short-lived and Long-lived TCP Flows by Selma Yilmaz Ibrahim Matta Computer Science Department Boston University.
QoS on GÉANT - Aristote Seminar -- Nicolas Simar QoS on GÉANT Aristote Seminar, Paris (France), Nicolas Simar,
27th, Nov 2001 GLOBECOM /16 Analysis of Dynamic Behaviors of Many TCP Connections Sharing Tail-Drop / RED Routers Go Hasegawa Osaka University, Japan.
Worcester Polytechnic Insitute, Worcester, MA, USA1 Traffic Sensitive Active Queue Management for Improved Multimedia Streaming Authors: Vishal Phirke,
Scavenger performance Cern External Network Division - Caltech Datagrid WP January, 2002.
Less than Best Effort -- Nicolas Simar Less than Best Effort QoS IP 2003, Milan (Italy), Nicolas Simar, Network Engineer.
Analysis of QoS Arjuna Mithra Sreenivasan. Objectives Explain the different queuing techniques. Describe factors affecting network voice quality. Analyse.
Analysis of RED Goal: impact of RED on loss and delay of bursty (TCP) and less bursty or smooth (UDP) traffic RED eliminates loss bias against bursty traffic.
Doc.: IEEE /1263r2 Submission Dec 2009 Z. Chen, C. Zhu et al [Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving] Date: Authors: Slide.
Quality of Service Schemes for IEEE Wireless LANs-An Evaluation 主講人 : 黃政偉.
Queue Scheduling Disciplines
Real-time Transport for Assured Forwarding: An Architecture for both Unicast and Multicast Applications By Ashraf Matrawy and Ioannis Lambadaris From Carleton.
Performance Evaluation of L3 Transport Protocols for IEEE (2 nd round) Richard Rouil, Nada Golmie, and David Griffith National Institute of Standards.
QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar QoS Experience on European Backbone TNC 2003, Zabgreb (Croatia),
Instructor Materials Chapter 6: Quality of Service
QoS & Queuing Theory CS352.
CS 268: Lecture 6 Scott Shenker and Ion Stoica
Malicious Packet Dropping: How It Might Impact the TCP Performance
TCP-LP: A Distributed Algorithm for Low Priority Data Transfer
Chapter 6 Congestion Avoidance
Speaker : Che-Wei Chang
Monitoring Appliance Status
Mean Value Analysis of a Database Grid Application
TCP-LP Distributed Algorithm for Low-Priority Data Transfer
Queue Dynamics with Window Flow Control
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 6: Quality of Service Connecting Networks.
Advanced Computer Networks
Insensitivity in IP network performance
[Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving]
Provision of Multimedia Services in based Networks
ECE 599: Multimedia Networking Thinh Nguyen
[Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving]
Quality of Service What is QoS? When is it needed?
RAP: Rate Adaptation Protocol
Project-2 (20%) – DiffServ and TCP Congestion Control
Lightweight but Powerful QoS Solution for Embedded Systems
EE 122: Differentiated Services
Module 4: Implement the DiffServ QoS Model
Real-Time Protocol (RTP)
Real-Time Protocol (RTP)
1 Traffic volumes at different T T = 5 sec T = 1 sec T = 10 msec.
Approximate Mean Value Analysis of a Database Grid Application
Presentation transcript:

Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT Experiments with Less than Best Effort (LBE) Quality of Service on GÉANT Tiziana Ferrari Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

Experimental set-up (cont) Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

Performance without congestion Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT One-way delay Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT IPDV traffic volume: [10, 50] % 2 flows (1 LBE, 1 BE) maximum IPDV (BE): 11 usec sample of 100 consecutive packets IPDV negligible for both LBE and BE Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT Packet reordering - proportional to packet rate affecting both LBE and BE maximum IPDV (BE): 11 usec sample of 100 consecutive packets packet reordering due to the M-160 architecture Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

Performance with congestion Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT Packet loss 3 LBE streams (75% of traffic load), 1 BE stream (25%), plus BE production traffic in case of LBE congestion: no BE packet loss no IP Premium packet loss (when IP Premium traffic is injected) only LBE packet loss, proportional to the amount of LBE traffic injected Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT Throughput 7 LBE streams, 2 BE streams, 1 IPP stream load: [50, 100] % in case of LBE congestion (traffic load: 100% of a STM-16) : BE and IPP per-flow throughput equals the UDP input rate only LBE throughput affected by LBE congestion Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT One-way delay 100 streams, 98 streams DE2 -> IT, 2 streams DE2 -> DE1 (LBE and BE) LBE: increase in both average and max one-way delay in case of congestion max delta (max – min): 1.865 msec BE: Slight increse of average and max one-way delay Max delta (max – min): 0.537 msec Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

One-way delay frequency distributions (LBE) test duration: 10 sec time divided in time intervals of 0.1 sec each -> 100 intervals for each interval, min/avg/max one-way delay is recorded Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

One-way delay frequency distributions (BE) Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT IPDV (LBE) 2 streams: 1 LBE stream, 1 BE stream (DE2 -> IT) considerable increase in maximum LBE IPDV no difference in IPDV frequency distributions with and without congestion (100 consecutive packets) Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT Packet reordering BE queue priority = LBE queue priority = high extremely high percentage of out-of-order packets in case of congestion percentage is a function of the packet rate of a given stream it affects both BE and LBE traffic the configuration of different queue priorities solves the problem of throughput loss of BE end-to-end TCP streams Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT

Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT Conclusions LBE DSCP transparency on GEANT is possible Correct isolation of BE traffic from LBE congestion Negligible impact on BE one-way delay and IPDV Packet reordering can be greatly reduced so that end-to-end TCP throughput is preserved, by: assigning a lower weight to the EF queue Configuring different priorities to the LBE and BE queues Packet reordering seems to affect TCP best-effort throughput if the parameters are wrong. Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT