Randall Consolidated School District

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bethware Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Advertisements

North Shelby School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Turning Point Grades Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Burns Middle School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
North Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Shelby Intermediate School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Fallston Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Casar Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Union Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Least Restrictive Environment Identification of High Percentage.
Report Cards 101. ELD Progress Report Cards Complete ELD portfolios. Only score the standards you have taught. Score individual standards on assessments/work.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT. 11/10/05 22 Parent Involvement2 A parent is… (300.30)  Natural or adoptive parent of a child  A foster parent  A guardian but.
Selecting Students for Title I Services in a Targeted Assistance School (TAS)
 Describes the special education program and services that are provided within a school district and those special education programs and services which.
RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ESE and Charter Schools.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
The IEP: Individual Education Plan. The IEP Team  (1) The parents of the child;  (2) At least one regular education teacher of the child (if the child.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
B-1: Graduation Percent of youth with an IEP graduating from high school with a regular diploma Measurement – Michigan identified >80% as the target for.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Overview of the Title I Program at [school name] Presenter Date Location.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Spring 2009 MCAS Results. Dedham Elementary Schools.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
2012 – th Grade SRI Proficiencies – th Grade SRI Proficiencies.
Read to Achieve Parent Presentation What is Read to Achieve? Read to Achieve was created in legislation and approved by the North Carolina.
School for Early Development and Achievement Kim Johnsen SPE 644.
District Annual Determinations IDEA Part B Sections 616(a) and (e) A State must consider the following four factors: 1.Performance on compliance.
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
IDEA 1997 P.L The Facts. IEP Must explain how the child’s disability affects their ability to participate in the general education classroom Must.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
Kari Radzik Summer SPE 644. Who are we?  Randall Consolidated is a grade K-8 school that is located in southwestern Kenosha County, in Twin Lakes, WI.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
“ IT IS PROOF NOT TRUTH” THE IEP IS THE PROOF Dr. Jodi Roseman Director of Special Education School District of Springfield Township.
…program and placement decisions are based on students strengths, potential, and needs?
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Closing the Educational Gap for Students with Disabilities Kristina Makousky.
1 The IEP Process & Product How an IEP Team Writes an IEP.
Special Education School District Profile Slinger School District Lynda McTrusty.
Navigating the ARD/IEP Process
Assessment.
What is Title I? How Can I Be Involved?
Special Education District Profile:
American Institutes for Research
What is “Annual Determination?”
Appleton Area School District
Milwaukee School District
Special Education Division Data Identified Noncompliance (DINC) Overview Presented by the Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit.
Overview of the Title I, Part A Program at [school name]
Hartford Jt. 1 School District
Using the new Teacher-Based Team Protocol
Standards-aligned IEPs
Nominating Your Child for the Challenge Program
California's Accountability System
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Special Education Process
Jayhawkville Central High School
Data Overview Sandtown Middle School
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
Module 6: Parental Placement
Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day
Developing an IEP for my child
Presentation transcript:

Randall Consolidated School District Jena Paszek SPE 644

District Profile 4K-8th grade in the building Feeds into Wilmont High School

Strengths Participation rate for students with disabilities on regular or alternate statewide assessments Local State Target 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th grade reading students 100% 99% At or above 95% 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th grade math students

Strengths Local State Target Percent of students with disabilities ages 6-21 served inside the regular class less than 40% of the day 0% 10.01% At or below 9.7% Percent of students with disabilities ages 6-21 served inseparate schools, residential facilities, or homebound/hosiptal placements 1.2% At or below .95%

Strenghts Local State Target Percent of children who were evaluated within 60 days of receiving parental consent for initial evaluation 100% 98.91% Percent of children referred by a birth to three agency prior to age 3, who were found eligible for special education and related services an and LEA, and who had an IEP 99.23%

Weaknesses Percentage of student with disabilities who scored at the proficient and advanced levels on regular or alternate statewide assessment Local State Target 5th Grade Reading 8% 15% At or above 19.8% 6th Grade Reading 0% 14% 5th Grade Math 17% 26% At or above 28.2% 6th Grad Math 11% 20%

Weaknesses Local State Target Percent of students with disabilities served inside the regular class 80% or more of the day 55.88% 59.42% At or above 52.5%

Recommendations In regards to Indicator 3C, the district is behind the state, especially for 5th and 6th grades. In order to have those students with IEPs reach the advanced and proficient levels, the teachers will need to focus more on preparing these students. They can work on areas of the state test that these students have been struggling with.

Recommendations For Indicator 5A, the school is 7% behind the target for having students with a disability served in a regular education classroom for 80% of their day. The school could make better use of their aids, by having them go into the classroom with the students more frequently so the curriculum can reach those students. The school could also put those students all in the same classroom to make it easier to have an aide be working with more than one student.

Resources www2.dpi.state.wi.us/DistrictProflie/Pages/DistrictProfile.aspx

Marian University School of Education SPE 644 – Special Education Law Assignment 5 Rubric – School District Profile Name: Jena Paszek Cohort: ON01 Comments: Criterion Description Maximum Score Earned Points   Required Elements Completed a one-year summary report based on actual data from school district profile using Prezi, Animoto, Word chart, or Powerpoint and uploaded it to the class wiki; included a reflection narrative, focused on weaknesses with recommendations for meeting target areas. 13 Alignment Cited relevant sources, statutes, case law as well as applicable standards. 3 Technical Requirements Information is organized in a logical, clear order; no misspellings or grammatical errors. Included rubric Timeliness Assignment is submitted on or before due date 1 Total 20 /20