Muon Alignment: Organization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
15-Apr-15 Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez L2 Muon Trigger Status Report: L2 seeding study B. de la Cruz, C. Diez (CIEMAT, Madrid) Muon HLT Meeting 17th April,
Advertisements

Level-1 Trigger CMS Week, Brussels 14 Sep C.-E. Wulz Deputy Trigger Project Manager Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna Prepared with slides/material.
Particle rate in M1 and M2 Muon Meeting
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
Calibration for different trigger sources (DT,CSC,RPC) S.Bolognesi for the Torino group (with a big help from M. Dalla Valle) DT Cosmic Analysis meeting.
Skeleton: Hardware Alignment for EMU meeting James N Bellinger 15-Mar-2009.
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
1 G4MICE downstream distributions G4MICE plans Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 27/6-05.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
1 CMS Tracker Alignment and Implications for Physics Performance Nhan Tran Johns Hopkins University CMS Collaboration SPLIT
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
MCP checks for the H-4l mass. Outline and work program The problems: – Higgs mass difference from the  – Possible single resonant peak mass shift (with.
1.Check Laser track of B=0 run and exclude some tracks in order to get precise GGV eff, which in turn is used when extract T1, T2 value by pos-B and neg-B.
1 Status Report RPC Diagnostic with DT Segment Extrapolation Camilo Carrillo CERN Departamento de Física UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES Bogotá, Colombia.
First Reconstruction Results on the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment at CERN S. Guragain, G. Baksay, M. Hohlmann Florida Tech 74.
Run13 MUID Hit Efficiency RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
Effect of muon misalignments on muon p T resolution and on the search for Z' SSM → µ + µ - using 7 TeV MC samples Samir Guragain, Marcus Hohlmann Florida.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 27-November-2009 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 27-November-2009.
UCLA group meeting1/11 CSC update – a 2-week summary Status of CMS at LHC: L=2*10 32 reached 25-Oct-2010 (=the original goal for 2011) and 42 pb -1 collected.
T. Kawamoto1 ATLAS muon small wheels for ATLAS phase-1 upgrade LHCC T. Kawamoto (New) small wheels ? Why new small wheels for high.
1 MuonGeoModel status report focus on issues relevant to , 20 Access to Condition DB with M. Verducci, R. Harrington MDT deformations with I. Logashenco.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Kaori Maeshima (FNAL), Alignment Workshop at CERN: May 17-18, Endcap Alignment Status of Offline Software Alignment CERN 17, 18 May 2001.
Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring.
CSC High Pileup Sumulations Vadim Khotilovich Alexei Safonov Texas A&M University June 15, 2009.
Muon Barrel Geometry Studies Luca Scodellaro Muon Barrel Workshop July 6 th, 2010.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 2-February-2011 Status and Plans for Endcap Hardware Alignment James N. Bellinger 2-February-2011.
Samir Guragain, Marcus Hohlmann Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL Z′ Mass Reach MC Analysis USCMS meeting Brown University May 6 – 8, 2010.
Preliminary results on DT T0s in beam collisions J. Santaolalla, J. Alcaraz (+ help/suggestions from C. Battilana, C. Fouz)
R. Castello (UC Louvain) on behalf of the Tracker alignment group The 2011 Tracker misalignment scenario CMS AlCa meeting Cern, 22/11/2011.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
Javier Castillo3rd LHC Alignment Workshop - CERN - 15/06/ Status of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer Alignment Strategies & Results from Cosmic run Javier.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 15-March-2009 Hardware Alignment.
Effects of Endcap Staging/Descoping D.Acosta University of Florida.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
Comparison of algorithms for hit reconstruction in the DTs: Test of calibration procedures for t trig and drift velocity on Test Beam data Test of calibration.
Alignment of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer
C.Cheshkov 15/09/2005 Weekly Offline Meeting
L2 Muon Trigger Study Status Report
CMS WEEK Sept. 24 Opening session CMS MUONS: Barrel Drift Tubes
Calibration Status of the art – the first tTrig calculated from data
Approved Plots from CMS Cosmic Runs (mostly CRUZET, some earlier)
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
Analysis Test Beam Pixel TPC
Tracker to Solenoid Alignment
Global PID MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick
Status of Full Simulation for Muon Trigger at SLHC
Gaseous Beam Position Detectors, with Low Cost and Low Material Budget
DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data
CMS Tracker Alignment with Cosmic Data and Strategy at the Startup
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction University of Wisconsin-Madison
Transfer Line and CSC Rφ Reconstruction
University of Wisconsin-Madison
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
University of Wisconsin-Madison
DQM for the RPC subdetector
Cosmic ray test of RPC for the ATLAS experiment
Priorities and contents of releases
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Sector Processor Status Report
SCT Wafer Distortions (Bowing)
RPC approved plots.
Plans for the 2004 CSC Beam Test
Presentation transcript:

Muon Alignment: Organization New co-coordinator: Jim Pivarski (to be formalized at MUIB) The sign-off chain is formalized, but long: we'll need to have a common decision on a muon geometry within the group a few weeks in advance of the CMS-wide sign-off MUIB

Muon Alignment: Strategy “Quasi-static” alignment state Even when a requested sign-off date is announced in advance, slippage can make the actual date uncertain To avoid being caught without an agreed-upon geometry, will aim to always have a “state-of-the-art" at hand The discrepancies/problems that we're working on are usually motivated by the results of validation anyway: having a validated working point formalizes that (and can help assess priorities) Documentation! So far largely underused muon alignment Twiki Aim to document results, validations, tools periodically Keep documentation updated with respect to “state-of-the-art”

Muon Alignment (quick) Status Full barrel alignment All DTs aligned simultaneously using optical (barrel+link) system Good agreement of TK-MU relation between HW and tracks Decent agreement between track-based and HW constants discrepancies under study First combined HW+track-based alignments Validated by PVT Improved internal DT alignment Includes theta superlayer Includes all corner-block-to-wires and quality control measurements CB f q f CSC alignment New beam-halo + photogrammetry alignment New optical alignment in r-f coordinates Combined Endcap + Link information Next step: integration of optical + track-based alignments

Track-Based Alignment Status I Unexpected dependence of residuals on position within the chamber (“sawtooth effect”) and on track curvature are now both explained: Due to a typo, RPC hits were allowed to bias tracker-to-muon propagation With this corrected, many long-standing mysteries have been resolved Consequences: Can lower pT > 100 GeV/c cut used in alignment (see next slide) Must revise resolution vs. integrated luminosity estimates (“5-20 pb-1 for 200 microns” derived from affected code, likely to be too optimistic)

Track-Based Alignment Status II Residuals are now wider but mean is independent of Pt: can align without high Pt cut

Removing the RPC-hit bias Track-Based Alignment III Removing the RPC-hit bias Both of these effects had the same cause All barrel residuals distributions now behave ~ as expected; new alignment produced

Muon Alignment: HW vs Tracks Chamber-to-chamber agreement at the level of 1.3mm Outliers in these TB-HW rf difference plots are low-statistics chambers Largest remaining discrepancy: trend vs. wheel in local-x Independent of RPC-hit bias Simple twist model already ruled out by Link and Global and SA track constrains Other possibilities under study

Muon Alignment: ongoing studies Track-based analysis: Confirmed at the level of raw residuals: no sharp breaks at chamber boundaries indicates either a track bias or a coherent rotation of the superplanes Not proportional to station number, as would be expected of rotated tracks (effect is clearly constant with respect to station number) Hardware analysis: End-to-end difference measured by link: 1.1 +- 0.6 mm, not 4 mm as it appears from tracks Inclinometers and transfer lines can provide additional independent cross-checks Using independence of the TB/HW datasets to find remaining problems and converge upon a solution

Alignment Constants Time-line Agree on common HW runs @ 3.8T 2/7 9/7 16/7 23/7 30/7 6/8 13/8 20/8 27/8 3/9 BH, cosmics, pp CSC tracks CSC HW+B.H. combination studies HW Automation Tools for Endcap X,Y ME2,3,4 Barrel Cosmics, pp DT tracks Link AR vs. TK Endcap Z, fx ??? Endcap T.L. ??? Integrated HW Geom @ 3.8T Optimize HW+Track Combination Validated HW alignment Validated track alignment Integrated HW + track-based Geom Validated Muon Alignment Geometry Enter “quasi-static” loop (with faster turn-around) New alignment constants due ~ here ? 9