16th World Conference of the International Society of Family Law

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mr. Marquina Somerset Silver Palms Civics
Advertisements

11 Theory of Knowledge/Government Ms. Halle Bauer
 Following the development of legal principles through the decisions of judges in earlier cases can be difficult.  Determining which precedent, if any,
The Supreme Court/ The Supreme Court at Work
AP US Government Judicial Branch. The creation of judicial review Election of 1800: the Federalists lost both the Presidency and control of the Congress.
Trade Unions: essence and functions LPSK lawyer Jolanta Cinaitienė.
Challenges of a New Nation: Constitution Convention.
Judicial Branch Test Review. Supreme Court What is the highest court in the Country?
JUDICIAL BRANCH ARTICLE III. JURISDICTION: THE AUTHORITY OF A COURT TO HEAR PARTICULAR CASES. JURISDICTION DEPENDS ON WHICH SYSTEM –STATE OR FEDERAL --
Chapter 10: The Judicial Branch
Judicial Branch Chapter 11: The Federal Court System.
The United States Supreme Court Part 1. Main Job The main job of the Justices is to hear and rule on cases to decide whether laws are allowable under.
Why is the power of judicial review key to the system of checks and balances? Because the power of judicial review can declare that laws and actions of.
Chapter 8: Getting the Words and the Money: Policy Formulation and Policy Adoptions. Mefleh Althamer.
The United States Supreme Court. The decisions of the Supreme Court have wide- ranging effects because the Justices interpret the meaning of the Constitution.
Ch 8 The Judicial Branch 8.4 Deciding Cases at the Supreme Court.
Civil Liberties Personal rights & freedoms that cannot be abridged Limits governments power to restrain or dictate how we act Conflict occurs when individuals.
JUDICIAL BRANCH ARTICLE III. LEADERSHIP- SUPREME COURT The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States. It is the only court actually created.
The U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Justices.
Federal Courts. Federal Court System Each of the states has its own court system who have their authority based in state constitutions. The SCOTUS and.
The Supreme Court and Lower Courts Chapter 3 Section3.
- Why do we have rules? - What are some important rules at home? At school? For society? - What are the criteria for good rules?
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 3. Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc.Slide 2 Chapter 18, Section 3 Objectives 1.Define the concept of judicial.
Deciding Cases at the Supreme Court
Chapter 12: Supreme Court Decision Making
The Federal Court System
The Judicial Branch NEXT.
International Association of Tax Judges
The Supreme Court.
7th Grade Civics Miss Smith *pgs Civics in Practice
SESSION 3. Civil Registration in the Context of Basic Human Rights
The Federal Court System
LEARNING OBJECTIVES/ GOALS/ SWBAT
Chapter 7 The Judicial Branch
The Irish Constitution
The Constitution: Structure and Principles
The Federal Judicial System: Applying the Law
Legal Basics.
AP US Government Judicial Branch
The Constitution: Structure and Principles
Jurisdiction And Judicial Power
Warmup What kind of judgments do you have to make in your daily life?
Prof. Ingrid Boone 16th ISFL World Conference Amsterdam 27 July 2017
Supreme Court Essay Format
Power and Jurisdiction of the Courts
Chapter 15: Courts, Judges and Laws.
The Supreme Court.
3-3 State Court Systems GOALS
Chapter 3 – The Meaning of Citizenship
Instructor: Dr/ Randa Donia
Judicial Branch.
Chapter 7 The Judicial Branch
Jeopardy Final Jeopardy Limited Government Bill of Rights Safeguards
7th Grade Civics Miss Smith *pgs Civics in Practice
The Constitution: Structure and Principles Mr
Sources of Law Legislature – makes law Executive – enforces law
The Constitution: Structure and Principles Mr
Welcome! Today is Thursday, March 29, 2018
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 3
Warm Up #1 In response to public opinion polls revealing Americans’ ignorance of the Bill of Rights, one commentator argued that, “The less Americans know.
Bell Ringer: Write five questions you think may be on the test for chapter 7 Include the test question and the answer The questions can be ABC choice,
Study Guide!.
Bell Work Please take out your composition book and your colors
In Defense of Looseness
Chapter 12: Supreme Court Decision Making
Court Procedures The Supreme Court is not required to hear all cases presented before it and carefully chooses the cases it will consider. Section 4.
The United States Court System
The United States Court System
8.4 The Supreme Court at Work
Dovilė Juodkaitė Inclusion Europe conference, Vilnius 6 June, 2019
Presentation transcript:

16th World Conference of the International Society of Family Law 16th World Conference of the International Society of Family Law. “Family Law and Family Realities” AMSTERDAM – JULY - 2017 “THE PRINCIPLE OF AFFECTION IN THE BRAZILIAN SUPERIOR COURTS” PROF. DR. FLÁVIO TARTUCE. AUTONOMOUS FACULTY OF LAW OF SÃO PAULO - MASTER AND PHD PROGRAM LAWYER AND CONSULTANT.

The Principle of Affection in the Brazilian Superior Courts. There’s no doubt that the last year was the year of affection in the Brazilian Courts. Never has it been so updated. The idea has never been so often applied by our Superior Courts of Law, especially by the Supreme Court of Law (STF). In our Maximum Court’s level, two judgments are decisive for these statements, with influence on all Brazilian court levels.

The Principle of Affection in the Brazilian Superior Courts. First trial: in August of the last year (2016), the Brazilian Supreme Court started the trial about unconstitutionality of article 1.790 of the Civil Code, which deals with the succession rights of the companion (Process number 878.694/MG). Seven Ministers of Court lined up to the Rapporteur’s thesis: “In the constitutional system in force, the distinction between succession regimes among weds and companions is unconstitutional and, in both cases, the regime set forth in article 1.829 of Brazilian Civil Code must be applied”.

The Principle of Affection in the Brazilian Superior Courts. First trial: Minister Toffoli did not agree with the thesis and the result of the judgment in March of this year (2017) was 7 x 1. In May the judgment restarted with the vote of Minister Marco Aurelio and the final was 8 x 3, with the disagreement of Minister Lewandowisk. The Court has held his vote in this judgment, among other propositions, outstanding the importance of affection as a legal value of our system.

The Principle of Affection in the Brazilian Superior Courts. Second trial: Thesis in the judgment of general repercussion about social affection parenthood: “the social affection parenthood, either declared or not in registering, does not impede the recognition of equal filiation link, based on biological origin, with proper legal effects” (published in Notice nr. 840 of the STF). Three aspects of this last trial must be remarked.

The Principle of Affection in the Brazilian Superior Courts. First aspect: The recognition by several judges that affection has legal value, being a linking principle to the Brazilian civil order. This is the opinion shared by great part of the doctrine in Brazil: CALDERON, Ricardo; DIAS, Maria Berenice; GROENINGA, Giselle; SIMÃO, José Fernando; LÔBO, Paulo; PEREIRA, Rodrigo da Cunha.

The Principle of Affection in the Brazilian Superior Courts. Second aspect: The social affection parenthood is as a form of civil kinship as set forth in article 1.593 of the Brazilian Civil Code. It is in equal situation compared with biological parenthood. There is no hierarchy between filiation modalities, what represents a reasonable and straight equilibrium.

The Principle of Affection in the Brazilian Superior Courts. Third aspect: Multiple links of filiation are admitted by the Brazilian Law, even against the biological father’s will or the social affection father’s will (multi-parenthood). It has been made clear through the decision that recognition of concomitant links is for all effects, including alimony and succession. The decision of the STF has also generated problems that we have to solve in the future in Brazil.

The Principle of Affection in the Brazilian Superior Courts. Conclusion The affection principle was the great character of the last year in search of Courts in Family Law in Brazil. In the next years, this role must continue to be played and even improved by the Brazilian Supreme Court, which should judge, among other topics, the possibility of recognition of wedding links and concomitant relationships, also in search of general repercussion (Process number 656.298).

THE END THANK YOU VERY MUCH! DANK U WEL! OBRIGADO! Flávio Tartuce www.flaviotartuce.adv.br. fftartuce@uol.com.br.