FIELDS SCM Thermal iPER

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ExoMars UV Laser diode thermal vacuum test Alex Rousseau.
Advertisements

Palestine TV Test Jason Link University of Hawaii ANITA Collaboration Meeting at UCI 4/7/05 – 4/9/05.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Intermixing of Cells in Nickel-Cadmium Batteries for Aircraft Usage May 11, Intermixing of Cells in Nickel-Cadmium.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT I&T Subsystem CDR, March 28, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 4 - Page 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I & T Peer Review Performance.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
MPSRThermal- 1 UCB, Oct 26, 2006 THEMIS MISSION PRE-SHIP REVIEW Thermal Christopher Smith University of California - Berkeley.
THEMIS INSTRUMENT PER 1 UCB, May, 2005 EMC / Mag Instrument Test Plan & Results Michael Ludlam University of California - Berkeley.
GoetzFIELDS iPDR – I&T SPP/FIELDS Integration and Test Preliminary Design Review Keith Goetz University of Minnesota 1.
SPP FIELDS V5 Antenna Mechanical Peer Review Draft 2 David Glaser, Paul Turin, Jeremy McCauley, John Bonnell, Dennis Seitz SSL UCB 7/17/13.
THEMIS/GBO Engineering Peer Review 1 UCB, Oct. 17, 2003 Ground Based Observatories (GBO) Observatory System Design Stewart Harris - UCB.
THEMIS Instrument Suite PERSuite T-V- 1 UCB, May 2, 2005 THEMIS Instrument Suite Thermal Vac Test Rick Sterling University of California, Berkeley.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Test Plan Michael Ludlam Space Sciences Laboratory.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 6.0 Subsystem Verif. Test Plan 1 GLAST Large Area.
THEMIS Instrument CDR(1) UCB, April 19 & 20, 2004 Mission Assurance Critical Design Review Ron Jackson University of California - Berkeley.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct. 2, I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist WBS
FM4/FM5 PSRSCM - 1UCB, May 5 th, 2006 THEMIS FM4/FM5 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE-SHIP REVIEW (PSR) SEARCH COIL MAGNETOMETER (SCM) Michael Ludlam University of.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW Boom PER 30 June RBSP EFW Spin Plane Booms Greg Dalton Space Sciences.
24-1 MAVEN IPSR October 30,31, 2012 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Ship Review October 30,31, : ATLO Support Dave Curtis Mars Atmosphere and Volatile.
THEMIS Mission PDR/CAR 1 UCB, November 12-14, 2003 Instrument Integration & Test Dr. Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
MAVEN CDR May 23-25, 2011 Particles and Fields Package Critical Design Review May , 2011 Integration and Test Dave Curtis PFP Package Manager Mars.
PFP Instrument Status All PFP Instruments Except SWEA have been delivered, integrated, and tested; supporting environmental tests Issues: –EUV alignment.
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 Acuña1 MAGNETOMETER (MAG) M. H. Acuña NASA/GSFC Laboratory for Extraterrestrial Physics.
THEMIS IDPU PDR I&T REQUIREMENTS- 1 UCB, October 16, 2003 I&T REQUIREMENTS Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
F1, F3, F4, F5 PER 1 UCB, June 23, 2006 THEMIS MISSION PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Thermal Christopher Smith Thermal Engineer University of California - Berkeley.
FM1 Instrument Suite Pre-Ship Review (PSR)INT- 1 UCB September 21, 2005 THEMIS FM1 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE-SHIP REVIEW (PSR) INTEGRATION AND TEST PLANS Jeremy.
THEMIS MISSION PDRINSTRUMENT OVERVIEW- 1 UCB, November, 2003 THEMIS INSTRUMENT PAYLOAD SYSTEM OVERVIEW Dr. Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Fluxgate Magnetometer QSR – June 2015 June 16, SPF MAG Quarterly Report – June 2015 MAG FM1 electronics PCB assembled (see.
June 16, 2015SPP/FIELDS SOC CDR: Integration & Test SPP/FIELDS Integration and Test SOC Critical Design Review Keith Goetz University of Minnesota
FM2/FM3 PSR FM4/FM5 PERSCM - 1UCB, November 10, 2005 THEMIS FM2/FM3 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE-SHIP REVIEW (PSR) THEMIS FM4/FM5 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE- ENVIRONMENTAL.
1-1 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Ship Review November 19, 2012 STATIC Thermal Status Millan F. Diaz-Aguado Mars Atmosphere.
THEMIS Instrument PDRMission Assurance- 1 UCB, October 15-16, 2003 THEMIS Mission Assurance Preliminary Design Review Ron Jackson University of California.
SPP Fluxgate MAG input to FIELDS Quarterly Review – 7/18/2013 Bob MacDowall, Ron Oliversen, Dave Sheppard, Scott Murphy, Jim Odom, Jack Connerney.
MPEREnvironmental Test OverviewUCB, June 23, 2006 THEMIS MISSION PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Test Overview and Logistics Rick Sterling University.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Systems Engineering Michael Ludlam Space Sciences.
FM4/FM5 IPSRSYS - 1 UCB, May 5, 2006 THEMIS INSTRUMENT SUITE FM4/FM5 PRE-SHIP REVIEW SYSTEM OVERVIEW Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
Spacecraft Level Testing and Verification Part 3 1.
1 SWEA pre-CDR Peer Review Particles and Fields Package (PFP) SWEA pre-CDR Peer Review Integration with PFP, Qualification, ATLO 2011 March 28 Dave Curtis.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes Sept 30 – Oct RBSP EFW ICDR1 Integration and Test Michael Ludlam (EFW Systems Engineer)
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) Thermal Analysis Christine Cottingham LM/GSFC 545 Hume Peabody GSFC.
1 PFP IPDR 2010/6/ Particles and Fields Package (PFP) Instrument Preliminary Design Review Integration & Test David Curtis, PF Package Manager.
THEMIS-SCM SCM – OVERALL RESSOURCES – STATUS versus REQUIREMENTS ItemSpecificationStatus Sensor Bandwith Sensor Sensitivity Up to 4 kHz 1 pT/√Hz at 10.
EMI/EMC GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Pre-Shipment Review
FIELDS MEP Thermal Vacuum Cycling iPER
FIELDS MEP & V5 Pre-Ship Review Thermal Summary
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS MEP iPSR SOC Marc Pulupa April 10, 2017
Gayle K. Martin November 14, 2016
FIELDS V1234 Thermal Vacuum & Balance Tests iPER Draft
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS MEP i-PER Safety and Mission Assurance
General overview Place : Institue of Space Astrophysic (IAS, Orsay)
FIELDS Mission Assurance Manager University of California, Berkeley
EIDP Status. Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Main Electronics Package iPSR Management Apr 10, 2017.
FIELDS MEP & V5 Pre-Ship Review Thermal Summary
(EFW Systems Engineer) University of California, Berkeley
Agenda. Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Main Electronics Package iPER Agenda Feb 2, 2017.
Solar Probe Plus – FIELDS Main Electronics Package
SPP FIELDS V1234 Thermal PSR
Solar Probe Plus – FIELDS Verification Instrument mini-PER (V5)
THEMIS Mission Assurance
FIELDS Keith Goetz Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Main Electronics Package iPER EMC Feb 2, 2017
LAT Requirements Verification in TVAC
© The Aerospace Corporation 2008 Rationale for Selected MIL-STD-1540E Thermal Test Requirement John W. Welch The Aerospace Corporation TFAWS
0.0 Instrument Suite Name Presenter’s name
Jason Link University of Hawaii
University of California, Berkeley
7E: Tower test plans GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem
Thermal Vacuum Test: Plans and Procedures
Integration and Test Organization Chart
Presentation transcript:

FIELDS SCM Thermal iPER Gayle K. Martin November 11, 2016

SCM Thermal Cycling Objectives and Summary Test Objectives Qualify the flight model of the SCM instrument Verify that the SCM unit can bear the temperatures Provide workmanship and performance verification Component temperatures shall be tested to 10°C beyond flight model predicts Test Summary Twelve thermal cycles will be complete in air (in lieu of 6+1 vacuum cycles approved via waiver) CPTs will be conducted at the first and last cycles at cold and hot temperatures LPTs will be conducted for all other operational cycles

SCM Thermal Cycling Test Configuration Hardware configuration The flight units will be fully assembled, flight heaters will be included with the flight unit The SCM will not be blanketed Chamber configuration The SCM flight units will be tested in the UCB/SSL Sun Systems MODEL EC1x Environmental chamber There is a single temperature zone for the thermal cycling test Electrical configuration The harness will be connected to a feedthrough to connect to the SCM GSE external to the chamber The flight instruments will be controlled and internal thermistors monitored via the SCM GSE connected externally to the chamber SCM flight unit Test harness schematic

SCM Thermal Cycling Test Configuration Thermocouples will be mounted along the flight unit, and harness to verify temperatures during thermal cycling

SCM Thermal Cycling Test Profile The test duration for the combined thermal cycling test will take ~5 days (assuming 4 hour soaks) including set-up and take-down time Instrument functions Pre-test functional Hot and cold operation CPTs (cycles 1 and 12) Hot and cold operation LPTs (cycles 2 through 11) Post-test functional Test parameters The transition rate of the instrument is not to exceed 3°C per minute Start of soak is defined when the control temperature is within 1°C of the test temperature Soak is defined as a minimum of four hour at case temperatures with a change in temperature of ±1°C Temperature set points for each cycle case -60°C to 80°C Note: heater setpoint is -50°C Future vacuum testing Vacuum exposure will occur on the flight hardware The SCM assembly will “ride-along” with the FIELDS MEP in thermal cycling 6 operational cycles from -25°C to 60°C 1 survival cycle from -30°C to 65°C

Back-up

Risk Assessment (Waiver) The FIELDS EM SCM saw vacuum testing in sensor level TB, instrument-level TV as well as TB testing of the mag boom – all with nominal results. The FIELDS FM SCM will see vacuum testing in instrument-level thermal vacuum cycling. The FIELDS FM SCM will see vacuum testing in spacecraft-level thermal balance and spacecraft-level thermal vacuum cycling. FIELDS believes that doing thermal cycling in air would actually be more effective at revealing workmanship problems in a limited duration test. The SCM sensor includes a number of EEE parts – all fully encapsulated in the 3d-Plus preamplifier structure. As such, testing in air with reasonable dwell times at temperature extremes will give good workmanship results.

Handling & Contamination Control All test articles and test hardware to be bagged and kept in clean room Personnel are to handle only with appropriate gloves and contamination gowning EMECP specifications shall be practiced during flight hardware handling, test set-up and test operations Contamination control of the instrument must follow the specifications in the SPP-FIELDS Contamination Control Plan 

Test Abort, Real Time Activity Assessment and Success/Failure Criteria Minor anomalies will be evaluated and fixed or alleviated in an attempt to continue testing Examples of minor anomalies include temporary loss of thermocouple, minor problems with hardware (cable movement) or problems with vacuum facility Response to minor anomalies will be made by Test Conductors at test site Significant anomalies will result in abort of further testing The UCB Test Engineer has the authority to stop testing if deemed damage may be occurring to the hardware, the test equipment functioning is suspect, output data is questionable, or test is not compatible with this procedure All anomalies shall be reported as part of standard Project Problem/Failure Reporting. Success/Failure Criteria Adequate temperature data collected at steady state from all test cases Meet all S/C requirements