Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
8:16 SB 25ns dumped by RF; integrated lumi 0.6 nb-1. 9:14 BIC problem in TI8 and CMS recovering their tracker 10:09 Abort gap cleaning commissioning. 16:29.
Advertisements

“What you get” Transverse damper system (ADT) F. Dubouchet W. Höfle G. Kotzian D. Valuch Special thanks to: A. Boucherie, A. Butterworth, S. Calvo, G.
W. LHC Studies WG Day Review MDs Transverse Damper from Run1 to Run2 reported by W. Hofle for ADT & friends LHC MSWG Special Meeting.
First measurements of longitudinal impedance and single-bunch effects in LHC E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF Thanks: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, T. Bohl,
Off-momentum tail scraping for passive abort gap cleaning (MD 444) D. Mirarchi, R. Bruce, S. Redaelli On behalf of the LHC Collimation Team LHC Study Working.
Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
ADT re-commissioning after LS1 A. Butterworth, W. Höfle, F. Killing, G. Kotzian, T. Levens, D. Valuch with many thanks to BE/OP LBOC, ADT re-commissioning.
High Bandwidth damper Input from W.Hölfe Acknowledgement to all collaborators at SLAC, INFN, LBNL and CERNL Presentation of recent MD results (J.Cesaratto):
00:15: Stable beams fill 1883, 1.1E33 cm-2s-1.  Seems the 144 bunches beam 1 doe not fit properly on the injection kicker waveform. Systematically the.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
Interplay of transverse damper and crab cavities W. Hofle BE/RF/FB W. Hofle, 4th Crab Cavity Workshop16-Dec-10 Acknowledgements: RF group, G. Arduini,
ADT Tune Measurement F. Dubouchet, W. Hofle, D. Valuch Acknowledgement: R. Calaga, F. Roncarolo, E. Bravin, shift crews New developments and tests on August.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
LHC Progress Thursday 29 th October 2015 Coordination Week 44: Massimo Giovannozzi, Wolfgang Hofle, Jorg Wenninger.
RF improvements over the weekend Giulia on behalf of Delphine, Philippe, Andy and many other people in the RF team LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group,
News on TMCI in the SPS: Injecting high intensity bunches Benoit for the MD team: T. Bohl, K. Cornelis, H. Damerau, W. Hofle, E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B.
LHC Injection Sequencing MD 16/23/2009 Injection sequencing / BCM R, Giachino, B. Goddard, (D. Jacquet), V. Kain, M. Meddahi, J. Wenninger.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 30/11/2010 /241 PRELIMINARY FINDINGS FROM INSTABILITY MEASUREMENTS DURING THE 75ns AND 50ns.
1 Fast kicker study Machine Time 2011/10/18~10/29(2 weeks) TB meeting 2011/01/14 T.Naito.
04:01 Injection kicker timing problems B2  Injection pre-pulse shifted, causing BETS to inhibit beam injection. 144 bunches on TDI.  Run without ROF.A81B2.
Coupled-bunch oscillation feedback studies 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 20 February 2013 Many thanks to R. Garoby, S. Gilardoni, S. Hancock,
LHC transverse Damper Observations versus expectations W. Hofle BE/RF/FB CERN BE-RF team for ADT L. Arnaudon, P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, G. Cipolla,
Beam loss and radiation in the SPS for higher intensities and injection energy G. Arduini 20 th November 2007 Acknowledgments: E. Shaposhnikova and all.
Thursday 20 th April 01:53 RCBV17.R7B2 tripped as happened few days ago: SIS intercepted. 05:54 Stable beams, 1380b, still RF problems B1, abort gap cleaning.
Controlled Transverse Blowup with ADT MD block #3 / th August 2011 presented by W. Hofle T. Levens, S. Redaelli, F. Roncarolo, R. Schmidt, D. Valuch.
ADT kickers and amplifiers in tunnel point 4 of LHC, RB44 and RB46 1 W. Hofle LHC Transverse Damper LARP CM20 Napa April 8-10, 2013 LHC Transverse Damper.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
RF Commissioning D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé. November 8 th 2007D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé2 RF systems in a few words (I) A transverse dampers system ACCELERATING.
W. Hofle / March 5, 2008 Extended LTC meeting 1/22 Acknowledgements: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, E. Ciapala, B. Goddard, A. Koschik, F. Killing, G.
Jørgen S. Nielsen Center for Storage Ring Facilities (ISA) Aarhus University Denmark ESLS XXIII (24-25/ ), ASTRID2 facility 1.
Bunch by bunch feedback systems for KEKB Makoto Tobiyama KEK Accelerator Laboratory.
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
MD Planning Fri – Sat (26. – 27.8.)
M.Fitterer, A.Patapenka, A.Valishev (FNAL)
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
Space charge studies at the SPS
Update on single-collimator impedance measurements using ADT data
Summary of the dedicated MD on July 4th 50ns in SPS with nominal and low γt optics – transverse aspects T. Argyropoulos, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, A. Burov,
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
Saturday 24 March 2012.
ADT and ObsBox in 2016 W. Hofle, M. Jaussi, G. Kotzian, S. Rains,
MD2036: UFO dynamics studies and UFO fast detection
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Digitizers in CCR for transverse wide-band pick-ups
Summary Friday h38: Ramp down and pre-cycle.
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
Transverse Feedback System (LHC Damper)
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Fill 1410 revisited Peak luminosity 1.4e32 Beam current 2.68/2.65 e13
Wednesday /Thursday 09-11:00 Verification of the LSS6 interlocked BPMs: took longer to fill due to some problems with RF cavities in the PS. In the mean.
Thursday morning – optics correction
Monday 18 October : Collimation system
Summary of Week 11: 14 – 21 March
Wednesday Morning 8: :30 end of fill study - octupole polarity inversion (Elias, Tatiana, Alexey, Georges, …): Goal: study the effect of the.
SPS Transverse Damper System
Mon 22/8 – Tue 23/8 00:07 stable beams #2040. Initial luminosities: 2.1x1033 cm-2s-1 18:00 Programmed dump. End of physics #2040. ~83 pb-1 in ~18 hours.
Limits on damping times
Friday 14th December - morning
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
News on TMCI in the SPS: Injecting high intensity bunches
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
Collective effects in the SPS and LHC (longitudinal plane)
Sat 18/3 - Ramp to 4 TeV Again glitch on the safe beam flag for beam 2. Cause identified: noise on BCT2B giving values above the safe beam limit (2.4×1010.
Tuesday 6th April 8:00 Injection studies 16:00 RF studies
Wednesday :35 : Beam lost because of trip of RCBXH3.L1
Daniel, Gianluca and Belen (for the Collimator team)
Presentation transcript:

Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements Wolfgang Hofle , Gerd Kotzian, Daniel Valuch

ADT – Overall System Architecture Pickups in the tunnel (pt. 4), signal processing on the surface (SR4), driver amplifiers and controls UX45, power amplifiers and kickers in the RF zone (UX451) Multiple redundant system Work on the new generation Beam Position modules started in 2016 Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

ADT Kickers and the Power System Four kickers per beam, per plane (16 total), located in RF zone (UX451) at point 4 Electrostatic kicker, length 1.5 m, powered by a class AB, tetrode push-pull amplifier Max. differential voltage ~10 kV, providing a kick of ~2 mrad @ 450 GeV (all 4 units combined). Useful bandwidth ~1 kHz – 20 MHz* (* terms and conditions may apply) ADT kickers and power amplifiers at point 4 Power amplifier detail Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

ADT as Exciter Four measurements involving active beam excitation by ADT are currently being discussed Bunch by bunch tune measurement for e-cloud induced bunch by bunch tune shift along a batch – modelling by Elias Metral & co. Bunch by bunch controlled emittance blow-up for p-Pb run – John Jowett & co. ADT as AC dipole for optics measurements – Rogelio Thomas & co. Pulsed excitation for the e-lens MD – Miriam Fitterer & co. More or less all can be done in an “expert mode” already now For a proper operational tool 1,3,4 requires the ADT mDSPU firmware update …but all require MPP to be informed and/or approval of Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

ADT as Exciter Thanks to the state of the art digital LLRF system, the ADT can synthesize virtually any signals, which can be used for beam excitation Currently implemented and routinely used excitation modes: Coherent excitation (with many modulation modes). Used for abort gap and injection gap cleaning, tune measurement, chirp, MDs Wideband white noise excitation. Used for transverse emittance blow-up, loss maps, MDs External analogue input for BI signals What we discuss today: Active beam excitation by repetitive single-turn kicks at flat top ADT validation after a firmware update Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Excitation, Definition of Terms Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Excitation, Definition of Terms Maximal window length for white noise excitation (blow-up) is also 12.8us (512 bunch slots). Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Excitation, Definition of Terms Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Active Excitation – What Are We Doing Already Abort gap cleaning (AGC) Injection gap (IGC) Blow-up for loss maps, bunch intensity reduction etc. Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Abort Gap Cleaning Abort gap is cleaned in the vertical plane A machine critical setting tells the mDSPU which excitation mode it should execute (abort gap/injection gap) For AGC, the excitation window length is limited to 120 bunch slots (3ms). The limit is hard wired in the FPGA firmware For AGC, the gating delay is fixed and it is a machine critical setting AGC is running during the whole “Injection Physics Beam” process At flat top, the AGC can be triggered on demand by operator, or automatically by SIS Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Injection Gap Cleaning Injection gap is cleaned in the horizontal plane For IGC, the excitation window length is limited to 512 bunch slots (12.8ms). The limit is hard wired in the FPGA firmware For IGC, the gating delay is programmed by the injection sequencer Injection gap cleaning is activated before every injection The excitation is stopped by OR of the three sources: 1) by the sequencer just before the injection, 2) beam-in pulse, 3) time-out after 19 seconds When going to Prepare for Ramp, all IGC settings are programmed to zero to prevent accidental activation Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

White Noise Excitation and Controlled Blow-up A pseudo-random number generator provides a white noise-like signal, one value per bunch. The frequency response is shaped by a digital filter* For blow-up, the excitation window length is limited to 512 bunch slots (12.8ms). Limit is hard wired in the FPGA firmware The gating delay is programmed by LSA The excitation can be triggered only when in possession of special RBAC role Strength adjustable from “gentle blow-up” to “exterminate” Used anytime during the whole cycle. * for reasons of simplicity only the variable part of the response shaping devices is mentioned Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

How Well Do We Control the Excitation? The excitation can be gated to individual/group of bunches, and the response is then shaped by digital filters* The response can be engineered to be surgically precise (at bunch by bunch level), very powerful (full kick with ~700ns rise time), or a combination of both * for reasons of simplicity only the variable part of the response shaping devices is mentioned Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

How Well Do We Control the Excitation? Comparison of the standard “conservative” and the “aggressive” AGC cleaning response at flat top. The latter was cleaning with full strength only 50ns from the incoming bunch #1 Conservative AGC settings. Only 1.5ms of the 3ms cleaned “Aggressive” AGC settings. Almost all of the 3ms cleaned Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

How Well Do We Control the Excitation? Controlled emittance blow-up at bunch level within a 25ns train… Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

ADT operation – a cook book of black magic What Do We Want To Do? Bunch by bunch tune measurement at flat top Input from Elias Metral: “We believe we have an e-cloud TMCI-like instability during stable beam and the observable is the e-cloud induced bunch by bunch tune shift along a batch of 72 bunches during stable beam… And ideally we would like to see how this bunch by bunch tune shift along a batch evolves during time as it should increase at the moment of the instability.” “The order of magnitude of the coherent tune shift along the batch that we would like to measure at 6.5 TeV is ~1E-4, i.e. quite small.” What ADT can do? ADT operation – a cook book of black magic D.Valuch, LBOC 24.5.2016

Vector Mode Excitation and b-b-b Tune Vector excitation mode provides a constant kick, or I-Q excitation for given number of turns. It is used for ADT closed/open loop beam transfer function measurement, ADT system setting up, diagnostics, tune measurement, MDs A single turn kick generated by the ADT allows to extract the beam transfer function, bunch by bunch tune or bunch by bunch damping time. Can be done on-demand, any time within the cycle. Including the analysis… Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Vector Mode Excitation and b-b-b Tune Example of a closed loop transfer function measured by the ADT kick method. The b-b-b tune is extracted as a ‘side product’ Extracted b-b-b tune, using 10 turns of data, initial oscillation amplitude 0.5mm Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Vector Mode Excitation and b-b-b Tune The procedure: Kick the selected batches, or a full turn by ADT. Excitation length 1 turn. Exact oscillation amplitude limit is subject of MPP approval. Start negotiations at 100um@ pickups at point 4… Transverse feedback is active during the test, i.e. regular damping ~50 turns Collect the bunch by bunch position data Compute the required parameters (e.g. b-b-b tune) A feasibility test (e.g. end of fill study) is needed. Functionality exists already, as a very expert diagnostics tool. No changes to the operational system required. If successful, the method should be properly implemented as operational tool. Involves FPGA code update with hard wired excitation limits (length, number of turns etc.) Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Bunch by bunch controlled emittance blow-up In order to achieve better performance during the p-Pb run, it might be necessary to actively equalize individual bunch emittances of the proton beam (J. Jowett & heavy ion team) This can be done with already existing infrastructure. A simple controller would collect the individual bunch emittance data, program a bunch by bunch excitation window and trigger the excitation. Repeat for all trains. The whole procedure takes few seconds No changes to the ADT, nevertheless if used operationally a proper application is needed A feasibility test at injection, or end of fill study is needed to find the tweak factors Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

ADT as AC dipole The optics team (Rogelio & co) uses AC dipole for optics measurements. The excitation is strong and lasts for few thousand turns For some measurements a more gentle excitation, lasting for 50-100k turns would provide better results (limit the losses, use of nominal bunches, excite only selected bunches etc.) This functionality requires FPGA code update (implement ramps into the excitation amplitude setpoint) Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Pulsed excitation for the e-lens MD Request to provide gated excitation (only every n-th pulse executed) for the e-lens MD This functionality requires FPGA code update (implement pulsing into the excitation amplitude setpoint) Modified FPGA code can be flashed only for this particular MD… However, there is no former experimental feature which is not used as an operational tool today... Release requires a full transverse feedback re- validation with beam (~1 hour with few short trains) Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

ADT Validation After an Intervention New FPGA code can be released during a TS, release requires a full transverse feedback re-validation with beam (~1 hour with few short trains Full transverse feedback re-validation with beam means Injection of one, or few short trains Measurement of the open loop beam transfer function for each modified module (up to 8 mDSPUs, rules out unintentional group delay changes caused by a re-compiled FPGA) Test of the modified functionality in operational environment (e.g. does it still clean?) with operational FESA classes Firmware update is usually done during a technical stop Experience: normally transparent. Nevertheless one case of delay change due to a different version of FPGA synthesis tool since 2008 Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Summary (1) ADT is a very versatile device. Apart of the primary feedback, it can excite the beam by very sophisticated signals Excitation can target individual bunches within a 25ns train while not affecting the neighbours Full power, or a very fine excitation is already routinely used in operation Bunch by bunch tune measurement should help better understanding the currently observed instabilities. ADT can do it with already existing infrastructure, but active excitation at flat top is needed. If used operationally implementation requires mDSPU firmware update, followed by a full system validation. Active bunch by bunch emittance control might be needed for the p-Pb run. ADT can do it with already existing infrastructure, but active excitation at injection is needed. Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Summary (2) ADT as AC dipole will help the optics team to do finer, and more precise measurements. Implementation requires mDSPU firmware update, followed by a full system validation. Gated excitation for pulsing the e-lens MD. Implementation requires mDSPU firmware update, followed by a full system validation. Where the MPP needs to act? Approval and final green light to use excitation on live beam at flat top If successful, approval to use the method operationally Advise on approval process in such cases Advise on limits and conditions of use Advise on required testing and validation Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Thank you for your attention Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Abort Gap Cleaning At injection, AGC excitation is a gated, sinusoidal signal, with frequency swept in range Qver±0.01, in 15 steps, one full sweep cycle lasts 1 second. The sweep needs to be re-triggered every second by a timing pulse In physics, AGC excitation is a gated, sinusoidal signal, with frequency swept in range Qver±0.01, in 30 steps, one full sweep cycle lasts 2 seconds. The excitation sweep is started by software. Then free running, until stopped by software Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016

Injection Gap Cleaning IGC excitation is a gated, sinusoidal signal, with frequency swept in range Qhor±0.01, in 15 steps, one full sweep cycle lasts 1 second and it is repeated up to 19 times. The excitation is stopped by OR of the three sources: 1) by the sequencer just before the injection, 2) the beam-in pulse, 3) time-out after 19 seconds Excitation by ADT and active bunch-by-bunch tune measurements. D.Valuch, MPP 10.6.2016