Background for Molecular Biology of Lactase Persistence

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transcriptional regulation in Eukaryotes The regulatory elements of bacterial, yeast, and human genes.
Advertisements

Control of Gene Expression
Outline Questions from last lecture? P. 40 questions on Pax6 gene Mechanism of Transcription Activation –Transcription Regulatory elements Comparison between.
Synthetic approaches to transcription factor regulation and function Tim Johnstone BIOL1220 Spring 2010.
Regulating Gene Expression Turning Genes On and Off.
Negative regulatory proteins bind to operator sequences in the DNA and prevent or weaken RNA polymerase binding.
BACKGROUND E. coli is a free living, gram negative bacterium which colonizes the lower gut of animals. Since it is a model organism, a lot of experimental.
The Hardwiring of development: organization and function of genomic regulatory systems Maria I. Arnone and Eric H. Davidson.
Transcriptional Regulation and RNA Processing
Transcription Co-activator Family Proteins
Molecular genetics of gene expression Mat Halter and Neal Stewart 2014.
Gene regulation  Two types of genes: 1)Structural genes – encode specific proteins 2)Regulatory genes – control the level of activity of structural genes.
How Genes Are Controlled
Controlling the genes Lecture 15 pp Gene Expression Nearly all human cells have a nucleus (not red blood cells) Almost all these nucleated cells.
(c) The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Raven - Johnson - Biology: 6th Ed. - All Rights Reserved - McGraw Hill Companies Control of Gene Expression Copyright © McGraw-Hill Companies Permission.
Chapter 11 Phage strategies.
6D Gene expression the process by which the heritable information in a gene, the sequence of DNA base pairs, is made into a functional gene product, such.
A Biology Primer Part III: Transcription, Translation, and Regulation Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou University of Texas at Dallas.
Gene Regulation and Expression. Learning Objectives  Describe gene regulation in prokaryotes.  Explain how most eukaryotic genes are regulated.  Relate.
Molecular Basis for Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype DNA RNA protein genotype function organism phenotype DNA sequence amino acid sequence transcription.
TATA box Promoter-proximal elements Effects of mutations in promoter element sequences on transcription.
Gene regulation biology 1 lecture 13. Differential expression of genetic code in prokaryotes and eukaryotes Regulation at the transcription level How.
Enhancers and 3D genomics Noam Bar RESEARCH METHODS IN COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY.
Transcription 7.2.
LncRNAs exert their effects by diverse mechanisms. LncRNAs exert their effects by diverse mechanisms. (A) lncRNAs can.
Transcriptional Regulation
more regulating gene expression
Chapter 12.5 Gene Regulation.
Regulation of Gene Expression
There are four levels of structure in proteins
Concept 18.2: Eukaryotic gene expression can be regulated at any stage
Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Transcription in Prokaryotic (Bacteria)
Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
Homework #2 is due 10/17 Bonus #1 is due 10/24 FrakenFlowers.
Ultraconserved Elements in the Human Genome
A Zero-Knowledge Based Introduction to Biology
Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
From Prescription to Transcription: Genome Sequence as Drug Target
Control of Gene Expression in Eukaryotic cells
Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
Genetic variation in DREs could be a causative factor in dysregulation of distal target gene expression. Genetic variation in DREs could be a causative.
Even-skipped gene regulation
Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
James 4:7 7 Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.
The Role of Chromosome Domains in Shaping the Functional Genome
Disaccharide Digestion: Clinical and Molecular Aspects
A Lexicon for Homeodomain-DNA Recognition
Section 14.3 Gene Expression and Regulation Part 1
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Diabetes Mutations Delineate an Atypical POU Domain in HNF-1α
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
The DNA-binding helix-turn-helix motif
Schematic drawing of alternatively-spliced GFP reporter gene.
Chapter 6.2 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Biology 12 (2011)
Prokaryotic (Bacterial) Gene Regulation
Overlap between changes in de novo protein synthesis after p53- or miR-34a-induction. Overlap between changes in de novo protein synthesis after p53- or.
Transcriptional Control of SLC26A4 Is Involved in Pendred Syndrome and Nonsyndromic Enlargement of Vestibular Aqueduct (DFNB4)  Tao Yang, Hilmar Vidarsson,
Eukaryotic Gene Regulation
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Presentation transcript:

Background for Molecular Biology of Lactase Persistence Eukaryotes perform combinatorial control of gene expression Multiple regulatory transcription factors “vote” to express a gene The result is spatial (which cell types) and temporal (which stage of development) control of gene expression Regulatory transcription factors bind to DNA sequences that are Near the promoter (promoter proximal) Far away from the promoter (enhancer or silencer) Regulatory transcription factors are activators or repressors Regulatory transcription factors usually have a DNA binding domain and an activation domain There are several families of DNA binding domains Most use an alpha helix to contact the bases in the major groove of DNA DNA binding domains bind to specific DNA sequences, known as binding sites or motifs Motifs are short, usually 8-12 base pairs long Motifs can be degenerate (variations possible) Transcription factors themselves are encoded by genes and subject to gene regulation by other transcription factors (in a gene regulatory network) Variation in binding site sequences can affect transcription factor binding and, thus, expression of the regulated gene

LCT enhancer (left) and proximal promoter region (right) The enhancer is located within intron 13 of the upstream MCM6 gene, over 13,000 base pairs away from the transcription start site. 3 TF binding sites in proximal promoter 5 TF binding sites in enhancer Total of 6 different TFs bind these 8 binding sites Lewinsky et al. (2005) Figure 3A 5’-...GCAATACAGATAAGATAATGTAGCCCCTG...-3’ ------- Underline is Oct-1 binding site Dashed line is overlapping GATA binding site

LCT enhancer (left) and proximal promoter region (right) The enhancer is located within intron 13 of the upstream MCM6 gene, over 13,000 base pairs away from the transcription start site. Lewinsky et al. (2005) Figure 3A The European SNP associated with lactase persistence is at the end of the Oct-1 binding site. 5’-...GCAATACAGATAAGATAATGTAGTCCCTG...-3’ ------- Underline is Oct-1 binding site Dashed line is overlapping GATA binding site

6 SNPs are located in or near the Oct-1 binding site in the LCT enhancer region 5’ 3’ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/variation/view/?q=rs4988235, Accessed 19 June 2015

“Wild type”: 5’-...CAGGGGCTACATTATCTT...-3’ “wild type” and 6 SNP sequences, top strand only shown 3’ 5’ “Wild type”: 5’-...CAGGGGCTACATTATCTT...-3’ rs185707784: 5’-...CAGGGGCTACACTATCTT...-3’ rs41380347: 5’-...CAGGGGCTACCTTATCTT...-3’ rs41456145: 5’-...CAGGGGCTGCATTATCTT...-3’ rs4988235: 5’-...CAGGGACTACATTATCTT...-3’ rs4988236: 5’-...CAGAGGCTACATTATCTT...-3’ rs41525747: 5’-...CACGGGCTACATTATCTT...-3’ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/variation/view/?q=rs4988235, Accessed 19 June 2015

wt top strand: 5’-...CAGGGGCTACATTATCTT...-3’ “wild type” and 6 SNPs: both strands of DNA shown for each, top strand in black, bottom strand in grey, oriented as shown in NCBI Variation Viewer window wt top strand: 5’-...CAGGGGCTACATTATCTT...-3’ bottom: 3’-...GTCCCCGATGTAATAGAA...-5’ rs185707784: 5’-...CAGGGGCTACACTATCTT...-3’ bottom: 3’-...GTCCCCGATGTGATAGAA...-5’ rs41380347: 5’-...CAGGGGCTACCTTATCTT...-3’ bottom: 3’-...GTCCCCGATGGAATAGAA...-5’ rs41456145: 5’-...CAGGGGCTGCATTATCTT...-3’ bottom: 3’-...GTCCCCGACGTAATAGAA...-5’ rs4988235: 5’-...CAGGGACTACATTATCTT...-3’ bottom: 3’-...GTCCCTGATGTAATAGAA...-5’ rs4988236: 5’-...CAGAGGCTACATTATCTT...-3’ bottom: 3’-...GTCTCCGATGTAATAGAA...-5’ rs41525747: 5’-...CACGGGCTACATTATCTT...-3’ 3’-...GTGCCCGATGTAATAGAA...-5’

wt bottom: 3’-...GTCCCCGATGTAATAGAA...-5’ “wild type” and 6 SNPs: bottom strand only shown for each, oriented as shown in NCBI Variation Viewer window wt bottom: 3’-...GTCCCCGATGTAATAGAA...-5’ rs185707784: 3’-...GTCCCCGATGTGATAGAA...-5’ rs41380347 : 3’-...GTCCCCGATGGAATAGAA...-5’ rs41456145 : 3’-...GTCCCCGACGTAATAGAA...-5’ rs4988235 : 3’-...GTCCCTGATGTAATAGAA...-5’ rs4988236 : 3’-...GTCTCCGATGTAATAGAA...-5’ rs41525747: 3’-...GTGCCCGATGTAATAGAA...-5’ “wild type” and 6 SNPs: bottom strand only shown for each, oriented as shown in LCT enhancer region/TF binding sites (reversed so 5’ is on left) wt bottom: 5’-...AAGATAATGTAGCCCCTG...-3’ rs185707784: 3’-...AAGATAGTGTAGCCCCTG...-5’ rs41380347 : 3’-...AAGATAAGGTAGCCCCTG...-5’ rs41456145 : 3’-...AAGATAATGCAGCCCCTG...-5’ rs4988235 : 3’-...AAGATAATGTAGTCCCTG...-5’ rs4988236 : 3’-...AAGATAATGTAGCCTCTG...-5’ rs41525747: 3’-...AAGATAATGTAGCCCGTG...-5’

wt bottom: 5’-...AAGATAATGTAGCCCCTG...-3’ “wild type” and 6 SNPs: bottom strand only shown for each, oriented as shown in LCT enhancer region/TF binding sites (reversed so 5’ is on left) wt bottom: 5’-...AAGATAATGTAGCCCCTG...-3’ rs185707784: 5’-...AAGATAGTGTAGCCCCTG...-3’ rs41380347: 5’-...AAGATAAGGTAGCCCCTG...-3’ G-13915, Kenya rs41456145: 5’-...AAGATAATGCAGCCCCTG...-3’ rs4988235: 5’-...AAGATAATGTAGTCCCTG...-3’ T-13910, Europe rs4988236: 5’-...AAGATAATGTAGCCTCTG...-3’ rs41525747: 5’-...AAGATAATGTAGCCCGTG...-3’ G-13907, Sudan Graphic from original Evo-Ed PowerPoint

wt bottom: 5’-...AAGATAATGTAGCCCCTG...-3’ “wild type” and 6 SNPs compared to Oct-1 binding site shown in Lewinsky et al. (2005), Fig. 2A wt bottom: 5’-...AAGATAATGTAGCCCCTG...-3’ rs185707784: 5’-...AAGATAGTGTAGCCCCTG...-3’ rs41380347: 5’-...AAGATAAGGTAGCCCCTG...-3’ G-13915, Kenya rs41456145: 5’-...AAGATAATGCAGCCCCTG...-3’ rs4988235: 5’-...AAGATAATGTAGTCCCTG...-3’ T-13910, Europe rs4988236: 5’-...AAGATAATGTAGCCTCTG...-3’ rs41525747: 5’-...AAGATAATGTAGCCCGTG...-3’ G-13907, Sudan Transfac M000137: NNNRTAATNANNN Oct-1 consensus sequence 5’-GGCAATACAGATAAGATAATGTAGTC-3’ ------- Underline is Oct-1 binding site Dashed line is overlapping GATA binding site DNA logo of Oct-1 binding motif (M000137) http://motifmap.ics.uci.edu/

MotifMap Database reports 9 different consensus binding sites for Oct-1 “Canonical” M00342 “Non-canonical” M00137 NNNVTAAWNRNNN consensus from Motifmap NNNRTAATNANNN consensus from Transfac

8 structures for Oct-1 (POU2F1) in the Protein Data Bank The POU2F1 protein is 743 amino acids long. It has a homeobox DNA binding domain and a POU-specific DNA binding domain separated by a flexible linker. The POU-specific domain contacts the 5' half of the canonical binding site (ATGCAAAT). The POU homeodomain contacts the 3' half of the canonical binding site (ATGCAAAT). The linker region is not visible in the crystal structure. Since the POU2F1 binding site in the LCT enhancer is noncanonical, we cannot use the crystal structure to understand structurally how the SNPs affect the binding of POU2F1. 1OCT viewed with NCBI Cn3D

rs4988235 in red >hg19_dna range=chr2:136608590-136608902 5'pad=0 3'pad=200 strand=+ repeatMasking=none AAAATCAAACATTATACAAATGCAACCTAAGGAGGAGAGTTCCTTTGAGG CCAGGGGCTACATTATCTTATCTGTATTGCCAGCGCAGAGGCCTACTAGT ACATTGTAGGGTCTAAGTACATTTTTCCTGAATGAAAGGTATTAAATGGT AACTTACGTCTTTATGCACTCTATAAACTATGACGTGATCGTCTCCGTCT AACAACTACACTCAAATGCTTACCAAGCTCTTTAAAGGGAAGAATTCCAT GGTCGTATGAGCATTCAACAGTTACATAAAAATGTATTTGCAGTGAATTC TAGTATGTCCCAT

Leonardo da Vinci's Madonna and Child (Madonna Litta). Photograph: State Hermitage Museum, St Petersburg http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/dec/30/leonardo-da-vinci-madonna-litta-breastfeeding