Endangered Species Act

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Signed on December 1973 and provides for the conservation of species that are endangered or threatened throughout all or significant portion of their.
Advertisements

Endangered Species Conservation Banking
Consultation Under the Endangered Species Act Garwin Yip, NOAA Fisheries Service, Southwest Region.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
Streamlined Consultation Training Modules Module #1 - Frequently Asked Questions on the Section 7 Consultation Process Module #2 - An Overview of Streamlined.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Amendments to Part 182: Endangered Species Regulations.
Beyond Fish and the Federal ESA Chris Maguire Terrestrial Biology Program Coordinator Oregon Department of Transportation Local Government Environmental.
1 Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives  By statute and regulation, Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives must: Avoid the likelihood of jeopardy or adverse.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Briefing on Proposed Amendments to Endangered Species Regulations.
ARRT Update January Workgroup Commissioned in FEB 2011 “to ensure the AK Unified Plan complies with ESA section 7 consultation requirements” ESA.
Use of the Endangered Species Act in Alaska Doug Vincent-Lang, Special Assistant Alaska Department of Fish & Game 1.
May 17 th,  Overview of endangered species regulations  Purpose of Habitat Conservation Plans  Review Balcones Canyonlands Conservation Plan.
THE ACTS What you need to know about MBTA, BGEPA, & ESA.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Streamlined Consultation Training Modules
NFIP ESA ComplianceImplementing a Reasonable and Prudent Alternative – FEMA Region 10 ESA and the National Flood Insurance Program Implementing a salmon.
Endangered Species Act
Endangered Species US Fish and Wildlife Service. Endangered Species Endangered Species Act Passed in 1983 Purpose Conserve Endangered and Threatened Species.
Endangered Species Act Overview
Endangered Species Act GOALS: Prevent species extinctions Increase numbers to the point where a species has recovered and can be delisted.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Section 7(a)(1) of the Endangered Species Act—Supporting the Mission through Proactive Conservation Planning.
Other Environmental Issues U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Noise Endangered and Threatened Species Explosive/Flammable Hazards and Underground.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Module 4 Section 7 Interagency Cooperation. The Subtitle of Section 7: Federal Agency Actions and Consultations Credit: istockphoto.com.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
The Endangered Species Act’s Section 7 Consultation Requirement: Strategies and Tools Cherise M. Oram Stoel Rives LLP Permitting Strategies May 11, 2006.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 (ESA) Larsen Schlachter Per. 3.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1) Background 2) Sections 1 – 18 3) Section 7 - Section 7(a)(1) - Section 7(a)(2) Informal Consultation Initiating Formal.
Biological Opinions & Endangered Species Act Consultation – A “How To” Guide for Working with Agencies on ESA Issues MATTHEW A. LOVE Partner- Seattle,
The Lesser Prairie Chicken Has Been Listed As Threatened: Now What!? The Lesser Prairie Chicken Has Been Listed As Threatened: Now What!? Jim Jones Power.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Endangered Species Act Counterpart Regulations for National Fire Plan Projects Bureau of Land Management Forest Service June 9, 2004.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 By Tristan Armstrong.
Species At Risk Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Legislation - Update on Status Bill C-5 currently before the Senate Has been given 1st and 2nd readings Bill.
The Endangered Species Act Everything you wanted to know and more.
ESA Section 7 Requirements & the Caribbean Reef Fish Fishery: Effects on Threatened Acropora and Their Designated Critical Habitat Jennifer Lee Fishery.
Fish and Wildlife : Regulatory Framework and Challenges Cherise M. Oram STOEL RIVES LLP Hydrovision 2008 Ocean/Tidal/Stream Power Track 7D “Environmental.
Endangered Species Act 2005 Legislative Action. House of Representatives  On Sept. 29, 2005 the House passed H.R. 3824: Threatened and Endangered Species.
THE SPECIES AT RISK ACT (SARA) CBA/Justice National Section Meeting National Environmental Energy Resources Law Group Ottawa – October 24, 2004.
Puget Sound Salmon Hatcheries April 2003 Puget Sound Salmon Hatchery Management Decision Making ESA & NEPA Processes Independent Scientific Review Process.
Environmental Considerations in Planning
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT & THE FLORIDA BEACHES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN.
Endangered Species Act Basics & Section 7 Consultation Strategies for Hydropower Relicensing & License Amendments Cherise M. Oram Stoel Rives LLP Hydropower.
TOWARDS A COMMON GOAL Coordinating actions under the Clean Water Act (FWPCA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Recovery Planning Advances Cherise M. Oram Stoel Rives LLP Northwest Environmental Summit October 20, 2005.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans021-1 Unit 21 Endangered Species Endangered Species Act of 1973.
Endangered Species Act Overview: Section 7 Process and Biological Opinion West Coast Region U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
National Flood Insurance Program ESA Consultation for Online Information Sessions May 11 th and 12 th 2016 Oregon.
Environmental Issues Update - Endangered Species 1.
Endangered Species Act (Section 7) Consultation In Federal Land Management Agencies American Chemical Society National Meeting Boston, Mass. August 2015.
Endangered Species Act Application in New York State – What’s New? October 4, 2015 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Robyn A. Niver.
Oil Spill Response and the Endangered Species Act RRT IX Meeting Oakland, California June 28, 2012 Elizabeth Petras- National Marine Fisheries Service,
California WaterFix Aquatic Science Peer Review Sacramento, California April 5, 2016.
Indiana Bats, Fire, and the Endangered Species Act Sue Cameron US Fish & Wildlife Service April 16, 2013.
National Environmental Policy Act and Endangered Species Act Compliance in the Bureau of Land Management.
Water Quality Standards Submittal & Review Process
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Module 19a: Water Quality Certification
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Sara Eddy Fisheries Protection Program Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Endangered Species Conservation Banking
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Endangered Species Act Update
Endangered Species.
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives
Presentation transcript:

Endangered Species Act Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering

Source of Class Materials Presentations and Handouts adapted from The U.S. EPA’s Water Quality Standards Academy November 27-December 1, 2006 Washington, DC

Endangered Species Act (ESA) Mission To conserve listed species and their habitat Imposes overarching substantive obligation on Federal agencies to ensure their actions do not jeopardize listed species All actions authorized, funded or carried out, in whole or in part, by a Federal agency which may affect listed species or designated critical habitat http://www.ucsusa.org/gulf/pixgulf/state_al_bio02.jpg

ESA: Interagency Cooperation 7(a)(1): Federal agencies shall use their authorities to conserve species 7(a)(2): Federal agencies shall "consult" to ensure actions do not jeopardize species Action includes activities authorized, funded or carried out by a Federal agency

ESA: “Take” Unlawful to “take” a listed species “Take” includes harass, harm, pursue, hunt, kill, capture or collect Exception: Service may permit take if take is incidental to and not the purpose of an otherwise legal activity http://biokecklab.uno.edu/research/images/Sevosa%20met.jpg

ESA Application to WQS 85% of listed animal species use wetlands and aquatic habitats Federal Action "May Affect“ Biological Evaluation Adversely Affected Informal Consultation Formal Consultation Biological Opinion Jeopardy - RPAs and RPMs http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/pics15/manateecowcalf.jpg

Biological Evaluations If action “may effect” species or critical habitat, agency is to conduct a biological evaluation Evaluate the potential effects of the action on listed species and critical habitat Determine if listed species or critical habitat are likely to be adversely affected http://www.ecology.org/ecophoto/reptiles_files/Thumbnails/PrimaryCatalog-6343.jpg

‘Adversely Affected’ Agency is to determine if any species or critical habitat are likely to be adversely affected Not ‘likely to be adversely affected’ if effect is beneficial, discountable, or insignificant http://teacher.scholastic.com/scholasticnews/indepth/endangered_species/animals/popups/images/salmon.jpg

Informal Consultation Determine if formal consultation is necessary All discussions and correspondence between agency and Service prior to formal consultation If the agencies determine “not likely to adversely affect,” then consultation concludes http://www.posy1.anl.gov/Gallery/galleryImages/consultation.jpg

Formal Consultation Required with action agency determination of “likely to adversely affect”, although action agency may request formal consultation at any time Action agency may proceed with its action prior to formal consultation, providing its action is consistent with ESA Section 7(d) Concludes with Service’s biological opinion (or mutual “not likely to adversely affect” finding) http://www.usinternetconsulting.com/images/internet_consultation.jpg

Biological Opinion Summary of information on which opinion is based Discussion of the effects of the action on listed species and critical habitat Indicates Service’s opinion on whether action is likely to jeopardize species or adversely modify critical habitat Jeopardy - Accompanied by Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives Recommended alternative actions MUST BE Consistent with the scope of the Federal agency’s legal authority Consistent with the intent of the action Economically & technologically feasible Avoid the likelihood of jeopardy

What is Jeopardy? Defined IF jeopardy Action…expected…to diminish a species’ numbers, reproduction, or distribution so that the likelihood of survival and recovery in the wild is appreciably reduced IF jeopardy Federal agency is to notify the Service of final decision on the action A jeopardy opinion is non-binding HOWEVER Federal agency is at risk in not fulfilling the requirements of the ESA http://www.reimer-media.de/images/tv_show/jeopardy_logo_01.jpg

‘No Jeopardy’ Finding Amount of incidental take that can occur Reasonable and Prudent Measures (RPMs) necessary to minimize the incidental take Terms and conditions that Federal agencies are to use to implement the RPMs

Formal Consultation: Expectations Concludes 90 days after initiation Unless by mutual agreement to extend Service is to issue its biological opinion within 45 days of conclusion Federal agency shall provide the Service with the best scientific and commercial data available OR which can be obtained for an adequate review of effects of action

Consultation Process ACTION AUTHORIZED, FUNDED, OR CARRIED OUT BY FEDERAL AGENCY? No Yes End ACTION MAY AFFECT LISTED SPECIES? Action “affects” species if the effect is either detrimental or beneficial No Yes INFORMAL CONSULTATION Consists of communications between Action agency and Service. Action agency provides data and perform a biological assessment (Action agency may go directly to formal consultation)

Consultation Process…cont’d AGENCY FINDS ACTION NOT LIKELY TO “ADVERSELY AFFECT” SPECIES AND SERVICE CONCURS IN WRITING Yes No End FORMAL CONSULTATION 90 days unless extended by agreement of agencies. Service can request agency to provide additional data, which the agency must obtain, if practicable, within consultation period.

Consultation Process…cont’d SERVICE RENDERS “BIOLOGICAL OPINIONS” WITHIN 45 DAYS AFTER CONCLUSION OF FORMAL CONSULTATION AS TO WHETHER ACTION IS LIKELY TO JEOPARDIZE THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF ENDANGERED SPECIES IF SERVICE FINDS JEOPARDY, INCLUDES REASONABLE AND PRUDENT ALTERNATIVES TO AVOID JEOPARDY. IF SERVICE FINDS NON-JEOPARDY, IT MAY INCLUDE AN INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT WHICH INCLUDES REASONABLE AND PRUDENT MEASURES AGENCY DECISIONS ON HOW TO PROCEED. Service opinion not binding but Action Agency must develop an adequate record to support a finding of No Jeopardy

Questions?