City Council Meeting Tuesday, May 7, 2013 Marinship: Next Steps City Council Meeting Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Background “Marinship 101” presentation (March 5) Council Direction: Conduct further analysis and plan a scope of work Work with Councilmembers Withy and Theodores Subcommittee Meetings March 28, April 22, May 2

Overview of Presentation Review of Specific Plan Land Use Infrastructure Economics Identification of examples of: “Healthy” vs. “struggling” areas Review of existing conditions in the Marinship “Cost” of not acting Subcommittee Recommendation Council Discussion

Review of MSP Land Use Infrastructure Economics

Examples of Healthy Areas 30 Liberty Ship 10/20 Liberty Ship mix of industrial uses, applied arts, marine commercial services, art studios 28 Liberty Ship mix of restaurant uses, recreational facilities, applied arts, light industrial marine industrial Schoonmaker Point Marina Clipper Yacht Harbor KKMI Boatyard boat service, restoration, repair and boat sales

Examples of Healthy Areas applied arts, restaurants, arts, grandfathered offices 3030 Bridgeway mix of applied arts, grandfathered offices

Examples of Struggling Areas East side of Gate 5 Road Sausalito Shipyards Across from Marin Self Storage 25 Liberty Ship

Location of Healthy/Struggling Areas East side of Gate 5 Clipper Harbor KKMI Boatyard area 3030 Bridgeway Mariner’s Landing Area Sausalito Shipyard and Marina Across from 2340 Marinship way 10/20, 28, 30 Liberty Ship and Schoonmaker Marina 25 Liberty Ship

Existing Conditions Review

Land Use Infrastructure Economics Zoning Ordinance and Marinship Specific Plan are inconsistent Deteriorating storm drains, piers, buildings, sewers; Subsidence; Flooding Perception of economic stagnation in the area Land Use Uncertainty in leasing space Revenues not high enough to support improvements Economics Infrastructure Flooding causes decreased business revenue

Cost of Doing Nothing in the Marinship Businesses are impacted City resources expended re: EPA order Flooding Occurs Sewers are overloaded Residents and employees safety in jeopardy City exposed to unfortunate events Businesses lose revenue Deteriorating storm drains Miscellaneous public safety issues (i.e., railroad ties) Deteriorating sewers, Uneven road surfaces Business revenue declines Residents and employees safety in jeopardy Pilings rise Pipes break Road surface buckles Flooding Occurs Cost of Doing Nothing in the Marinship Sea Level is Rising Area is Sinking Poor Usability of MSP Document Deteriorating Buildings Infrastructure not put in place Existing Infrastructure in Decline Impact City services Negative Impact on Thriving Businesses Loss of Historic Resources Lowers Property Values Increase in Crime Blight Uncertainty for Property Owners Uncertainty for Businesses City recourses expended-resolving inconsistencies MSP: Outdated Parcel Numbers/ Addresses/ Names Inconsist-encies between MSP and Zoning Ordinance Residents and employees safety in jeopardy City exposed to unfortunate events Lack of continuous sidewalks, streetlights, benches Uneven road surfaces

Subcommittee Recommendation Direct a City Council-appointed Steering Committee, City Staff and a hired consultant work together to do the following: Evaluate the MSP using studies already completed on behalf of the City and any new studies as recommended by consultant to determine to what degree that the MSP is adding to the health of the City and to the degree that is necessary to avoid the negative consequences of doing nothing. Identify areas of the Marinship where improvements can be made to the MSP to add to the health of the City and to avoid the negative consequences of doing nothing. Develop a community engagement plan and a property owner outreach program. Recommend changes to the MSP as required. 2. Appoint a Steering Committee subject to the Brown Act to be composed of five members appointed by the City Council and two City Council liaisons appointed by the Mayor. The City Council should provide direction on the make-up of the five members appointed by the Council.