Ships and Waves Reaching Polar regions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Storm-induced sea ice breakup and the implications for ice extent Alison Kohout, Mike Williams, Sam Dean (NIWA) Mike Meylan, University of Newcastle, Australia.
Advertisements

SWARP: Ships and Waves Reaching Polar regions
PRESENTS: FORECASTING FOR OPERATIONS AND DESIGN February 16 th 2011 – Aberdeen.
Operational Forecasting Wave Models. WaveWatch III (Tolman 1997, 1999a) Model description: – Third generation wave model developed at NOAA/NCEP. – Solves.
Discretizing the Sphere for Multi-Scale Air Quality Simulations using Variable-Resolution Finite-Volume Techniques Martin J. Otte U.S. EPA Robert Walko.
David Prado Oct Antarctic Sea Ice: John N. Rayner and David A. Howarth 1979.
TOPAZ monitoring and forecasting system Laurent BERTINO, Knut Arild LISÆTER, Nina WINTHER, François COUNILLON, Hanne SAGEN, Cecilie HANSEN, Intissar KEGHOUCHE.
A coherent framework for forecasting currents, waves and drift: 1. What we do at SHOM 2. Hydrodynamics theory 3. First results 4. Perspectives on remote.
Properties of Multilayer Optics An Investigation of Methods of Polarization Analysis for the ICS Experiment at UCLA 8/4/04 Oliver Williams.
METO 621 Lesson 13. Separation of the radiation field into orders of scattering If the source function is known then we may integrate the radiative transfer.
1 Progress Towards Developing a Coupled Atmosphere-Wave-Ocean Framework for Research and Operational Hurricane Models Isaac Ginis B. Thomas, R. Yablonsky,
WATER VAPOR OBSERVATIONS AND PROCESSES Long Beach, 11. Feb The atmospheric moisture budget in the Arctic – introducing and applying a consistent.
Model-free extraction of refractive index from measured optical data
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
SWARP KO Bergen, 4 Feb WP4 : Satellite remote sensing of wave in ice
WP 7 SWARP Kickoff Meeting, 4-5 February 2014 WP7 Dissemination and exploitation Torill Hamre, Aleksander Vines and Laurent Bertino SWARP KickOff Meeting.
Dr. Frank Herr Ocean Battlespace Sensing S&T Department Head Dr. Scott L. Harper Program Officer Team Lead, 322AGP Dr. Martin O. Jeffries Program Officer.
Recent advances for the inversion of the particulate backscattering coefficient at different wavelengths H. Loisel, C. Jamet, and D. Dessailly.
Oceanic and Atmospheric Modeling of the Big Bend Region Steven L. Morey, Dmitry S. Dukhovksoy, Donald Van Dyke, and Eric P. Chassignet Center for Ocean.
Ocean and sea-ice data assimilation and forecasting in the TOPAZ system L. Bertino, K.A. Lisæter, I. Kegouche, S. Sandven NERSC, Bergen, Norway Arctic.
Assimilation of HF Radar Data into Coastal Wave Models NERC-funded PhD work also supervised by Clive W Anderson (University of Sheffield) Judith Wolf (Proudman.
Meteorologisk Institutt met.no Operational ocean forecasting in the Arctic (met.no) Øyvind Saetra Norwegian Meteorological Institute Presented at the ArcticGOOS.
WP5: Integration & Validation IFREMER, NERSC, NIERSC, ODL, NAVTOR, NERC.
Comparison of Different Approaches NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR is Sponsored by NSF and this work is partially.
IICWG 5 th Science Workshop, April Sea ice modelling and data assimilation in the TOPAZ system Knut A. Lisæter and Laurent Bertino.
SWARP: WP2, wave modelling
Modeling the upper ocean response to Hurricane Igor Zhimin Ma 1, Guoqi Han 2, Brad deYoung 1 1 Memorial University 2 Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
VERIFICATION STRATEGY FOR OCEANS, WAVES & SEA-ICE Robert Grumbine, Avichal Mehra and Arun Chawla NWS/NCEP/EMC.
The dynamic-thermodynamic sea ice module in the Bergen Climate Model Helge Drange and Mats Bentsen Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center Bjerknes.
Thirty Years of Operational Ocean Wave Forecasting at Fleet Numerical Meteorology and Oceanography Center Paul Wittmann and Mike Clancy Fleet Numerical.
Dressed Spin Simulations Steven Clayton University of Illinois nEDM Collaboration Meeting at Arizona State University, February 8, 2008 Contents 1.Goals.
Improvement of the Monte Carlo Simulation Efficiency of a Proton Therapy Treatment Head Based on Proton Tracking Analysis and Geometry Simplifications.
June 30, 2011 Plasma Pressure Constraints on Magnetic Field Structure in the Substorm Growth Phase Sorin G. Zaharia 1 and Chih-Ping Wang.
Sea ice modeling at met.no Keguang Wang Norwegian Meteorological Institute.
3.3 Separation of Variables 3.4 Multipole Expansion
MyOcean2 First Annual Meeting – April 2013 WP 06 MONITORING & FORECASTING CENTRE for ARCTIC Laurent Bertino, NERSC MyOcean2 First Annual Meeting.
Use of the Moon as a calibration reference for NPP VIIRS Frederick S. Patt, Robert E. Eplee, Robert A. Barnes, Gerhard Meister(*) and James J. Butler NASA.
Milton Garces, Claus Hetzer, and Mark Willis University of Hawaii, Manoa Source modeling of microbarom signals generated by nonlinear ocean surface wave.
NAME SWG th Annual NOAA Climate Diagnostics and Prediction Workshop State College, Pennsylvania Oct. 28, 2005.
Matthew J. Hoffman CEAFM/Burgers Symposium May 8, 2009 Johns Hopkins University Courtesy NOAA/AVHRR Courtesy NASA Earth Observatory.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
Acknowledgments: The study is funded by the Deep-C consortium and a grant from BOEM. Model experiments were performed at the Navy DoD HPC, NRL SSC and.
Progress and Assessment of the Arctic subpolar gyre State Estimate (ASTE) An T. Nguyen, Patrick Heimbach, Ayan Chaudhuri, Gael Forget, Rui M. Ponte, and.
Great Lakes Ice Database, 1973-present 1/15 Great Lakes Ice & Climate Research, Modeling, and Applications Jia Wang Integrated Physical & Ecological Modeling.
In order to accurately estimate polar air/sea fluxes, sea ice drift and then ocean circulation, global ocean models should make use of ice edge, sea ice.
Norwegian Marine Data Centre contributions from Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center Lasse H. Pettersson.
(2) Norut, Tromsø, Norway Improved measurement of sea surface velocity from synthetic aperture radar Morten Wergeland Hansen.
Jinping Zhao, Hongli Fu, Shugang Zhang (Ocean University of China)
Anton Eliassen, Lars Petter Røed and Øyvind Sætra
INTAROS – Integrated Arctic Observation System
TOPAZ monitoring and forecasting system
Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
Frequency dependent microseismic sources
ASCAT sensors onboard MetOps : application for sea ice
Operational Oceanography Science and Services for Europe and Mediterranean Srdjan Dobricic, CMCC, Bologna, Italy on behalf of National Group of Operational.
Course Evaluation Now online You should have gotten an with link.
Prospective Tracer Release Experiments In the Arctic Jim Ledwell
ARC MFC: En havovervåkings- og varslingstjeneste for nordområdene
Dynamical Models - Purposes and Limits
Shelf-basin exchange in the Western Arctic Ocean
Shuyi S. Chen, Ben Barr, Milan Curcic and Brandon Kerns
GIJS DE BOER(1), GREGORY J. TRIPOLI(1), EDWIN W. ELORANTA(2)
What is a Climate Model?.
WaveFlow KO Øyvind Breivik (MET Norway), Joanna Staneva (HZG), Jean Bidlot (ECMWF) and George Nurser (NOC)
Coupled Atmosphere-Wave-Ocean Modeling Experiments in Hurricanes
Modelling Overwash of Ice Floes by Water Waves
Tore Furevik Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen
What is a Climate Model?.
Global Defects near Black Holes
Presentation transcript:

Ships and Waves Reaching Polar regions Laurent Bertino, Timothy Williams

 Nansen Environment and Remote Sensing Center, Bergen, Norway Contract number 607476

Objectives As of today, there is no forecasting service in GMES that is valid for the gray zone where waves-in-ice processes dominate. Aim: Filling the gaps existing in the GMES services with respect to waves in sea ice 1) extending the validity of wave and sea ice forecasting systems in the marginal ice zone, 2) developing remote sensing methods for routine monitoring of combined risks of waves and ice

2-3 days Waves and Sea Ice Forecast Models setup Topaz4 NA & AO Nesting: Ocean and Ice myocean.met.no Boundary Conditions Ocean and Sea Ice Model (EVP + MIZ) WIM module (wave in ice) 2-3 days Waves and Sea Ice Forecast Atmosphere (ECMWFR) NB! Today only EVP+MIZ on 3 day forecast on webpage, WIM module only 2 days wave data WW3 Wave model / WAM Nordic Validation Nesting Forcing Forecast Models Validation

Quantitative “MIZ width” validation

Solution of Laplace equation Based on Strong’s work about the MIZ mean width, solving the Laplacian equation: ∇2Ψ = 0 Courtenay Strong (2012) Atmospheric influence on Arctic marginal ice zone position and width in the Atlantic sector, Feb-Apr 1979-2010

More advanced geometry

All February 2014

SWARP: WP2, wave modelling Fabrice Ardhuin, Mickael Accensi, Justin Stopa (Ifremer) Vernon Squire (University of Otago) Dany Dumont and Paul Nicot (UQAR) Tim Williams (NERSC) http://wwz.ifremer.fr/iowaga

1. From « physical » to « spectral » space V. Squire et al. are working on the deterministic modelling of wave scattering by a field of ice floes . From Montiel, Squire & Bennets (Arxiv 2014)

+ Sice,scat (k) + Sice,dis (k) 1. Principles of phase- averaged wave models These models describe the sea state as a random superposition of waves, and tracks their energy in space and time which evolves due to various processes represented by “source terms” S... . This approach was followed in a simplified manner by Williams et al. (WIM module in an ice model). + Sice,scat (k) + Sice,dis (k) The novel aspect here is the incorporation of sea ice effects See e.g. Meylan & Masson (2006)

2. developments for SWARP Parameterizations: Implementation of ice scattering term from Williams et al. (2013) : based on 1D calculations of Kohout & Meylan + assuming isotropic scattering → requires a floe size distribution and ice thickness → new forcing parameters In WAVEWATCH III (thickness implemented for single grid. Dmax or Davg Needs to be added)