Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API December 12, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
Advertisements

Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CST DATA ANALYSIS STAR RESULTS Presented by Audrey Lee Director, Curriculum & Educational Technology 10 September.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Boyd Independent School District 2012 District Performance/AEIS Report.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
KCS Achievement Data. District-wide Achievement District Achievement  Achievement plots will be included for the following subjects  Algebra I  Algebra.
Parent Information Night Oklahoma’s A-F School Grading System.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
PRHS SAT REPORTS DISTRICT AYP REPORTS. WHAT IS THE SAT TEST? The SAT is a globally recognized college admissions exam. It tests your knowledge of reading,
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
Mohawk Jr-Sr High School PSSA/PVAAS Act 82 – New Teacher Evaluation Law Beginning in the school year, fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Data Overview Faculty Meeting-October 14,2014 Mission Possible: MOTIVATE, EDUCATE, GRADUATE!!!
Thank you for being willing to change the date of this meeting! Annabelle Low 7lbs 13oz.
2011 – 2012 ACE Remediation Bixby Public Schools.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Annual Report to the Public CENTERPOINT OCTOBER 10, 2016 SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Brassfield 5th & 6th Grade Center Bixby Public Schools
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
2013 – 2014 TEXAS ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE REPORT
Accountability Rating
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API September 13, 2010.
Academic Report 2007/2008 AYP.
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Burlington Public Schools
Michigan School Report Card Update
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report
Texas State Accountability
Laredo Independent School District Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) January 8, 2019.
A-F Accountability and Special Education
State and Federal Accountability Overview
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
PARCC Results Spring 2018 Administration
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Shelton School District SY 11-12
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API December 12, 2011

AYP Timeline 932 Math 914 Reading 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Math 932 1074 1216 1358 1500 Reading 914 1060 1206 1352

District API Subscores API Goal Math 1074 Reading 1060 OSTP (80%)* Reading and Math (Grade 3-8, English II EOI, Algebra I EOI) Math All = 1279 Reading All = 1259 Total All API = 1260 Reg Ed API = 1310 99.8% (math), 99.8% (reading) of All Students were tested district-wide School Completion (10%) Attendance Rate 2010-2011 Dropout Rate 2009-2010 Graduation Rate 2009-2010 School Completion API API 971 1492 1361 1275 Rate Target 94.4 92.0% 1.1% 1.0% 93.1 67.8% *Data Disaggregated by ethnicity and socioeconomic status

District API Subscores API Academic Excellence (Overall 10%) Total ACT (60%) Total Remediation (10%) Advanced Placement Credit (30%) 2011 1030 1037 1500 ACT Participation 2010 (67.6%) 939 ACT Composite 2010 (21.5) 1121 Math Remediation Rate 2008 (29.0%) 1061 English Remediation Rate 2008 (17.4%) 1012 Academic Excellence API 1172

Adequate Yearly Progress? District Why? Yes Subgroup IEP Math--Safe Harbor Subgroup Econ. Dis Math—Safe Harbor Is our district designated a School Improvement District? No These scores were designated as “Safe Harbor” which is A 10% decrease in % of students scoring below Satisfactory or A 10% increase in the difference between the previous year’s API score and the API upper limit of 1500 ELL Math, Reading IEP Math, Reading Black Math Hispanic Math, Reading Econ. Dis. Math, Reading

Bixby High School 2010 2011 Target English II 1228 1373 1060 EOI Test Results 2009-2010 2010-2011   % Satis/ Above English II 90 96 English II OMAAP 80 100 English III 83 HS Algebra I 82 87 HS Algebra I OMAAP 92 Algebra II 76 81 Geometry 95 Biology I 85 93 Biology I OMAAP U.S. History U.S. History OMAAP 41 Subscores 2010 2011 Target OSTP (80%) -ALL English II Algebra I 1228 1373 1060 1158 1241 1074 School Completion (10%) Dropout Rate Grad. Rate Attend. Rate API Rate Target 1492 1.1 1.0% 1361 93.1 67.8% 603 91.9 92.0% Academic Excellence (10%) ACT (Total) College Rem. AP Credit API 1030 1037 1500 Adequate Yearly Progress? No Econ. Disadvantaged and IEP in Math were below 1074. Safe Harbor: IEP Reading

Bixby Middle School 2010 2011 Target 1260 1297 1060 Reading (7,8) OCCT Test Results 2009-2010 2010-2011   % Satis/ Above Reading 7th/OMAAP 83/100 86/76 Reading 8th/OMAAP 89/89 93/100 Math 7th/OMAAP 86/94 87/74 Math 8th/OMAAP 90/95 90/79 Algebra I 100 7th Geography 94 95 8th History 92/na 8th Science/OMAAP 97/100 92/100 8th Writing 99 Subscores 2010 2011 Target OSTP (90%) -ALL Reading (7,8) Math (7,8) 1260 1297 1060 1330 1332 1074 School Completion (10%) Attend. Rate API Rate Target 1059 95.0 92.0% Academic Excellence (0%) Not applicable Adequate Yearly Progress? Yes Safe Harbor: IEP Reading

Bixby North 4/5/6 School 2010 2011 Target 1228 1256 1060 OCCT Test Results 2009-2010 2010-2011   % Satis/ Above Reading 4th/OMAAP 81/85 86/77 Reading 5th/OMAAP 86/86 78/71 Reading 6th/OMAAP 88/90 88/82 Math 4th/OMAAP 80/84 92/70 Math 5th/OMAAP 85/79 83/77 Math 6th/OMAAP 91/91 90/86 Science 5th/OMAAP 98/50 98/83 Social Studies 5th 95/na 92 Writing 5th 96 91 Subscores 2010 2011 Target OSTP (90%) -ALL Reading (4,5,6) Math (4,5,6) 1228 1256 1060 1218 1310 1074 School Completion (10%) Attend. Rate API Rate Target 1132 95.5 92.0% Academic Excellence (0%) Not applicable Adequate Yearly Progress? Yes Safe Harbor: IEP Math, Am Indian Reading, Hispanic Reading, Econ. Dis Reading

Brassfield 5/6 School 2010 2011 Target 1084 1169 1060 Reading (5,6) Subscores 2010 2011 Target OSTP (90%) -ALL Reading (5,6) Math (5,6) 1084 1169 1060 1096 1177 1074 School Completion (10%) Attend. Rate API Rate Target 1059 95.0 92.0% Academic Excellence (0%) Not applicable Adequate Yearly Progress? Yes OCCT Test Results 2009-2010 2010-2011   % Satis/ Above Reading 5th/OMAAP 72/77 80/71 Reading 6th/OMAAP 77/87 82/92 Math 5th/OMAAP 67/80 74/100 Math 6th/OMAAP 71/100 82/100 Science 5th/OMAAP 93/na 95/na Social Studies 5th 76 89 Writing 5th Safe Harbor: IEP Math and Reading, Am Indian Math and Reading, Econ Dis Math and Reading,

Central Elementary School Subscores 2010 2011 Target OSTP (90%) -ALL Reading (3,4) Math (3,4) 1175 1189 1060 1084 1274 1074 School Completion (10%) Attend. Rate API Rate Target 1118 95.4 92.0% Academic Excellence (0%) Not applicable Adequate Yearly Progress? Yes OCCT Test Results 2009-2010 2010-2011   % Satis/ Above Reading 3rd/OMAAP 80/75 82/82 Reading 4th/OMAAP 81/85 78/100 Math 3rd/OMAAP 72/71 84/78 Math 4th/OMAAP 80/84 88/88 Safe Harbor: IEP Math and Reading, Am. Indian Reading, Econ. Disadvantaged Reading

North Elementary School OCCT Test Results 2009-2010 2010-2011   % Satis/ Above Reading 3rd/OMAAP 84/86 86/88 Math 3rd/OMAAP 88/86 82/100 Subscores 2010 2011 Target OSTP (90%) -ALL Reading (3) Math (3) 1195 1216 1060 1283 1233 1074 School Completion (10%) Attend. Rate API Rate Target 1147 95.6 92.0% Academic Excellence (0%) API Not applicable Adequate Yearly Progress? Yes Safe Harbor: Econ. Disadvantaged Math and Reading, IEP Reading

Implications Target Professional Development to improve student achievement Reading (1206) and Math (1216) Targets; District goal is 90% in all subgroups Specific Subgroups such as Special Education, ELL, American Indian, Economically Disadvantaged Increased monitoring of number of students taking the test (95%) Continued emphasis on increasing number of students taking ACT (67.6% to goal of 70%) Increased emphasis on attendance (94.4% to a goal of 98%) Continue to take preventative action to reduce drop-outs (1.0% or less—current is 1.1%) Appropriately test special education students