New Knowledge, Innovations & Improvements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Magnet Recognition Program®
Advertisements

Definitions of EBP Popular in SW
MEDICAL HOME 1/2009 Mary Goldman, D.O., President of MAOFP.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Joan Pollner, RN, BSN, CHPN October 18, 2006.
A Regional Approach to Improvement Julie Branter Associate Director for Clinical Governance and Patient Safety 21 September 2010 South West Strategic Health.
NIPEC Organisational Guide to Practice & Quality Improvement Tanya McCance, Director of Nursing Research & Practice Development (UCHT) & Reader (UU) Brendan.
6 Key Priorities A “scorecard” for each of the 5 above priorities with end of 2009 deliverables – with a space beside each for a check mark (i.e. complete)
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.
Next Accreditation System (NAS) Primer Cuc Mai IM Residency Program Director Annual PD Workshop 2015.
California Department of Public Health California Department of Public Health Accreditation Readiness Team (ART) Orientation Office of Quality Performance.
Diane Trimble, MSN, RN-BC Saint Luke’s Health System.
Collaborative & Interpersonal Leadership
Fall Improvement Team, Veterans Health Unit
Models of Primary Care Primary Care – FAMED 530
Chapter 33 Introduction to the Nursing Process
Clinical Learning Environment Review GMEC January 8, 2013
Developing Safety Huddles to Meet Organizational Needs Brett Shipley MSN, RN Patient Safety Officer Ann Steffe MSN, RN, PCCN Director of Critical.
Mental Health Program; CVH and M Site
Kaiser Permanente National Nursing Research
Interprofessional Health care Teams
Quality Profiles Dr. Jennifer Martin,
The Essentia Institute of Rural Health (EIRH) is
ACT Comprehensive Assessment
Structural Empowerment
Chapter 5 Using Huddles.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Patient Centered Medical Home
Sandra L. Price, MS, RN, CAPA, Ambulatory Surgery Center
Overview of MAAP Accreditation
MUHC Innovation Model.
Exemplary Professional Practice
2017 Re-designation Site Visit Preparation
Review of Evidence-Based Practice and determining clinical questions to address This group of 17 slides provides a nice review of evidence-based.
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
2017 Re-designation Site Visit Preparation
EPAs as Curriculum Tools
PARTNERSHIPS WITH CLINICAL SETTINGS: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF NURSE EDUCATORS – Chapter 9 –
Compensation Committee 2017 Goals – Updated
An Overview of the Minnesota Afterschool Accreditation Program (MAAP)
Overview Daneen Calvin, Director
The Patient/Family Centered Medical Home
AMP 450v Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
AMP 450v Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Peg Bradke and Rebecca Steinfield
Caring for the Critically Ill Patient
Getting Started with Your Malnutrition Quality Improvement Project
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
Phase 4 Milestones.
Workforce Planning Framework
Community Step Up Program
Background to The Conference
Pharmacists Optimizing Cancer Care
Jordan’s Principle Summit Winnipeg, MB September 13, 2018
The 5th Annual Lorraine Tregde Patient Safety Leadership Conference “The Will to Pursue Excellence” June 14, 2012.
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Interprofessional learning and teaching in evidence-based practice
Developing Safety Huddles to Meet Organizational Needs Brett Shipley MSN, RN Patient Safety Officer Ann Steffe MSN, RN, PCCN Director of Critical.
The impact of small-group EBP education programme: barriers and facilitators for EBP allied health champions to share learning with peers.
Kimberly Bock Hanson, BSN, RN, CWON Gina Jansen, BSN, RN, CWOCN
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
Home visiting evaluation
Proposal Development Support & Planning
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
The Magnet Program from the Perspective of the Magnet Hospital
Reducing Falls in Ward 5D and increasing days between falls
Building Capacity for Quality Improvement A National Approach
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
By: Andi Indahwaty Sidin A Critical Review of The Role of Clinical Governance in Health Care and its Potential Application in Indonesia.
Presentation transcript:

New Knowledge, Innovations & Improvements 2017 Re-designation Site Visit Preparation

The Magnet Vision Magnet-recognized organizations will serve as the fount of knowledge and expertise for the delivery of nursing care globally. They will be solidly grounded in core Magnet principles, flexible, and constantly striving for discovery and innovation. They will lead the reformation of health care, the discipline of nursing, and care of the patient, family, and community. The Commission on Magnet Recognition, 2008

Anticipated Activities of the Site Visit (partial listing) Visit all inpatient units and ambulatory care areas (main campus and satellites) Document Review: personnel records—professional performance appraisals (looking for supervisor’s evaluation, self-evaluation, peer review professional goals) and patient records (looking for interdisciplinary plan of care and interdisciplinary teaching) Meetings: Clinical (staff) nurses—randomly selected for numerous breakfast, lunch & dinner meetings Department of Nursing committees—including Collaborative Governance Physicians, advanced practice nurses, other disciplines, case managers, support services Interdisciplinary hospital committees Patients, families, volunteers, & community representatives Organizational & Patient Care Services leadership MGH senior management & Board of Trustees Quality and Safety initiatives leadership Patient Care Services Executive Committee Nursing Directors/Managers & CNSs/NPSs Human Resources Education Research

Role of Magnet Champions Collaborative Governance Champions and identified staff at off-site locations Role: actively engage peers in on-going development of practice Discovery | Communication | Motivation With local nursing leadership, leads dialogue with peers about Magnet evidence and site visit preparation

Communication and Education Plan Weekly Focus Topics Magnet Monday e-mails – targeted info & resources Weekly forums for staff – Thursdays, O’Keeffe Auditorium, 1:30 - 2:30pm (videostreamed) Updates at meetings – Combined Leadership & Nurse Director Collaborative Governance committee meeting dialogues SAFER Fair display (Weds., Oct. 11, 12:00 – 2:00pm, Bulfinch Tent) Magnet Recognition® Journey/Joint Commission Resource Guide for all staff “Magnet Roadmap” poster for all units/areas PPM and PCDM graphics for display boards/staff areas Excellence Every Day Magnet portal www.mghpcs.org/PCS/Magnet/index.asp

Weekly Focus Topics WEEK OF TOPIC 5 MAGNET MODEL COMPONENTS Sept.18 General Survey Preparation and Magnet 101 Sept. 25 Transformational Leadership Oct. 2 Structural Empowerment Oct. 9 Exemplary Professional Practice Oct. 16 New Knowledge, Innovations and Improvements Oct. 30 Empirical Outcomes Nov. 6 Site Visit Begins !!!! 5 MAGNET MODEL COMPONENTS

Magnet Model Components Provides a framework to achieve excellence in practice

New Knowledge, Innovations & Improvements Innovate & Improve Characteristics As exemplary professionals, nurses are accountable for using and expanding nursing knowledge. Magnet nurses are pioneers of our future. Innovations in nursing care, care delivery and the practice environment are the hallmark of Magnet organizations. Create new designs, models of care evidence and standards.

New Knowledge, Innovations and Improvements Innovate and Improve Definitions at MGH Differentiate between: Research is a systematic investigation that is designed to generate new knowledge that can be generalized to broader applications. Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a method of decision making (practice recommendations) that are based on: a rigorous/systematic appraisal of current research, patient preferences and provider expertise/environmental situations Process/Quality Improvement (QI) is a process by which nurses and clinicians work to improve systems at the local level. The steps involve PCDA (Plan, Do, Check, Act). – The intent is to monitor performance and improve outcomes in an ongoing process Nursing Innovations in Care Delivery – "Innovation is the application of creativity or problem solving that results in a widely adopted strategy, product, or service that meets a need in a new and different way. Innovations are about improvement in quality, cost effectiveness, or efficiency.” Kaya et al., 2015

Infrastructure to Support Nursing and Collaborative Research New Knowledge, Innovations and Improvements Innovate and Improve Infrastructure to Support Nursing and Collaborative Research The Yvonne L. Munn Center for Nursing Research YLM Nursing Research Awards YLM Post-Doctoral Fellowship Doctoral Forum Collaborative Governance Research and Evidence-Based Practice Committee (REBP) The Clinical Nurse Specialist Research Task Force The Norman Knight Nursing Visiting Scholar Program Infrastructure to Support Innovation The Center for Innovation in Care Delivery IDEA (Innovation, Design, Excellence Award) grants Collaboration with Northeastern University

Example from our Magnet Evidence Development of a Transitional Care Model for Pediatric Patients with Critical Airway Conditions Across Institutions Purpose: To gain an understanding of the challenges occurring during transitions of care between two institutions for children with critical airway conditions To describe the family experience of caring for their child with a tracheostomy during the transition from hospital to home, and to identify types of support that families require to be successful caregivers. Methods: Qualitative Descriptive Focus groups: MGH and MEEI nurses, Family members Planned and facilitated by a nurse investigator Analysis: Applied basic content analysis methods with three-person consensus Coded text to capture meaning , compared cores to identify core categories and enable comparisons between MGH and MEEI nurses and among participants Validation through multiple techniques: debriefing, engagement with data, and consideration of field and reflective notes Linked results from core categories to inform conclusions

Example from our Magnet Evidence

Example from our Magnet Evidence

Example from our Magnet Evidence EBP Project: “Effectiveness of Silicone-Coated Foam Dressings On Prevention of Pressure Injuries: An Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Project” Focus on prevention of sacral pressure ulcers in critical care patients What more can we do, what does the evidence suggest? EBP Members (7): Blake 12 Multi-disciplinary ICU and Ellison 4 SICU (NDs, CNS, ARNs), and PCS Institute of Patient Care CNS/EBP Co-Lead PICO Question: “As compared to Mepilex foam dressings (C), are Allevyn Life foam dressings (I) as effective at preventing sacral PI (O) in critical care patients (P)” Each member assigned to review and appraise the evidence utilizing the Johns Hopkins Evidence Appraisal Tools Bullet 1: We are all aware that critically ill patients are at the greatest risk for developing pressure ulcers due to hemodynamic instability, organ failure, the use of vasopressors which leads to poor perfusion, malnutrition, immobility, and medical devices. Despite our standards of practice in the prevention of HAPI with the utilizing of low air loss mattress, frequent turning and repositioning, incontinence management, and nutritional interventions, our patients were still at risk for developing sacral pressure ulcers. What else can we do? Since 2012, the use of prophylactic silicone foam dressings has been used in the prevention of sacral pressure ulcers. At the time, the product that was in house was Mepilex foam dressings, and there was one made specifically for the sacral area (shaped like a heart). We were also presented with the opportunity to trial another product called Allevyn Life that had a dressing for the sacral area that appeared to have more cushion, was more durable, and provided more moisture wicking. Our EBP team wanted to evaluate the evidence related to the effectiveness of the use of prophylactic silicone foam dressings in preventing sacral pressure ulcers to determine if the use of these dressings would warrant an immediate translation into practice, or if there was a need for original research Bullet 2: Our team met every other week in the beginning, then monthly Bullet 3 & 4: We developed a PICO question and initiated a search of the databases through the Treadwell library for articles related to our PICO question . Our search returned 31 citations; each member was assigned to review and appraise the evidence utilizing the Johns Hopkins Evidence Appraisal Tools

Example from our Magnet Evidence After a review of the evidence, (4) articles were selected for inclusion: (2) Level I (high quality) (2) Level II Implications for Practice Evidence supports the use of prophylactic silicone foam dressings Need for further research for clinical application Translation into Practice at MGH Transition to Allevyn Life dressing in December 2016 Updated MGH Skin Care Guidelines MGH Nursing Research Day - May 2017 Cost savings Bullet 1: Level I articles demonstrated a lower incidence of sacral pressure ulcers with the use of prophylactic Mepilex foam dressing compared to no dressing. Level II demonstrated lower incidence of sacral pressure ulcers when patients treated with Allevyn Life or Mepilex foam silicone dressings vs standard treatment without dressings Bullet 2: Evidence was limited but the evidence that we did find, supported the use of prophylactic silicone foam dressings, both Mepilex and Allevyn Life, to prevent sacral pressure injuries. Further research is warranted to provide more evidence for clinical application Bullet 3: The Allevyn Life sacral dressing was trialed in the Blake 12 ICU and Ellison 4 ICU and was highly recognized for its added cushion, durability, and absorbancy, we transitioned over to Allevyn Life dressings in December 2016. Submitted our abstract and it was accepted, we did a poster presentation for MGH Nursing Research Day. The MGH Skin Care Guidelines was updated to include change from “prophylactic foam dressing” to Allevyn Life foam dressing. The Allevyn Life dressings were also at a lower cost and provided nearly a $1500 cost savings as compared with the Mepilex dressings within one month. Data:  ”safety reports for Skin / Wound for Blake 12, March 1, 2016 through March 29, 2017. Of 45 safety reports, only three patients developed pressure injuries (PI) on the sacrum/coccyx  during their stay in the Blake 12 ICU. Two of these PIs occurred during the timeframe when Mepilex dressings were in use (March, 2016); one occurred after the transition to Allevyn Life foam dressings (December, 2016)” – Ginger Current data to present?

Example from Magnet Evidence Assessing the impact of the MICU CLABSI flip board on staff’s engagement with the CLABSI prevention process via qualitative analysis Bathroom Safety Harness to prevent patient falls eCare Residency Program In 2016, Mass General “went live” with an entirely new operating system—electronic medical record: Epic. This high-reliability, high-stakes venture required the uninterrupted and safest possible delivery of care before, during and after. Preparing the 7,000-plus members of the Nursing and Patient Care Services staff for this major shift in operations and practice was a massive undertaking. From the first second of “Epic Live,” the staff had to be fully functioning within the new system. Mass General PCS took a different approach than most organizations that had made this transition. In July 2015, the hospital began hiring new graduate nurses for a six month residency program. Hiring more than 300 graduate nurses enabled all staff to have dedicated time to participate in extensive Epic training programs. Hiring resident nurses meant there was no need to hire external nurses from other agencies for the go-live, thereby ensuring the quality and consistency of care, patient safety and staff resilience during a period of great change. All of the hospital’s nurses were successfully MGH and Epic trained.

MGH Professional Practice Model (PPM)

Patient Care Delivery Model (PCDM) Key Components Relationship-based care Domains of practice IOM’s six aims of quality improvement Empirical outcomes

New Knowledge, Innovations & Improvements Innovate and Improve Mock questions…

It’s all about showcasing your practice… You’ve got this! For info & resources visit the EED Magnet Portal http://www.mghpcs.org/PCS/Magnet/index.asp