WT CALL – 11/10/2017 2017-10-11.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Service Design & Onboarding
Advertisements

Contributors: Vimal Begwani (AT&T) Dean Bragg (AT&T) Lingi Deng (CMCC)
ONAP E2E Flow `.
ONAP Management Requirements
Orchestration and Controller Architecture Alignment Vimal Begwani AT&T
Rationalizing ONAP Architecture for R2 and Beyond Vimal Begwani – AT&T
ONAP layering/MEF alignment
Data Collection Framework
ONAP Architecture Meeting 8/8
Enterprise vCPE September 27, 2017.
Orchestration and Controller Alignment for ONAP Release 1
ONAP Architecture Slides Current Plan of Record
ONAP Multi-VIM/Cloud Long Term Architecture and Use Cases (Under Community Discussion across Use Case, Optimization Framework, OOM,
5G Network Deployment, Slicing, Network Optimization and Automation Framework – Use Case Deep Dive 5G Use Case Team.
Aligning Orchestration and Controller Per Merger Agreement Vimal Begwani – AT&T Jamil Chawki – Orange Alla Goldner -- Amdocs.
WT CALL – 04/10/
Aligning Orchestration and Controller Per Merger Agreement Vimal Begwani – AT&T Jamil Chawki – Orange Alla Goldner -- Amdocs.
Rationalizing ONAP Architecture for R2 and Beyond
Interface to External Controllers and SD-WAN Use Case
ONAP Interface to External Controllers
ARC: Definitions and requirements for SO/APP-C/VF-C discussion Chris Donley Date , 2017.
ONAP Architecture Meeting 8/8
ARC 5: Deployment Options Chris Donley
5G Network Deployment, Slicing, Network Optimization and Automation Framework – Use Case Deep Dive 5G Use Case Team.
MEF LSO Legato SDK 24 October 2017 Andy Mayer, Ph.D. Tara Cummings.
Target ONAP End-to-End Architecture Vimal Begwani – AT&T Parviz Yegani – Futurewei Technologies Jamil Chawki – Orange.
ONAP Integration to External Domain Management Systems (DMS)
Enterprise vCPE use case requirement
ONAP Run-time Catalog Project
Target ONAP End-to-End Architecture Tiger Team Presentation Parviz Yegani – Futurewei Technologies Contributors: Vimal Begwani (AT&T), Jamil Chawki.
ONAP Reference Architecture for R2 and Beyond Tiger Team Presentation Parviz Yegani – Futurewei Technologies Contributors: Vimal Begwani (AT&T), Jamil.
ONAP Amsterdam Architecture
PNF and Mixed Infrastructure Support for EtE Network Slicing --Cloud Infrastructure Controller Vivien Yang.
Key Gaps/Enhancements in ONAP R2 to make ONAP carrier-grade
Enterprise vCPE use case requirement
Enhanced Platform Awareness (EPA) Alex Vul Intel Corporation
VF-C R2 Feature Planning & Implementation Yan Yang
Agenda Where we are (Amsterdam Architecture)
ONAP APIs Andrew Mayer, AT&T
Open Source Access Manager™ ONAP Proposal
ONAP Amsterdam Architecture
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case (Network Deployment, Slicing, Network Optimization and Automation Framework) 5G Use Case Team.
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case Architecture Review 5G Use Case Team June 26, 2018.
Documenting ONAP components (functional)
Key Gaps/Enhancements in ONAP R2 to make ONAP carrier-grade
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case Summary of Planned Enhancement Areas 5G Use Case Team May 16, 2018.
Multi-VIM/Cloud High Level Architecture
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case (Network Deployment, Slicing, Network Optimization and Automation Framework) 5G Use Case Team.
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case Summary of Planned Enhancement Areas 5G Use Case Team June 14, 2018.
FUNCTIONAL Architecture for R2+
ONAP Beijing Architecture Chris Donley 1/9/18
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case (Network Deployment, Slicing, Network Optimization and Automation Framework) 5G Use Case Team.
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case (Network Deployment, Slicing, Network Optimization and Automation Framework) 5G Use Case Team.
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case Summary of Planned Enhancement Areas (TSC Review) 5G Use Case Team May 10, 2018.
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case (Network Deployment, Slicing, Network Optimization and Automation Framework) 5G Use Case Team.
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case (Network Deployment, Slicing, Network Optimization and Automation Framework) 5G Use Case Team.
ONAP 5G USE CASE ENHANCEMENTS FOR PNF DEPLOYMENTS
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case (Network Deployment, Slicing, Network Optimization and Automation Framework) 5G Use Case Team.
Candidate for ONAP Dublin Implementation 5G RAN E2E Slice Design, Deploy and Manage 5G Use Case Team.
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case Summary of Planned Enhancement Areas (TSC Review) 5G Use Case Team May 10, 2018.
Network Slicing (and related) Features in 3GPP
ONAP 5G USE CASE ENHANCEMENTS
ONAP Network Slice Model
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case Summary of Planned Enhancement Areas (TSC Review) 5G Use Case Team May 10, 2018.
GNFC Architecture and Interfaces
ONAP Optimization Framework (OOF) POC for Physical CellID (PCI) Optimization July 30, 2018.
ONAP Architecture Principle Review
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case Summary of Planned Enhancement Areas 5G Use Case Team May 10, 2018.
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case Summary of Planned Enhancement Areas 5G Use Case Team May 10, 2018.
Title: Robust ONAP Platform Controller for LCM in a Distributed Edge Environment (In Progress) Source: ONAP Architecture Task Force on Edge Automation.
Presentation transcript:

WT CALL – 11/10/2017 2017-10-11

AGENDA Administrative and organizational ONAP - document PoC 4.1 PoC 5

ADMINISTRATIVE AND ORGANIZATIONAL Administrative : status of collaborators: There is a template to be filled. There is reference person in ONF: David Boswell david@opennetworking.org OTCC bi-weekly call done on 9/10: ODTN project (see next slide) OIF demo (see next slide) We have announced on our side the inital discussion for a PoC 5 Video on ONF web and YouTube channel: update requested.

FROM OTCC CALL (1)

FROM OTCC CALL (2)

FACE TO FACE INTERIM MEETING

PoC 4.1 Scope of the PoC: retrieve of the inventory through AAI interface (ONAP architecture) from ODL SDN Controller. On southband the Equipment model and inventory model is requested from equipment vendors. Round-table about possible participation of the vendors attending the call: Ceragon: no official position yet (11/10 to be checked) NEC: under evaluation remote connection participation. Nokia: need to check Ericsson: We would prefer to concentrate on further enhancements in definitions and implementations and propose to show the planned content of PoC 4.1 within PoC 5. ZTE: possibility to participate from remote labs SIAE: no official position yet (11/10 to be checked) Note that the participation can be also remote, connecting equipment to the SDN CTRL located in DTAG (used for the 4th PoC). IP tunnel will be needed to connect. ONAP: ongoing the ONAP meeting in Paris: see the following slides: https://rs.opennetworking.org/wiki/download/attachments/265093121/5G%20RAN%20Slicing%20and%20Optimization%20Framework%20v5.pptx?api=v2

PoC 4.1

PoC 4.1

SUM-UP Reference interface Interface extensions requested Extensions in other components Extensions in SDN WT controller equipment and inventory AAI Not on southbound (equipment model to be implemented) no Adapter between ONF equipment model and AAI alarms DCAE Adapter between ONF model and DCAE upload of configuration ?? configuration statistics

PoC 5 It has been proposed to start thinking the next step (PoC 5) Possible content: ETH PHY model implementation Equipment model Core Model 1.3 Synchronization Integration with ONAP Based on ODL (is there any ONOS possible path ?) we need to track the content and the possible date for the PoC 5

THANK YOU

5G Network Deployment, Slicing, Network Optimization and Automation Framework – Use Case Deep Dive 5G Use Case Team

Contributors: Supporting Companies Contributing Members Alla Goldner Kaniz Mahdi Erik Westerberg Trung Nguyen Tim Strickland Oskar Malm Karpura Suryadevara Paul Bullock Peter Loborg Vimal Begwani Denis Fluet Vivien Yang Shekar Sundaramurthy Todd Morris Ranjit Cavatur Tom Tofigh Alex Dodin Rajesh Gadiyar Gil Bullard Rodney Wilson Eng Wei Koo Sarat Puthenpura Raghu Ranganathan Dmitriy Andrushko Cagatay Buyukkoc Stephen Terrill George Lapiotis Slawek Stawiarski John Quilty Vladimir Yanover

Business Drivers: 5G and network slicing are emerging technologies that are complex and distributed Multiple service providers are getting ready to deploy This will help 5G technology vendors to understand ONAP requirements and deliver PNF / VNF capabilities that can be managed using ONAP This use case is expected to: Enhance ONAP platform capabilities for supporting hybrid network consisting of PNFs & VNFs in a multi-domain (RAN vs WAN vs EPC) scenario demonstrate use of ONAP platform to realize following: A planned list of 5G Nodes are on-boarded into ONAP, and ONAP configures the Nodes to the level they are ready to handle traffic. ONAP begins to actively monitor and manage the nodes CRUD operations on RAN-only slice(s) and RAN-to-EPC slice(s) Optimizations of 5G & E2E Slice, Slice Segment, etc.

Design, Deploy and Manage Network Slices Supporting Multiple Services Scope of Use Case A Onboard, Deploy & Manage Disaggregated 5G Radio Access Network Elements B Design, Deploy and Manage Network Slices Supporting Multiple Services C Enhance ONAP Platform to Create an Open Environment for Optimization of Network / Services / Slices using µServices from Multiple Sources

A: 5G Radio Access Network Requirement Statement The use case describes a Service Provider (SP) need to deploy a disaggregated 5G Radio Access Network (3GPP 5G Option 2-2 configuration).  Some of the disaggregated network functions are expected to be virtualized (VNF), running on a cloud infrastructure and while others will be PNF (e.g. appliance based peripherals) The network elements in scope for such a disaggregated 5G RAN (in this release) are: Distributed Radio Element Distributed BBU Virtualized Centralized BBU and nrt-L2 function (CU-UP) Virtualized Centralized Radio Control Unit (CU-CP) This disaggregation can include moving processing closer to the edge, and require deployment of Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) components and applications in order to meet 5G performance goals An Illustrative Example of Disaggregated Radio Access Network Virtualized Radio Control Function (CU-UP) Distributed Radio Unit (UP + CP) Distributed BBU-DU, L1+L2rt Function (UP+CP) Virtualized BBU-CU & UP L2nrt Components

A: 5G Radio Access Network Deployment ONAP Design Platform Requirements: 1 Service Design Onboard SW packages, descriptors and any other artefacts provided by the RAN vendor Design RAN-level templates, recipes and workflows covering common network elements, transport network, data collection and analytics, policies and corrective actions Design node-level templates, recipes and workflows covering network elements (PNFs and VNFs), transport network, placement or QoS constraints, data collection and analytics, policies and corrective actions 2 Verify Design Verify templates and recipes from step 1, using dedicated test environment or limited trial following steps below. If necessary, make adjustments accordingly to step 1 3 Deploy Shared Services Distribute the completed design as well as vendor-provided artefacts to the various run-time components

A: 5G Radio Access Network Deployment – Continued ONAP Execution Platform Requirements: 4 Instantiate 5G Radio Access Network On receiving service instantiation request via Portal or external API, SO will decompose the request, and allocate and connect the various resources A sub-flow includes the onboarding process for related PNFs In this step node-specific data from planning is also inserted Application Controller will Configure RAN VNF / PNF in scope Update Inventory and VNF / PNF State in AAI DCAE will start fault, performance, and log data collection as described during design time DCAE will perform data analytics as configured in recipes, to monitor the environment and detect anomalous conditions. Output from analytics is forwarded to Policy and dashboard 5 Verify Operation Verify that service is provided and can be monitored through dashboard using basic observability data and calculated KPIs 6 React to Incident Corrective/remedial action for network impairments or for violations of service levels as described by defined policies are initiated using the SO and/or controllers For verification purposes this may require fault injection Verify that policy definitions and their corrective actions have intended effect

B: Slice & Service Definition, Deployment, and Management Requirement Statement Each Service Provider (SP) needs to support a rich set of advanced 5G wireless services, such as enhanced Mobile Broad Band (eMBB), massive Internet of Things (mIoT), and Ultra-Reliable, Low-latency Communications (URLLC ), for mission critical communications These services have very different requirements on latency, reliability, availability, mobility, and bandwidth Deploying multiple separate networks to support these varying requirements is not practical End to End network slicing as defined by 3GPP provides specifications for efficient creation of multiple logical networks sharing a common network infrastructure while meeting the specified service levels for each of the services ONAP must support the complete lifecycle management of such network slicing Automated configuration of a slice during the instantiation, configuration, and activation phases, a newly created set of identifying parameters collection is automatically configured Automated reconfiguration happens during run-time e.g. an active slice can be reconfigured automatically because of a change in the service requirements or service conditions

B: Terminology and Abbreviations Definition Network Slice A logical network that provides specific network capabilities and network characteristics Network Slice Instance (NSI) A set of Network Function instances and the required resources (e.g. compute, storage and networking resources) which form a deployed Network Slice NSI contains Core Network part and Access Network part NSSI Network Slice Subnet Instance NST Network Slice Template NSST Network Slice Subnet Template NSMF Network Slice Management Function NSSAI Network Slice Selection Assistance Information PNF Physical Network Function DP Data Plane OOB Out of Band

B: Slicing – Network Architecture Communication Services Service 1 Service 2 Service 3 NSI A NSI B NSI C Core Network NSSI - Best Effort NSSI - Normal NSSI - Premium Access Network NSSI - HB NSSI - Normal Intel Confidential

B: Network Slice Support Key Assumptions & Observations In order to enable both an e2e service view and re-usable services from the different segments/domains in the network, the design must be done in such a way as to support: Abstraction of the services offered by the different domains/segments Ability to tie the services offered by the different domains/segments into an e2e service Support the network to provide isolation of physical resources and between the slices (to the extent that is reasonable according to the networks capabilities) In order simplify the use case, a network plan containing only a few participating network elements will be used

B: Slice Definition and Design: ONAP Design Platform Requirements The ONAP Service Designer define TOSCA templates for the reusable tasks, examples could be: Create a VLAN to be used for control and user data within an NSI Per CN node type: Create template connect to the proper VLAN Per RAN resource to be shared (e.g. the EUtranCell): Reconfigure to use yet another PLMN and a specific VLAN for that PLMN Create a CN NSSI using provided VLAN tags and PLMNI-ID value with a specified “capacity” (the “capacity” value to be used to select number of CN nodes to spin up). This also includes filtering or aggregation rules for DCAE to produce NSSI related FM/PM/Event data. Create a RAN NSSI template using provided VLAN tags and PLMN-ID covering a specified set of cells. This also includes filtering or aggregation rules for DCAE to produce NSSI related FM/PM/Event data. Create a Service model for NSI used to instantiate, modify, and remove. This also includes filtering or aggregation rules for DCAE to produce NSI related FM/PM/Event data, aggregating that data into KPI values for SLA evaluation.

B: Slice Instantiation & Monitoring ONAP Execution Platform Requirements Service Operator Initiates Creation of one or more Needed Slice Segments (NSSI) in Radio Access Network Orchestrator executes Slice Segment Creation / Modification recipe Pass configuration specifications, as per abstraction standards, to RAN controller for radio slice segment created Service Operator Initiates Creation of one or more Needed Slice Segments (NSSI) in Core Network Pass configuration specifications, as per abstraction standards, to App-C controller for EPC Slice Segment Creation Service Operator Initiates Creation of E2E Slice Segment Establish net VLAN connectivity Pass QoS, bandwidth, resiliency requirements for transport network to SDN-Controller Start data collection and SLA / SLO monitoring with right DCAE(s) Monitor Needed KPI / Counter to Monitor Each Slice Segment and Compute Needed SLA / SLO Values Take Needed Corrective Action when SLA / SLOs are violated by any Slice Segment Compute and Validate SLA / SLO for active E2E slices and Services

C: Optimization Framework Need Requirement Statement Service Provider (SP) must, in real-time, optimize the performance of the 5G Radio Access Network (RAN) This optimization may be effected via dynamic configuration of relevant 5G radio and backhaul network parameters Such optimization is part of the so-called “Self-Organized Networking” or SON ONAP will enable the design and implementation of an open SON ecosystem for 5G RAN optimization by providing a common open framework Enables multiple identity (Vendor, Open Source, SPs, etc.) to design & implement their SON solutions using Open ONAP Platform ONAP must provide facilities for managing and coordinating the concurrent application of multiple independently developed and deployed these algorithms, identifying, avoiding or resolving conflicts that might arise Conflict Resolution Must be Done at Design as well as Execution Time (Not all conflicts can be identified and resolved during design time)

C: RAN Network & Slice Optimization: ONAP Design Platform Requirements The ONAP Design Studio (SDC) must support the following Capabilities: Design per slice segment Data Collection, Analytics, SLA / SLO calculations Design E2E Slice & Services Analytics and SLA / SLO calculation Define policies / anomalies that indicate sub-optimal slice segment / E2E slice, and service performance Define policy evaluation to identify best possible slice / slice segment and service optimization action(s) Create recipes for addressing slice / slice segment performance degradation Design data collection and analytics for various network optimization functions Define policies / anomalies that indicate sub-optimal network performance Define policy evaluation to identify the best possible optimization action(s) Define SON coordination policies for the prevention, detection and resolution of conflicts or negative interactions of individual SON functions Create recipes for executing network optimization steps (e.g. new configurations for RAN elements)

C: RAN Network & Slice Optimization: ONAP Execution Platform Requirements ONAP execution framework should provide all needed support to the optimization micro-services developed by multiple organizations: Access to the network performance data via certain DCAE instances Access to historical data when needed Access to the analytics needed for SON operations e.g. for computation of the KPIs and KQIs that are targeted in the optimization and/or involved in optimization conditions (restrictions). The micro services (MSs) implementing such analytics can be directly called or set to generate an event if/when certain condition is met Access to the configuration management (controllers) in the network domains where the SON actions are executed Access to the policies, defined by the operator, that influence (e.g. restrict) execution of SON actions

Functional Platform Requirements ONAP Platform Impact: Functional Platform Requirements SDC AAI SO SDN-C APP-C Portal DCAE Policy OOF Support for PNF - Onboarding Support for PNF - Configuration & Control Support for PNF - Data Collection & Monitoring Slice Management - Definition Slice Management - Composition Slice Management - Orchestration & Control Slice Management - Data Collection & Monitoring Optimization - Onboarding Optimization - Configuration & Control Optimization - Data Collection & Monitoring Optimization - Conflict Resolution  OOF - Multi-cloud    OOF - Optimization  New / Enhancement Applicable to Slicing Subcase Only

ONAP R2+ Architecture – Current Draft View OSS BSS ONAP Portal – Design Studio & Dashboard Support run time conflict detection & resolution Design-time (SDC) Run-time ONAP Operations Management (OOM) External Data Movement & APIs Resource Onboarding Orchestration (SO) Inventory/Topology (AAI) Data & Analytics (DCAE) Policy Enhance SDC to support PNF onboarding, PNF management design, slice / slice segment modeling and management. Network Optimization design and conflict detection / resolution VNF/PNF SDK Service Level Orchestration Active / Available DCAE Analytic µServices Service & Product Design Policy Execution Engine Entitlements CDAP Holmes … Policy Creation & Validation Resource Level Orchestration Resource / Service Topology Data Distribution ESR Data Collection Layer Analytic Application Design Common Services Enhance SO to support PNF, slice segment and slice instantiation and life cycle management DMaaP AAF Logging Micro Services Bus Expand DCAE to monitor PNF, Slice Segment, E2E slices and services monitoring. Open Platform for hosting optimization micro services Catalog Enhance AAI to support PNF, slice segment and slice inventory and topology Multi-VIM Interface Open Stack AWS Azure MEC Infrastructure Adaption Layer Adaption Layer Service Logic Interpreter Config Database Yang Netconf CLI Life Cycle Mgmt Func L0-3 Network Controller (SDN-C) 3rd Party Network controller L4-7 Controller (App-C) Testing & Certification Vendor VNFM Adaption Layer (VF-C) Products Resources Eng. Rules Services Policies Analytics Config Database Service Logic Interpreter Life Cycle Mgmt funcs Life Cycle Mgmt funcs Standard Adaption Layer Vendor OA&M Adaptor Vendor A Vendor B Chef Netconf Ansible Recipe / Engineering Rules & Policy Distribution VIM to support interfaces to Mobile Edge Cloud (MEC) App-C & SDN-C to support RAN elements, Slice Segments, E2E slices and services configuration sVNFM sVNFM sVNFM Expand scope of SDK to include PNFs … VNF1 VNF2 VNF3 PNF 1 VNFn Infrastructure OpenStack VMware RackSpace Azure Peripherals

Thank You!

BACKUP SLIDES

New Challenges in 5G Use Case Support a hybrid network consisting of PNF & VNF across RAN, WAN and EPC Support Design, Deploy, Monitor and Management of Network Slice(s) Design studio (SDC) enhancement Component models: e.g., RAN VNFs, Core VNFs, PNFs, etc. E2E model(s): e.g. service chain (tosca) topology, policy model(s) AAI enhancements to capture topology & inventory  SO / App-C / DCAE / Policy enhancements to support for PNF and slice lifecycle management, slice deployment and management DCAE / Policy enhancements to support open framework for near-real time network optimization, conflict resolution during design time as well as run time across multiple microservices OOF enhancements to support multi-cloud and 5G network optimizations