Extended Scene Shack-Hartmann

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMSC 2006 Orlando Active Alignment System for the LSST William J. Gressler LSST Project National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) Scott Sandwith New.
Advertisements

Kevin Kelly Mentor: Peter Revesz.  Importance of Project: Beam stability is crucial in CHESS, down to micron-level precision  The beam position is measured.
Kawada Industries Inc. has introduced the HRP-2P for Robodex 2002
1 Estimate on SOT light level in flight with throughput measurements in SOT sun tests T. Shimizu 1, T. Tarbell 2, Y. Suematsu 3, M. Kubo 1, K. Ichimoto.
DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan Co-phasing JWST during commissioning using Dispersed Hartmann Sensing or Dispersed.
Géraldine Guerri Post-doc CSL
Vision and Revision Wavefront Sensing from the Image Domain Benjamin
Currently: 3 year ( ) NSF-supported UF/IAP collaborative project "Methods and Instruments for High-Precision Characterization of LIGO Optical Components"
Adaptive Optics for Wavefront Correction of High Average Power Lasers Justin Mansell, Supriyo Sinha, Todd Rutherford, Eric Gustafson, Martin Fejer and.
EBSD – Fundamentals Phosphor Pole piece Phosphor Screen Camera EBSP
Optical Alignment with Computer Generated Holograms
High-Order Deformable Mirror
SDW20051 Vincent Lapeyrère LESIA – Observatoire de Paris Calibration of flight model CCDs for CoRoT mission.
Image Exposure. Exposure Exposure = Intensity of Light (X) Time Intensity = is controlled by the aperture (f/stop) Time = is controlled by the shutter.
LGS wavefront sensor : Type and number of sub-apertures NGAO Team Meeting #4 V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories 01/22/2007.
PALM-3000 High-order Wavefront Sensor Update Christoph Baranec Team Meeting #9 10/22/2008.
Thermally Deformable Mirrors: a new Adaptive Optics scheme for Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers Marie Kasprzack Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
High index glass spherical targets for laser interferometry Miroslav Sulc 1st PACMAN worshop 1.
Figuring large off-axis segments to the diffraction limit Hubert Martin Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
CCD testing Enver Alagoz 12 April CCD testing goals CCD testing is to learn how to – do dark noise characterization – do gain measurements – determine.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Subsystem Optical Designs R.A.Buchroeder.
LSC meeting, HLO, August 18, 2004 IAP/UF/LIGO Research Collaboration: Status and Prospectives Efim Khazanov, Ilya Kozhevatov, Anatoly Malshakov, Oleg Palashov,
Laboratory prototype for the demonstration of sodium laser guide star wavefront sensing on the E-ELT Sexten Primary School July 2015 THE OUTCOME.
19 February 2009 Cophasing sensor for synthetic aperture optics applications First steps of the development of a cophasing sensor for synthetic aperture.
Exoplanet Exploration Program Starshade and Coronagraph Technology Gaps and Paths to Close Them Peter Lawson and Nick Siegler Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
Position sensing in Adaptive Optics Christopher Saunter Durham University Centre for Advanced Instrumentation Durham Smart Imaging.
October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 1 MEIDEX – Crew Tutorial Calibration of IMC-201 Adam D. Devir, MEIDEX Payload Manager.
Lyot Stop Focal Plane Mask OAP3 Out of plane spherical mirror.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
1 1 st Light AO 4 LBT Pyramid WFS Adaptive Secondary MMT Unit.
Optics Observations Pinholes, apertures and diffraction
CDE CDR, September 14, 2004 Your Position, Your Name 1 GATS AIM Science Team Meeting January 23-24, 2007 CIPS Calibration Review, Aimee Merkel, Bill McClintock.
The Active Optics System S. Thomas and the AO team.
MAXIM Periscope ISAL Study Highlights ISAL Study beginning 14 April 2003.
Image Quality –Which Metric Should I Choose? Jed Hancock Optical Sciences 521.
Lawrence Livermore CfAO Video Conference - March 29, 2001 Emily Carr Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of California, Davis.
Hartmann Sensor for advanced gravitational wave interferometers
Aidan Brooks, Peter Veitch, Jesper Munch
Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Optics for AO
Fundamentals of adaptive optics and wavefront reconstruction Marcos van Dam Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National.
Charts for TPF-C workshop SNR for Nulling Coronagraph and Post Coron WFS M. Shao 9/28/06.
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Hartmann Wavefront Sensing for the Gingin Experiment Aidan Brooks, Peter Veitch, Jesper Munch Department of Physics, University of Adelaide LSC, LLO Mar.
Date of download: 6/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Potential imaging modes. (a) Each detector in a focal plane array measures the.
Page 1 Lecture 13: Basic Concepts of Wavefront Reconstruction Astro 289 Claire Max February 25, 2016 Based on slides by Marcos van Dam and Lisa Poyneer.
University of Rochester, Center for Visual Science The Use of a MEMS Mirror for Adaptive Optics in the Human Eye Nathan Doble 1, Geun-Young Yoon 1, Li.
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. Performance of a 100 kW th Concentrated Solar Beam-Down Optical Experiment J. Sol. Energy.
Single Object Spectroscopy and Time Series Observations with NIRSpec
VERTICAL SCANNING INTERFEROMETRY VSI
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Design and Manufacture of a Large Aperture Wavefront Sensor (LAWS)
Agenda ComCam planning and scheduling (James & Jacques) CCS & CCS-TCS Interface (Tony) Software to use ComCam Software to get data out of ComCam (Mike)
Design of the NFIRAOS PWFS module
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
Weak-Beam Dark-Field Microscopy
Mitigating CTE losses: Charge Injection and Pre/Post Flash
Picture Analysis Answer the questions on each slide about that particular picture shown.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Adaptive optics Now: Soon: High angular resolution
Visuomotor Tracking Abilities of Adults who Stutter, Adults with Parkinson’s disease and Normally Fluent Healthy Adults Victoria Tumanova Department of.
Image Stabilization System (ISS)
Team 70: Air Guitar Gloves
LightGage™ Frequency Scanning Technology
Lecture 2 Photographs and digital mages
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
500 nm WRITE VOLTAGE 0 V.
Optics Alan Title, HMI-LMSAL Lead,
1) If 3(x + 2) - 2(x + 1) = 8, the value of x is
Calibration Plan Chris Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory April 20, 2010.
NGAO Trade Study GLAO for non-NGAO instruments
Presentation transcript:

Extended Scene Shack-Hartmann A Wavefront sensing and control testbed was built to develop wavefront sensing and control technique for active optics Phase Retrieval Camera (PRC) Shack-Hartman Camera (SHC) CCD camera 10k+ subapertures Slower update rate ~12sec Source module provides a point source and extended scene source for the testbed Point source: narrow band or broadband Extended scene: broadband, 5 scenes Shack-Hartmann sensor Centroid based WFS for point source Image correlation based WFS for extended scene targets Using one subaperture image as reference image for correlation

Simplified Testbed Description Optical Bench DM Accelerometers Thermal sensors Calib. Mirr. BS1 BS2 FSM Source BS DFS Source Module PRC SHC

SHC Sub-aperture Images PRC Image (Full Aperture High Res Image Extended Scene #4 SHC Sub-aperture Images PRC Image (Full Aperture High Res Image Scene #4: USAF 1951, coarse pattern, 100% contrast, negative, Groups -1 through -2 Negative of like this

ESHC Sensing Accuracy and Robustness Using a poked DM actuator to test ESHC sensing accuracy. Plot shows the result from an actuator poking with voltages between -1 and +1 volt Net DM poke WFE (difference between poked and flat) ESHC measures the subaperture WF slops which then convert to OPDs. (see PRC DM setup slide) OPD area is cropped around the actuator poke for more meaning full RMS and P-V calculations For ESHC robustness testing the extended scene target intensity is varied from 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% to the full well exposure. RMS WFE scattering is less than 0.6 nm DM Zygo calibration measures the gain of actuator WFE ~13.6 nm/V – matching ESHC’s measurement ESHC WFE Gain = 14 nm/V

ESHC Sensitivity Map #1 Map #2 Map #3 Map #4 Map #5 Map #6 Using a small poked DM actuators to test ESHC sensitivity 6 DM poke maps with different poke values as well as both positive and negative DM pokes – see DM actuator map and tables blow for poke actuator location and poke values The results shown is from extended scene target #4 The results show that ESHC can sense WFE as small as 1.4 nm P-V DM Poke Map #1 & #2: Act #51: DPoke = ±0.05 V = ± 7.0 nm (P-V) Act #27: DPoke = ± 0.02 V = ± 2.8 nm (P-V) Act #47: DPoke = ± 0.01 V = ± 1.4 nm (P-V) Act #71: DPoke = ± 0.005 V = ± 0.7 nm (P-V) DM Poke Map #3 & #4: Act #51: DPoke = ± 0.1 V = ± 14 nm (P-V) Act #27: DPoke = ± 0.04 V = ± 5.6 nm (P-V) Act #47: DPoke = ± 0.02 V = ± 2.8 nm (P-V) Act #71: DPoke = ± 0.01 V = ± 1.4 nm (P-V) DM Poke Map #5 & #6: Act #51: DPoke = ± 0.5 V = ± 70 nm (P-V) Act #27: DPoke = ± 0.2 V = ± 28 nm (P-V) Act #47: DPoke = ± 0.1 V = ± 14 nm (P-V) Act #71: DPoke = ± 0.05 V = ± 7 nm (P-V) Map #1 Map #2 Map #3 Map #4 Map #5 Map #6

Compared to Point Source SHC Sensitivity The results shown is from point source SHC The results show that ESHC can sense WFE as small as 1.4 nm P-V ESHC and Point Source SHC sensitivities are comparable DM Poke Map #1 & #2: Act #51: DPoke = ±0.05 V = ± 7.0 nm (P-V) Act #27: DPoke = ± 0.02 V = ± 2.8 nm (P-V) Act #47: DPoke = ± 0.01 V = ± 1.4 nm (P-V) Act #71: DPoke = ± 0.005 V = ± 0.7 nm (P-V) DM Poke Map #3 & #4: Act #51: DPoke = ± 0.1 V = ± 14 nm (P-V) Act #27: DPoke = ± 0.04 V = ± 5.6 nm (P-V) Act #47: DPoke = ± 0.02 V = ± 2.8 nm (P-V) Act #71: DPoke = ± 0.01 V = ± 1.4 nm (P-V) DM Poke Map #5 & #6: Act #51: DPoke = ± 0.5 V = ± 70 nm (P-V) Act #27: DPoke = ± 0.2 V = ± 28 nm (P-V) Act #47: DPoke = ± 0.1 V = ± 14 nm (P-V) Act #71: DPoke = ± 0.05 V = ± 7 nm (P-V) Map #1 Map #2 Map #3 Map #4 Map #5 Map #6

ESHC In-Vac Repeatability Test ESHC is repeated measuring the WFE with Spherical Mirror in The RMS OPD variation (left plot) has shown that ESHC repeatability is less than 2.8 nm Point source SHC shows similar repeatability ESHC Repeatability Measurement of a Static WF RMS OPD Deviation from the Mean OPD