MEMPHYS non-oscillation physics NOW 2006 - Conca Specchiulla 9-16/09/06 MEMPHYS non-oscillation physics Alessandra Tonazzo APC et Université Paris 7
Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane Contacts: J.E.Campagne and M.Mezzetto The MEMPHYS detector [see talk by S.Katsanevas] Modane, France Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane Megaton Mass PHYSics @Fréjus Water Cherenkov (“cheap and stable”) Total fiducial mass: 440 kt Baseline: 3 Cylindrical modules 65X65 m Size limited by light attenuation length (λ~80m) and pressure on PMTs Readout: 12” PMTs, 30% geom. cover (#PEs =40%cov. with 20” PMTs) PMT R&D + detailed study on excavation existing & ongoing Frejus Tunnel 4800 m.w.e. Bardonecchia, Italy 65m 60m http://www.apc.univ-paris7.fr/APC_CS/Experiences/MEMPHYS/ arXiv: hep-ex/0607026 Contacts: J.E.Campagne and M.Mezzetto NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
Physics goals (=outline of my talk) SuperNovae core-collapse Early SN trigger Diffuse SuperNovae Neutrinos Astrophysical sources of neutrinos Proton decay Oscillation measurements with beams [see talk by T.Schwetz] NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
SN neutrinos @ detector n emission Flavor conversion Shock wave EARTH [slide “stolen” from A.Mirizzi] Core Collapse Event rate spectra f : from simulations of SN explosions P : from n oscillations + simulations (density profile) s : (well) known e : under control [see talk by Cardall] NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
SN neutrinos Neutronization burst Accretion + K-H cooling [see talk by Cardall] Neutronization burst E~1051 erg t~25 ms Accretion + K-H cooling E~1053 erg t~10 s 99% of total explosion energy Propagation to Earth: Matter effects Pee(12) Level-crossing probability PH(E, V(x,t), m2,13) Survival prob. p= Pee*PH “Sensitivity to θ13 one order of magnitude better than planned terrrestrial experiments” [see for ex. Lunardini-Smirnov hep-ph/0302033] Hierarchy of interaction strength Fogli et al., hep-ph/0412046 Raffelt et al., astro-ph/0303226 NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
Detection of SN neutrinos Inverse-beta (89%) Large statistics in detectors with lots of free p Good determination of time and energy Option: add Gd to tag neutron from delayed-γ Elastic scattering (~3%) Pointing NC on Oxygen (8%) n g [see talk by Vagins] e- ne,x Fogli et al., hep-ph/0412046 NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics SN @ MEMPHYS Evidence up to ~1Mpc Galactic SN: Huge statistics we can do spectral analyses in time in energy in flavour composition Access to SN explosion mechanism: shock waves, neutronization burst Neutrino production parameters: rate, spectra Neutrino properties (a partial overview in the following) Fogli et al., hep-ph/0412046 NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
SN spectral analyses (1) Extracting the astrophysical parameters Learning about black-hole formation Abrupt cut-off of neutrino flux visible if a black-hole forms in the middle of a SN explosion Just an example (“old” paper) to get a feeling of the sensitivity w.r.t. smaller detectors Minakata et al., hep-ph/0112160 from UNO whitepaper NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
SN spectral analyses (2) Learning about the shock wave Crossing of resonances can induce time-dependent matter effects in neutrino oscillations Shock-wave effects on survival probabilities (PH) depend on 13. m2atm,13 m2sol,sol self-interactions ? Duan et al., 0606616 Raffelt et al., 0608050 Schirato and Fuller, astro-ph/0205390 Fogli et al., hep-ph/0304056 NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
SN spectral analyses (2) Learning about the shock wave “Double-dip” in <Ee> “Double-peak” in <E2e>/<Ee>2 vs time Time-dips are Energy-dependent: Compare bins of “low” and “high” E Fogli et al., hep-ph/0412046 Forward shock Forward+Reverse shock IH shock IH static NH For NH, some information can be gathered from time-spectrum of e+O events Tomas et al., astro-ph/0407132 NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
SN spectral analyses (2’) Stochastic density fluctuations behind the shock front can have significant damping effects on the transition pattern and modify the observed spectrum Fogli et al., hep-ph/0603033 = fractional (random) variations of average potential NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
SN spectral analyses (3) Earth matter effects Dighe et al., hep-ph/0311172 Modulations of energy spectrum of and/or Observable with a single detector in Fourier-transform of y~1/E In water-Cherenkov, due to poor energy resolution, need >60k events: OK @Mton For Earth effect not seen Inverted Hierarchy + large θ13 Earth effect seen Degeneracy: NH or IH+small θ13 NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
SN spectral analyses (4) Neutronization burst Kachelrieβ et al., astro-ph/0412082 Signal: Bkg: mainly rejected by angle and E cuts + Gd n-tag ES of other flavours Observation of time peak depends on oscillation scenario Burst / no-burst break degeneracy A/C if θ13 unknown Measurement of SN distance D~1/N1/2 @10kpc within 5% NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics SN trigger Detection of SN from galaxies up to ~10Mpc Coincidence of two neutrinos in the same detector within ~10sec Bkg <0.7 ev/yr Rate > 0.15/yr Identify SN without optical confirmation (= anticipate by few hrs) Detect SN heavily obscured by dust or optically dark Neutrino-Optical coincidence improve knowledge of start time of core collapse from ~1day (optical) to ~10s @Mton RSN @SK Ando et al., astro-ph/0503321 NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
Diffuse SN neutrinos We don’t need to wait and hope to be lucky… [see talk by C.Lunardini] (thanks for these slides!) Lunardini, astro-ph/0509233 NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
Diffuse SN ’s @H2O detectors Small signal over very large bkg: Decay e from “invisible ” generated by CC interaction of -atm and with E<Cherenkov threshold atmospheric e Reactor (E<~10 MeV) Can be reduced with Gd (reject non- anti-e ) Malek et al. [SK Coll.], hep-ex/0209028 NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
Diffuse SN ’s @ MEMPHYS We WILL see them in few years Direct measurement of emission parameters 5y SK+Gd =1y MEMPHYS+Gd Fogli et al., hep-ph/0412046 7-60 events in 4 yrs: “most conservative” estimate by C.Lunardini What can we learn ? astro-ph/0509233 Yuksel et al., astro-ph/0509297 NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
Diffuse SN ’s @ MEMPHYS Decays of DSN modifications of spectrum Constraints on Dark Energy parameters +estimate of SN rate from future SN surveys 10 y with Gd Mirizzi et al., hep-ph/0405136 Hall et al., hep-ph/0607109 NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
Neutrino astrophysics Low-E ’s from GRB accompanying UHE-’s and optical emission seen in other experiments “GRB background” detectable in few years ’s from Black-Hole formation death of stars with M>40Msun ’s from interaction of ’s “from below” Point-sources, such as AGNs WIMPs annihilating in Earth, Sun or Galaxy [cfr SK analysis: hep-ex/0404025] High-E ’s from GRBs Nagataki et al., astro-ph/0203481 Sumiyoshi et al., astro-ph/0608509 NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics Proton decay Complete review: Nath and Perez, hep-ph/0601023 Forbidden in SM Non-SUSY GUTs (dim-6 operators) Favours p e+ 0 Predictions: p~1034-1036 yrs Predictions depend only on fermion mixing SUSY GUTs (dim-4 and dim-5 operators) Favours p K+ nu-bar Predictions: p~3x1033-3x1034 yrs Predictions depend on SUSY particle spectrum, Higgs sector and fermion masses (note interplay with direct searches @LHC) Current limits by SuperKamiokande: p K+ nu-bar p>2.3x1033y p e+ 0 p>1.6x1033y Complementarity of the two main decay channels No dedicated study done for MEMPHYS: rely on UNO simulation results (see UNO whitepaper) NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics Proton decay Search for p e+ π0 Main bkg: Ask: 2 or 3 “e-like” rings, Ptot<PFermi, Minv~Mp => Eff. ~44% MEMPHYS coverage 30% with 12”PMTs is equivalent to SK coverage 40% with 20”PMTs in terms of #PE H2O is best for this channel MEMPHYS XXX XXX MEMPHYS From UNO whitepaper NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
Proton decay Search for p K+ + anti- K below Ch. Threshold : infer from decays 90% of K decay at rest K decay channels: K monoenergetic + 6.3 MeV prompt- from capture K +0 with H2O is not as good as LAr, LScint for this channel NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics Summary and outlook MEMPHYS - Megaton Mass PHYSics @ Fréjus Supernova Explosion Evidence up to 1 Mpc Spectral analyses information on explosion mechanism, emission and propagation Diffuse Supernova Neutrinos Evidence within few years Information on emission parameters and more Early SN trigger Neutrino astrophysics Proton decay: Optimal detector for p e+ π0 Important synergies with LAr, LiqScint LAGUNA NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
BACKUP
SN spectral analyses (2) Learning about the shock wave: Normal Hierarchy NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics SN187A by Lunardini NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics SN1987A Yukserl et al., astro-ph 0509297 Other analyses: Jegerlehner et al., PRD 54 (1996) 1194 Lunardini, astro-ph/0509233 (5-par fit) NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics
SN spectral analyses (2) Learning about the shock wave Time-dips are Energy-dependent: Compare bins of “low” and “high” E “Double-dip” in <Ee> “Double-peak” in <E2e>/<Ee>2 vs time Fogli et al., hep-ph/0412046 Tomas et al., astro-ph/0407132 NOW06 15/09/06 A.Tonazzo - MEMPHYS: non-oscillation physics