Stellarator Divertor Design and Optimization with NCSX Examples

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Svetlana Marmutova Laminar flow simulation around circular cylinder 11 of March 2013, Espoo Faculty of Technology.
Advertisements

Basic law of heat conduction --Fourier’s Law Degree Celsius.
Chapter 2: Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient
MESF593 Finite Element Methods HW #4 11:00pm, 10 May, 2010.
Update on Modeling of Power and Particle Control for ARIES- Compact Stellarator A.Grossman UCSD 11/04/2004 Acknowledgements: P.Mioduszewski(ORNL) J. Lyon.
Modeling of Particle and Power Control for Compact Stellarators Update Arthur Grossman UCSD 2/24/2005.
Progress in Configuration Development for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries Project Meeting, June 16-17,
Neutron Wall Loading Profile Using CAD/MCNP Interface and (progress report) Mengkuo Wang ARIES Meeting June 16-17, 2004 University of Wisconsin - Madison.
Physics of fusion power
Code Integration for Efficient Divertor Design H. McGuinness D. Steiner ARIES project meeting UCSD, Nov Nuclear Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8: Conserved quantities / mirror / tokamak.
Physics of fusion power
Preliminary Assessment of Porous Gas-Cooled and Thin- Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, UCSD (March 2004)
Magnet System Definition L. Bromberg P. Titus MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting November 4-5, 2004.
Poloidal Distribution of ARIES-ACT Neutron Wall Loading L. El-Guebaly, A. Jaber, D. Henderson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison.
GOURDON/GEOM Parallelization Progress and Outlook Hayden McGuinness Don Steiner Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute In collaboration with T.K. Mau and A.
Power Loads and Divertor Design Hayden McGuinness Don Steiner Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute In collaboration with T.K. Mau and A. Grossman.
Status of safety analysis for HCPB TBM Susana Reyes TBM Project meeting, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA May 10-11, 2006 Work performed under the auspices of the.
April 27-28, 2006/ARR 1 Support and Possible In-Situ Alignment of ARIES-CS Divertor Target Plates Presented by A. René Raffray University of California,
AN UPDATE ON DIVERTOR HEAT LOAD ANALYSIS T.K. Mau, A. Grossman, A.R. Raffray UC-San Diego H. McGuinness RPI ARIES-CS Project Meeting June 14-15, 2005 University.
Overview of ARIES Compact Stellarator Study Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego US/Japan Workshop on Power Plant Studies & Related Advanced.
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
Status of Coil Structural Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: ORNL: D. Williamson UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray.
IPP Stellarator Reactor perspective T. Andreeva, C.D. Beidler, E. Harmeyer, F. Herrnegger, Yu. Igitkhanov J. Kisslinger, H. Wobig O U T L I N E Helias.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
AN UPDATE on DIVERTOR DESIGN and HEAT LOAD ANALYSIS T.K. Mau (UCSD) H. McGuinness (RPI), D. Steiner (RPI) A.R. Raffray (UCSD), X. Wang (UCSD), A. Grossman.
Scoping Study of He-cooled Porous Media for ARIES-CS Divertor Presented by John Pulsifer Major contributor: René Raffray University of California, San.
10/04/ D Source, Neutron Wall Loading & Radiative Heating for ARIES-CS Paul Wilson Brian Kiedrowski Laila El-Guebaly.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture 7: Stellarator / Tokamak.
Monte Carlo Methods in Partial Differential Equations.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
TITLE RP1.019 : Eliminating islands in high-pressure free- boundary stellarator magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium solutions. S.R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello,
pkm- NCSX CDR, 5/21-23/ Power and Particle Handling in NCSX Peter Mioduszewski 1 for the NCSX Boundary Group: for the NCSX Boundary Group: M. Fenstermacher.
Simulation Study on behaviors of a detachment front in a divertor plasma: roles of the cross-field transport Makoto Nakamura Prof. Y. Ogawa, S. Togo, M.
1 Electric Field – Continuous Charge Distribution As the average separation between source charges is smaller than the distance between the charges and.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10: tokamak – continued.
第16回 若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 JAEA
Conclusions Using the Diffusive Equilibrium Mapping Technique we have connected a starting point of a field line on the photosphere with its final location.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 9 : The tokamak continued.
14 Oct. 2009, S. Masuzaki 1/18 Edge Heat Transport in the Helical Divertor Configuration in LHD S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Murase, T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu,
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
1 Modular Coil Design for the Ultra-Low Aspect Ratio Quasi-Axially Symmetric Stellarator MHH2 L. P. Ku and the ARIES Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association Different numerical approaches to 3D transport modelling of fusion devices Alexander Kalentyev.
1) Disruption heat loading 2) Progress on time-dependent modeling C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Bethesda, MD, 4/4/2011.
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
TITLE Stuart R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello, A.H.Reiman, D.J.Strickler, S.P.Hirshman, L-P. Ku, E.Lazarus, A.Brooks, M.C.Zarnstorff, A.H.Boozer, G-Y. Fu and G.H.Neilson.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Technical Readiness Level For Control of Plasma Power Flux Distribution.
QAS Design of the DEMO Reactor
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
1 PFC requirements  Basic requirements  Carbon based  Provisions for adding (interface design included in research prep budget)  NBI armor  Trim coil.
Neutron Wall Loading Update L. El-Guebaly, A. Jaber, A. Robinson, D. Henderson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison
1 CASE 2: Modeling of a synthetic jet in a cross flow Williamsburg, Virginia, USA March 29 th -31 th 2004 C. Marongiu 1, G. Iaccarino 2 1 CIRA Italian.
Presented by Yuji NAKAMURA at US-Japan JIFT Workshop “Theory-Based Modeling and Integrated Simulation of Burning Plasmas” and 21COE Workshop “Plasma Theory”
Ion Mitigation for Laser IFE Optics Ryan Abbott, Jeff Latkowski, Rob Schmitt HAPL Program Workshop Atlanta, Georgia, February 5, 2004 This work was performed.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Compact Stellarators as Reactors J. F. Lyon, ORNL NCSX PAC meeting June 4, 1999.
Unstructured Meshing Tools for Fusion Plasma Simulations
Recent Progress in Stellarator Optimization
Mechanisms for losses during Edge Localised modes (ELMs)
Extended Surface Heat Transfer
Finite difference code for 3D edge modelling
E3D: status report and application to DIII-D
By: Derek Anderson & Alex Walker
Steady-State Heat Transfer (Initial notes are designed by Dr
Summary slide for Conceptual Design Study for Heat Exhaust Management in the ARC Fusion Pilot Plant, E.A. Tolman et al., IAEA- FIP-P1-22 Introduction ARC,
New Results for Plasma and Coil Configuration Studies
Stellarator Program Update: Status of NCSX & QPS
ACT-1 design point definition
Presentation transcript:

Stellarator Divertor Design and Optimization with NCSX Examples A. Koniges (LLNL) J. Kisslinger, E. Strumberger (MPG) A. Grossman (UCSD); P. Mioduszewski (ORNL) Contact: koniges@llnl.gov ARIES Project Meeting, May 6-7, 2003, Livermore, CA

General Goals Develop the divertor/limiter concept for NCSX via: Moderate/uniformly distributed power/particle load at the divertor Desirable Qualities: Small angles of incidence Adequate coverage by plates Large areas of incidence within plate area Li383 Results: Footprints and inclinations of field line intersections with limiting surfaces for candidate NCSX Plasma (li383) Diffused field-line lengths (related to connection length) Heat flux estimates Final Design Optimization: Final coil set, Vary b, more accurate field outside LCMS Iterate and optimize positions of actual divertor/limiter plates Could extend to alphas -- key is accurate diffusion

Methodology Start with Finite- reference configuration from VMEC/MFBE solution inside and outside LCMS (could be replaced by PIES solution eventually) Divertor, Limiter and/or first-wall-like surface(s) specified Fast-method to Trace field lines using diffusion to mitigate spurious points Simulate anomalous plasma transport via diffusive effects Calculate intersection locations with limiting surfaces Calculate inclination angle of intersection Estimates of field-line length Not just field-line tracing!

Magnetic field inside and outside LCMS is obtained from VMEC/MFBE Solution (Li383) Outer Limiting Surface

People often start field line tracing marching outward from some location Surfaces and intersections calculated without this method can show spurious points

-Obtain a starting surface by integrating just inside the VMEC LCMS -Obtain a starting surface by integrating just inside the VMEC LCMS. -Field line tracing with diffusion started from this surface. -When a field line terminates from an intersection, a new starting point is calculated by linear interpolation.

Diffusive effects model anomalous transport and assure field line space is covered Cross-field diffusion is assumed anomalous and of order 104 cm2/s. To simulate the SOL diffusion numerically, we introduce 'diffusion' of field lines in our integration techniques. Diffusion coefficient, D, is given by D is the maximum displacement introduced during field-line tracing l is a characteristic length, V is a thermal velocity Direction of the diffusive kick is random, so the particle may diffuse either inward or outward.

Snap shot of field line tracing with diffusion A: limited, B: not limited NCSX 0o A B Sample Poincare plots showing 10,000 punctures. Millions of punctures are generated while calculating intersections with the limiting wall. Lines are started inside the VMEC LCMS and diffuse outward.

3D Views of a 60o Toroidal NCSX Segment 3D Views of a 60o Toroidal NCSX Segment. Roughly 12,000 intersections with a limiting wall in the full toroidal extent are calculated for the full-beta full-current reference li383 case. Plots are color coded by inclination angle of intersection 12-15o red 9 - 12o green 6 - 9o blue 3 - 6o yellow 0 - 3o orange

Same data in poloidal/toroidal plane

Heat flux to wall from numerical distribution function of field line intersection data Bin data on uniform 2D mesh in () space using linear interpolation Inclination angle effects not included

Diffused field-line length in meters binned according to number of intersections

Flow chart of stellarator design procedure INPUT: Coil Currents Fourier approx LCMS VMEC: Free boundary equilibrium MFBE: Magnetic Field Inside and outside GOURDON: Field Lines Limiter/Divertor Plate Positions Intersections and angles: via Lines with diffusion Wall intersections Power flux

Method for divertor/limiter design Estimate candidate-NCSX divertor heat load Footprints and inclinations of field-line intersections have been calculated using fast method of line tracing with diffusion Diffused field line lengths are also calculated Shaping with limiters can be used to optimize heat load Method may be applicable to alpha strike point optimization Code capability for discrete divertor/limiter plates Contact: koniges@llnl.gov For more information, see publication: Koniges, et al., “Magnetic Topology of a Candidate NCSX Plasma Boundary Configuration,” Nuclear Fusion, 2003. This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S Department of Energy by the University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-ENG-48 UCRL-PRES-153463