CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cavity BPM for Spectromety: progress and plans A. Lyapin.
Advertisements

1 KEK Cavity BPM Hitoshi Hayano Development of Cavity BPM for Q-magnet attachment, Aiming; compact design, 0.2µm resolution, BPM center error (between.
Beam position monitors LCABD Plenary meeting Bristol, 24th March 2009 A. Aryshev, S. T. Boogert, G. Boorman, S. Molloy, N. Joshi JAI at Royal Holloway.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting - 24 th May 2013 CTF3 1 CTF3: Highlights of the 1 st run R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
IP-BPM NOV. BEAM TEST RESULTS Siwon Jang (KNU). 11cm Low-Q IP-BPM design  11cm Low-Q IP-BPM drawings of HFSS 100mm Sensor cavity Wave guide Antenna Designed.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
Status of ATF2 Cavity BPM Project Sep 29, 2005 Project Scope: Instrument both couplers ATF2 cavity BPM’s (35) Produce prototype for December cavity test.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
Experience on design, prototyping and testing of cavity BPM for the European-XFEL > Motivation > Introduction > Principle of CBPMs > Mechanical properties.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba,
Status of the Fermilab Cold BPM R&D Manfred Wendt Fermilab 10/1/20091LCWA09 Main Linac WG.
BPM-Based Energy Spectrometer Contributors: A. Lyapin, B. Maiheu, F. Gournaris, D. Attree, M. Wing, D. Miller University College London (UCL) M. Slater,
Cavity BPM processing and hardware upgrade plans A. Lyapin, S. Boogert, E. Yamakawa.
1 C. Simon CLIC Instrumentation workshop BPM C. Simon on behalf of the Saclay’s group CLIC Instrumentation workshop 2 nd - 3 rd June.
The Cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM) Massimo Dal Forno Paolo Craievich, Raffaele De Monte, Thomas Borden, Andrea Borga, Mauro Predonzani, Mario Ferianis,
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
IP-BPM status Siwon Jang KNU. Contents The electronics repair status –Repair work status –Electronics RF test (by using Oscilloscope) –Electronics shipment.
Cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM) for future linear colliders such as CLIC. N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, et al. Royal.
Status of the ILC Main Linac BPM R&D Thibaut Lefevre CERN Claire Simon CEA Sacley Sebastien Vilalte LAPP Manfred Wendt Fermilab 11/19/20081ILC08 Main Linac.
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team.
High resolution RF cavity BPM design for Linear Collider Andrei Lunin 8th DITANET Topical Workshop on Beam Position Monitors.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
CLIC09 Workshop October 2009Drive beam BPM’sLars Søby 1 Drive Beam BPM’s CLIC 09 work shop, CERN, of October 2009, Lars Søby.
High resolution cavity BPMs in the context of the European XFEL
IPBPM issues (Limitation of resolution) Siwon Jang (KNU)
Beam Test status and Plans of the ILC Main LINAC BPM
1 Cold L-Band Cavity BPM: Design Status July 2006 Gennady Romanov Linda Valerio Manfred Wendt Fermilab July 21, 2006.
Marc Ross T9 – Snowmass 2001 Closing Plenary T9 – Diagnostics M. Ross/R. Pasquinelli Thursday, July 19 RD: 1) determine mixing between z and x/y 2) determine.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
BPM for Spectromety development status A. Lyapin.
Fermilab BPM R&D Activities Nikolay Solyak, Manfred Wendt Fermilab Nicolas Chritin, Lars Soby CERN Nobuhiro Terunuma, Junji Urakawa KEK March 26-30, 20101LCWS10.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
MLI Summary Chris Adolphsen SLAC. Summary of MLI Talks Quadrupoles (V. Kashikhin) –Expect test of a SLAC/CIEMAT and FNAL cos(2phi), ~ 60 T/m, SC Quads.
Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,
Cold BPM development in KEK H. Hayano, March 2011 Jung Keun Ahn (PNU), Sun young Ryu (PNU), Eun San Kim (KNU), Young Im Kim (KNU), Jin yeong Ryu (KNU),
1 CTF3 CLEX day July 2006 CLEX day 2006 Introduction G.Geschonke CERN.
Low-Q IP BPM Y. I. Kim *, A. Heo, E-S. Kim (KNU) S. T. Boogert (JAI) D. M. McCormick, J. May, J. Nelson, T. Smith, G. R. White (SLAC) Y. Honda, N. Terunuma,
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
16/01/12DITANET Topical Workshop on Beam Position Monitors Reentrant Beam Position Monitors DITANET Topical Workshop on Beam Position Monitors 16 th –
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
Report and plan of the tilt monitor Daisuke Okamoto Tohoku University.
CLIC Workshop 2008 TBTS status. PETS testing program and installation status. Igor Syratchev & Germana Riddone for the CLIC team.
D. Lipka DESY Hamburg Dark current Monitor for the European XFEL, tests at PITZ and FLASH.
MLI Update Chris Adolphsen SLAC. CAVITY VESSEL T4CM QUAD T4CM BPM QUADS LEADS 80K BLOCK 4K BLOCK Quadrupole Package.
XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting Bolko Beutner, DESY First results of micro-bunching and COTR experiments at FLASH Bolko Beutner, Winfried Decking,
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.
1CEA/ Saclay/ SACM CARE/SRF/WP11 Development of a new Beam Position Monitor for FLASH, XFEL and ILC Cryomodules Claire Simon, Michel Luong, Stéphane Chel,
CLIC Workshop 18 th -22 nd January 2016, CERN 1 Alfonso Benot Morell Manfred Wendt.
11th February th CTF3 Committee - Wilfrid Farabolini1 Status and progress of the CTF3 probe beam 1.
Phase Feed-Forward Piotr Skowroński (CERN)
First Year of Operation at the Two-beam Test Stand
CAVITY BPM FOR CALIFES Claire Simon, Michel Luong, D. Bogard, P
Wakefield & Cavity based Monitors: Fermilab BPM Development Plans
CLIC Main Linac Cavity BPM Snapshot of the work in progress
12.4: SRF HOM Diagnostics: Experimental Results and Future Plans
BPM-Based Energy Spectrometer
    BEAM POSITION MONITORS USING A RE-ENTRANT CAVITY C. Simon1, S. Chel1, M. Luong1, P. Contrepois1, P. Girardot1, N. Baboi2 and N. Rouvière3.
Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date
Fabrication of KEK-ATF2 Q-BPM
High Precision SC Cavity Alignment Diagnostics with HOM Measurements
VELA BPMs Alex Brynes.
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Undulator Cavity BPM System Status
First results of micro-bunching and COTR experiments at FLASH
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Presentation transcript:

CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM J. Towler, S. Boogert, B. Fellenz, T. Lefevre, A. Lyapin, M. Wendt

CLIC MB BPM Requirements 50 nm spatial and 50 ns time and resolution. Multiple measurements in a 156 ns long bunch train Range of ±100μm >4000 BPMs 14 GHz for CLIC Design is scalable 15 GHz resonant frequency for CTF prototype. Prototype design based on stainless steel cavity, new design uses copper. Q factor tailored to match the required time resolution MB parameters and BPM Requirements Machine CLIC CALIFES Bunch Spacing 0.5 ns 0.667 ns Bunch Length 44 μm 225 μm Train Length 156 ns 1 – 150 ns BPM Spatial Resolution <50 nm BPM Time Resolution <50 ns BPM Accuracy <100 μm BPM Range ±100 μm ± 100 μm BPM Resonant Frequency 14 GHz 15 GHz 19/01/2016 CLIC Workshop 2016

Cavity BPM Basics Centered beam excites monopole mode (TM010). Amplitude dependent on charge Away from the center, other modes are excited. First order dipole mode (TM110) depends linearly on beam offset and charge. TM110 splits in 2 orthogonal modes. Beam excites other unwanted higher order modes. Requires suppression of unwanted modes. 19/01/2016 CLIC Workshop 2016 CLIC Workshop 2015 3

Copper Cavity BPM Design Modified cavity BPM design Main geometry unchanged. Copper to raise Q to 500 New feedthrough design eliminate tuners. Prototype manufactured for RF testing Poor dimensions, particularly the reference cavity Measurements compared with simulations Before and after brazing Frequencies and Q factors External Q’s high – feedthroughs Excellent low cross coupling Cavity QL F0 /GHz Reference 938 14.772 Predicted 500 15.0 Position ~830 14.996 524 19/01/2016 CLIC Workshop 2016

2015 Installation Four prototype BPMs in CLEX (CTF3) 3 copper, 1 old stainless steel End of probe beam line All 3 new BPMs on X and Y movers Old BPM added as ref cavity OTR screen for ensuring beam transmission Electronics next to the beamline Higher resolution (12-bit), lower rate (250MS/s) digitiser to demonstrate spatial resolution 19/01/2016 CLIC Workshop 2016

Downconverter Electronics Concept tested with a single cavity at CTF3 Single-stage downconverter mixer electronics Draft design, signal estimates and control interface by RHUL Detailed design and PCB fabrication by FNAL (N. Eddy, B. Fellenz, J. Bogaert) Gain flexibility, remote control, custom IF filters 9 downmixer channels and 3 LO/CAL signals Three units installed in CLEX, one for each BPM 19/01/2016 CLIC Workshop 2016

Downconverter Tests All 9 downconverter channels were characterised Gain measured for range of variable gain and attenuation settings Operational values were determined Dynamic range also measured at various settings A nominal dynamic range of 80dB can be achieved 19/01/2016 CLIC Workshop 2016

Beam Tests BPMs calibrated with a stable beam and scanning the BPM position with the stages. I’s and Q’s are measured and the position and tilt dependent parts of the measured signal are determined. A position sensitivity factor is calculated from this and is used to measure beam position. Charge sensitivity of the reference cavity also needs to be determined. 19/01/2016 CLIC Workshop 2016

Beam Tests Resolution measured with 3 BPMs where the position in pickup is predicted by the signals measured in the other 2 1000s of shots taken Simple correlation between BPMs gives a resolution of ~1 μm. Due to the phase behaviour in the centre of the BPM and the angled trajectory of the beam, the position is not accurately measured around 0 A model is required to predict the behaviour in this region 19/01/2016 CLIC Workshop 2016

Amplitude-Phase Modulation It was seen that phase changed with amplitude due to non-linearities in electronics To combat this, the modulation was measured and corrected Restores the IQ curve to a line correction 19/01/2016 CLIC Workshop 2016

Long Range Nonlinearity In long range scans the position response becomes nonlinear Fitting a 3rd order polynomial to the measured signal Measure the difference and correct for it. 19/01/2016 CLIC Workshop 2016

Conclusion and Future Plans A system of 4 BPMs has been installed in CLEX Beam measurements have been taken Resolution measurements so far are sub micron With an appropriate model and additional data taken a better resolution is expected A simultaneous measurement of the spatial and temporal resolution is required Apply a chirp to the beam 19/01/2016 CLIC Workshop 2016