Classroom Video Observation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Know role of and characteristics of effective feedback
Advertisements

Welcome to Day 3 Please be seated in groups of 4.  Like grade bands  Mixed schools  New faces Introduce yourself to your table members.
EngageNY.org Making Sense of Classroom Data: “Trackers” and The Atlas Protocol Session 1, December 2014 NTI.
A Continuum of Interventions Experienced with NTI Teachers/Coaches Session 1.
Welcome to Algebra for All Year 2 October 29, 2010.
Session 3: Living a Lesson Part 1 (Elementary)
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
EngageNY.org Principals’ Session: Identifying CCSS Aligned Instruction in Writing.
Instructional Coaching Columbia High School February 17, 2011 JoAnn Moore, Facilitator 10 minutes.
A Closer Look I6: Differentiation to Support Content Language Objectives.
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades 6–12: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
1 What are the roles of learning targets and success criteria in my classroom? – I can specify plans for engaging my students with learning targets.
© TNTP 2014 March Principal Training. / 2 Do Now Reflect on your progress from the last session: How successful were you in supporting a teacher to identify.
EngageNY.org Session 5: Criteria for Speaking and Listening November, 2013 Network Teams Institute.
EngageNY.org Strengthening Writing through Student-Engaged Assessment.
Building Students’ Deep Understanding through a Common Core-Aligned Unit Session 1 – Setting the Stage Session 2 – Rigorous Tasks as Unit Drivers Session.
EngageNY.org Living a Lesson Part 1 (Secondary) Session 3, November 2013 NTI.
Peer Observation & Connecting to the Kentucky Framework for Teaching.
Coaching for Math GAINS Professional Learning Day 2 April, 2009.
Designing Supplemental Focus Lessons that Support All Learners December NTI Session 3.
Presentation 1 Roles for Discussing Student Work There are four roles for discussing student work: Presenting Teacher Participant Recorder Facilitator.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Social and Emotional Child Development Fall 2015.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
Examining Student Work in Science Jacque Melin – GVSU
{ Developing Student Thinking Seventh Grade Mathematics.
Providing Feedback and Removing Barriers Session 4, October 2014 NTI.
Examining Student Work (using the Tuning Protocol) Jacque Melin – GVSU
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
+ What Should I Expect to See During Mathematics Instruction? Helping Elementary Principals Recognize and Support Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Differentiation: Follow-Up Designing and providing instruction that meets the differing needs of all students. 1.
ELA FELLOWS Convening #4. SWITCHING LENSES As a learner, how did I manage my learning? As a teacher, how have I helped my students make meaning? As a.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Session 5: Criteria for Speaking and Listening
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Avon Grove School District October 2009
TEPG Formative Assessment Follow-Up Session “Formative assessment is one of the most powerful ways to raise student achievement” (Black & Wiliam, 1998)
Lesson Design Study Leading Lesson Study.
What are the impact of changes to lesson observation and feedback processes on teachers’ attitudes and practice? Why this? The new process. What did we.
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Understanding by Design
Scaffolding Lessons to Meet Students Needs
Promoting Reflective Practice Local District 6 February 18, 2005
Learning Forward Annual Conference Session F28
Elementary District Professional Development
Component 4: Effective and Reflective Practitioner Session 2
BANKED TUESDAY REFLECTION AND REVISION OCTOBER 18TH, 2016.
Texts Worth Reading Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Ensuring Success through Assessment – Involve Students
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Reading Closely For Textual Details
The Tuning Protocol.
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Together We improve student learning and achieve more by:
Connection: …between formative and summative assessment (including use of data)
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Resident Educator Program
Assessment for Learning
Build it and They Will Come
Learning Intentions and Success Criteria
Book Study Presented by: Kayla Hatcher
Seminar Four Quality Academic feedback: oral and written
Presentation transcript:

Classroom Video Observation TEPG Cohort: 2014-2015 Classroom Video Observation Welcome! Fall, 2014 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1

Purpose To strengthen understanding and use of the TEPG Rubric and Companion Guide as a teacher is provided targeted feedback based on a video observation. Evidence based feedback includes praise, probing, and polishing.

Group Norms Be fully present Manage technology Ask questions and put ideas on the table Pay attention to self and others and adjust if necessary Other?

Teaching Channel Video https://www.teachingchannel.org/videos/improve-teaching- with-video

Roles: Presenter(s) Facilitator Note-taker Time Keeper Cohort participants

Lesson Context from the Presenter: Goal(s) of the lesson Context needed to understand the clip 1-2 aspects of teaching practice (standard indicators) for which you like focused feedback.

Core Propositions/Standard Indicators

Following the Video: Small Group Alignment: what evidence did you collect that aligns to the Standard Indicator of focus in the CG? Other Indicators evidenced in the clip? B. Praise: “I noticed…;” positive, specific feedback C. Probe: Follow-up questions to probe deeper into the teacher’s decision making and practice and to help them reflect on the lesson. D. Polish: Suggestions for refinements or other strategies that might be used.

Feedback: Praise from each group; citing evidence from the clip Probing questions from each group – presenter responses One suggestion from each group Presenter: Clarifying questions Reaction to feedback What was re-affirming? Was anything surprising? Why? How was the videotaping process? Next step(s)? CG Revisit: Other evidence noted in the clip – alignment in the CG?

Thoughts about the process? How do you see this working in your cohorts? Suggestions for revision to the protocol? Time adjustments? Power-point helpful? Other???