Scott Bradner, Kevin Dubray, Jim McQuaid, Al Morton

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Link-State IGP Data-Plane Convergence Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-20 draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-20 S. Poretsky,
Advertisements

Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 60th IETF – San Diego, CA Thursday, August 5, 2004, Chairs: –Kevin Dubray –Al Morton.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 84th IETF Thursday, August 2, 2012 (1730 Vancouver Local Time, GMT-7:00) Chairs: –Al Morton If.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) Virtual Interim Meeting prior to 76th IETF Friday, October 30, 2009, GMT Chairs: –Al Morton
SIP Performance Metrics 66 th IETF – Montreal Daryl Malas.
SIP End-to-End Performance Metrics draft-malas-performance-metrics-06.txt.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 70th IETF – Vancouver, Canada Thursday, December 6, 2007, 9:00-11:30 (Oak) Chairs: –Al Morton If.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 80th IETF Tuesday, March 29, 2011, CDT (Central Europe Daylight Time, GMT+2:00) Chairs: –Al Morton
Quality of Service (QoS) of interconnected Packet- based Networks Workshop on “Monitoring Quality of Service and Quality of Experience of Multimedia Services.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 82nd IETF Monday, November 14, 2011, (Taipei Local Time, GMT+8:00) Chairs: –Al Morton
Quality of Service (QoS) Monitoring and Functions of Internet ITU Regional Standardization Forum for Africa (Kampala, Uganda, June 2014) Yvonne UMUTONI.
Proposal for new Working Group Item: Core Router Software Accelerated Life Testing (draft-poretsky-routersalt-term-00.txt) Authors: Scott Poretsky, Avici.
SIP Performance Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-02 draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-02 July 24, 2010 Prof. Carol Davids, Illinois Inst. of Tech.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 85th IETF Tuesday, November 6, 2012 (1520 Atlanta Local Time, GMT-5:00) Chairs: –Al Morton – PLEASE.
Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 61st IETF – Washington, D.C. Thursday, November 11, 2004, Chairs: –Kevin Dubray –Al.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 77th IETF Monday, March 22, 2010, PDT (GMT – 7:00, due to DST in US) Chairs: –Al Morton
Delay Variation Applicability Statement draft-morton-ippm-delay-var-as-02 March 21, 2007 Al Morton Benoit Claise “
1 draft-duffield-ippm-burst-loss-metrics-01.txt Nick Duffield, Al Morton, AT&T Joel Sommers, Colgate University IETF 76, Hiroshima, Japan 11/10/2009.
SIP Performance Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-01 draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-01 March 22, 2010 Prof. Carol Davids, Illinois Inst. of Tech.
Delay Variation Applicability Statement draft-morton-ippm-delay-var-as-03 July 24, 2007 Al Morton Benoit Claise.
RFC 2544 Applicability Statement: Use on Real-World Networks Considered Harmful draft-chairs-bmwg-2544-as-00 Scott Bradner, Kevin Dubray, Jim McQuaid,
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 79th IETF Thursday, November 11, 2010, CST (China Standard Time GMT +8:00) Chairs: –Al Morton
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 64th IETF – Vancouver, Canada Monday, November 7, 2005, 15:10-17:10 (Oak) Chairs: –Kevin Dubray
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 67th IETF – San Diego CA, USA Tuesday, November 7, 2006, 13:00-15:00 (Spinnaker) Chairs: –Al Morton
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 66th IETF – Montreal, Canada Thursday, June 13, 2006, 13:00-15:00 (519A) Chairs: –Al Morton – If.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 71st IETF – Philadelphia, PA USA Monday, March 10, 2008, 13:00-15:00 (Salon J) Chairs: –Al Morton
Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 57th IETF – Vienna, Austria Tuesday, July 15, 2003, and Chairs: –Kevin Dubray
July 2010Geib/Morton/Fardid/Steinmitz / draft-ietf-metrictest-001 Testing Standards Track Metrics Draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-00 Geib, Morton, Fardid, Steinmitz.
64th IETF Vancouver November 2005 ASON-Compatible Signaling.
1 IMIX Genome Al Morton March 2011 draft-morton-bmwg-imix-genome-01.
RAGELab Violence Prevention by experimental rage-laboratory Grundtvig – Learning Partnership.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 78th IETF Thursday, July 29, 2010, CET (GMT – 0:00, due to DST in Europe) Chairs: –Al Morton
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 95th IETF Thursday, April 7, 2016 ( Local Time, UTC-3:00) Chairs: –Al Morton (acmorton(at)att.com) –Sarah.
Program Evaluation- Measuring Performance or Performance Measurements? Dr. Thomason Unit 3 Kaplan University.
OPSAWG chairs: Scott Bradner Christopher Liljenstolpe.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 73rd IETF – Minneapolis, MN USA Monday, November 17, 2008, Afternoon Session I (Rochester) Chairs: –Al Morton.
1 SIP End-to-End Performance Metrics 70 th IETF Conference PMOL Daryl Malas.
Canaries in the Network
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Awareness Training
IPv6 Benchmarking Methodology
SIP Performance Benchmarking
IPv6 Benchmarking Methodology
CLUE WG Interim Meeting San Jose, CA Sept , 2012
Benchmarking Framework
CONDUCTING OF GMP INSPECTION
Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 96th IETF
Al Morton July 2011 draft-morton-bmwg-imix-genome-02
Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 65th IETF – Dallas, Texas, USA
Connected Vehicle Technology
Benchmarking Framework draft-constantine-bmwg-traffic-management-02
Proposals and Progress Reports
The idea Policy Process Procedure.
IP Performance Specifications - Progress and Next Steps
SIP Performance Metrics
KINDS OF EXPERIMENT Laboratory experiments (controlled, artificial conditions): Pretest-post-test control and experimental group Two control groups and.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Awareness Training
Patent services for business community
Five insights ‘Peer’ is more about skill than just sameness Peer approaches are not about disseminating information Peer programs can be a strategic asset.
Developing and Communicating a Vision
Other Requirement Artifacts
Developing and Communicating a Vision
Audience Who is the intended audience? How do you know?
Test Equipment and Practices
Testing Standards Track Metrics Draft-geib-ippm-metrictest-02
Wireless Performance Prediction – Organization Proposal
PIM Backup DR Mankamana Mishra IETF-102
DRAFT ISO 9004:2018 Revision Overview “Quality Management - Quality of an organization – Guidance to achieve sustained success” ISO/TC176 TG 01 NXX.
Planning and Reporting
DCCP: Issues From the Mailing List
Scott Bradner & Martin Thomson
Presentation transcript:

Scott Bradner, Kevin Dubray, Jim McQuaid, Al Morton RFC 2544 Applicability Statement: Use on Real-World Networks Considered Harmful draft-chairs-bmwg-2544-as-00 Scott Bradner, Kevin Dubray, Jim McQuaid, Al Morton

Summary This memo clarifies the scope of [RFC2544], with the goal to provide guidance to the community on its applicability, which is limited to laboratory testing. Defines Isolated Test Environment contain the test streams to paths within the desired set-up prevent non-test traffic from traversing the test set-up

Explanation and Advisory Why RFC 2544 Methods are intended for ITE: Experimental Control, Repeatability, and Accuracy Containment of Implementation Failure Impact Methods intended for network devices(not nets) Operating test equipment on real-world networks according to the methods in [RFC2544], where overload is a required outcome, would no doubt be harmful to user traffic performance. These tests MUST NOT be used on active networks.