Firing Up Motivated Learners

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flexible Grouping Practices
Advertisements

Integrating Technology: Some Things You Should Know Raising the Bar November 5, 2007.
Reading Next Writing Next
LITERACY IN THE MIDDLE YEARS OF SCHOOLING INITIATIVE
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Division of Youth Services Oct 26, 2012 Common Core & the Content Areas.
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
Welcome Introduction Parking lot Etc.
Why Inquiry? Inquiry is a process which naturally integrates cross-curricular competencies and the subject areas. Engages learners by making connections.
READING FOR COMPREHENSION AND UNDERSTANDING IN THE 21 ST CENTURY. Kerry Pierce Conklin How is this achieved? Who is responsible?
ALL TEACHERS OF ELLS NEED TO USE THESE TEN KEY STRATEGIES FOR TEACHING ELLS.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
1 Welcome to 7th Grade Language Arts As a Comprehensive Approach to Teaching Reading and Writing.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Science Notebooks January 12, 2008 Jennifer Roberts TC- NSTWP 2007 Using Writing as a Learning and Teaching Tool for Science Inquiry.
Framework for Diagnostic Teaching. Framework The framework for diagnostic teaching places a premium on tailoring programs that specifically fit all readers.
Content Area Reading, 11e Vacca, Vacca, Mraz © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 0 Content Area Reading Literacy and Learning Across the.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
Tiffany Harrell “The goal for every student is to learn, but not every child learns in the same way.” (Firchow, 2011)
Crysten Caviness Curriculum Management Specialist Birdville ISD.
Chapter 1 –organizing principle
Melody Gatti & Kristin Hase – (August 2013) Bell Work: Log into Edmodo -- CODE = kfdiht FOR INTERNET – Edmodo.com Click on “+” next to “Groups”, click.
Terry Spears, PYP Coordinator
Teaching Reading Comprehension
Inquiry Based Learning What is it and how is it achieved? Israel_Johnson_Schlosser Module 2 Assignment 6 Board of Ed Proposal.
New Pathways to Academic Achievement for K-12 English Learners TESOL March 26, 2009 Anna Uhl Chamot The George Washington University.
Hannah Love LSIS 5645 Core Assessment IV. Why is information literacy necessary?  To fulfill the goals of education by preparing students for The workplace.
The Learning Cycle as a Model for Science Teaching Reading Assignment Chapter 5 in Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point.
Inclusion and the Differentiated Classroom By Jennifer Cucinotta.
CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Using Inquiry and Primary Sources.
TEACHING WITH A FOCUS ON LEARNERS One model of Differentiation: Sousa and Tomlinson (2011) Differentiation and The Brain. Purpose: Understanding Text Complexity.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Pedagogy As it relates to the field of linguistics.
1 Using Technology as a Tool in the Differentiated Classroom Doing “whatever it takes to ensure that struggling and advanced learners, students with varied.
UDL and Differentiation EDU 673 Dr. Myisha Warren Rita Scott January 28, 2014.
Goals and Objectives  Why Use Questioning Strategies?  Effective Questioning Techniques  Levels of Questioning…Increasing Understanding, Models for.
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION (DI) Melody Murphy Week 4 Discussion.
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
Get to Know the People at Your Table! 3 things in common non-work related.
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION Cynthia Eason EDU 673 Instruction, Strategy for Differentiated Teaching & Learning.
Close Reading in Non- Fiction Utilizing the three-part learning framework, we will examine practical ways to weave comprehension strategies into your content.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
COMPREHENSION STRATEGIES
Flexible Grouping Practices
ORAL LANGUAGE UNDERPINS ALL READING STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES
Fitting It All In Incorporating phonics and other word study work into reading instruction Michelle Fitzsimmons.
Big Ideas & Problem Solving A look at Problem Solving in the Primary Classroom Lindsay McManus.
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Literacy Practice: Promoting Content Area Reading
Reading Procedures: MODELLED READING
Stematic instru Content instruction Grade level appropriate Tied to the content standards and Frameworks Context embedded and cognitively demanding.
The Concept of INTERDISCIPLINARY TEACHING
High Expectations for a School Community
Learning and Teaching Principles
Scaffolding Instruction
Creating an Active Learning environment
PLC Design and Expectations: A Small School’s Focus on Synergy
Integrating Technology: Some Things You Should Know
Previously Implemented Instructional Approaches
Developing wonder… A process model for learning, inquiry, research, and creativity for WCPSS K-8 students.
University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning
Inquiry in Science.
PBL…The Experience (Problem Based Learning) reflecting the way that learning takes place in every day life. Dr. Simpfronia Taylor Director, Ripley Center.
Thinking About Planning Amalia Lopez
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Action Research: Project Based-Learning Using Research Projects
Insert Slam Dunk Title 1. Inquiry Task & Question
Media Project 4 Assessment and Learning
Presented by: Jenni DelVecchio, Renee Mathis, and Kevin Powell
Presentation transcript:

Firing Up Motivated Learners Building Neuronal Networks through Integrated Instruction Created by: Patricia McDermott EdFS 377 Summer 2008

Psych Ed. Project An integrative unit of study based on “Concept Oriented Reading Instruction (CORI)”, an instructional framework developed at the University of Maryland Guthrie, Van Meter, et. al. 1998 & Guthrie, Cox et. al. 2000

Goals for the Project The goal for this project is twofold: To work collaboratively with teachers to implement CORI in classrooms To provide teachers with a model of integrated instruction that will intrinsically motivate students to learn and gain deep knowledge

Rational for “The Project” Zull points to the need for educators to help students "make connections" in order to gain comprehension and reach deep understanding. CORI provides teachers with a framework to make these connections while increasing flexibility in utilizing class time efficiently and effectively

Rational for “CORI” in the Classroom The principles for integrated instruction contain three vital connections: 1. connections between disciplines, such as science and language arts, taught through conceptual themes 2. connections between strategies for learning, such as searching, comprehending, interpreting, composing, and the teaching of content knowledge 3. connections among classroom activities that support motivations and social and cognitive development” (Guthrie & McCann, 1997)

Additional Rational for “CORI” CORI is based on the premise that classrooms should be structured to build self-efficacy promote curiosity foster collaboration challenge students intrinsically motivate students to seek new knowledge

The Zull, Kolb, CORI Connection Provide students with opportunities to connect prior knowledge with new knowledge through concrete experiences (building on existing neuronal networks) engage in self-directed learning (allowing control) work collaboratively with peers toward a common goal (reflecting and social networking) strengthen meaning and understanding through conceptual learning (forming new neuronal networks) integrate knowledge to formulate ideas and carry out plans of action that will, ultimately, serve as evidence of deep understanding (action)

The CORI, Zull, Kolb Connection

CORI’S Framework of Instruction

Reading GLEs and Science GEs

Establishing Prior Knowledge Reading Primary Observation Assessments • Teacher Observations Science Teacher-made Pre-assessment on the Five Senses

Assessing Prior Knowledge of the Five Senses

Rubric for Assessing Prior Knowledge

Week 1: Observe & Personalize Zull’s sensory cortex; Kolb’s concrete experiences Students interact with the real world Activate background knowledge Observe and record information Compare and contrast Relate experiences Pique interest for learning Pose questions (use “Curiosity Chart”) Differentiation: Learning Styles

"At-a-Glance”: Sample of a lesson plan for the first week

Sample of a Five Senses Recording Sheet (to be used at Stations)

Sample of Activity (to reflect and react)

The Next Three Phases of CORI Search & Retrieve Phase 3: Comprehend & Integrate Phase 4: Communicate to Others Students choose subtopics and learn to search for information Students learn strategies for comprehending and integrating information Students become experts and develop synthesis projects to share with others

Phase 2: Search & Retrieve Zull’s back integrative cortex; Kolb’s reflection Students choose subtopics and learn to search for information Students choose a topic to research Expand knowledge about topic through research Teams search for and gather information using a variety of modes: multiple texts, graphs, charts, maps, tables, and media Work collaboratively in groups according to interest Differentiation for interest and reading ability

Phase 3: Comprehend & Integrate Zull’s frontal integrative cortex; Kolb’s generation of abstractions Students learn strategies for comprehending and integrating information Main instructional focus is on reading strategies (using guided reading groups to provide scaffolding) Determine critical details Summarize important information from texts Organize important information using concept maps Use interesting texts and sources including internet Collaborate and create plans and ideas for presenting information to an audience Differentiation: Interest, readiness (reading ability), learning styles

Phase 4: Communicate to Others Zull’s motor cortex; Kolb’s active testing Students become experts and develop synthesis projects to share with others Communicate conceptual learning: teach an audience about science content Present information about content knowledge using oral and written language, as well as visual images Given criteria (rubrics), students choose how they will share new knowledge for an audience Differentiation: Learning Styles

Interesting Websites on the Five Senses The following websites from edHelper.com have an assortment of grade-appropriate, printable reading materials for primary students (at a cost): キ http://freda.auyeung.net/5senses/... キ http://www.edhelper.com/five_senses.htm... キ http://freda.auyeung.net/5senses/smell.htm... キ http://freda.auyeung.net/5senses/taste.htm... キ http://www.edhelper.com/ReadingComprehension_27_68.html... Provide good activities for activating PK and observing & personalizing: キ http://www.fi.edu/qa97/me9/... - キ http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/chtoget.html... (called Neuroscience for Kids) Excellent for accelerated readers/enrichment キ http://www.nlm.nih.gov/changingthefaceofmedicine/resources/lesson_k_2.html... Incredible website for teachers - talks about senses and the brain キ http://www.hhmi.org/senses/c210.html

MORE Interesting Websites CORI-related http://www.cori.umd.edu/development/framework/ http://www.cori.umd.edu/overview/goals/reading.php http://www.readingrockets.org/article/284 http://www.teach.virginia.edu/go/clic/nrrc/cori_r10.html Zull-Kolb’s Work http://neurons.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/learning-the-brain-%E2%80%93-taylor-lamoreaux-adult-learning-zull-model/

References Guthrie, John L. & McCann, Ann Dacey. (1997). Characteristics of classrooms that promote motivations and strategies for learning. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 128-148). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association. Perencevick, Kathleen C. (2004) How the CORI Framework looks in the Classroom. In Guthrie, John T., Wigfield, Allan, & Perencevich, Kathleen C. (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction (pp. 25-53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Zull, James E. (2002). The art of changing the brain: enriching the practice of teaching by exploring the biology of learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus

- IF you choose to reflect… plan… & act! NOT the End - IF you choose to reflect… plan… & act!