Trilateral Research EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ETSI Standards, open standards and Interoperability
Advertisements

COMMON ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS (CAMSS)
Quality Label and Certification Processes Vienna Summit 11 April 2014 Karima Bourquard Director of Interoperability IHE-Europe.
1 European Standardisation and the Identification of ICT Technical Specifications 13th XBRL Europe Day Rome, 6 May 2014 Antonio Conte, Project Manager.
Jose Braz, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3rd Package 11th December 2008 The Agency for the Cooperation of European Energy Regulators.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
World Class Standards Standards Mandate M 376 – Phase 2 European public procurement of accessible ICT Mandate M European Accessibility requirements.
The Crown and Suppliers: A New Way of Working People & Security15:35 – 16:20 Channels & Citizen Engagement Social Media ICT Capability Risk Management.
Standardisation in the European Statistical System Barteld Braaksma, Cecilia Colasanti, Piero Demetrio Falorsi, Wim Kloek, Miguel Angel Martínez Vidal,
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
Roles and Responsibilities
N° 1 The European railway Agency: an engine for the integrated railway area EFRTC, Vilamoura on June 24 TH 2005 Olivier PIRON 24 June 2005.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Convergence and the eHealth Interoperability Framework
National Institute of Standards and Technology Information Technology Laboratory 1 USG Cloud Computing Technology Roadmap Next Steps NIST Mission: To promote.
EC Initiative « Standardisation Package » latest news Cyrill DIRSCHERL EC – DG ENTR /C.5 Standardisation Unit.
JRC - IRMM – 17/18 June 2008 – EAQC-WISE project workshop – Held1 The EAQC-WISE blueprint: Recommendations for a quality control system for chemical monitoring.
European Commission - DG Research - Directorate B – “Structuring the European Research Area” Jean-David MALO – Bucharest, February 12-13, NOT LEGALLY.
Interoperability Rudy van Beurden GTE ExCom member GTE+ Workshop on GTE+ Work Programme 24 June 2008.
Action Plan for the future of organic production in the European union State of Play 1.
SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT
3rd Helix Nebula Workshop on Interoperability among e-Infrastructures and Commercial Clouds Carmela ASERO, EGI.eu 17 September 2013, Madrid
CONFERENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF MARKETS IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DIRECTIVE -MiFID- Split, June 2007 OPENING SPEECH Ante Samodol President of the Board.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
DG Enterprise and Industry European Commission Standardisation Aspects of ICT and e-Business Antonio Conte Unit D4 - ICT for Competitiveness and Innovation.
Proprietary and confidential. Do not distribute.Deck Title1 May, 2016 DG CONNECT European Catalogue KEY RULES & DECISION MAKING Trilateral: Monica Lagazio,
Who needs a European Catalogue of standards? iEU seminar 6 June 2016 Moderator: Nico Westpalm van Hoorn Chair of the Dutch Standarisation Forum.
CEN WS/BII Business interoperability interfaces for public procurement in Europe The path towards more efficient procurement in Europe through standards.
Bled, 18 th June 2008 eCollaboration: Overcoming Boundaries through Multi channel collaborations Workshop on Services.
European Commission 1 Interoperability of Air Traffic Management systems for the Single European Sky.
Global Standards Management Process Henri Barthel General Manager Business Development EAN International.
This project has received funding from the European Union’s H2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no Introduction to CIVILEX.
EGI Foundation (Session Chair)
INSPIRE and the role of Spatial Data Interest Communities (SDIC)
“Self-Sustaining Innovation Ecosystems for European Leadership”
Integrated Management System and Certification
Observatory, Service catalogue, Marketplace and SME end-user club
Trilateral Research EUROPEAN COMMISSION
National planning for Open Research euroCRIS 2017, 30 May 2017
Trilateral Research EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Implementation Strategy July 2002
Session II: System authority for ERTMS 4RP Trackside approval
Community Solutions Initiative Partnership Discussion
ETSI Standardization Activities on M2M communications
Roadmap to Enhanced Technical Regulations of WMO
Project proposal for ISO 27001:2013 implementation
The Role of European Standards in Support of the Cybersecurity Act
Presentation to TRAN Committee
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
Change Assurance Dashboard
Using the Checklist for SDMX Data Providers
CAMSS ISA² - Action Common Assessment Method for
ERTMS: specifications, deployment, financing
WMO Global Multi-Hazard Alert System
CEPMC Executive Board and General Assembly EC standardisation package
E-invoicing Training conference Towards electronic invoicing in 2020:
INSPIRE fitness for purpose – Analysis
Revision of the European Interoperability Framework (EIF)
WWater reuse Water Directors 24/11/2014 Nicola NOTARO
State of play of B2G eInvoicing in public procurement
The evaluation process
BUSINESSEUROPE The Confederation of European Business
Jørgen Friis, ETSI VP SES
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
2012 Annual Call Steps of the evaluation of proposals, role of the experts TEN-T Experts Briefing, March 2013.
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
5.b3 Monitoring & Reporting 2019
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
… Two-step approach Conceptual Framework Annex I Annex II Annex III
European Commission's Initiative on Electronic Transport Documents
Presentation transcript:

Trilateral Research EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Innovation and Advanced Manufacturing KETs, Digital Manufacturing and Interoperability European Catalogue ADOPTION METHODOLOGY Fondazione FORMIT: Pietro Costanzo, Massimiliano Argiolu DG CONNECT June, 2016

Adoption Methodology: structure of this session Presentation of the proposed Adoption Process and the key activities including role and responsibilities; Presentation of an Adoption Process Use Case; Workshop participants to evaluate the process “fit-for-use” Following Directive 98/34, this document defines a 'Standard' as “a technical specification approved by a recognised standardisation body for repeated or continuous application, with which compliance is not compulsory and which is one of the following: International standard: a standard adopted by an international standardisation organisation and made available to the public, Such as ISO European standard: a standard adopted by a European standardisation body and made available to the public, National standard: a standard adopted by a national standardisation body and made available to the public.” In addition, the European Commission will provide means by which fora and consortia specifications can be used with the same validity, once these have been approved by a multi-stakeholder platform. For the remainder of this document we will refer to formal standards developed by standard setting bodies, and technical specifications from fora and consortia that have the necessary properties to be approved by the multi-stakeholder platform as "standards".

Proposed definition of adoption methodology for the Catalogue The adoption methodology is the process of adopting ICT standards and related solutions based on the gathering of needs and proposals, the assessment, the adoption and the implementation. Each Catalogue Entry can include an Use Case and related standards profiles or set of standards, recommendations and procurement guidelines. USE CASE = possibile caso di utilizzo dello standard

The BPM Notation Events Activities Gateways Connections

Adopting ICT standards process: domain neutral including steps being or not being in place across MS

Process actors Solution Requester Actors that need to define requirements for a specific purpose. E.g. a procurer that needs to define requirements for a tender, or a private company that has to answer to an EU level tender. Also a Standard Organization can submit its own Standard for being inserted into the Catalogue (providing possible Use Case and Standard Profile, guidelines, etc.). Catalogue Management Team (CMT) CMT is responsible for the implementation, maintenance and improvement of the Catalogue. Setting priorities for each domain in short and long term and evaluate new requests, they also have to consider the impact of adopted standards changes. Teams of technical experts of Matter (TEM) TEM supports the CMT in deeper evaluation of technical aspects within the different domains. The team will be defined according to the governance model. Their duty is to analyse all the technical aspects of requirements and to identify interoperability issues; furthermore, they support the CMT in building the profiles. Board of Reviewers (BOR) BOR is the final decision making body about the adoption of a standard. Its composition depends on the chosen governance model. BOR should be supported by TEM and MS delegates, appointed depending on the specific subject to adopt.

New standard taking charge activities External Input Collection (Responsibility: Catalogue Management Team) the CMT receives requests coming from the external Process Stakeholders (like MS procurers or industries, Large Pilot Programmes or Standard Organization) checking if these requests are complete (i.e.: standard and its classification, domain, use case, etc.) Impact Analysis (Responsibility: Technical Experts of Matter) This analysis activity has to identify the impacts of introducing Standards, Profiles, Use Case, into the Catalogue, verifying possible issues.

Questions? Some inputs… If a standard is already present into the Catalogue, or the Use Case proposed is very similar to another, is it useful to execute the impact analysis in order to find possible integrations or improvements? When a new standard is proposed, is it useful to reassess all the use cases and related standard profiles, with similar topics?

First approval and Use Case definition and review Requirement approval review (Responsibility: Board of Reviewers) This activity reviews the results of the Impact Analysis, verifying if the proposed standard adheres to the Catalogue scope and it does not introduce risks that could alter the Catalogue. If the proposed standard is declared as not mature yet and/or not enough stable it could be refused. Proposed Catalogue Entry Discarding (Responsibility: Catalogue Management Team) After refusing a standard/requirement or other kind of input, the CMT has to store these information in a specific part of the Catalogue for future purposes issuing a formal motivation to the applicant. Use Case Definition (Responsibility: Catalogue Management Team) The aim of this activity is to define the use cases in which the proposed standard can be applied, e.g. in terms of domains, scope and applicability Use Case Review (Responsibility: Board of Reviewers ) Use Case proposed by the stakeholder or developed by CMT validation. BOR has to be supported by all interested stakeholders (internal or external to the governance).

Questions? Some inputs… Which kind of information do you need in building a use case representative of your real needs? Which are the necessary elements you need in the Use Case definition?

Catalogue Entry definition and adoption Selection of necessary Standards Definition of Standard Profile Definition of Procurement Guidelines (Responsibility: Catalogue Management Team) the Use Case should be integrated with other standards (other than the proposed ones) that could fit with Use Case scope. These standards should be aggregated in specific “profiles” based on the single needs depicted in the Use Cases. If necessary, procurement guidelines should be defined or collected Compliancy and interoperability Review (Responsibility: Technical Experts of Matter) This review tests the deliverables released in the last three activities. The CAMSS methodology and external databases (e.g. CEF) could be useful for avoiding interoperability issues Consultation Process Catalogue Entry Adoption Review (Responsibility: Board of Reviewers) This sub-process is useful to create consensus about all the deliverables produced; it is articulated depending on complexity and impact. At its end a formal review assesses the feedbacks received and decides to adopt the Catalogue Entry as highly recommended/mandatory or recommended only according to the agreement and the endorsement reached.

Questions? Some inputs… Other than the CAMSS, which other instruments could be useful to consider? NIST? ISO generic (i.e. ISO 20k family)? Cabinet Office Standards?

Catalogue Review Process

A simple use case example … A Procurer has to create an own Cloud Computing Service Catalogue by a tender or a framework agreement with the providers. The Procurer does not have developed specific service levels (SLA) and/or certification requirements yet. Which standards, (other than the CAMSS assessed) could be used for the Procurement? ITIL ISO 27001 ISO 20000 TOGAF NIST SP 800-146: Cloud Computing Synopsis and Recommendations NIST SP 800-144: Guidelines on Security and Privacy in Public Cloud Computing Procurement Innovation for Cloud Services in Europe (http://www.picse.eu/) Other Standards?

A simple use case example … The need is to support a User in the customization and/or tailoring a Cloud Computing Service.  The Service/Operational Level Agreement has to be adapted to the user’s needs. User also requires that Service has specific interoperability requirements (e.g.) and/or certification evidences against the requirement (e.g. Security) Which standards, (other than the CAMSS assessed) could be used? ITIL ISO 27002 SOC CSA CCM ODCA SUoM (Standard Units of Measure for IaaS)

A simple use case example … Other similar use case already in? Other use case or standard impacted

A simple use case example … Verify existing guidelines A simple use case example … Standard CAMSS only? Adaptable depending on impact and complexity

European Catalogue ADOPTION METHODOLOGY Trilateral Research EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Innovation and Advanced Manufacturing KETs, Digital Manufacturing and Interoperability European Catalogue ADOPTION METHODOLOGY DG CONNECT June, 2016

Trilateral Research EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Innovation and Advanced Manufacturing KETs, Digital Manufacturing and Interoperability European Catalogue ADOPTION METHODOLOGY – Draft issued by Fondazione FORMIT, June 2016 DG CONNECT June, 2016