Summary of National Family Needs Assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Texas Medicaid to Schools Program Random Moment Time Study (RMTS)
Advertisements

An Audiological Management Manual for UNHS Referrals Antonia Brancia Maxon, Ph.D. Karen Ditty, M.S. Kathleen Watts, M.A. Diane Sabo, Ph.D. Karen Munoz,
SCHOOLS K - 12 Dr. Susan W. Floyd Education Associate Speech-Language Disabilities, Assistive Technology Office of Exceptional Children South Carolina.
Parent Educational Advocacy Training Center
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
Roadmap for Your Transition IEP:
Transition to Postsecondary Education, Training, Employment, & Independent Living.
The Top 10 Basics of Special Education The final 5 of.
W isconsin E ducational S ervices P rogram for the D eaf and H ard of H earing (WESP-DHH) Outreach Program Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
 IDEA is a federal law that helps millions of children with disabilities to receive special services designed to meet their unique needs  Under IDEA.
Shelley Ardis Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind Outreach Services: 30 Years of Successful Services.
 Describes the special education program and services that are provided within a school district and those special education programs and services which.
Laura Matson, Ph.D. Director, Special Services Puget Sound Educational Service District Navigating the School Culture September 25, 2014.
The Basics of Special Education. Steps: The Basics of Special Education Process under IDEA Step 1. Step 1. Child is identified as possibly needing special.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Special Education Process: Role of the School Nurse Marge Resan, Education Consultant Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Idaho Educational Services for the Deaf and the Blind
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
 Services and Support to young children with special needs  creating partnerships  Family  School  Community.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Jim O’Brien Head Start Bureau Health and Disabilities Services Branch 330 C Street, SW Washington, DC Phone: (202)
Support Services for Deaf-Blind in N.C.
Your state Project information Here. Your State Project Information Funded through the US Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Child & Family Connections #14. What is Child and Family Connections The Early Intervention Program in Illinois State funded program to assist families.
Early Learning Board Presentation March 2, 2016.
TRANSITION from School to Work to Independence Presented by: Attorney Janine A. Solomon © Massachusetts Advocates for Children June.
IEP Basics. Special Education Laws Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA-2004) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA-2004) Section.
Advocacy Using Assessment of FASD in Schools
National Webinar April 19, 2017
Perkins School for the Blind
Mary Beth Bruder, Ph.D. Cristina Mogro-Wilson, Ph.D.
Related Service Providers
Sister Van Nga Le Nhat Hong Center for the Blind & Visually Impaired
Understanding Your Child’s IEP
Visiting Parents Program
Administering Inclusive Infant-Toddler Child Care
Pre-Summit Webinar Initiative Updates
Education, Advocacy, Resources
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Making Connections: Vermont’s Early Intervention Partnerships
Montana DHH Outreach Program
Idaho Educational Services for the Deaf and the Blind
Building a National Collaborative Network for Deaf-Blind Services
The Arc of the District of Columbia, Inc.
Engaging Families in Special Education
Working with Transitioning Youth
NAMI 2018 Conference Monterey, CA
DB Summit 2016 Early Identification/Referral Session
from Pediatric to Adult Care
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
A non-profit organization providing support to North Carolina parents and professionals for more than 25 years.
Summit 2016 – Family Engagement Initiative Update
Education, Advocacy, Resources
Linda McDowell Susan Edelman Sam Morgan
1:1 Aides 1/29/2016.
OSEP “Hot Topics in Early Childhood” Meeting
Summit 2016 Planning and Preparation
California Bridges to Youth Self-Sufficiency
California Bridges to Youth Self-Sufficiency
The Transition Planning Process
Exceptional Children’s Program
Family Guide: Understanding Transition Team Members’ Responsibilities
SUPPORT FOR STATE DEAF-BLIND PROJECTS: TWO-PART WEBINAR SERIES
Ellen Condon, NCDB Project Director, Montana Deaf-Blind Project
Support for State Deaf-Blind Projects Part 2: NCDB TA Services
Alignment Across the Ages
Presentation transcript:

Summary of National Family Needs Assessment Megan Cote, NCDB Family Engagement Lead Mark Schalock, NCDB Data and Evaluation Coordinator nationaldb.org info@nationaldb.org The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education #H326T130013. However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of The Research Institute, nor the US Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Jo Ann McCann.

Overview of the Assessment Background Child and Family Needs and Strengths Experiences with Agencies, Programs and Service Providers Experience and Interactions with other Families Local, State and National Supports

I. Background Section I focuses on the recruitment of Families, number of responding families, and some demographics of their children.

Recruitment of Families State Deaf-Blind Projects NFADB Charge Syndrome Foundation NCDB English and Spanish versions On-line as well as paper-pencil versions 184 families responded to one or more items

Current Age of Children (N=184) Youngest = less than 1 year of age Oldest = 61 years of age Average = 12 years 3 months Birth – 2 = 9 Pre-school age (3-5) = 38 Elementary school age (6-11) = 54 Middle/High school age (12-17) = 42 Young adults age 18-21 = 25 Young adults ages 22-30 = 10 Over 30 = 7

Age of Diagnosis of Deaf-Blindness (N=182) At birth = 54 Before 1 year old = 34 1-2 years old = 47 3-5 years old = 29 6-10 years old = 15 Older than 10 years = 2 Not sure = 1

Age when Connected to State Deaf-Blind Project (N=132) At birth = 8 Before 1 year old = 14 1-2 years old = 28 3-5 years old = 38 6-11 years old = 21 Older than 11 years = 7 Don’t Remember = 16

Referral to State Deaf-Blind Project (N=63) Who referred you to State Deaf-Blind Project Part C Provider (22%) School Personnel (19%) The SDBP contacted me (13%) Hospital/medical professional (11%) Another parent or friend (10%) I sought them out (8%) Social worker/other program or agency (6%) Don’t remember (11%)

II. Needs and Strengths Section II focuses on the needs of children as well as the needs and strengths of families.

Child Needs (N=180 respondents; 485 responses) What are current top needs you have for your child? Most frequent responses Communication system Qualified knowledgeable personnel at local level Social engagement Health Independent living and functional living skills Supports in the home and community Parent training to support our child

Areas of Child Needs What are the current areas of need for your child? Greatest areas of need General/cut across (e.g. communication, qualified personnel, etc.) Community engagement/supports Home supports Medical/Health care Post-Secondary/Adult Life School A number of additional needs were mentioned by families. These included such things as: Dealing with Medical System, Housing, access to Brailled materials, General Development, an Intervener, Accessible Materials, Sensory Supports, Speech and Language Therapy, Toilet Training, Transportation, Auditory Supports/Hearing Aids, Networking with other children/families, Summer Camps, College and Feeding.

Family Needs (N= 154) What do you most need information about? (In order of frequency) Assistive technology use Communication methods and instruction Advocacy skills to support my child in school and the community Impact of vision and hearing loss Helping my child build social skills and friendships Building a network of support for my child Transition to adult life Supporting my child with complex medical needs

More Family Needs What else do you most need information about? Interveners in school Dealing with challenging behaviors Life of our child as an adult Dealing with IEPs and assessments Movement Employment Sibling support Transition from early intervention to school

Family Strengths (N=124) Family characteristics and dynamics (n=123) Our family is a strong team Our adaptability, determination and patience Love, humor and faith Knowing and understanding our child Being consistent We allow our child freedom to explore We focus on strengths and maintain high expectations We include our child in all family activities We celebrate successes

Family Strengths Our skills and abilities (n=102) Taking care of educational and medical needs Ability to advocate for our child Ability to find resources Ability to communicate with our child Experience as educator(s) – teaching specific skills Our ability (financial) to provide support Development of external supports (n=12) Connecting with other families Having external supports

III. Experiences with agencies and service providers Section III focuses on the various agencies and service providers families deal with in supporting their child.

Satisfaction with Service Agencies/Programs (N= 166) State and Local School District/Department of Education (n=154); 69% have had positive experiences Part C Program (n=97); 75% have had positive experiences Developmental Disabilities (n=84); 42% have had positive experiences Vocational Rehabilitation (n=48); 38% have had positive experiences

Satisfaction with Service Agencies/Programs Other Medical System (n=130); 78% have had positive experiences Public Health System (n=60); 47% have had positive experiences Kellen Keller Regional Representative (n=56); 52% have had positive experiences Parent Center (n=38); 42% have had positive experiences Other local, state and national agencies/programs (n=43); 95%have had positive experiences

Educational Service Providers (N=162) Educational Personnel Teachers Special Education Teacher (143), Teacher of the Visually Impaired (126), Early Intervention Teacher (120), Regular Education Teacher (106), Teacher of the Deaf or Hard of Hearing (105), Teacher of the Deafblind (37) Related Service Providers SLP (150), OT (142), PT (138), School nurse (104), O&M (94), Interpreter (33) Paraeducators Paraeducators (84), Interveners (46) Administrators School administrator (96) District administrator (63)

Medical/Social Service Providers (N=162) Vision/Hearing Professionals Audiologist (150), Ophthalmologist (142), Optometrist (110) General Medical Professionals Pediatrician (145), Physician (141), Public Health Nurse (31) Social Service Personnel Social Worker (68)

IV. Experiences and interactions with other families Section IV focuses on the experiences and interactions with family groups and other families.

Interactions with other Families (N=149) Frequency of Interactions with Other Families Of the 149 respondents: 74 (49.7%) never communicate with other families 53 (35.6%) communicated 1-2 times per month 5 (3.4%) communicated 3-5 times per month 17 (11.4%) communicated more than 5 times per month

Preferred Interactions with Other Families (N=152) Means of Interaction Of the 152 respondents: 112 preferred in person interactions 90 preferred private Facebook groups 69 preferred phone calls 69 preferred texting (& a few preferred email) About 25% preferred some form of on-line communication (Skype, Facetime, Google Chat, etc.) Several respondents were not interested in communicating with other families

Experiences and Interactions with other Families(N=132) Parent Groups and Advocacy Efforts Of the 132 respondents: 69 indicated that there was a parent group in their state 40 indicated they were active in their state parent group 28 indicated that there wasn’t a parent group 46 did not know or did not respond 13 indicated that they were active in state and/or national advocacy efforts.

V. Supports Section V focuses on family supports at the local, state and national levels.

Decision Making Supports (N= 156) Who do Parents Rely on in Making Decisions (overall rankings in parentheses) Themselves Their own knowledge of their child (1) Reading and self-study (3) Experts Service providers (Part C providers, teachers, physicians, etc.) (2) State Deaf-Blind Project personnel (5) Trainings and workshops (4) Watching online videos (8) Other Families Parent of a child who is deaf-blind (6) Local or national parent group (7)

Most Helpful Supports Generally (N=112) Who has provided the most helpful supports Other Families State Deaf-Blind Project CHARGE Syndrome Foundation NFADB HKNC Usher Syndrome Foundation

Most Helpful Supports Specifically (N=112) What has been most helpful Connections to other Families Conferences and Parent Weekends Facebook Groups Resources/information used in home, community, school One on one assistance, TA, training, etc. Advocacy for/support in obtaining services in school and the community

Most Helpful SDBP Supports (N=102) Most Helpful State Deaf-Blind Project Supports Parent workshops/weekends (45%) One on one support to our family (26%) Access to resources and information (25%) TA to teams in school (23%)

Additional Comments (N=40) Need more support groups for parents to connect and share (n= 13) Need help navigating state programs and agencies – especially adult/community services and programs (6) We need qualified personnel in our state: interveners and teachers (4) We/I need more support from national organizations and projects (4) Resources need to be easier for me to find (5) Thank you for your supports/activities (8)