Figure 2 Nonparametric thin-plate spline visualizations of the response surface for each pair of traits. The unbroken line gives the WHR that intersects.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Cancer cachexia by J.N. Gordon, S.R. Green, and P.M. Goggin QJM Volume 98(11): October 17, 2005 © The Author Published by Oxford University.

Advertisements

© Oxford University Press How are the plates moving?

Figure 4. NMDAR subunit protein levels in control and schizophrenic subjects. Scatter plots showing (A) NR1, (B) NR3A, and (C) NR3A/NR1. Small circles.

Figure 1. Genomic instability biomarkers in non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate patients and control children. Frequency of MN (a), nucleoplasmic bridges.

Figure 1: effects of the fire frequency and season treatments on cumulative mean fire intensity (mean intensity of all fires on a plot × number of fires/period.

From: The World Price of Credit Risk

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.

Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.

Figure 1 Effects of playbacks on the time of night when badgers began foraging at the first food patch, measured in minutes after sunset, comparing extant.

Figure 1 Mean number of total invertebrates collected (100 l/h) from drift nets in control and drift-depleted pools during day and night. The number of.

Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.

Figure 4 SNR profiles of 6 of 12 species tested

Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Figure 1 Individual Lifted from Group Photograph

From: Mate choice plasticity in a coral reef fish

Figure 1. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) testing uptake and results among women delivering at Bairo Pite Clinic in Dili, Timor-Leste. From: Prevalence.

From: Where do we go from here

Example 14. Schubert, Quartet in G Major, D

Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data.

M ap 1. Camps and Markets in Tanzania, 1993–94

Fig. 1. The required sample sizes nPPV and nNPV versus the sample allocation fraction P for the case study. From: Sample size for.

Figure 3. Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal (HPA)-axis functioning moderates crime exposure: regions of significance on X (crime). The lines represent two.

Figure 1. Time of initiation of therapeutic hypothermia according to who initiated it. Note the logarithmic scaling of the vertical axis. From: Initiation.

From: Intention, Interpretation, and Contemporary Visual Art

Figure 1: Time points at which sperm samples were analysed for aneuploidy frequencies in controls and cancer patients From: Sperm aneuploidy frequencies.

NOTE.—Error bars in all figures represent standard errors of the means. From: So Close I Can Almost Sense It: The Interplay between Sensory Imagery and.

Figure 1. Percentage of trainees is represented on the y-axis for each competency/knowledge item represented in the x-axis. Only Poor/Fair (P/F) ratings.

Figure 1 Map of the Mediterranean Sea showing the location of Lampedusa island and the main area in which the study was carried out. From: Anthropogenic.

From: Social enviroment influences aphid production of alarm pheromone

Figure 1. Impact ratings for prospective memory lapses for younger (~age 30), middle-age (~age 50), and older (~age 65) adults. From: Daily Memory Lapses.

Figure 6. RRs for clinical cure rates stratified by different diseases

Figure 1. Percentage of participants in each group (holocaust survivors, prewar immigrants, and postwar immigrants) by the main coded strategies. From:

Figure 1 Measured differences in preference for the stimulus colors chosen for the experiment. The total percent chosen for each color averaged across.

NOTE.—ERROR BARS ARE STANDARD ERRORS.

Figure 1 Weighted social networks for (a) chase behavior and (b) display behavior. Each node represents an individual, and individuals are in the same.

Figure 1 Experimental arena to study female locations in response to a green LED. The LED was switched on in the LED ... Figure 1 Experimental arena to.

Figure 1 Female receptivity in the Playback Experiment

Figure 1 Waveforms of example stimuli illustrating how within-individual variation was manipulated. Invariant signals ... Figure 1 Waveforms of example.

Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal success of hatchling turtles as a function of the interaction between hatchling body ... Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal.

Figure 1 Survival plot showing the detection rate of experimental hosts as the proportion butterflies still searching ... Figure 1 Survival plot showing.

Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) ... Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals.

Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.

Figure 1 We consider a scenario where the distributions of signals under safe or dangerous situations mean that a ... Figure 1 We consider a scenario where.

Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs per gram = epg) (A through C) and corresponding infection probabilities estimated by ... Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs.

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.

Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.

Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (solid line) for incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a ... Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted.

Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.

Figure 1 The probability of sighting a Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii) is significantly higher in the morning than ... Figure 1 The probability of sighting.

Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.

Figure 1 (A) Distributions of model (prey; dashed line) and Mimic (predator; solid line) cue values, showing ... Figure 1 (A) Distributions of model (prey;

Figure 1 Maternal relatedness between calves and non-calf unit members correlates with babysitting rate. Relatedness ... Figure 1 Maternal relatedness.

Figure 2 Boxplots indicating male (top) and female (bottom) mate preferences for native (positive numbers) or foreign ... Figure 2 Boxplots indicating.

Figure 1 (a) The distribution of paternity amongst 84 hatchlings sampled at a HDS on the western coastline of Little ... Figure 1 (a) The distribution.

Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following ... Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated.

Figure 1 Mean ± standard error proportions of (a) courtship and (b) copulation by female-male type pairing. Error bars ... Figure 1 Mean ± standard error.

Figure 1 The difference between dominance scores of individual male native Gehyra dubia (n = 10) and introduced male ... Figure 1 The difference between.

Figure 1 (A) Proportion of major prey types found in the diet of 9–10-day-old pied flycatcher nestlings in the Drenthe ... Figure 1 (A) Proportion of major.

Figure 1 Relationships between pair indices of dance performance (joint entropy or mutual information) and the past ... Figure 1 Relationships between.

Figure 2 Model flowchart: (1) Look for a resource; (2) determine whether there are one or more resources in the ... Figure 2 Model flowchart: (1) Look.

Figure 1 Changes in average first serve speed (km/h) over age in women (dark gray; online version red) and men (light ... Figure 1 Changes in average first.

Figure 1 Pace-of-life should mediate behavior

Figure 1 Percentage of male and female helpers in different categories

Figure 2. Forest plot of multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression illustrating the impact of chemoradiation ... Figure 2. Forest plot of multivariable.

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2

Figure 1. Forest plot of lung cancer mortality in LDCT trials.

Presentation transcript:

Figure 2 Nonparametric thin-plate spline visualizations of the response surface for each pair of traits. The unbroken line gives the WHR that intersects the fitness peak (0.75), and the broken lines is a ratio of 0.7 that previous studies have shown to be most attractive. From: Beyond waist–hip ratio: experimental multivariate evidence that average women's torsos are most attractive Behav Ecol. 2009;20(4):716-721. doi:10.1093/beheco/arp051 Behav Ecol | © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Figure 1 Control model (C) Figure 1 Control model (C). The proportions of model C comprise mean values of shoulders, waist, and hips. From: Beyond waist–hip ratio: experimental multivariate evidence that average women's torsos are most attractive Behav Ecol. 2009;20(4):716-721. doi:10.1093/beheco/arp051 Behav Ecol | © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Figure 3 Cubic spline visualization of selection along the only significant canonical axis of selection, m<sub>3</sub>. The solid line is the fitted spline, broken lines are the bootstrapped standard errors, and dots are the observations. From: Beyond waist–hip ratio: experimental multivariate evidence that average women's torsos are most attractive Behav Ecol. 2009;20(4):716-721. doi:10.1093/beheco/arp051 Behav Ecol | © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Figure 4 Nonparametric thin-plate spline visualizations of the response surface for waist and hip circumference with mean values of samples of women plotted on the surface. A = Playboy centerfolds, B = 1920s models, C = 1990s models, D = Australian escorts, E–H = Australian women—E = 19–24 years, F = 25–44 years, G = 45–64 years, H = 65+ years. The unbroken line gives the WHR that intersects the fitness peak (0.75), and the broken lines is a ratio of 0.7 that previous studies have shown to be most attractive. From: Beyond waist–hip ratio: experimental multivariate evidence that average women's torsos are most attractive Behav Ecol. 2009;20(4):716-721. doi:10.1093/beheco/arp051 Behav Ecol | © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org