the Pattern Recognition Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEVELOPMENT OF ONLINE EVENT SELECTION IN CBM DEVELOPMENT OF ONLINE EVENT SELECTION IN CBM I. Kisel (for CBM Collaboration) I. Kisel (for CBM Collaboration)
Advertisements

Computing EVO meeting, January 15 th 2013 Status of the Tracking Code Gianluigi Boca, Pavia University.
1 Sci Fi Simulation and Reconstruction Status M.Ellis/C.Rogers Wednesday 31 st March 2004.
Ties Behnke, Vasiliy Morgunov 1SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Pflow in SNARK: the next steps Ties Behnke, SLAC and DESY; Vassilly Morgunov, DESY and.
ALICE HLT High Speed Tracking and Vertexing Real-Time 2010 Conference Lisboa, May 25, 2010 Sergey Gorbunov 1,2 1 Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies,
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.
KIP TRACKING IN MAGNETIC FIELD BASED ON THE CELLULAR AUTOMATON METHOD TRACKING IN MAGNETIC FIELD BASED ON THE CELLULAR AUTOMATON METHOD Ivan Kisel KIP,
Many-Core Scalability of the Online Event Reconstruction in the CBM Experiment Ivan Kisel GSI, Germany (for the CBM Collaboration) CHEP-2010 Taipei, October.
CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Simulation Status V. Friese.
1 Tracking Reconstruction Norman A. Graf SLAC July 19, 2006.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
Fast reconstruction of tracks in the inner tracker of the CBM experiment Ivan Kisel (for the CBM Collaboration) Kirchhoff Institute of Physics University.
Some Thoughts about Hits, Geometry etc Rob Kutschke, Hans Wenzel Fermilab March 13, 2007.
Status of Reconstruction in CBM
Y.Fisyak, BNL - STAR Upgrade workshop, 12/2/ Integrated Tracker – STAR tracking framework of the future update on  status and  perspective IT(TF)
LHCb Lausanne Workshop, 21st March /12 Tracking Software for DC’06 E. Rodrigues, NIKHEF LHCb Tracking and Alignment Workshop  To do list, and done.
Vertex finding and B-Tagging for the ATLAS Inner Detector A.H. Wildauer Universität Innsbruck CERN ATLAS Computing Group on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
1 PID & FPD Software Gilvan Alves (Lafex/CBPF) Q4Q4 D S Q2Q2 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 Q3Q3 Q4Q4 S A 1Q A1SA1S A 2Q A 2S P 1Q P 2S P 1S P 2Q p p Z(m) A D1 Detector Roman.
Standalone FLES Package for Event Reconstruction and Selection in CBM DPG Mainz, 21 March 2012 I. Kisel 1,2, I. Kulakov 1, M. Zyzak 1 (for the CBM.
Track Finding based on a Cellular Automaton Ivan Kisel Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Uni-Heidelberg Tracking Week, GSI January 24-25, 2005 KIP.
Performance simulations with a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon tracking for CBM Number of integration components Ladders106.
Methods for fast reconstruction of events Ivan Kisel Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Uni-Heidelberg FutureDAQ Workshop, München March 25-26, 2004 KIP.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Cellular Automaton Method for Track Finding (HERA-B, LHCb, CBM) Ivan Kisel Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Uni-Heidelberg Second FutureDAQ Workshop, GSI.
K 0 s reconstruction in ALICE Giuseppe Lo Re INFN, Sezione di Catania, and Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Catania, Italy, March 2002.
Marco Cattaneo, 6-Apr Issues identified in sub-detector OO software reviews Calorimeters:18th February Tracking:24th March Rich:31st March.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.
Giuseppe Ruggiero CERN Straw Chamber WG meeting 07/02/2011 Spectrometer Reconstruction: Pattern recognition and Efficiency 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer.
AliRoot survey: Reconstruction P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
Object-Oriented Track Reconstruction in the PHENIX Detector at RHIC Outline The PHENIX Detector Tracking in PHENIX Overview Algorithms Object-Oriented.
Low-energy Sim/Reco Capability Xin Qian (BNL) Tingjun Yang (FNAL) 1.
FPGA Helix Tracking Algorithm for PANDA Yutie Liang, Martin Galuska, Thomas Geßler, Wolfgang Kühn, Jens Sören Lange, David Münchow, Björn Spruck, Milan.
FPGA Helix Tracking Algorithm for PANDA Yutie Liang, Martin Galuska, Thomas Geßler, Jifeng Hu, Wolfgang Kühn, Jens Sören Lange, David Münchow, Björn Spruck,
FPGA Helix Tracking Algorithm with STT Yutie Liang, Martin Galuska, Thomas Geßler, Wolfgang Kühn, Jens Sören Lange, David Münchow, Milan Wagner II. Physikalisches.
FPGA Helix Tracking Algorithm -- VHDL implementation Yutie Liang, Martin Galuska, Thomas Geßler, Wolfgang Kühn, Jens Sören Lange, David Münchow, Björn.
14/06/2010 Stefano Spataro Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Stefano Spataro III Panda.
Vienna, PANDA meeting, December 1 st, 2015 Universita’ di Pavia Italy Track efficiency and contamination in Road Finding Pattern Recognition when the interaction.
1 The Scintillation Tile Hodoscope (SciTil) ● Motivation ● Event timing/ event building/ software trigger ● Conversion detection ● Charged particle TOF.
Year 3 Reconstruction and Calibration Status David Hardtke LBNL 1.What’s new? 2.Status of Calibrations 3.Why we need ITTF.
PANDA Software Trigger K. Götzen Dec Challenge Required reduction factor: ~1/1000 (all triggers in total) A lot of physics channel triggers → even.
Torino, June 15 th, 2009 Status of the Pattern Recognition with the Hough transform and the STT system alone. Gianluigi Boca 1.
Gianluigi, 10 Sep 2012 Paris, September 10 th 2012 Status of the Pattern Recognition Code Gianluigi Boca GSI & Pavia University 1.
Frascati September 8 th, 2014 Universita’ di Pavia Italy Improvements in the offline Pattern Recognition in the 20 MHz interaction rate environment Gianluigi.
FPGA Helix Tracking Algorithm with STT
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
(LHE) tracking and PID packages
Intelligent trigger for Hyper-K
CLAS12 DAQ & Trigger Status
Using IP Chi-Square Probability
STT Detector risk’s assessment
The interplay of GEM and STT
STT pattern recognition improvements since last December meeting and
Upgrade Tracker Simulation Studies
Progress on the online tracking algorithm
Hit Triplet Finding in the PANDA-STT
Resolutions in the central tracker without the Mvd system
Status of the Offline Pattern Recognition Code GSI, December 10th 2012
Tracking muons in Panda(Root)
Update on the FPGA Online Tracking Algorithm
Study of T0 Extraction in the Online Tracking Algorithm
Distribution of MC Information
Criteria for quality assurance and comparison among
Tracking Pattern Recognition
Status of the Offline Pattern Recognition Code Goa, March 12th 2013
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Andrea Bocci Riccardo Ranieri Massimiliano Chiorboli Alessia Tricomi
road – Hough transform- c2
Tracking QA | Tobias Stockmanns on behalf of the MVD group.
Presentation transcript:

the Pattern Recognition Workshop Gieen March 20th, 2015 Summary of the Pattern Recognition Workshop Universita’ di Pavia Italy Gianluigi Boca Universita’ di Pavia and INFN, Italy

On last Monday there was a workshop dedicated to Pattern Recognition software issues : Secondary Vertices Pattern Recognition Pattern Recognition in the Forward Detector Pattern Recognition in the Central Detector Quality Assurance task The T0 task task G.Boca U. Pavia & INFN, Italy

Secondary Vertices Pattern Recognition The hyperons channels are very important for the Panda physics program and the → p - reconstruction is a very challenging task. Long presentation by Lia Lavezzi on the status of her secondary vertex pattern recognition that now includes Stt, Mvd and Gem Ideas presented by Walter Ikegami Andersson focussed on a pattern recognition efficient for secondaries decaying in the Stt system (no Mvd nor forward detectors hits, particularly important for instance for  - ) Discussion on possible synergies between these two tasks to avoid duplications of efforts. G.Boca U. Pavia & INFN, Italy

Pattern Recognition in the Forward Detector Talk by Piotr Poznanski from Cracow University of Technology on four different approaches to the PR with the Forward Tracker. Time of delivery of a working package I hope a few months (?) Recommendation of looking at Martin’s work in order to avoid duplications of efforts. From conversations I had later I learned it is possible that Martin comes back into the game after his graduation. Also Ivan Kisel expressed interest of his group in writing a Cellular Automaton algorithm for foward PR. G.Boca U. Pavia & INFN, Italy

Pattern Recognition in the central detector Talk by Tobias Stockmanns on a new fast Hough trasform algorithm based on Mvd hits to which later the axial Stt hits are added. Talk by Gianluigi Boca on the progress made in the ‘Cleanup Procedure’ necessary to the ‘Road Finding’ algorithm when the 20 MHz interaction rate pileup is turned on. Talk by Ludovico Bianchi on the implementation of an Online Pattern Recognition on GPUs G.Boca U. Pavia & INFN, Italy

Quality Assurance task There is the need to define criteria and to implement a task for assessing the track reconstruction efficiency of a given PR algorithm : degree of spurious hits and fake tracks, momentum resolution etc. and to judge how good is an algorithm in comparison with another. It is possible that different algorithms are the ‘best’ for different topologies (for instance : low P tracks, high momentum tracks, etc) and in the end we may want to use them all to try to reconstruct the largest number of tracks. NEED OF A QUALITY ASSURANCE TASK !

Quality Assurance task Presentation by Lia Lavezzi on the criteria to use (true hits, spurious hits, missing hits etc.) and a detailed implementation in a Pandaroot class: PndMCTrackTrackAssociator and PndTrkQualityAssuranceTask

PndTrackingQualityData Quality Assurance task Presentation by Tobias Stockmanns on the criteria to use and a detailed implementation in a Pandaroot class using Fairlinks : PndTrackingQualityData Lia and Tobias agreed to cooperate and come up with a proposal of a class to use as MC associator/Track quality

The T0 task issue The time at which an interaction happened (T0) is an essential piece of information for all pattern recognition algorithms : it is necessary in order to assign a hit to an event, to determine correctly the drift time in STT etc. Two presentations on this subject. G.Boca U. Pavia & INFN, Italy

The T0 task issue Yutie Liang presented a method based only on the Stt hits belonging to a track, for extracting the T0 information of that track. This method can run fast on FPGA and it can be used for online PR (and also for the offline PR !) and is very useful when T0 cannot be provided by other detectors (for instance if there are no SciTil hits) G.Boca U. Pavia & INFN, Italy

The T0 task issue Michael Papenbrock presented a project to use the info from different detectors (SciTil, Mvd, Dirc, Gem…) in the offline code to extract a T0 for any topology of events interesting for Panda. G.Boca U. Pavia & INFN, Italy

Conclusions A lot of interesting talks during all day of Mondays showing the progress made in all areas of the Pattern Recognition software; the issue of the Pattern Recognition in the Forward Spectrometer is being addressed by the Cracow group and also the Frankfurt group is interested in it; we are addressing the crucial issues of a Quality Assurance task and the T0 task G.Boca U. Pavia & INFN, Italy