New Courses in the Fall Biodiversity -- Pennings

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BIOL EVOLUTION AT MORE THAN ONE GENE SO FAR Evolution at a single locus No interactions between genes One gene - one trait REAL evolution: 10,000.
Advertisements

SNP Applications statwww.epfl.ch/davison/teaching/Microarrays/snp.ppt.
Chapter 2: Hardy-Weinberg Gene frequency Genotype frequency Gene counting method Square root method Hardy-Weinberg low Sex-linked inheritance Linkage and.
1) Linkage means A) Alleles at different loci are independent B) Alleles at different loci are physically close to each other and on the same chromosome.
Microevolution Chapter 18 contined. Microevolution  Generation to generation  Changes in allele frequencies within a population  Causes: Nonrandom.
Genetic Linkage. Two pops may have the same allele frequencies but different chromosome frequencies.
The Evolution of Populations Chapter 21. Microevolution Evolutionary changes within a population  Changes in allele frequencies in a population over.
INTRODUCTION TO ASSOCIATION MAPPING
Discovery of a rare arboreal forest-dwelling flying reptile (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea) from China Wang et al. PNAS Feb. 11, 2008.
Chap 23 Evolution of Populations Genotype p2p2 AA 2pqAa q2q2 aa Phenotype Dominantp 2 + 2pq Recessiveq2q2 Gene pA qa p + q = 1 p 2 + 2pq + q 2 = 1.
Topics How to track evolution – allele frequencies
OUTLINE 22 Forces that disrupt HW equilibrium
Evolution in Populations (or How Natural Selection Works)
Genes within Populations
III. Modeling Selection
Genetic Linkage.
MULTIPLE GENES AND QUANTITATIVE TRAITS
The population genetics of sex and recombination
Evolution and Populations –Essential Questions p
Population Genetics.
Evolution of populations
Mutation source of all new alleles and genes
Population Genetics Population Genetics.
Genetic Variation within Populations 11.1
Modelling Effects at Multiple Loci
Genetic Linkage.
Recombination (Crossing Over)
Evolution in Populations
The Evolution of Populations
Modes of Natural Selection
PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY & GENETIC ENGINEERING (3 CREDIT HOURS)
Genes may interact additively, multiplicatively, or epistatically
Evolution of populations
BIOLOGY NOTES EVOLUTION PART 2 PAGES
15.3 PDQ.
Diversity of Individuals and Evolution of Populations
Evolution of populations
MULTIPLE GENES AND QUANTITATIVE TRAITS
The ‘V’ in the Tajima D equation is:
Basic concepts on population genetics
Chapter 18: Evolutionary Change in Populations
The Evolution of Populations
The Genetic Basis for Evolution
16-2 Evolution as Genetic Change
Hardy Weinberg: Population Genetics
Mechanisms of Evolution
The Mechanisms of Evolution
Genetic Drift, followed by selection can cause linkage disequilibrium
Genetic Linkage.
Mechanisms of Evolution
Population Genetics.
NOTES - CH 23: Population Genetics.
Genetic drift in finite populations
Modern Evolutionary Biology I. Population Genetics
Genetics.
Modern Evolutionary Biology I. Population Genetics
16-2 Evolution as Genetic Change
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
POPULATION GENETICS.
Vocabulary A species is a group of individuals with the potential to interbreed to produce fertile offspring. A population is a localized group of individuals.
BIOLOGY NOTES EVOLUTION PART 2 PAGES
Mechanisms of Evolution
Testing for Selective Neutrality
Mechanisms of Evolution
Population Genetics I. Basic Principles A. Definitions:
Modern Evolutionary Biology I. Population Genetics
BIOLOGY NOTES EVOLUTION PART 2 PAGES
Lesson Overview 17.1 Genes and Variation.
Unit 9: Evolution 9.5 Genes and Variation.
Population Genetics: The Hardy-Weinberg Law
Presentation transcript:

New Courses in the Fall Biodiversity -- Pennings Evolution of Development -- Azevedo Lab/Field Positions

Dynamics of Unlinked Loci two loci, each on a different chromosome A: A1, A2 f (A1) = p, f (A2) = q B: B1, B2 f (B1) = r, f (B2) = s Under Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium, the expected genotype frequencies for each locus are: A: f (A1A1) = p2 f (A1A2) = 2pq f (A2A2) = q2 B: f (B1B1) = r2 f (B1B2) = 2rs f (B2B2) = s2 If the population is in HWE, the 2-locus genotype frequencies are the joint probabilities: f (A1A1B1B1) = p2r2 f (A1A2B1B1) = 2pqr2 f (A2A2B1B1) = q2r2 f (A1A1B1B2) = 2rsp2 f (A1A2B1B2) = 2pq2rs f (A2A2B1B2) = 2rsq2 f (A1A1B2B2) = p2s2 f (A1A2B2B2) = 2pq s2 f (A2A2B2B2) = q2s2

Significant Deviation From 2-locus HWE ---> significant non-random association of genotypes = linkage disequilibrium (w/ or w/o physical linkage) measuring the degree of association: use expected vs. observed distribution of gamete types gamete exp. freq. obs. freq. if loci are independent, A1B1 pr a exp. freq. = obs. freq. A1B2 ps b i.e., pr – a = 0, etc. A2B1 qr c A2B2 qs d what if pr – a  0 ?? D / gametic disequilibrium parameter / deviation from random association between alleles D = a – pr; more generally, D = ad - bc

significant deviation from 2-locus HWE ---> significant non-random association of genotypes = linkage disequilibrium (w/ or w/o physical linkage) measuring the degree of association: use expected vs. observed distribution of gamete types gamete exp. freq. obs. freq. if loci are independent, A1B1 pr a + D exp. freq. = obs. freq. A1B2 ps b - D i.e., pr – a = 0, etc. A2B1 qr c - D A2B2 qs d + D what if pr – a  0 ?? D / gametic disequilibrium parameter / deviation from random association between alleles D = a – pr; more generally, D = ad – bc; *D* < 0.25 magnitude of D measures how much association between alleles at different loci, scaled by their frequency

Recombination Erodes Linkage Disequilibrium: Dt = (1 – r)tDo

Linkage Disequilibrium in Natural Populations May Be Transient Or Permanent: Transient --recent fusion of populations with different allele frequencies and incomplete mixing (admixture) --recent mutation (single copy, by definition in LDE with specific alleles at other loci) --popn bottlenecks or founder events --genetic drift Permanent --very low recombination (e.g., chromosomal inversions) --non-random mating --selection What kinds of selection maintain linkage disequilibrium ??

simplest model -- one trait, one gene, one fitness survival: A--->pr(escape) once predator attacks wij B--->pr(detection) xij multiplicative fitness pr(survival) = pr(detection) x pr(escape) A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 B1B1 w11x11 w12x11 w22x11 B1B2 w11x12 w12x12 w22x12 B2B2 w11x22 w12x22 w22x22

Another Example survival: A--->each A2 allele = 1 additional offspring wij B---> each B2 allele = 1 additional offspring xij additive fitness fecundity = wij + xij A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 B1B1 w11 + x11 w12 + x11 w22 + x11 B1B2 w11 + x12 w12 + x12 w22 + x12 B2B2 w11 + x22 w12 + x22 w22 + x22

Snail Shell Color background color: brown or light (pink, tan, yellow) presence of bands: banded or unbanded snails occur in mixed woods —open (sunny, short grass) and shaded (trees, long grass) brown snails overheat in the open, do best in shade, light do better in the open brown snails with stripes are more conspicuous, eaten by predators light snails without stripes are more conspicuous

brown light banded dead alive fitness depends simultaneously on unbanded alive dead both traits = epistasis

survival depends simultaneously on color and pattern A: A1 = light, A2 = brown B: B1 = banded, B2 = unbanded epistatic fitness A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 B1B1 z11 z11 z21 B1B2 z11 z11 z21 B2B2 z12 z21 z22 where z12 < z11, z12 < z22, and z21 < z11, z21 < z22

fitness epistasis generates strong linkage disequilibrium in polymorphic mimetic swallowtail butterflies such as Papilio dardanus and P. memnon

Epistatic interactions between the alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) and a-glycerol phosphase dehydrogenase loci in Drosophila AdhS a-GpdhS

with ethanol Adh genotype SS SF FF a-Gpdh SS 0.60 1.29 0.93 genotype SF 0.96 1.00 0.84 FF 0.91 0.97 0.86 without ethanol a-Gpdh SS 0.99 1.06 0.86 genotype SF 1.08 1.00 0.94 FF 0.77 1.16 0.75

AdhS a-GpdhS computer simulations

AdhS/S common

with ethanol Adh genotype SS SF FF a-Gpdh SS 0.60 1.29 0.93 genotype SF 0.96 1.00 0.84 FF 0.91 0.97 0.86 without ethanol a-Gpdh SS 0.99 1.06 0.86 genotype SF 1.08 1.00 0.94 FF 0.77 1.16 0.75

How Important Are Epistatic Interactions ?? epistasis implies multiple adaptive peaks -increased variance of F2 hybrids -well-documented examples where different physiological mechanisms produce the same phenotype Do We See Evidence of Epistasis at the Genome Level ??

linkage disequilibrium may slow the rate at which a beneficial mutation increases under selection --linkage to deleterious alleles higher substitution rates associated with higher recombination replacement silent

using LDE to detect positive selection: allelic variation in G6pd (glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase)

the distribution of G6pd-202A corresponds to the distribution of malaria; individuals carrying this allele have reduced risk

Detecting Positive Selection ---> fate of a new allele under mutation and drift: - alleles that are rare (young) with high LDE - alleles that are rare (old) with low LDE - alleles that are common (old) with low LDE recent positive selection: - allele is common with high LDE Sabeti et al. 2002 Nature 419:832 X-chromosomes of 230 men nine alleles of G6pd (based on 11 SNP loci), incl. G6pd-202A genotype each chromosome at 14 add’l SNP loci up to 413Kb away LDE as extended haplotype homozygosity (EHH); defined as pr(same genotype at all marker loci to point x)

G6pd Has Significantly Higher LDE Than Other Alleles

Genes may interact additively, multiplicatively, or epistatically Epistatic selection favors individuals with specific combinations of alleles at different loci Epistasis is suggested by violation of two-locus HWE Linkage disequilibrium is the non-random association of alleles at different loci; D measures the degree of non-random association, scaled by allele frequencies in the population Transient LDE can be produced by drift or admixture; permanent LDE is caused by non-random mating or selection LDE may be relatively uncommon; but direct estimation from pairs of loci likely to interact is difficult