Focused Midterm Report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
1 Responding to Extreme Changes between Self-Study and the Evaluation Visit Dr. Andrew Thompson, Provost Dr. Richard Resch, Provost (Retired) The American.
MSIP Accountability Plan
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
STATUS UPDATE 3/12/2010 Proposed Changes to RCM. Goals Align RCM incentives with institutional goals Identify source of central strategic funds Simplify.
A Presentation for Peralta Community College District Governing Board By Thomas E. Henry, PCCD Fiscal Adviser November 10,
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Presentation for Flex Day June 7, 2011 LATTC Accreditation
COD Institutional Effectiveness Process (IEP) Planning, Assessment, Allocation Learn More.
Strong Schools, Strong Communities Strategic Plan Implementation Process and Roles Saint Paul Public Schools has designed the following process and roles.
ACCJC SPECIAL REPORT DUE TO FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTACT: DR. VICTOR JAIME, ED.D DUE: APRIL 15, 2014.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
PARTNERSHIP FOR STUDENT SUCCESS AT SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE Overview and Two Models.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
August Priority 7 Review Team 7: Planning Subcommittee R. Hall-Allen, M. DesVignes, J. Moore, R. Romali, R. Tillberg Increase the resources available.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
All College Day Friday, January 25, 2013 West Valley College Integrated Planning.
Fall 2006 Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review Process Tenure Review Process Riverside Community College District.
What’s Going on at SCC Presented by: Corinna Evett.
The University of Maine at Fort Kent RURAL U Dual Enrollment Faculty Orientation GOV 200 American Government – 3 credits.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Accreditation Update August 24, 2016 Susan Mills, Accreditation Liaison Officer.
Institutional Self Study in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation Laney College 900 Fallon Street Oakland, CA Accrediting Commission for Community.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Integrated Planning for GCC
MSJC Accreditation Classified Professional Day – March 22,2017
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
Accreditation Update Board of Trustees Meeting January 12, 2016
Moving forward to Fall 2018 visit
LMU’s WASC Special Visit:
COD Institutional Effectiveness Process (IEP)
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
Houston GPS Timeline: Getting Started
ACCJC 18-Month Follow-up Report
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
All About Resources: Standard III
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
William “Bill” McGinnis
Presented by: Corinna Evett
President Yong Vice President Aytch Lynette Apen, IEC Co-Chair
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
House Appropriations Committee Retreat Update on Degree Funding Initiative Tony Maggio November 13, 2018.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Evergreen Valley College Accreditation Update October 20, 2014
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Accreditation & Institution Set Standards
Perkins Training January 10, 2013.
Fort Valley State University
Accreditation follow-up report
Senate Meeting Summary
Presentation transcript:

Focused Midterm Report January 22, 2007

Summary of Team Team visit on March 16-18, 2004. The college was given 10 recommendations. Special emphasis on Recommendations 2, 5, 6, and 7. The college was requested to do a Focused Midterm Report (This requirement is due in the third year after each comprehensive evaluation). Ours is due on March 15, 2007. The 2004 letter to the president asks for inclusion of student loan default rates.

The Midterm Report The purpose of the Midterm Report is to: Indicate progress toward meeting the Accreditation team’s recommendations. Forecast where the college expects to be by the time of the next comprehensive evaluation. Include a summary of progress on college-identified concerns as expressed it the self study.

Key to responses Met— We have evidence that we have completed the recommendation. Significant progress— The item is ongoing and it is not possible to fully meet. Partial— We have not fully met the recommendation; but the college is diligently working on this task. Plan to address— We have a plan that includes the person and deadline to address.

Recommendation Terms PLANS (The expectation is that the plans are to be implemented) Strategic Master Plan, SMP (2003-2009), previously known as the College Master Plan Facilities Master Plan, FMP is a building plan Facilities plans for maintenance of facilities Educational Master Plan, EMP 2006 Departmental plans – at the division level Learning resources — Library, tutoring labs, special labs, etc. Other Plans, EMP 2006 Diversity Plan Information Technology Plan Staff Development Plan Institutional Governance Review Plan Post Retirement Funding Plan

Process to Review Midterm Report Assigned to a staff member Reads the Accreditation Team Report (history/issue of the recommendation) Read our responses All Commission members review the report The Commission votes on the status of our report

Special Emphasis Recommendation 2 College to address the previous team’s recommendation by moving quickly to implement long-range planning in Information and Technology Services and learning resources linked to budget allocations. College Assessment Information and Technology Plan - PARTIAL Learning resources Plan – PARTIAL Linked to budget - PARTIAL Plan to address recommendations I.T. to complete Information and Technology plan - APRIL 2007 College Services to complete the learning resources plan – APRIL 2007 Link plans to budget request - MAY 2007

Special Emphasis Recommendation 5 College to complete a staff diversity plan that would result in greater equity and diversity among all employee groups (especially academic administrators and full-time faculty). College Assessment Staff Diversity Plan - PARTIAL Staff Diversified – SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS Plan to address recommendation HR to complete Staff Diversity Plan - APRIL 2007

Special Emphasis Recommendation 6 Develop a comprehensive Educational Master Plan (EMP) that identifies program needs, strengths and weaknesses, and new programs. This plan will be tied to the program review, facilities planning and the budget process. There is to be a clear linkage between the planning processes and the resource allocation process (budget process) College Assessment Educational Master Plan - MET (Fall 2006) Linkage to facilities - MET Linkage to budget process – MET Plan to address recommendation Implement linking EMP with the Budget process - MAY 2007

Special Emphasis Recommendation 7 An actuarial study should be performed to quantify the outstanding liability of the College’s post-retirement benefits. College Assessment Actuarial study - MET (Fall 2006 study presented to Board) Plan to address recommendation The College/Budget Committee is developing a plan with timelines to address funding this liability - MAY 2007

Remaining Recommendations: Recommendation 1 The facilities plan, technology plan and focused departmental plans should be comprised of actions/strategies and key performance indicators. College Assessment Facilities Plan - PARTIAL Technology Plan - PARTIAL Departmental Plan - PARTIAL Plan to address recommendation Administration to expand the FMP to include a facilities maintenance plan - APRIL 2007 I.T. to complete the technology plan - APRIL 2007 Instruction to complete departmental plans - APRIL 2007

Recommendation 3 Establish planning priorities to guide restoration of lost positions and rehiring new employees. Strong effort to restore and maintain staff development leading to professional growth of staff. College Assessment Planning priorities to restore lost position - PARTIAL Staff development - PARTIAL Plan to address recommendation Senior Staff to review list and outline priorities – MARCH 2007 Staff Development to continue activities.

Recommendation 4 Employee groups, especially management positions, be evaluated in a timely manner. College Assessment Evaluations of employee groups done in a timely manner - PARTIAL Evaluation of management - PARTIAL Plan to address recommendation Cabinet to monitor the evaluation of all employee groups including management positions - MONTHLY

Recommendation 8 Restore college’s depleted reserves to minimum prudent recommended levels. College fixed expenditures not to exceed its fixed revenue. College Assessment Restore reserves to minimum - MET Fixed expenditure not exceed fixed revenue – MET Plan to address recommendation The college’s reserves comprised of on-going monies – SPRING 2010

Recommendation 9 Adhere to a formal process for the evaluation of the CEO, the Board, institutional governance, and associated procedures. College Assessment Evaluation of CEO - PARTIAL Evaluation of the Board - PARTIAL Evaluation of institutional governance - MET Evaluation of governance procedures – SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS Plan to address recommendation ECO and Board evaluations - MAY 2007 Evaluation of governance is an ongoing annual process.

Recommendation 10 The Board should develop a presidential recruitment and transition plan for the new president. College Assessment Hire new president - MET Transition for new president - MET

Summary The college has fully met the following: - Development of the EMP Study of post-retirement liabilities Reserve of 5% Fixed expenditures within fixed revenues New president The college still has a lot of work to do on the following plans and must tie them to budget: - Technology Employees--Staffing, diversity, staff development, evaluation of personnel Facilities Educational programs and learning resources, Finances—reserve, post-retirement liability Governance—review process Board and CEO evaluations The final Midterm Report will be presented to the Board on February 12.