Microcavity Multipixel Performance Report 4

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of test beam data analysis … with emphasis on resistive coating studies Progress and questions 1Meeting at CEA Saclay, 25 Jan 2010Jörg Wotschack,
Advertisements

Muon EDR: Chamber design M2/3 R1/2 16/04/20031T.Schneider/LHCb Muon EDR 1.General description - AW read out -Cathode pad read out -HV supply 2.Details.
24/05/2010Rui De Oliveira1 Resistive protections for Bulk Micromegas Rui de oliveira, Joerg Wotschack Venetios Polychronakos.
Atsuhiko Ochi Kobe University 4/10/ th RD51 collaboration meeting.
Layer 0 Grounding Requirement in terms of noise performance Grounding/Shielding studies with L0 prototype Summary Kazu Hanagaki / Fermilab.
Transmission Bridges All calls through an exchange require the use of a transmission bridge. The main requirements of a transmission bridge are : 1) The.
1Daya Bay RPC HV FDR 6/17/2008 RPC HV cable pick-up noise issue C. Lu, Princeton University (6/17/2008)
29 June 2004Paul Dauncey1 ECAL Readout Tests Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey, C. Fry, R. Halsall, M.
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting Feb, 13, 2008.
1 ME 234/2 HV noise investigation N.Bondar CMU. 12/18/02.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
TPAC1.1 Testing JC/Jan 16 th. Comparator Investigations Two (related) symptoms were observed – Non-gaussian threshold scans, with steep sides and flat.
Mauro Raggi Status report on the new charged hodoscope for P326 Mauro Raggi for the HODO working group Perugia – Firenze 07/09/2005.
UM PPS Lab Activities PPS meeting October 9 and 16, 2012.
(You may use the book and/or notes) 1.Find C T 2. Using V C = V S (1 - e -t/  ), what is the voltage across a capacitor at 10 seconds if R = 5Ω, C=2F,
UM PPS Lab Activities - HV Readout Long Run - Single Source Saturation Test PPS meeting April 30, 2012.
Read-out boards Rui de Oliveira 16/02/2009 RD51 WG1 workshop Geneva.
Characterization of the electrical response of Micromegas detectors to spark processes. J.Galan CEA-Saclay/Irfu For the RD51 meeting.
Chapter 19 DC Circuits. Objectives: The student will be able to: Determine the equivalent capacitance of capacitors arranged in series or in parallel.
ENGR 6806 – Motor Control Prepared By: Rob Collett September 15, Office: EN2074.
Timing Jitter and Cross Talk in the SRS + Xray scan of FIT zigzag board Michael Phipps, Bob Azmoun, and Craig Woody 1.
CVD PCB, first steps. 15 mm 25 mm Chip area. No ground plane underneath the chip. Bulk isolated => only one ground line Power lines Connector: 11,1mm*2,1mm:
Modelling of TPM noise problems Greg, following discussions and measurements with David and Senerath.
Status of TRD Chamber and Readout Electronics Integration Ken Oyama and Christian Lippmann for the TRD Collaboration Sep. 26, 2005 TRD status meeting in.
Malte HildebrandtDC Status Report, Dear MEG Committee,PSI, April 14 th 2009 this is the first report concerning the drift chamber status as.
1 Stony Brook Update T.K. Hemmick for the Tent Crew.
Andrew Glenn 4/21/02 Commissioning and Performance of the. Muon Identifier Andrew Glenn (University of Tennessee), for the PHENIX collaboration April APS.
Design and operation of existing ZS B.Balhan, J.Borburgh, B.Pinget B.BalhanDesign and operation of existing ZS SPS ZS Electrostatic Septum Upgrade Review.
DC Circuits. EMF and Terminal Voltage Electric circuit needs a battery or generator to produce current – these are called sources of emf. Battery is a.
Long Run Test on Microcavity #2 PPS meeting 01/06/ The UoM guys SETUP 90 Sr (4.7 mCi in 1993) Source at ~3 inches over the panel over the pixel in.
12/Dec/2012SBS-Meeting1 of 24 Status of the Front Tracker GEM and INFN Electronics 2012 – Dec – 12 SBS Weekly Meeting GEM Assembling SRS – INFN Electronics.
11/22/2004EE 42 fall 2004 lecture 351 Lecture #35: data transfer Last lecture: –Communications synchronous / asynchronous –Buses This lecture –Transmission.
Atsuhiko Ochi Kobe University
24/05/2010Rui De Oliveira1 Resistive protections for Bulk Micromegas Rui de oliveira, Joerg Wotschack Venetios Polychronakos.
Phys102 Lecture 10 & 11 DC Circuits Key Points EMF and Terminal Voltage Resistors in Series and in Parallel Circuits Containing Resistor and Capacitor.
1 Stony Brook Update: Another Frustrating week... However difference is isolated: CF 4 T.K. Hemmick for the Tent Crew.
Review (Only leave this in if it makes sense) Get white boards out for all this lecture) How long does it take a 5uF capacitor in a series RC circuit to.
UM PPS Lab Activities Mid-size Panel Tests PPS meeting January 15, 2012 Claudio, Curtis, Dan, Ethan, Riley.
Proton Test Beam Experimental Program Overall objective: Study response of modified monochrome DC Plasma Display Panels to low energy proton beam. Energy.
Lab Activities: Chamber Baking & Mixing Station Flushing Claudio Curtis Dan PPS meeting 22 June, 2011.
Results on a Large Area triple-GEM Detector at LNF 5 th RD51 Collaboration Meeting Freiburg, 25 May 2010 D. Domenici - LNF.
Small, fast, low-pressure gas detector E. Norbeck, J. E. Olson, and Y. Onel University of Iowa For DNP04 at Chicago October 2004.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
TRIPLEGEM and VFATs at The Test Beam Area TRIPLEGEM and VFATs at The Test Beam Area N. Turini……reporter Eraldo Oliveri! Eraldo Oliveri main worker! N.
PIXEL 2000 P.Netchaeva INFN Genova 0 Results on 0.7% X0 thick Pixel Modules for the ATLAS Detector. INFN Genova: R.Beccherle, G.Darbo, G.Gagliardi, C.Gemme,
D. De Gruttola SALE-01: issues with HV supply fixed SALE-01: issues with HV supply fixed QA weekly meeting 26/04/2016.
Full Wave Rectifier NavigationTutorial: 6 of 8 The Full Wave Rectifier In the previous Power Diodes tutorial we discussed ways of reducing the ripple or.
1 Dependence of RPC’s Performance on Weather ( run in Digital Hadron Calorimeter Small Prototype with Glass RPCs) For LCWS08&ILC08 from 11/15-11/20 in.
Investigating how the charge on a capacitor changes with time. This experiment uses the same circuit as the one with the motor, but instead of the motor.
High Speed Properties of Digital Gates, Copyright F. Canavero, R. Fantino Licensed to HDT - High Design Technology
Power Distribution Copyright F. Canavero, R. Fantino Licensed to HDT - High Design Technology.
Development of T3Maps adapter boards
PreShower Characterisations
P. S. Friedman Integrated Sensors, LLC
Testing of Transformers
Modifications to the DRS4’s code
The High Voltage problem
High-Speed Serial Link Layout Recommendations –
Charge collection studies with irradiated CMOS detectors
Tower 8 – X6 anomaly MRB Meeting – 24 August 2005.
Update on Noise Analysis of the DHCal Test Beam at Fermilab
GRPC activity for EuDHCAL in IHEP-Protvino
Setup for Cosmic Ray Test of VPA panel, using MiniDAQ
SANE Cherenkov - Bigcal Efficiency Update
Noise analysis of the 1m3 DHCal test beam
Barth CDM Measurement Components Improve Repeatability With Accurate Characteristics “Measure what is measurable; make measurable what is not” Galileo.
Unexpected Failures of Modules on Rods
String-21 Flasher Analysis
Chapter 26 DC Circuits Chapter 26 Opener. These MP3 players contain circuits that are dc, at least in part. (The audio signal is ac.) The circuit diagram.
Presentation transcript:

Microcavity Multipixel Performance Report 4 C. Ferretti, D. Levin HV Card and Dead Time Pixel Uniformity Run with 3 Rows of Pixels Hardware challenges Comments April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

Quick Recap of Single Pixel Results Microcavity (MC1) filled with AAT0001 at 737 Torr Quench: 100 MΩ HV card + 1GΩ pixel Waveform similar for all the pixels: |A|~1V, FWHM~2ns, Rise Time~2ns Three main results: 64h single pixel <rate>10’  Rate stable over days Six single pixel rate vs HV Plateau similar for all pixels collimated 106Ru ~4-6 Hz Single pixel (R5-3) arrival time σ≈5 ns (at 1150V) April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

University of Michigan PPS Pixel Quench 1GΩ 100 MΩ ~150 μs dead time with 100MΩ ~1.3 ms dead time with 1GΩ X-axis 500 μs/div Y-axis 200 mV/div X-axis 500 μs/div Y-axis 500 mV/div RC=200 M𝝮 x 0.25 pF dead time=3 *RC= 3*50 μs = 150 μs With 100MΩ at 1050V the single pixel 106Ru rate is doubled respect to 1GΩ  dead time not long enough  back to the 1G𝝮, but this time on the HV card Dead time is expected to be again ~1.3 ms. Instead it was still below 200 μs Added an extra 1G𝝮 in line with the HV, but this too had no effect on dead time! The HV card itself is a capacitor (~2.6 nF, two ground planes) replenishing the little pixel capacitance (fraction of a pF), while recharging with a characteristic time much longer  new HV card and back to 1GΩ at the pixel April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

University of Michigan PPS Line 10 Recovery The RO cable for line 10 (and the ground line nearby) was disconnected  re-attached just soldering and worked and then got detached again April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

University of Michigan PPS Line 1 Recovery RO line 1 disconnected because of a damaged pad due to sparks between it and the nearby ground line  re-attached with conductive epoxy (John) April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

University of Michigan PPS Pixel by Pixel Test Each pixel tested at 1050V as the only one in HV-RO crossing “Current” result: 51/63 OK (81 %) 2/63 Dead (3 %) 3/63 Noisy (5 %) 7/63 Sparking (11%) April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

Single Pixel Background Rate Included one not-too-noisy pixel April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

Single Pixel Collimated 106Ru–bkg Rate No systematic error included for the source positioning April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

University of Michigan PPS Multi-Pixel Tests Instrumented the first 3 lines (HV #3, 5, 7 and partially 10) without any dead or sparking pixel (and RO line #10). Total 23/29 pixels. April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

Multi-Pixel Background 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 0 Number of active pixel/line April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

University of Michigan PPS 106Ru 15 cm Above the Panel The illumination was more or less uniform. The rate (at 1050 V) on each line is proportional to the number of active pixels on that line! Pixel rate (~ 0.3 Hz) more than one order of magnitude above background (~0.015 Hz) 3 pixels line 2 pixels line April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

University of Michigan PPS Going for The Full Test April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

University of Michigan PPS 1 GΩ on All Good Pixels 1st time: one pixel sparked at ~970 V. The solder flowed across the bottom of the resistor and shorted it out  fixed 2nd time: another pixel sparked at ~1000 V. While not shorted out, the resistor had solder flows creating a current path  fixed 3rd time: around 1030 V, visible glowing of a dozen of the new resistors discharges at a very high rate, suggesting that nearly all the newly installed resistors were providing an effectively very small resistance  dismounted all of them and adding only a few new resistors at the time following the HV lines 4th time: readout line (#5) completely dead. Cable disconnected from the pad as for line 10? It turned out that both 50Ω on the RO card were fried (~26MΩ and 4.6MΩ) by one sparking pixel. Once replaced the line was OK April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

University of Michigan PPS Lesson Learned The accepted technique of microdrop of Kester solder-in-flux deposited on the resistor pads is inappropriate as the tiny Pb-Ag balls can float around and underneath the component creating an archipelago of solder balls that can bridge the 1 GΩ (differently from PCB missing raised separator between the pads). The preferred method, so far, is to pre-tin the resistors and the pads, clean off the residue then solder the resistors into place One pixel showing high noise was recovered by dismounting, cleaning and re-soldering the pixel quench resistor. Likely it is possible to recover at least a few more sparking We will try to use the digital soldering iron (at 850°F) and the special solder 96.5% Sn / 3.0% Ag / 0.5% Cu used for the cables April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

University of Michigan PPS More Pixel, Igor! Added a fourth row of pixels (HV #13) and things start to change - Background rate remains OK - Rate collimated source on pixel ~ OK - Noise on other lines is higher and higher as we get far away from RO April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

University of Michigan PPS One More HV Row Background and pixel close to RO still OK But not the position of the collimated source is barely recognizable April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

Correlated Pulses on Scope X=50 ns Y=500 mV RO Line2, Line 3, Line 4 The problem increases far from RO: with HV#18 on. It is not even possible to reach 1050V, background rates ~100Hz at 1020V! Possible explanations  April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS

Why? Possible ways that cells communicate Photon propagation However, the cavities are metalized and embedded. There is no obvious path for photons to move from one cavity to another. The observed delay time of 100 ns is much too long for photons. Ion-propagation. While the gas channels do not directly connect one pixel to another, there could be a significant gas gap between the top layer and bottom substrate: Exaggerated view if top plate is not flush with bottom substrate

Positive ions or charged CF4 can migrate through the gap to a nearby pixel - + + - - + + + + + + + +

University of Michigan PPS Conclusions Collimated source over the nearest neighbor or 5 pixels away in both cases gives ~ 2 x background  collimator works well Current HV board prevents splitting quench resistors between pixel and HV line (only pixel count)  new one without ground planes near HV already designed Hardware very sensitive: adding new pixels is very tricky and takes quite a bit of practice and time, RO line can loose connection and the repair is difficult, … (Resistive paste in the via seems risky) The initial single spark often seen on newly connected pixel suggests the possible presence of dust  next prototype better if assembled in a clean room Important to image the cavities before the assembly in order to match eventual imperfections with faulty/noisy/uncharacteristic pixels Suspect of not perfect parallel assembly of the two substrates (possibly due to uneven epoxy, not parallel planes, distortions, …) Results of pixels test results both in single and in combinations pixel background rate much lower than the one whit (collimated) source the rate of a line can be predicted by the number of pixels instrumented  they are really working as isolated entities April 22, 2014 University of Michigan PPS