Time Response Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 5 – The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Advertisements

The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Nise/Control Systems Engineering, 3/e
H(s) x(t)y(t) 8.b Laplace Transform: Y(s)=X(s) H(s) The Laplace transform can be used in the solution of ordinary linear differential equations. Let’s.
Chapter 4 Continuous Time Signals Time Response Continuous Time Signals Time Response.
Lect.7 Steady State Error Basil Hamed
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
4. System Response This module is concern with the response of LTI system. L.T. is used to investigate the response of first and second order systems.
Chapter 5 – The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Feedback Control Systems
Transient & Steady State Response Analysis
Review last lectures.
Out response, Poles, and Zeros
Feedback Control Systems (FCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain URL :
1 Chapter 2 We need to write differential equations representing the system or subsystem. Then write the Laplace transform of the system. Then we will.
DNT Control Principle Root Locus Techniques DNT Control Principle.
MESB374 System Modeling and Analysis Forced Response
سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي- دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
It is the time response of a system to an input that sets the criteria for our control systems. Many quantitative criteria have been defined to characterise.
By Irfan Azhar Time Response. Transient Response After the engineer obtains a mathematical representation of a subsystem, the subsystem is analyzed for.
Chapter 5 Transient and Steady State Response “I will study and get ready and someday my chance will come” Abraham Lincoln.
Feedback Control Systems Dr. Basil Hamed Electrical Engineering Islamic University of Gaza.
Chapter 3 Dynamic Response The Block Diagram Block diagram is a graphical tool to visualize the model of a system and evaluate the mathematical relationships.
Subsea Control and Communications Systems
Lec 6. Second Order Systems
Modern Control System EKT 308 Steady-State and Stability.
Discrete Controller Design
Modeling Transient Response So far our analysis has been purely kinematic: The transient response has been ignored The inertia, damping, and elasticity.
1 Time Response. CHAPTER Poles and Zeros and System Response. Figure 3.1: (a) System showing input and output; (b) Pole-zero plot of the system;
Modern Control System EKT 308
1 Teaching Innovation - Entrepreneurial - Global The Centre for Technology enabled Teaching & Learning, M G I, India DTEL DTEL (Department for Technology.
Lecture 13: Second-Order Systems Time Response Lecture 12: First-order systems Lecture 13: Second-order systems Lecture 14: Non-canonical systems ME 431,
Intelligent Robot Lab Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Lab Chapter 7. Forced Response Errors Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Laboratory.
SKEE 3143 Control Systems Design Chapter 2 – PID Controllers Design
3.0 Time Response OBJECTIVE
Lecture 7/8 Analysis in the time domain (II) North China Electric Power University Sun Hairong.
EE4262: Digital and Non-Linear Control
Root Locus Techniques DNT Control Principle Date: 18th September 2008
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Lesson 20: Process Characteristics- 2nd Order Lag Process
Lesson 12: Transfer Functions In The Laplace Domain
Dynamic Behavior Chapter 5
Youngjune, Han Chapter 4 Time Response Youngjune, Han
Control Response Patterns
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Instructor: Jongeun Choi
Control System Toolbox
Eigenvalues: p1=-4.526, p2,3= ±2.7883i, p4=
Eigenvalues: p1=-4.526, p2,3= ±2.7883i, p4=
Time Response System & Control Engineering Lab.
UNIT-II TIME RESPONSE ANALYSIS
Lecture 23 Second order system step response
Control Response Patterns
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Response of Higher Order Systems
Chapter 4. Time Response I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be. Pusan National University Intelligent.
Lecture 6: Time Domain Analysis and State Space Representation
Control System Toolbox (Part-II)
Second-Order Systems Chapter 5 Standard form:
CH. 3 Time Response Chapter3. Time Response.
Control System Toolbox (Part-II)
Eigenvalues: p1=-4.526, p2,3= ±2.7883i, p4=
B.Tech – II – ECE – II SEMESTER ACE ENGINEERING COLLEGE
2a. Transfer function of closed loop system
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Chapter 5 – The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Time Response, Stability, and
Exercise 1 For the unit step response shown in the following figure, find the transfer function of the system. Also find rise time and settling time. Solution.
By: Nafees Ahamad, AP, EECE, Dept. DIT University, Dehradun
Presentation transcript:

Time Response Analysis

Contents Introduction Influence of Poles on Time Response Transient Response of First-Order System Transient Response of Second-Order System

Introduction The concept of poles and zeros, fundamental to the analysis of and design of control system, simplifies the evaluation of system response. The poles of a transfer function are: Values of the Laplace Transform variables s, that cause the transfer function to become infinite. Any roots of the denominator of the transfer function that are common to roots of the numerator. The zeros of a transfer function are: The values of the Laplace Transform variable s, that cause the transfer function to become zero. Any roots of the numerator of the transfer function that are common to roots of the denominator.

Influence of Poles on Time Response The output response of a system is a sum of Forced response Natural response System showing an input and an output Pole-zero plot of the system

Influence of Poles on Time Response Evolution of a system response. Follow the blue arrows to see the evolution of system component generated by the pole or zero

Influence of Poles on Time Response Effect of a real-axis pole upon transient response First-order system Pole plot of the system

First-Order System General form: Problem: Derive the transfer function for the following circuit

First-Order System Transient Response: Gradual change of output from initial to the desired condition. Block diagram representation: By definition itself, the input to the system should be a step function which is given by the following: Where, K : Gain  : Time constant C(s) R(s)

First-Order System General form: Output response:

First-Order System Problem: Find the forced and natural responses for the following systems

First-order system response to a unit step

Transient Response Specifications Time constant,  The time for e-at to decay 37% of its initial value. Rise time, tr The time for the waveform to go from 0.1 to 0.9 of its final value. Settling time, ts The time for the response to reach, and stay within 2% of its final value.

Transient Response Specifications Problem: For a system with the transfer function shown below, find the relevant response specifications Time constant,  Settling time, ts Rise time, tr

Second-Order System General form: Roots of denominator: Where, K : Gain ς : Damping ratio n : Undamped natural frequency

Second-Order System Natural frequency, n Damping ratio, ς Frequency of oscillation of the system without damping. Damping ratio, ς Quantity that compares the exponential decay frequency of the envelope to the natural frequency.

Second-Order System Problem: Find the step response for the following transfer function Answer:

Second-Order System Problem: For each of the transfer function, find the values of ς and n, as well as characterize the nature of the response.

Second-Order System

Second-Order System

Second-Order System Step responses for second-order system damping cases

Second-Order System Pole plot for the underdamped second-order system

Second-Order System Second-order response as a function of damping ratio

Second-Order System Second-order response as a function of damping ratio

Second-Order System When 0 < ς < 1, the transfer function is given by the following. Pole position: Where,

Second-Order System Second-order response components generated by complex poles

Second-Order System Second-order underdamped responses for damping ratio value

Transient Response Specifications Second-order underdamped response specifications

Transient Response Specifications Rise time, Tr The time for the waveform to go from 0.1 to 0.9 of its final value. Peak time, Tp The time required to reach the first or maximum peak. Settling time, Ts The time required for the transient’s damped oscillation to reach and stay within ±2% of the steady-state value.

Transient Response Specifications Percent overshoot, %OS The amount that the waveform overshoots the steady-state, or final value at peak time, expressed as a percentage of the steady-state value.

System Performance Percent overshoot versus damping ratio

System Performance Lines of constant peak time Tp, settling time Ts and percent overshoot %OS Ts2 < Ts1 Tp2 < Tp1 %OS1 < %OS2

System Performance Step responses of second-order underdamped systems as poles move With constant real part With constant imaginary part

System Performance Step responses of second-order underdamped systems as poles move With constant damping ratio