Rapportage Mei 2014 Proposal for the external interim and final evaluation of the BENCH-CAN project Presentation Berenschot, 3rd BenchCan Core Group meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session 9b: Next steps on financial management harmonization and alignment.
Advertisements

DOs and DONTs Joan-Anton Carbonell Kingston University EC External Expert TEMPUS Modernising Higher Education TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY.
Examples of good practice. Examples of Good Practice Use of external UK and/or international external organisations as non-funded partners (target country.
EU – ACP PROGRAMME FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS AND CAPACITY BUILDING (PSTICB) 9 ACP RPR 61.
Brief overview of the contribution by the World Health Organisation in the upgrading of the Emeregency Medical Services Europe Presented by Dr. Raed Arafat.
Experiences of Patient and Public involvement in the Research Process Roma Maguire Senior Research Fellow Cancer Care Research Team School of Nursing and.
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
MIE2009 Good Evaluation Practice Workshop Pirkko Nykanen 1 Guidelines for Good Evaluation Practices in Health Informatics - A shared networked initiative.
Martinuzzi, Steurer: Analysis of national policies on CSR CSR HLG Meeting on May 30, 2006 Analysis of national policies on CSR, in support of a structured.
PRESENTATION The Structured Dialogue. What? A participative process for young people and decision-makers to discuss and elaborate recommendations jointly.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Rogaška Slatina 30. november- 1. december 2007 ESTABLISHING EXTERNAL QA SYSTEM IN SLOVENIA Franci Čuš Marinka Drobnič Košorok.
A New Start for EUTO Redruth, 29 September 2012 Henk Schüller.
Assessment of project proposals within EU grant schemes 17 & 18 December 2013 Government Office for Cooperation with NGOs Zagreb VLADA REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
Wiener Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies Regional Cooperation Council.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Preparation of a Strategic Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR) Project - Phase I (November January 2013) Climate Investment Funds (CIF) Grant.
EUnetHTA Joint Action 2010–2012 | EUnetHTA Joint action Sharing expertise and efforts Iris Pasternack, research officer, FINOHTA.
Evaluation Unit EuropeAid Martyn Pennington Head of Evaluation Unit- Devco B2 Workshop on Lessons Learned from International Joint Evaluations French Ministry.
ROMANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION National Centre for Development of Vocational Education and Training Implementation Unit of Phare.
Strengthening Cause-of-death Information in countries through Africa Programme on Accelerated Improvement of Civil Registration and Vital Statistics System.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
EUNetPaS is a project supported by a grant from the EAHC. The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the author(s). The EAHC.
Matthias Wentzlaff-Eggebert, BZgA This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding.
European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA | EUnetHTA European network for Health Technology Assessment THL Info.
What Progress on Poverty and Participation?
Professor Deborah Healey
BENCH-CAN Coordination
Pipeline Management Introducing the ATLAS pipeline management module
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
BENCH-CAN Internal evaluation 2nd semester
How IFAD Promotes Learning among Development Partners in the Field
Dorota Kilańska RN, PhD European Nursing Research Foundation (ENRF)
Strengthening Internationalization of HE in Armenia:
Eastern European Partner countries
March 2017.
Corporate-level evaluation on efficiency
Making Technical Cooperation work for capacity building
EVALUATION OF GENDER RESPONSIVE BUDGETING PROGRAMME IN NEPAL
General/family practice RefSet and ICPC mapping project – overview
BenchCan Core Group Meeting
A&M Workplan Objectives
Institut de cancérologie Gustave Roussy
MAIN FINDINGS OF NEEDS ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
Intergovernmental Group of Experts on Competition Law and Policy    16th Session 5-7 July 2017 Room XVII, Palais des Nations, Geneva    Wednesday, 5.
International Cooperation: Policy, Projects and Funding
PARIS21 - League of Arab States
EU instruments of funding and technical assistance
Atkinson Review - Health
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
The evaluation process
The MSK-HQ Developing a generic Musculoskeletal Patient Reported Outcome Measure Policy & Public Affairs Team, Arthritis Research UK e.
Building Statistical Capacity UNSD perspective
Research funding application process
Information on projects
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
EVALUATIONS in the EU External Aid
Phase 5 Capital Management.
Troika Secretariat - 2nd Meeting
Formulation and Development of National IP Strategy
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
SMEDATA Ensuring the Highest Degree of Privacy and Personal Data Protection through Innovative Tools for SMEs and Citizens Brussels, 3 December 2018.
Making Technical Cooperation work for capacity building
DG Justice and Consumers
Presentation transcript:

Rapportage Mei 2014 Proposal for the external interim and final evaluation of the BENCH-CAN project Presentation Berenschot, 3rd BenchCan Core Group meeting Brussels, May 14th 2014

Contents Our understanding of the BenchCan project Why Berenschot? Evaluation methodology Inception phase Planning Our team

Our understanding of the BenchCan project Is a collaboration of 6 associated European partners and one lead partner (OECI) Aim: to benchmark comprehensive cancer care and yield best practice examples in a way that contributes to improving the quality of interdisciplinary patient treatment. 6 specific objectives (summary): to collect, compare and align by consensus formation the standards, recommendations and accreditation criteria of comprehensive cancer care in selected European countries. To introduce a compatible benchmarking tool, to maximise knowledge exchange and sharing of best practices. To ensure the sustainability and longer-term benefits of the project. Co-funded by the Health Programme 2008-2013 of the European Union, as part of the Grant Agreement and the project risk management, an external evaluation of the project is demanded.

Our understanding of the BenchCan project (2) External evaluation is needed: As part of the Grant Agreement In addition to internal evaluations In close collaboration with the executive partners Goals of the external evaluation: Mainly the same as the internal evaluation External and objective assessment of the proceedings Suggest possible improvements along the way We consider the assignment as a qualitative review NOT: evaluation of the benchmarking methods Demands by means of time, involvement and input must be kept realistic

Why Berenschot? Berenschot: Independent Dutch consultancy firm with a strong international outlook and over more than 75 years of experience. Executed more than 500 projects worldwide, in over 40 countries in both the public and private sector Four main reasons: Experience with evaluations: evaluation of government programmes and policy instruments, for example the Dutch Trade Board and the ORET programme International experience: extensive track record when it comes to EU-programmes and –projects. We also have offices in Belgium, Ghana, South-Africa, Curacao and Brazil Experience with the medical sector: nationally, projects commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Health and the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Internationally we realise a new hospital in Willemstad, Curacao and perform a feasibility study to restructure the primary health care in a region of Indonesia Medical experts: we employ several medical experts, from health economists to organisational advisors in the health care sector, to medical doctors who know the healthcare sector from the inside

Evaluation methodology Our approach consists of four phases: Inception phase: phase of orientation in which we match the expectations of our counterparts with the approach that we suggest, making full use of the expertise and experience of our counterparts. Deliverable: External Evaluation Plan Field work phase: collection of information, attending Core group meetings. Interviews with all the project partners by telephone or by means of teleconference technology will be conducted in this phase, as well as document studies to assess the proceedings of the project. Deliverable: Answers to research questions Draft reporting phase: we will present and share our preliminary results with our principal and will discuss any possible adjustments and additions. Input from this phase will be used in the next phase. Deliverable: Preliminary report Final reporting phase: the draft final report will be presented to our principal and will be circulated among the core partners for feedback one month before finalising the report. The input from the core partners will be assimilated in the final version of the report, that will be submitted to the Lead partner, HCN and NKI. Deliverable: Final report

Inception phase Starts today Needed to match the external evaluation with the criteria of the Core Group To ensure a successful, usable and workable report To be determined: Concrete research questions Research methods (desk research, interviews, survey, workshop) Planning

Planning Preliminary Interim report planning Preliminary Final report planning

Our team The evaluations will be conducted by a core team of 2 international senior experts: Marjolein Lem (1980), has a master’s (MA) in International Relations and a bachelor’s (BA) in International economics. She is working as a senior consultant with Berenschot since 2004. Marjolein has extensive experience with the evaluation of publicly financed programmes Adriaan Kraal (1979), is a medical doctor (MD), working as a consultant with Berenschot since 2011. His passion is to use his medical knowledge in healthcare related projects and to bridge gaps between healthcare and other domains.

www.berenschot.com www.twitter.com/berenschot_nl Contact information Adriaan Kraal (Senior consultant) E: a.kraal@berenschot.com T: + 31 (0)30 291 68 88 Mobile: + 31 (0) 6 2123 4148