Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Virginia Conservation Agency. Section 319 Non Point Source Program WVCA is the primary entity responsible for the implementation of the: Agriculture.
Advertisements

Overview of Mitigation Banking Program December 10, 2009 Robert M. Brown, Director Environmental Resource Regulation Department Robert M. Brown, Director.
Transitioning the EEP Nutrient Offset Program to an Actual Cost Method James B. Stanfill Ecosystem Enhancement Program October 9, 2008.
David K. Paylor Director, Department of Environmental Quality May 27, 2014 VEDP Lunch & Learn Environmental Permitting 101.
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
EMC Review of Groundwater Corrective Action and Compliance Boundary Rules EVAN KANE NC DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES.
What is an In Lieu Fee Program ? Clean Water Act - Section 404 : “no overall net loss” of wetland acreage and functions. One mechanism for providing Compensatory.
Wetland Planning Requirements, Tools & Processes.
2006 Report to: Environmental Review Commission Ecosystem Enhancement Program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District.
Compensatory Mitigation in Coastal Louisiana Keith Lovell, Administrator Office of Coastal Management Department of Natural Resources 10/03/121.
Tracie Billington, P.E. Chief Financial Assistance Branch Department of Water Resources.
EEP Data Flow Kevin H. Miller CVS-EEP Vegetation Monitoring Workshop Wake Technical Community College Northern Campus June 9, 2009.
Jan 22-24, 2007 Transportation Research Board U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District North Carolina’s Interagency Agreements to Streamline Project.
PENSION REFORM: LACERS TIER II P RESENTATION TO L ABOR O RGANIZATIONS Office of the City Administrative Officer City of Los Angeles September 6, 2012.
DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees and Fee Setting Methodology Nick Villalpando Chief Financial Officer.
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Required for: Full EIA based on Palestinian EIA Policy Category A projects based on World Bank Policy.
Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, | MARCELLUS.
FURTHER INFORMATION ON MISO FTR AUCTIONS For SPP RSC Discussion October 6, 2010.
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF A SEP Projects must improve, protect or reduce risks to public health or environment. Projects.
In September of 2012 the RA Government made amendments in the Resolution No 168 on ‘Regulation of Procurement Procedures". 1. It is the responsibility.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
 Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 January 7, 2015.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
MICHAEL E. SCOTT, DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT Available Information on the Beneficial Reuse of Coal Combustion Products 1.
Department of Environmental Quality Life-of-Site Permitting Required Changes to Solid Waste Management Rules 15A NCAC 13B March 10, 2016.
Annual Disbursement and Commitment Decisions LFA Finance Training 2013.
Noncoal Program Fees Environmental Quality Board April 17, 2012 John Stefanko Deputy Secretary for Active and Abandoned Mining Operations.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
FY2007 Budget Presentation Annual Town Meeting April 24, 2006.
Evaluation of a Land Conservation Credit
Office of School Facilities and Finance
Environmental Quality Board
Department of Environmental Quality
Presented by Kate Barr, Nonprofits Assistance Fund
Kurt Stephenson Virginia Tech December 2016
Liaison Council Meeting
Jon Risgaard, Wastewater Branch Rick Bolich, Raleigh Regional Office
Further Information on MISO FTR Auctions
July 13, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
Environmental Review Commission
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
September 8, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
Rules for Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
Overview of the Reissuance of 401 Water Quality General Certifications
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Division of Water Resources Overview
May 12, 2016 Study of the State’s Riparian Buffer Protection Program Pursuant to SL Karen Higgins, Division of Water Resources.
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Department of Environmental Quality
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
May 11, 2016 Study of the State’s Riparian Buffer Protection Program Pursuant to SL Karen Higgins, Division of Water Resources.
Environmental Management Commission January 10, 2013
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Joint Army-EPA Mitigation Rule
September 8, 2016 Request Approval of the Determinations to be Submitted to Rules Review Commission for Subchapter 15A NCAC 02E (Periodic Review of Existing.
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Prime Contractor Performance
NC Environmental Management Commission
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services
Educational financial supervisory commission (EFSC) September 15, 2016
Capital Improvement Plans
December 10, BUDGET PRESENTATION.
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295
Lesson 9.2 Pro Forma Financial Statements
Environmental Management Commission January 2014
Proposed Mitigation Rule Amendment Rulemaking Pre-Proposal State and Local Government Outreach June 20, 2019.
Quarterly Budget Update 2017 Quarterly Reports
Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules (G.S. 150B-21.3A)
Presentation transcript:

Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services Proposed Amendments to 15A NCAC 02R July 13, 2017 Environmental Management Commission

What is In-Lieu Fee Mitigation? Solutions for the Development Community Assist developers with mitigation requirements Payment in-lieu of permittee-responsible mitigation DMS becomes responsible for permit requirements DMS uses watershed planning to inform project location for highest environmental benefit

EEP Private Sector Customers:

EEP Public Sector Customers:

DMS ILF Programs Present Rate Schedule Over 600 projects Inventory Overhead Admin Costs Project Costs Land Design Construction Monitoring Stewardship Over 600 projects 700 miles of streams 29,000 acres of wetlands, 800 acres of riparian buffer 800 tons of stormwater pollutants 02R rule readoption per  G.S. §150B-21.3A More tools and data available Project costs are rising faster than inflation Regulatory impacts higher than anticipated

Forecasted Program Finances

Proposed Amendments to Subchapter 02R Rules Major proposed revisions: Actual Cost Method (ACM) calculate buffer fees Modified ACM to calculate stream and freshwater wetland rates Increase coastal wetland rate commensurate with costs   Minor proposed revisions: Updated language for watershed planning component Formatting and technical corrections Modification to adjustment factor for nutrient fees to address diminishing revenue volume Modification to consistency determination

SECTION .0200 - BASINWIDE RESTORATION PLANS Proposed Amendments to 02R .0201-.0203 Reflect current basinwide restoration planning components Address public comments Assessment of watershed conditions Prioritization of functional improvement for aquatic resources

SECTION .0200 - BASINWIDE RESTORATION PLANS Proposed Amendments to 02R .0301 Clarifies what it means to be consistent with basinwide restoration plans Current Rule– located within TLW or approved by USACE Proposed Rule – project demonstrates it advances functional improvement goals of Basinwide Restoration Plan

SECTION .0400 - ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION FUND Stream and Wetland Fees (.0401) SECTION .0600 – RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION FUND Riparian Buffer Fees (.0601) Nutrient Offset Fees (.0602)

Nutrient Offset ILF Nutrient Offset ILF Program State Laws and Rules Application Process Fee Schedule Financing Uses Actual Cost Methodology to Set Fee Rates Rates evaluated quarterly Rates automatically updated annually Timeline requirements start at payment Nutrient Offset ILF

Actual Cost Method Completed Projects Terminated Projects Existing Projects in Process Staff Supplies Rent All Costs Adjusted to Present Day Costs

Total Pounds Adjusted to Present Day Values Actual Cost Method Total Pounds Adjusted to Present Day Values Represents true cost of implementing new project Addresses concerns over regulation changes Ensures rate will never be below actual cost

Actual Cost Method

Actual Cost Method Ensures additional collections are made if historical receipts were below costs If Actual Costs > Actual Receipts, the gap is distributed to future pounds paid into program

15A NCAC 02R .0602 NUTRIENT OFFSET PAYMENT RATES Continue using ACM Minor changes: Special watershed rates applied when costs exceed rate by 33% (from 40%) Immediate rate adjustment when program suspends acceptance of payments due to costs Modification to adjust for the lower and volatile nature of the frequency of payments: Adjustment Factor shall not comprise more than 60% of overall rate

Riparian Buffer ILF Riparian Buffer ILF Program State Laws and Rules Application process All customer types Receipts Based Uses single statewide fee ($1.16) Adjusts annually for inflation Riparian Buffer ILF

15A NCAC 02R .0601 RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION FEES Actual cost method- ACM Detailed method Rate evaluated and adjusted quarterly 2 premium watershed rates Rates reflect actual project costs Ensure financial sustainability Rates responsive to changes in costs

15A NCAC 02R .0601 RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION FEES Current Rate Estimated Initial ACM Rates Standard Rate Areas $1.16 $1.06 Randleman Watershed Rate $2.98 Jordan (Lower New Hope)

Statewide Stream & Wetland ILF Statewide Stream & Wetland Program 1996 Start All customer types Application process Fee schedule financing Annual updates for inflation Costs accelerated faster than inflation Program costs currently exceed receipts Statewide Stream & Wetland ILF

Statewide Stream & Wetland Program Annual inflation adjustments have ranged from -1.9% to +6.4% since the last time the rates were amended. Type Higher Rate Standard Rate Stream $391 $297 Coastal Wetland $175,323 Riparian Wetland $71,273 $40,297 Nonriparian Wetland $51,422 $26,445

15A NCAC 02R .0402 Statewide Stream & Wetland Program Rates Issues Last Fee change - 2008 rulemaking Costs accelerating faster than inflation Rates are not reflective of current costs Rates must keep pace for program to remain viable

15A NCAC 02R .0402 Statewide Stream & Wetland Program Rates

15A NCAC 02R .0402 Statewide Stream & Wetland Program Rates Simplified Actual cost method- ACM: Ensure financial sustainability Allows rates to respond to actual costs Rate evaluated and adjusted annually Statewide Rates and Special watershed rates Eliminates quarter-acre wetland rounding Simplifies wetland categories in rate schedule Rates reflect actual project costs from last 3 yrs.

15A NCAC 02R .0402 Statewide Stream & Wetland Program Rates Watershed Planning Inventory Overhead Administrative Costs (Staff, Rent, Office Equip., etc.) Credit Risk / Contingency Project Costs (including Stewardship) Program Costs 30% 70%

15A NCAC 02R .0402 Statewide Stream & Wetland Program Rates 70% Total = Project Costs Total = (1.0/0.7) * Project Costs Total Costs = 1.43 * Project Costs Program Costs Actual Total Costs = 1.43 x Project Costs Project Costs (70%) All Other Program Costs (30%)

15A NCAC 02R .0402 Statewide Stream & Wetland Program Rates Simplified ACM Actual Project CostsPresentDay means the sum of all Full Delivery and Mitigation Bank Credit Purchase project costs in the three years prior adjusted for inflation. Costs associated with administrative, watershed planning, operational, and contingency are captured by the coefficient of 1.43 and represent 30% of the total fee calculation.

15A NCAC 02R .0402 Statewide Stream & Wetland Program Rates Coastal Wetlands State Program Wetland Type Price Range (Present Day) Virginia ILF Tidal Wetlands $429,457 -$644,187 Massachusetts ILF Saltmarsh $1,006,515 New Hampshire ILF $451,542 Proposed Coastal Wetland Rate: $825,000/credit Payments average 0.25 credits per year No economies of scale High coastal land costs Proposed rate sufficient for single project every 2-4 years Will allow mitigation to occur closer to impacts

Statewide Stream & Wetland Program – Rates (.0402) Current Rates (Higher/Standard) Estimated Initial ACM Rates Stream $391/ $297 $458 Riparian Wetland $71,273/ $40,297 N/A Non-riparian Wetland $51,422/ $26,445 Freshwater Wetland $67,851 Coastal Marsh Wetland $175,323 $825,000

NC DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES Questions? NC Division of Mitigation Services 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 919-707-8976 deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services Department of Environmental Quality