Some movement monitor systems at DESY

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.
Advertisements

October 21, 2005 Internal LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review Georg Gassner, SLAC / MET 1 HLS Monitoring System Georg.
K. Balewski (DESY)IWBS Conceptual Design of the PETRA III Orbit Feedback K. Balewski, H.T Duhme, J. Klute, I. Krouptchenkov, R. Neumann, G. K. Sahoo,
Experience Report with the Alignment Diagnostic System Georg Gassner September 17 th 2010.
Wire Position System LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review, Oct. 22, Franz Peters Wire Position System The Undulator.
Robert Ruland Installation Alignment -Magnetic Measurements – Fiducialization April 7-8, 2005 FAC Meeting 1 Installation Alignment,
Workshop TS May 2008 GENERAL CLIC ALIGNMENT Progresses and strategy. Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, TS/SU/MTI.
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Physics.
Robert Ruland Intra Girder Assembly and Alignment - October 20, 2005 Internal LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review 1 Intra.
M. Bieler, M. Ebert, L. Fröhlich, J. Keil, J. Klute, G. Kube, G. K. Sahoo, R. Wanzenberg, DESY, Hamburg, Germany Abstract Acknowledgment Commissioning.
F Tevatron Software Digital Receiver Beam Line Tuner Vic Scarpine Instrumentation Instrumentation Meeting July 13, 2005.
Beam Instrumentation for Orbit Stability I. Pinayev.
Ultra-Low Emittance Storage Ring David L. Rubin December 22, 2011.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC ACTIVE PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDIES: STATUS FOR CDR AND PROSPECTS FOR TDR PHASE.
Quad-to-quad correlated motion in FLASH Ramila Amirikas, Alessandro Bertolini DESY Hamburg XFEL beam dynamics meeting, February 25 st 2008.
Experience with DCCTs at DESY Klaus Knaack. All DC current measurements at DESY are done by PCTs (DCCTs) from Bergoz. They are installed in all circular.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team MDI alignment plans IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
Franz Peters, Georg Gassner WPM/HLS Status and June 17 th, WPM & HLS Status and Schedule Franz Peters, Georg Gassner.
BEPCII Prealignment Installation Survey and Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Xiaolong Wang
CLIC08 workshop CLIC module layout and main requirements G. Riddone, on behalf of the CMWG Home page of the TBM WG:
RREPS'11, Egham (UK) Status of Beam Loss Detector Tests and Developments at PETRA III & ESRF Gero Kube DESY (Hamburg) Introduction: PETRA III Extension.
Short range alignment strategy in CLEX and first results CLIC Workshop January 2015 on behalf of : Hélène Mainaud-Durand, Mateusz Sosin Mathieu.
The CLIC alignment studies 1 CLIC workshop October 2007 THE CLIC ALIGNMENT STUDIES Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
CLIC Module WG 20/07/2009 H. MAINAUD DURAND, BE-ABP/SU Pre-alignment system and impact on module design.
IP instrumentation configuration for Autumn 2010 ATF2 runs Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK 2010 / 7/ 1 10 th ATF2 project meeting.
1/13 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 9, 2006) Mount.
Very Forward Detectors Workshop on beam position monitoring and detector alignment.
Beam Physics Issue in BEPCII Commisionning Xu Gang Accelerator physics group.
Electron beams in order to sense nm-size mechanical vibrations? CERN: Marek Gasior: BBQ electronics (Andrea Boccardi: VME electronics) Juergen Pfingstner:
Alignment system and impact on CLIC two-beam module design H. Mainaud-Durand, G. Riddone CTC meeting –
Catherine LeCocq, SLAC Alignment Plan for the LCLS Undulator IWAA 2006,1 Alignment Plan for the LCLS Undulator Catherine.
October 27-28, 2005 FAC Meeting Undulator Metrology Catherine LeCocq, SLAC 1 Undulator Metrology Catherine LeCocq, SLAC October.
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
CLIC08 Workshop, CERN October 2008 PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDY STATUS AND MODEL FOR THE BEAM DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS TS/SU/MTI Thomas TOUZE Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
BRAINSTORMING ON LASER BASED SOLUTIONS FOR CLIC PRE-ALIGNMENT INTRODUCTION Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, BE/ABP/SU, 09/02/2010 Status of the study CLIC pre-alignment.
H. MAINAUD DURAND Studies on active pre-alignment for the CLIC project.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team Status on CLIC pre-alignment studies.
Summary of Presentation 1. Tolerances i. Vertical tolerances on BPMs (rf-BPM: ± 0.2μm, user BPMs: ±0.1μm, and X-BPMs: ± 0.1μm) ii. Tolerances on magnets’
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team oWPS versus cWPS OUTLINE Introduction oWPS cWPS Results of inter-comparison tests
Alignment and stability session
Tutorial On Fiducialization Of Accelerator Magnets And Undulators
Beam position measurements at synchrotron light sources
ALIGNMENT OF THE NEW TRIPLETS
David Urner Oxford University/JAI
Phase Feed-Forward Piotr Skowroński (CERN)
Alignment systems in ATLAS: Monitoring of the bedplates
on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team
Workshop on Tau-Charm at High Luminosity
SOLEIL Fast Orbit Feedback System
EuroTeV WP7 activities in DESY
Testbeam plans for LEP instrumentation
Need for Alignment Position of off-momentum proton w.r.t. beam
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
Towards a common mechanical interface
SOLEIL Fast Orbit Feedback System
Commissioning the Fast Orbit Feedback System at SSRF
Alignment challenges for a future linear collider
S.Ecklund, C.LeCocq, R.Pushor, R.Ruland, A.Seryi, Z.Wolf
Undulator System Installation
Latency measurements on the ALBA Electron units
Beam Current Monitoring with ICT and BPM Electronics
Status and experience of Liberas at Soleil
Towards a ground motion orbit feed-forward at ATF2
LCLS Undulator System Status and Schedule
Undulator Cavity BPM System Status
LCLS Undulator System Status and Schedule
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
Undulator Alignment Plan
Alignment Diagnostic System Status
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Presentation transcript:

Some movement monitor systems at DESY by K. Wittenburg, DESY Introduction/Experience with moving beam pipe in HERA Some comments and experiences: Commercial System (Eddy current) Hydrostatic Level System (HLS) Stretched Wire (Wire Position Monitor, WPM) PETRAIII: MOMO (Movement Monitor) High resolution BPM System for PETRAIII (very brief)

Moving beam pipe in HERA

Introduction DESY will rebuild the storage ring PETRA towards a low emittance synchrotron radiation source called PETRA III. PETRA (positron electron tandem ring accelerator) is a 2.304km storage ring which was built in 1976 as an e+ – e− collider. Stability requirement 0.1 * s (s = 5 mm) Sub micron orbit stability -> High resolution BPM system The movement of the BPMs (relative to ground) should be measured with a resolution of about 1 mm (near undulators). Comparison of the brilliance of PETRA III undulators to existing and planned sources.

Girder for PETRAIII

Girder for PETRAIII

Girder for PETRAIII

1) Commercial system The movement between of the BPMs (relative to ground) should be measured with a resolution of about 1 mm (near undulators). Different technical solutions are under study. Two commercial systems had arrived last week. Test are under way. Also an alternative solution by using a wire alignment system like in HERA will be studied.

Commercial system

Commercial system, test results in PETRAII No success, no data, system stopped function due to radiation (hot area) within a day. Reset-able, but no continuous data taken. Decision: Use radiation resistive systems, like in HERA

2) HLS The system consists of two types of HLS sensors, which complement each other. One sensor type is based on capacitive measurements, which has the advantage of being widely used and having a lower purchase cost, see Figure 2. The repeatability of the sensor is 1 μm with an accuracy of 5 μm over the 5 mm measurement range. A disadvantage of this sensor type is that capacitive sensors drift by about 1 – 2 μm per month due to aging of electronic components. The second type of sensor is based on ultrasonic runtime measurements, see Figure 3. The measurements are self calibrating and therefore no drifts are expected. The repeatability of the sensor is 1 μm with an accuracy of 5 μm over the 5 mm measurement range. Since the ultrasound sensors provide actual height differences to the water surface they can be used to calibrate the capacitive sensors.

HLS

HLS in PETRA II

HLS in PETRA II There was corrosion in the test System at PETRAII. Lots of synchrotron radiation!?! Markus Schlösser Daniel Kämtner PETRA(III)-HLS Hamburg, 20.10.2005

This system should detect vertical movements of the PETRAIII girders HLS This system should detect vertical movements of the PETRAIII girders In CTF2, six HLSs monitor the stability of the concrete girder supporting the accelerator. In CTF2, 34 WPS-sensors are installed on the girders and the quadrupoles.

3) WPM LCLS-TN-05-7 First Measurements and Results With a Stretched Wire Test Setup Franz Peters, Georg Gassner, Robert Ruland February 2005 SLAC

WPM Transverse position of quadrupoles can be determined within 0.5 μm (rms) by measurements of support temperatures within ±0.1 K. As extensive test measurements have shown [11], the readout resolution of the WPM system is much better than 100 nm and instrument drifts are lower than 100 nm per day. Due to the unavoidable large sag of long wires, the uncertainty of the wires in vertical direction will be higher than one micrometer, which is the required design objective for the quadrupoles. Therefore, the vertical position of both wires will be correlated to the horizontal plain defined by the Hydrostatic Leveling System. LCLS

FFTB WPM Sensor mounted on magnet Wire FFTB / SLAC

WPM 0.5 mm/div LCLS-TN-05-7 First Measurements and Results With a Stretched Wire Test Setup Franz Peters, Georg Gassner, Robert Ruland February 2005 SLAC

HERA WPM Sensor mounted on magnet Wire HERA

HERA WPM vertical horizontal HERAe current 200 mm Main magnet current

Experience from HERA: WPM Long wires disturbed always any kind of service on magnets, water, cables, … due to services, wires often got huge offsets, shorts, dismounted, … NO LONG WIRES IN PETRAIII

4) MOMO wire BPMs with vacuum chamber coupler top view side view

Laboratory-measurements on MOMO prototype 20 mm/div 20 nm/div 1 h

5) BPM requirements for fast orbit correction => Sub micron orbit stability => 0.2 mm resolution at 300 Hz bandwidth Part I: Readout electronic Very close cooperation with WP Feedback. Decision: Before buying extensive tests of electronic necessary: Slow orbit resolution Fast data readout for fast orbit feedback. Same system also used in Diamond, Soleil. Planned for ALBA, ESRF…

Absolute accuracy Regular beam based alignment foreseen Small electronic drifts:

Status BPM Electronic: Many successful tests in laboratory, PETRAII and ESRF. Extensive communication with I-Tech, Soleil, DIAMOND, ESRF and Libera users Useful firmware exist since middle 2006. Startup was troublesome. Latest version fulfills our requirements on slow orbit resolution and stability. Fast Data transfer (turn by turn = 130 kHz) exists since July 2006. Tests were very promising. Detailed specifications are in preparation Additional electronics necessary for distribution of triggers, clocks, alarms, etc. Test of temperature stabilized 19“racks (≈ ±1 0C) ongoing. Test at ESRF: 992 bunches vert.: 20 nm/div hor.: 400 s

Special BPM chamber for high sensitivity

Measurements at ESRF with Libera As already noticed, a slight touch of the cables may have led to jumps in the position value. This was proved online by watching the readout values, but no dedicated experiment was recorded. However, in the data one can find these kinds of jumps but we can correlate it no more with touches. Fig. 12 shows such a jump of 0.135 mm but offline observations had shown some mm jumps, too. … Fig. 12 shows also some kind of slow oscillations, which are also visible in other samples. The setup was done in a way to avoid influenced from real beam oscillations, but this might be an residual effect of real beam oscillations or effects from LIBERA itself (1/f noise?). Note that the amplitude of these oscillations is very small (≈ 0.01 mm). Fig. 12: Jump of x-position

FASH experience Stripline BPM: Bunch distance: 100 ns Will work with ≈50 ns without any changes

The End now open for discussion

WPS The first? CLIC NOTE 553 January 2003 AN ACTIVE PRE-ALIGNMENT SYSTEM AND METROLOGY NETWORK FOR CLIC F. Becker, W. Coosemans, R. Pittin, I. Wilson The first?