2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening Stacie B. Whinnery, Ed.D. swhinnery@uwf.edu
Florida Blueprint Increase the knowledge and skills of all teachers working with SWDs Provide guidance to institutions of higher education to revise teacher preparation programs
Project Goals Develop a collaborative faculty-led process to enhance teacher preparation curricula Use the collaborative process to strengthen UDL content coverage in undergraduate teacher preparation programs
Guiding Question #1 What challenges might you encounter when integrating EBPs and HLPs into pre-service programs?
Identifying and Reducing Barriers Accreditation fatigue Use a faculty-led process, not an imposed process Program ownership vs. Facilitate shared responsibility course ownership using a “critical friend” approach Faculty time constraints Create resources and supports Faculty feel unprepared Provide UDL PD using mediated to teach UDL learning Concern with overloading Facilitate understanding of links courses with new content between UDL and existing course content
Critical Components Collaborative Curriculum Enhancement Focus on internal priorities, not external requirements Adopt a conceptual framework for the work to promote coherence Develop a faculty learning community (FLC) Mediate the learning process, and provide on-going support Introduce and model the “critical friend” approach Celebrate and recognize the work of the group
CEEDAR UDL Innovation Configuration Conceptual framework for our work Provides a rubric for assessing UDL content coverage in teacher preparation programs Nine Essential Components: Four related to General Understanding of UDL Five related to Planning Instruction Using the UDL Framework Four implementation levels (Level 0 to Level 3)
Faculty Learning Community Professional development Deepen understanding of UDL Mediated learning Facilitated planning with faculty to: Identify courses for UDL integration Solicit faculty volunteers for enhancing courses Provide ongoing input to guide the process Resources and supports Examples of UDL Essential Components Course review forms Mentoring from UDL Project Team
“Critical Friend” Approach Faculty worked in teams during: Curriculum review Development of the curriculum enhancement map Curriculum enhancement workshops Goal: To establish culture of shared responsibility for content coverage across the programs General and special education Course work and clinical experiences
Lessons Learned Faculty-led process increased buy-in and ownership Faculty Learning Community facilitated: shared goals group learning and planning coordination across courses and clinical experiences Faculty valued the scaffolded presentation of new material Curriculum Review phase led to multiple positive outcomes Exploration of UDL Essential Components (EC) at a deeper level Identified current coverage of UDL content Recognition of possible ways to integrate UDL into existing courses
Lessons Learned Part 2 Faculty-led process increased buy-in and ownership Rating Form served multiple purposes Initially intended to document course enhancements Faculty valued the structure for planning Led to increased discussions about alignment of UDL content across the programs Shared decision-making led to positive outcomes Early hesitancy to integrate more than one EC was replaced with comprehensive integration across courses
Impact on Programs/Department Increased coverage of UDL content across the program Development of a collaborative process that can be replicated with other curriculum enhancement efforts Building capacity for collaborative teacher education Coordination between general education and special education Strengthening connections between course work and clinical experiences
Guiding Question #2 Considering the information presented today and your own experiences, share ideas for enhancing pre-service programs to better prepare general education teachers to teach students with disabilities.
Course Enhancement Examples University of West Florida Teacher Education
Applied Foundations (course enhancement example) Syllabus enhancements: SLOs Define Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and identify major principles Topics Universal Design for Learning framework Progress Monitoring Assignment UDL Quiz Enhancement example: IRIS UDL Module UDL quiz based on IRIS module
Methods of Inclusion and Collaboration (course enhancement example) Syllabus enhancement: SLOs Define UDL and identify learning barriers for students with disabilities Identify effective UDL strategies for instructing students with disabilities Topics UDL, Learning Barriers, Assistive Technology, Progress Monitoring Enhancement example: Introduction to UDL Video – “UDL At a Glance” (CAST ) Article – “Using a Universal Design Approach to Find Barriers and Solutions in the Curriculum” Discussion Groups – Groups respond to guided questions related to above material Quiz – over concepts covered
Teaching Science in the Elementary School (course enhancement example) Syllabus enhancements: SLOs Design flexible formative assessments to determine student learning in science, and identify possible alternative conceptions/misconceptions Using the UDL framework, identify inclusive strategies for promoting equitable participation of underrepresented populations Topic UDL Framework Assignments Next Generation Science Unit Plan Enhancement example: UDL Review Module (available as needed) Research and design an inquiry science unit that engages elementary students with diverse learning needs