2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Content Side of the ACPS Professional Learning Plan (PLP)
Advertisements

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
COE Office of Assessment and Accreditation Department of Elementary and Middle Grades Education COE Office of Teacher Education College of Education East.
UNIVERSAL DESIGN FOR LEARNING N ANCI L EE. Introduction to Universal Design Universal Design was a term coined by architect Ronald Mace. Design Principles.
Improving Educational Participation and Outcomes for ALL Students with Universal Design for Learning and–for some–Special Education Services Joy Smiley.
CEEDAR Cross State Convening Overview: Innovation Configurations Course Enhancement Modules H325A
Universal Design for Learning in the College Classroom Abstract This Faculty Learning Community (FLC) integrated components of Universal Design for Learning.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 September 16, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
IOWA CORE CURRICULUM LEADERSHIP TRAINING Day Two.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Amy Alexander. Analyzing Effectiveness Participants’ Reactions Participants’ Learning Organization Support and Change Participants’ Use of New Knowledge.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Module 5: Questioning, Inquiry and Problem Based Learning Introduction and Module Overview Standards Knowledge and skills Assignments.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
An Introduction to Co-Teaching for Professional Development Schools:
Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum Through Universal Design for Learning and Inclusion.
Bringing it All Together Focus on Curriculum Development & Instructional Delivery Focus on Instructional Practices Focus on Instructional Alignment Where.
Dr. Marty Hougen, CEEDAR Center
Broadening Participation through K-12 and Community Partnerships
Preparing Pre-Service Teacher Candidates for Inclusive Settings
Stephanie L. Craig, M.Ed. University of Kansas
My research questions What are academics’ perceptions of the influences on their curriculum decisions? What are the drivers that support and inhibit.
Cross-Institutional Collaboration for Sustainability
Cross-State Convening June 2017
First-Year Experience Seminars: A Benchmark Study of Targeted Courses for Developmental Education Students.
CEEDAR Center Cross-State Convening
Keywords: Engineering ethics, design education,
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
February 8, 2017.
California's Early Learning and Development System Overview
DEC, CEC, NAEYC Standards Alignment: A Tool for Higher Education Curriculum Development Council for Exceptional Children Annual Conference Boston, MA.
Using Formative Assessment
Assist. Prof.Dr. Seden Eraldemir Tuyan
Preparing Pre-Service Teacher Candidates for Inclusive Settings
21st Century Innovation School
Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Chapter Reflections: 1,2,3,5,6 By: Amy Howland.
Comprehensive Planning
How are HLPs used? Components of HLP identified.
A five-year community effort to improve Earth literacy and build a workforce prepared to tackle environmental and resource issues InTeGrate supports integrated.
Collaborative Inquiry and Professional Learning Communities
THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Dolores Esposito, Executive Superintendent of Leadership Developing Social and Emotional Skills in our Schools.
Kristin Reedy, Co-Director June 24, 2016
EDU 695Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Department of Special Education
Ohio Dean’s Compact Meeting September 14, 2018 ceedar.org
NCSI Cross-State Learning Collaboratives Part B Meeting
Mary T. Brownell, Director
Collaborative Leadership
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
CEEDAR Cross-State Convening June, 2017 Chicago, Illinois
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Welcome to the overview session for the Iowa Core Curriculum
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Introductions Introduction
Presentation transcript:

2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening Stacie B. Whinnery, Ed.D. swhinnery@uwf.edu

Florida Blueprint Increase the knowledge and skills of all teachers working with SWDs Provide guidance to institutions of higher education to revise teacher preparation programs

Project Goals Develop a collaborative faculty-led process to enhance teacher preparation curricula Use the collaborative process to strengthen UDL content coverage in undergraduate teacher preparation programs

Guiding Question #1 What challenges might you encounter when integrating EBPs and HLPs into pre-service programs?

Identifying and Reducing Barriers Accreditation fatigue Use a faculty-led process, not an imposed process Program ownership vs. Facilitate shared responsibility course ownership using a “critical friend” approach Faculty time constraints Create resources and supports Faculty feel unprepared Provide UDL PD using mediated to teach UDL learning Concern with overloading Facilitate understanding of links courses with new content between UDL and existing course content

Critical Components Collaborative Curriculum Enhancement Focus on internal priorities, not external requirements Adopt a conceptual framework for the work to promote coherence Develop a faculty learning community (FLC) Mediate the learning process, and provide on-going support Introduce and model the “critical friend” approach Celebrate and recognize the work of the group

CEEDAR UDL Innovation Configuration Conceptual framework for our work Provides a rubric for assessing UDL content coverage in teacher preparation programs Nine Essential Components: Four related to General Understanding of UDL Five related to Planning Instruction Using the UDL Framework Four implementation levels (Level 0 to Level 3)

Faculty Learning Community Professional development Deepen understanding of UDL Mediated learning Facilitated planning with faculty to: Identify courses for UDL integration Solicit faculty volunteers for enhancing courses Provide ongoing input to guide the process Resources and supports Examples of UDL Essential Components Course review forms Mentoring from UDL Project Team

“Critical Friend” Approach Faculty worked in teams during: Curriculum review Development of the curriculum enhancement map Curriculum enhancement workshops Goal: To establish culture of shared responsibility for content coverage across the programs General and special education Course work and clinical experiences

Lessons Learned Faculty-led process increased buy-in and ownership Faculty Learning Community facilitated: shared goals group learning and planning coordination across courses and clinical experiences Faculty valued the scaffolded presentation of new material Curriculum Review phase led to multiple positive outcomes Exploration of UDL Essential Components (EC) at a deeper level Identified current coverage of UDL content Recognition of possible ways to integrate UDL into existing courses

Lessons Learned Part 2 Faculty-led process increased buy-in and ownership Rating Form served multiple purposes Initially intended to document course enhancements Faculty valued the structure for planning Led to increased discussions about alignment of UDL content across the programs Shared decision-making led to positive outcomes Early hesitancy to integrate more than one EC was replaced with comprehensive integration across courses

Impact on Programs/Department Increased coverage of UDL content across the program Development of a collaborative process that can be replicated with other curriculum enhancement efforts Building capacity for collaborative teacher education Coordination between general education and special education Strengthening connections between course work and clinical experiences

Guiding Question #2 Considering the information presented today and your own experiences, share ideas for enhancing pre-service programs to better prepare general education teachers to teach students with disabilities.

Course Enhancement Examples University of West Florida Teacher Education

Applied Foundations (course enhancement example) Syllabus enhancements: SLOs Define Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and identify major principles Topics Universal Design for Learning framework Progress Monitoring Assignment UDL Quiz Enhancement example: IRIS UDL Module UDL quiz based on IRIS module

Methods of Inclusion and Collaboration (course enhancement example) Syllabus enhancement: SLOs Define UDL and identify learning barriers for students with disabilities Identify effective UDL strategies for instructing students with disabilities Topics UDL, Learning Barriers, Assistive Technology, Progress Monitoring Enhancement example: Introduction to UDL Video – “UDL At a Glance” (CAST ) Article – “Using a Universal Design Approach to Find Barriers and Solutions in the Curriculum” Discussion Groups – Groups respond to guided questions related to above material Quiz – over concepts covered

Teaching Science in the Elementary School (course enhancement example) Syllabus enhancements: SLOs Design flexible formative assessments to determine student learning in science, and identify possible alternative conceptions/misconceptions Using the UDL framework, identify inclusive strategies for promoting equitable participation of underrepresented populations Topic UDL Framework Assignments Next Generation Science Unit Plan Enhancement example: UDL Review Module (available as needed) Research and design an inquiry science unit that engages elementary students with diverse learning needs