Update on the NASA Langley Satellite Calibration SBAF Tools

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating Calibration of MODIS Thermal Emissive Bands Using Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer Measurements Yonghong Li a, Aisheng Wu a, Xiaoxiong.
Advertisements

Science Innovation Fund: Quantifying the Variability of Hyperspectral Shortwave Radiation for Climate Model Validation Yolanda Roberts 1 Constantine Lukashin.
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
NASA, CGMS-41, July 2013 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Calibration/validation of Operational Instruments at NASA Langley Research.
AGU 2002 Fall Meeting NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Validation of GOES-8 Derived Cloud Properties Over the Southeastern Pacific J.
Interannual Variability and Decadal Change of Solar Reflectance Spectra Zhonghai Jin Costy Loukachine Bruce Wielicki (NASA Langley research Center / SSAI,
Interannual Variability of Solar Reflectance From Data and Model Z. Jin, C. Lukachin, B. Wielicki, and D. Young SSAI, Inc. / NASA Langley research Center.
Agency xxx, version xx, Date xx 2016 [update in the slide master] Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Introduction to GSICS Presented.
GSICS Coordination Center Report Fangfang Yu, Fuzhong Weng, Fred Wu and George Ohring NOAA/Center for Satellite Applications and Research 8 April, 2013.
Desert-based calibration of co-located geostationary visible sensors using a daily exoatmospheric radiance model (DERM) Raj Bhatt, Dave Doelling, Ben Scarino,
Spectral band adjustment factors in the SW GSICS Annual Meeting, Williamsburg, VA, 7 March 2013 Benjamin Scarino a, David R. Doelling b, Patrick Minnis.
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
GSICS DCC calibration update
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
VIS/NIR reference instrument requirements
GRWG VIS/NIR Sub-Group Briefing Report
Benjamin Scarino, David R
Analysis Ready Data July 18, 2016 John Dwyer Leo Lymburner
Progress toward DCC Demo product
Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration with D. Doelling (NASA)
Extending DCC to other bands and DCC ray-matching
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
Spectral Band Adjustment Factor (SBAF) Tool
Doelling, Wagner 2015 GSICS annual meeting, New Delhi March 20, 2015
Requirements for GSICS Plotting Tool to support VIS/NIR products
DCC inter-calibration of Himawari-8/AHI VNIR bands
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
GOES-East DCC analysis
On the use of Ray-Matching to transfer calibration
Fangfang Yu and Fred Wu 22 March 2011
Introduction of the SCIAMACHY SBAF web tool
Closing the GEO-ring Tim Hewison
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
A Strategy for the Inter-Calibration of Solar Channels within GSICS
JMA Agency Report 2017 Arata Okuyama, Masaya Takahashi and Hidehiko Murata Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological Agency.
Update on the GIRO Benchmark
PATMOS-x AVHRR Calibration Update
Inter-Sensor Comparison for Soumi NPP CrIS
GRWG VIS/NIR sub-group briefing report
VIS/NIR sub-group discussion
Intercomparison of IASI and CrIS spectra
Implementation of DCC at JMA and comparison with RTM
Himawari-8 Launch and its calibration approaches
Moving toward inter-calibration using the Moon as a transfer
Inter-calibration of the SEVIRI solar bands against MODIS Aqua, using Deep Convective Clouds as transfer targets Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration.
Developing Spectral Corrections / SRF Retrievals Tim Hewison
Dorothee Coppens.
The Aqua-MODIS calibration transfer using DCC
Moving toward inter-calibration using the Moon as a transfer
Traceability of the GIRO to the ROLO: Definition of a benchmark
Development of inter-comparison method for 3.7µm channel of SLSTR-IASI
Using VIIRS I or M band as the calibration reference
Viju John, Rob Roebeling, Tim Hewison
Development of the MTSAT1 visible footprint point spread function
Strawman Plan for Inter-Calibration of Solar Channels
Use of GSICS to Improve Operational Radiometric Calibration
Progress toward DCC Demo product
Spectral Correction for Inter-comparion between VIIRS and MODIS TEB
Implementation of DCC algorithm for MTSAT-2/Imager
Inter-band calibration using the Moon
GSICS Server Upgrade - Requirements for New Deliverables
Impacts of I01 and M05 of S-NPP/VIIRS on AHI-VIIRS Ray-matching
Andrew Heidinger JPSS Cloud Team Lead
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
GRWG VIS/NIR sub-group briefing report
VIS/NIR sub-group discussion
Defining the Products: ‘GSICS Correction’
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
Towards a GSICS DCC product...
Presentation transcript:

Update on the NASA Langley Satellite Calibration SBAF Tools Benjamin Scarino1, David R. Doelling2, Arun Gopalan1, Thad Chee1, Rajendra Bhatt1, and Conor Haney1 1SSAI, One Enterprise Pkwy Ste 200, Hampton, VA 23666 USA 2NASA Langley Research Center, 21 Langley Blvd MS 420, Hampton, VA 23681-2199 USA 2017 GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting 20 - 24 March 2017 Madison, WI GRWG: VIS/NIR Sub-group Thursday, March 23rd, 14:40

Outline Purpose Spectral Band Adjustment Factor (SBAF) [brief] review Calibration webpage Highlighting the Solar Constant Comparison Tool Tool updates IASI SCIAMACHY and introducing GOME-2 Consistency Showcasing SRF and Spectra Tool Revisiting Hyperion Summary and conclusions

Purpose Provided tools for use by inter-calibration developers GSICS deliverable Open sharing to benefit calibration community Support proposed effort to provide open access SBAFs for consistent inter-satellite calibration and retrievals Need users Will take suggestions and adapt Spectral domains Tool features New sub-setting options Different buttons Plotting controls Uncertainty Range Need input from instrument teams New/updated/recommended SRFs New calibration Version updates E.g., next SCIAMACHY release this year

SBAF Review (a) The Wherli 1985 solar irradiance spectra. (b) The SCIAMACHY reflectance spectra over DCC, clear-sky ocean, and vegetation overlaid with GOES-12 Ch1 (G12) and MODIS Band 1 Derivation of reference- and target-sensor pseudo radiance (Lp)

SBAF Review 3rd-order relationship of WV channels resoled by 3rd-order SBAF application SBAF reduces relative gain difference of multiple independent calibration methods 400 – 2500 nm 240 – 1750 nm 3600 – 15500 nm 240 – 790 nm SBAF applicable for 0.24-2.50 μm via SCIAMACHY, Hyperion, and GOME-2 GOME-2 affords smaller footprint from narrower spectral range IASI covers 3.60-15.5 μm Will also support AIRS starting this year

NASA Langley Satellite Calibration Webpage https://satcorps.larc.nasa.gov https://satcorps.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/site/showdoc?mnemonic=SAT_CALIB_USER

Solar Constant Tool Select any instrument visible-band SRF for convolution Select up to 4 solar spectra from 6 options Plot provides image of SRF relative response and solar irradiance relative to wavelength Table reveals the SRF convolution of flux, irradiance, and radiance for the chosen solar spectra(s)

NASA Langley Satellite Calibration Webpage https://satcorps.larc.nasa.gov https://satcorps.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/site/showdoc?mnemonic=SAT_CALIB_USER

IASI-based IR SBAF Tool Update Available spectral domains and selection features as shown Current user request for land/water mask Recently implemented user requests for 11-μm BT subsetting, and wavelength cutoff for spectral convolution

IASI-based IR SBAF Tool Update Users conducting Overshooting Convective Top studies found it helpful to construct piece-wise SBAFs using limited ranges of 11-μm BT Works for any channel SBAF, not just 11-μm

IASI-based IR SBAF Tool Update A user suspected SBAF uncertainty was caused by CO2 absorption band just beyond 4.0 μm Intend to enable means simple spectral absorption band analysis

SCIAMACHY-based Visible SBAF Tool Update Available spectral domains and selection features as shown A current request for enhanced interfacing capabilities, i.e., run-time/real-time automation, script-driven production Security considerations Land-use community user recently requested clear-sky IGBP-specific subsetting Probably better served by GOME-2 User-controlled outlier filtering

GOME-2-based Visible SBAF Tool Introduction [In Development] Currently based on 1 month of data (July 2008) Will support full record as year continues Live for 18 IGBP Land Classification types (clear sky) Better sampled than can be accomplished with SCIAMACHY footprints

SCIAMACHY and GOME-2 Clear-sky IGBP Scene Spectra 8 years of SCIAMACHY vs. 1 month of GOME-2, and the ability to sample a properly-represented Wetlands scene ID

SCIAMACHY and GOME-2 Clear-sky IGBP Scene Spectra GOME-2-based SBAFs over Barren land (IGBP=16) suggest a 0.2% spectral disparity between the above SRFs SCIAMACHY-based SBAFs suggest no spectral correction necessary

Spectral Response Function Comparison Tool A fair SBAF comparison should have have adequate sampling from each instrument, with comparable viewing/solar geometry Preferable to use a PICS Otherwise can get significant SBAF difference for a more disparate SRF pairing https://satcorps.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/site/showdoc?mnemonic=SAT_CALIB_USER

Spectral Response Function Comparison Tool For example, VIIRS I1 vs. M5 Band https://satcorps.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/site/showdoc?mnemonic=SAT_CALIB_USER

SCIAMACHY and GOME-2 Clear-sky IGBP Scene Spectra SBAFs inconsistent for disparate bands Some difference could be owed to seasonal/regional/anisotropic effects

SCIAMACHY and GOME-2 Clear-sky IGBP Scene Spectra Best effort can be made to pick similar view/illumination angle allowances, season, and domain Won’t account for specific SZA difference Note: Will not be an adequate imitation of a simultaneous, co-located comparison

SCIAMACHY and GOME-2 Clear-sky IGBP Scene Spectra Likely that agreement is highly dependent on scene homogeneity SCIAMACHY may miss small clouds GOME-2 perhaps more accurately distinguishing spectra of bare rock vs. soil vs. sand, whereas SCIAMACHY may represent more of an average

SCIAMACHY and GOME-2 Clear-sky IGBP Scene Spectra Other scene types suggest better consistency for same disparate SRFs Again, conclusions about consistency are best afforded from formal PICS study Bottom line: Attempt to best match scene conditions of one’s calibration approach

SCIAMACHY Spectra Plotting Tool Mean radiance/reflectance spectra and standard deviation available for all SCIAMACHY Earth targets. https://satcorps.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/site/showdoc?mnemonic=SAT_CALIB_USER

Hyperion-based Visible SBAF Tool Update Map displays entire record of Hyperion ground measurements

Hyperion-based Visible SBAF Tool Update Map displays entire record of Hyperion ground measurements Grey → black = low → high density Irregular distribution due to nature of tasked retrieval

Hyperion-based Visible SBAF Tool Update Map displays entire record of Hyperion ground measurements Grey → black = low → high density Irregular distribution due to nature of tasked retrieval Enter coordinates for area of interest, or simply ‘shift+click+drag’

Hyperion-based Visible SBAF Tool Update Map displays entire record of Hyperion ground measurements Grey → black = low → high density Irregular distribution due to nature of tasked retrieval Enter coordinates for area of interest, or simply ‘shift+click+drag’

Summary and Conclusions Providing support for calibration community and developers with open access SBAFs for consistent inter-satellite calibration and retrievals Want to work with instrument teams to showcase highest-quality data and latest SRFs Feedback, suggestions, and requests Will integrate full record of GOME-2, introduce AIRS Update on the NASA Langley Satellite Calibration SBAF Tools Benjamin Scarino benjamin.r.scarino@nasa.gov