Race and Ethnicity Name Institution

Definition of Race and Ethnicity Race and ethnicity can be grouped as a social issue since race and ethnicity is a facet of a social pattern and a diverse number of persons face this issue Ethnicity defines a terminology that refers to the practices, values and beliefs of a group. This might comprise shared language, religion and customs, among other similarities. Race is described as a group of persons who have been segregated on the grounds of real or suspected physical characteristics.

Functionalist perspective According to Cole (2017), functionalist theorists would explain the problem of race and ethnicity by agitating that racism and discrimination do impact positively though only to the dominant group (Cole, 2017). In the opinion of factionalism, racial and ethnic inequalities ought to have served a critical role so as to exist so long as they have. They view that race and ethnicity has served dominant groups well to favor subordinate groups. The Functionalist theorist of sociology views that the racial and ethnic minorities possess less skilled skills for the available jobs.

Moreover, they also perceive that each society has job vacancies that are unattractive to the persons in that society. For instance, Asian immigrants outsourcing their skills to work places and Mexican settlers are employed as house helps, and landscapers.

Symbolic Interactionist Perspective Henslin et al., (2015) contemplates that Symbolic interactionist would elucidate the issue of race and ethnicity by stressing that race and ethnicity offer strong symbols as channels of identity (Henslin et al., 2015). As a matter of fact, some interactionists suggest that the symbols of race are what result to racism. Gabbidon (2015) says that this “perception of kind” has its roots from the collaboration between tribal crowds and remainder of the individuals of the community (Gabbidon, 2015).

Conflict Theory Caselli & Coleman (2013) dictate that conflict theorists view that the issue of race and ethnicity comes from the unlimited competition among groups for authority, affluence and social class (Caselli & Coleman, 2013) Notably, two groups of individuals struggle to amass the resources. In case the interest group were supposed to obtain authority, they would command the executive jobs that offer them status and better conducive working environment. Racial and ethnic disparity often almost result in conflict.

Relevance of the topic to the sociological perceptive The three different perspectives all have distinct perceptions of race and ethnicity and the issues of disparities that race and ethnicities endure. Functionalist theorists view disparity as a beneficial facet of societies because all unfriendly jobs will get executed. Conflict theorists view race and ethnic inequalities as a procedure to discover supremacy and power. Symbolic Interactionists views race and ethnicities as developed and kept going via concepts of social interactions and shared notions. All of these perspectives provide notions into why there is dissimilarity in race and ethnicity.

Position of the topic I agree the most with Functionalism. I believe that Functionalism explains the different roles that we all take in race and ethnicity the best. As we all understand these roles, we can work on better overcoming the problem in the society. I think that while race and ethnicity is a social problem and society can be educated to that problem; I think when it comes to making changes, it is an individual problem.

when it comes down to it, you choose what you put in your body when it comes down to it, you choose what you put in your body. You know your genetic disposition and what your body’s needs are. You know what your exercise are and you needs need to act on this knowledge. You can’t put all of this on society, it is an individual problem. The reason it is a societal problem is because there is such a large portion of the country suffering from this.

References Caselli, F., & Coleman, W. J. (2013). On the theory of ethnic conflict. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(suppl_1), 161-192. Cole, M. (2017). Critical race theory and education: A Marxist response. Springer. Gabbidon, S. L. (2015). Criminological perspectives on race and crime. Routledge. Henslin, J. M., Possamai, A. M., Possamai-Inesedy, A. L., Marjoribanks, T., & Elder, K. (2015). Sociology: A down to earth approach. Pearson Higher Education AU. Murji, K., & Solomos, J. (Eds.). (2015). Theories of Race and Ethnicity. Cambridge University Press.