RFQ Tuning Method last results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RFQ development for high power beams
Advertisements

The Front End Test Stand Collaboration ELECTROMAGNETIC DESIGN OF A RFQ FOR THE FRONT END TEST STAND AT RAL A. Kurup, A. Letchford The RAL front end test.
RFQ Tuning and RFQ Control Status
Effect of RFQ Modulations on Frequency and Field Flatness
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Lorentz force detuning measurements on the CEA cavity
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Prospects of Compact Crab Cavities for LHC Peter McIntosh LHC-CC Workshop, CERN 21 st August 2008.
Juliette PLOUIN – CEA/SaclayCARE’08, 3 December /21 Superconducting Cavity activities within HIPPI CARE ‘08 CERN, 2-5 December 2008 Juliette PLOUIN.
Bunch shape monitor for Linac-4 A.V.Feschenko Institute For Nuclear Research (INR), Moscow , Russia.
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
Part2: Cavities and Structures Modes in resonant cavity From a cavity to an accelerator Examples of structures JUAS 2015 Linacs-JB.Lallement - JUAS
SCU Measurements at LBNL
Internship for young academic teachers (CAS/36/POKL) CERN X-XII 2014 Zuzanna Krawczyk This work has been supported by the European Union in the framework.
Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac M. Pasini, CERN AB-RF LINAC4 Machine Advisory Committee 1 st meeting CERN January 29-30, 2008.
Alain FRANCE for the ESS RFQ Team at CEA Saclay
Mathematical Models and Numerical Investigation for the Eigenmodes of the Modern Gyrotron Resonators Oleksiy KONONENKO RF Structure Development Meeting,
INTEGRATION OF RF STRUCTURES IN THE TWO-BEAM MODULE DESIGN G. Riddone, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland A. Samoshkin, D. Gudkov, JINR, Dubna, Russia Abstract.
RF Cavity Simulation for SPL Simulink Model for HP-SPL Extension to LINAC4 at CERN from RF Point of View Acknowledgement: CEA team, in particular O. Piquet.
LLRF Cavity Simulation for SPL
Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008.
Status of the Front End Test Stand April Infrastructure R8 refurbished Laser lab under construction Vacuum system for first section delivered Stands.
Status of the PSB impedance model C. Zannini and G. Rumolo Thanks to: E. Benedetto, N. Biancacci, E. Métral, N. Mounet, T. Rijoff, B. Salvant.
Updated status of the PSB impedance model C. Zannini and G. Rumolo Thanks to: E. Benedetto, N. Biancacci, E. Métral, B. Mikulec, N. Mounet, T. Rijoff,
ISTC Project #3888 Development, manufacture and experimental investigation of a unique pilot CCDTL accelerating section in the energy range of MeV.
Development of the Room Temperature CH-DTL in the frame of the HIPPI-CARE Project Gianluigi Clemente,
Fine-Tuning the RFQ End Region. “…The Devil is in the Detail” RFQ bulk design very close to completion But before drafting need to check: Repeatability.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
PBG Structure Experiments, AAC 2008 Photonic Bandgap Accelerator Experiments Roark A. Marsh, Michael A. Shapiro, Richard J. Temkin Massachusetts Institute.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
CLIC workshop 2015 EXTRACTION KICKER STRIPLINE MEASUREMENTS C. Belver-Aguilar (IFIC) On behalf of: A. Faus-Golfe (IFIC), F. Toral (CIEMAT), M.J. Barnes.
RF QUALITY CONTROL AND CORRECTION DURING THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS OF THE SPL CAVITIES “DUMB-BELL TRIMMING” POA Meeting Ercan Pilicer, Kai Papke,
Main activities and news from the Impedance working group.
BINP geometry (= cavity inner dimensions which define the boundary) is based on CERN geometry (as of August 4, 2008) with some adjustments made in order.
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
THE LINAC4 RFQ – Experience with Design, Fabrication and Tuning C. Rossi and the RFQ Project Team GSI Review – 20 November 2013.
Shuichi Noguch, KEK 6-th ILC School, November RF Basics; Contents  Maxwell’s Equation  Plane Wave  Boundary Condition  Cavity & RF Parameters.
Wolfgang Vinzenz FAIR Proton Linac 10 th FAIR MAC November 25 th and 26 th 2013 Proton Linac 1 Status Buncher Design  Rectangular design, longitudinal.
Performance Studies of a NOvA 53 MHz RF Cavity Frederic Jones 1 1 Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY Fermilab National Accelerator Laboratory,
ESS wire scanner Benjamin Cheymol
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 6 March.
Accelerator RFQ system Anne-Catherine CHAUVEAU for the ESS RFQ Team at CEA Saclay April, 2016.
ESS RFQ B. POTTIN and RFQ team CEA-IRFU. RFQ design Strategy 3 RF codes to validate calculations Consideration of machining and assembly possibilities.
STATUS OF THE NC BUNCHING RFQ (Sub-task: SC-RFQ) Antonio Palmieri INFN-LNL.
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.
Feasibility of impedance measurements with beam N. Biancacci, N. Wang, E. Métral and B.Salvant COLUSM meeting 27/05/2016 Acknowledgements: A. Lafuente.
Bunch Shape Monitor for HINS Wai-Ming Tam Project X Collaboration Meeting September 11, 2009.
CLIC Main Linac Cavity BPM Snapshot of the work in progress
LINAC AG • IAP • Goethe Universität Frankfurt
Status of the CERN chopper.
BE/RF-IS Contribution to LIU C. Rossi and M. Paoluzzi
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Status of the Front End Test Stand April 2007.
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
STUDIES OF THE STRIPLINE KICKER FOR BEAM EXTRACTION FROM THE CLIC DRs
Part2: Cavities and Structures
Optimisation of the FETS RFQ
TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE-WALL IMPEDANCE FROM ZOTTER2005’S THEORY
    BEAM POSITION MONITORS USING A RE-ENTRANT CAVITY C. Simon1, S. Chel1, M. Luong1, P. Contrepois1, P. Girardot1, N. Baboi2 and N. Rouvière3.
Implications of HOMs on Beam Dynamics at ESS
CLIC DR EXTRACTION KICKER DESIGN, MANUFACTURE AND EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
I Alexander Nass for the JEDI collaboration
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collective Effects and Beam Measurements in Particle Accelerators
Part2: Cavities and Structures
TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE-WALL IMPEDANCE FROM ZOTTER2005’S THEORY
Physics Design on Injector I
System tests at CEA O. Piquet 19/03/2019
ICAP 2006, Chamonix Mont-Blanc
Presentation transcript:

RFQ Tuning Method last results CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM IPHI-SPL collaboration meeting - CERN 28 & 29 /04/2003

What do we electromagnetically tune ? 1. Resonance Frequency fQ : 352.21 MHz V [kV] z [m] 2. Accelerating voltage profile : Vp(z) |(uQ(z)-Vp(z))/Vp(z)|< 10-2 3. Dipole components presence within the accelerating mode |uS(z)/uQ(z)|< 10-2 |uT(z)/uQ(z) |< 10-2 4. Closest dipole modes frequencies f +D - fQ = fQ - f -D

… Quadripole Mode dipole Modes Mode S et T (ST) distribution S Mode Q  focalisation  Kpq = 352,2 MHz …

What do we mechanically tune ? End regions Central region 1. Slug tuners 2. « dipole » rods 3. Plate thickness

The tuning tools that we have developed Diagnosis Treatment 1. Model What is the ideal RFQ ? 2. Test bench e.l.m. parameters of the real RFQ e.l.m. parameters  mechanical devices 5. Mathematical formalism 3. Spectral analysis Frequencies Field distribution 1. Slug tuners 2. Dipole rods 3. End plates  4. Cold-model  Defaults real RFQ / ideal RFQ  Fast tuning  High accuracy

Our model & the associated spectral analysis Coupled, inhomogeneous, 4-wire line equivalent circuit Central region d2U/dz2 – A U = - (/c)2 U End regions Boundary conditions M = hermetian operator (tM=M) Eigen values (R+) = resonance frequencies fQi, fSj, fTk Eigen functions (orthogonal basis) = { vQi(z), vSj(z), vTk(z) } voltage base functions Refer to : A. France, F. Simoens, “Theoretical Analysis of a Real-life RFQ Using a 4-Wire Line Model and the Spectral Theory of Differential Operators.”, EPAC2002 Conference (Paris), June 2002

Comparison measurements / model / 3d simulations 2 4 L1 C1 L2 L3 C3 L4 C4 Model 3d simulations Refer to : F. Simoens, A. France, O. Delferrière, “An Equivalent 4-Wire Line Theoretical Model of Real RFQ based on the Spectral Differential Theory”, CEA-SACLAY, LINAC Conference (Gyungju, Korea), August 2002

Slug tuners : fast simultaneous convergence uQ(z) [u.a.] uT(z) [u.a.] uS(z) [u.a.] fQ 0 350,62 MHz 2 352,22 MHz 1 352,18 MHz RFQ 2x1m -6,4.10-2<(uQ-Vp)/Vp<3,4.10-2 -9,2.10-2<uD/uQ<10,6.10-2 -0,2.10-2<(uQ-Vp)/Vp<0,2.10-2 -0,4.10-2<uD/uQ<0,4.10-2 Ref: F. Simoens, A. France, J. Gaiffier, “A New RFQ Model applied to the Longitudinal Tuning of a Segmented, Inhomogeneous RFQ with Highly Irregularly Spaced Tuners”, EPAC2002 Conference (Paris), June 2002

Dipole rods length adjustment A new tuning criteria : ‘quadratic shift frequency’  Matching of the equivalent end loads When df(n)real RFQ  df(n)ideal RFQ  Good correspondence between the measured and the ‘ideal’ dipole mode frequencies Voltage profiles of the first dipole mode steep slopes before dipole rods tuning straightened slopes after dipole rods tuning Refer to : F. Simoens, A. France, “Tuning procedure of the 5 MeV IPHI RFQ”, CEA-SACLAY, LINAC Conference (Gyungju, Korea), August 2002

End plate thickness adjustment  = L x  f [m.MHz] L = RFQ half-length f = (mismatched resonance freq.) - (nominal cut-off freq.) End region mismatch characterization :  parameter Nominal mid-position thickness    0 m.MHz Example of the IPHI RFQ cold-model end region adjustment range [-0,24 m.MHz , +0,33 m.MHz] Refer to : F. Simoens, A. France, “Tuning procedure of the 5 MeV IPHI RFQ”, CEA-SACLAY, LINAC Conference (Gyungju, Korea), August 2002

End plate thickness adjustment  Parameter extraction from measurements End #2 End #1 Slugs are moved at some distance of the end being tuned i.e. for end#1, in planes #6, 7 and 8 of segment #1 = set of different voltage excitations Spectral analysis end#1 plate thickness  Average [m.MHz] Std. Dev. [m.MHz] -0.120 0.032 10 0.001 0.055 20 +0.300 0.086  The nominal plate thickness is well-adjusted, Refer to : F. Simoens, A. France, “Tuning procedure of the 5 MeV IPHI RFQ”, CEA-SACLAY, LINAC Conference (Gyungju, Korea), August 2002

Conclusion Last results The agreement between measurements, 3d simulations and our model validates our mathematical formalism. The tuning procedures of the different mechanical devices have been developed and experimentally validated. In a 2-m long RFQ, we have achieved relative voltage error lower than 10-2 within 3 steps of slug tuners displacements. For the dipole rods adjustments, a new practical tuning criteria has been introduced, that ensures the convergence of tuning. The end region mismatch can be characterized from a set different voltage excitations and directly related to the end plate thickness. Studies in progress Chronology of the different tuning procedures in the context of the RFQ machining and assembling steps. RF power coupling (iris / loop).