Wildfire Effects on Forest Cover in Ponderosa Pine Forest

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Central Washington Landscape Assessment (CWLA) project update and discussion.
Advertisements

Marmot Creek Research Basin 50 th Anniversary Workshop March , 2013 John Diiwu Forest Management Branch Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource.
Dale Blahna, Robert Deal, Jeff Kline, Trista Patterson, Tom Spies PNW Research Station John Allen, Cindy Glick, Tom Mafera Deschutes National Forest Nikola.
Using FFE-FVS to estimate potential fire behavior in early settlement Black Hills ponderosa pine Mike Battaglia, Colorado State University Skip Smith,
Weighing the Added Risk of Climate Change to Population Persistence in Native Trout Jack Williams Amy Haak Helen Neville Warren Colyer.
How the ecology of conifers determines an environmental issue.
Changes in Surface Albedo as a Result of Forest Fires in Northern Arizona Ponderosa Pine Forests Isaac Bickford, Kyle Jones George Koch, Bruce Hungate,
Harold S.J. Zald and Andrew N. Gray USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR Tree Regeneration.
Changes in fire regime, forest structure, and tree spatial patterns in ponderosa pine forests of the northern Colorado Front Range, 1860 to 2012 Peter.
Science & Monitoring Team Meeting Sept 23rd. Agenda Introductions Overview of CPRW & CO Conservation Exchange Review draft charter/workplan Watershed.
Fire effects on vegetation recovery Summary of Results and Project Deliverables Jill Johnstone, Teresa Hollingsworth, Emily Bernhart & Katie Villano.
Fire and Water Dr. Carolyn Hunsaker Pacific Southwest Research Station, Fresno, CA.
Thank you: Joint Fire Science Program Effects of using Visualization and Animation in Presentations about Forest Succession and Fire Behavior Potential.
Fire regimes and the World’s biomes 23 September 2010.
2 Cooperative Fire Hazard Mitigation Priority Project By Eric Geisler Coeur d’Alene Tribe, Forestry.
The Value of Prescribed Fire in Colorado’s Front Range Rob Addington The Nature Conservancy.
Post-wildfire erosion: Soil hydrophobicity in Colorado soils Meredith Albright Soil Geography December 13, 2007 GEOG 5401 – Fall 2007 – Univ of Colorado,
Class 13a: Fire ecology. Wildfire Wildfire consequences: species Animals Plants.
Effects of Climatic Variability and Change on Forest Resources: A Scale- based Framework for Analysis David L. Peterson USDA Forest Service, PNW Station.
“Near term response of surface soil nitrogen cycling and pools to forest clearing and burning” Heather E. Erickson Recent soils research from the Teakettle.
Effects of topography upon mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) transport and dispersion as indicated by mesoscale meteorological models. Brenda.
 Vegetation Density and Snow Accumulation Evan Esfahani Winter Ecology 2014 Mountain Research Station.
CLASS UPDATES Office hours: Fridays 9AM-12noon (or me for an appointment) Powerpoints – on class website Schedule changes: thesis statement, outline,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
4 Forest Restoration Initiative Overview of Vegetation Data, Modeling and Strategies Used to Develop the Proposed Action Neil McCusker Silviculturist 4FRI.
Fire Ecology and Fire Regimes in Boreal Ecosystems Oct 19, 2010.
Impact of Climate Change on NA Forests Fire Courtesy of Tom Swetnam, U of Arizona, LTRR.
A 2012 NASA-CMS Phase 2 study Lead Investigators: Nancy HF French, MTRI Don McKenzie, US Forest Service, PNW, FERA Eric Kasischke, University.
Clearwater Basin Collaborative Restoring America’s Forests Oct. 3-5, 2011, Truckee, CA Photo: William H. Mullins Kelly Creek CBC Landscape Assessment Preliminary.
Climate-Fire Relationships in a Rare High Elevation Forest Danielle Klaas Mentor: Dr. Pete Fulé.
Modeling the effects of forest succession on fire behavior potential in southeastern British Columbia S.W. Taylor, G.J. Baxter and B.C. Hawkes Natural.
Fire, birds, bears and trees Conservation and restoration of whitebark pine ecosystems.
Fire Ecology Brittany Ciancarelli 4/2/13 BC. 3 Needle Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine BC.
Using GIS for Analysis: Queries Re-classification Map overlay Real world Land use Elevation Parcels Streets Retail A sample of approaches:
The Wildfire Risk Reduction Grant Program Effectiveness Assessment and Program Overview Brett Wolk, Chad Hoffman, Claire Griebenow, and Tony Cheng January.
Pollutant Emissions from Large Wildfires in the Western United States Shawn P. Urbanski, Matt C. Reeves, W. M. Hao US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research.
Vegetation Module Seth Bigelow, Michael Papaik, Malcolm North USFS Pacific Southwest Research Station.
Harold S.J. Zald and Andrew N. Gray USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR Tree Regeneration.
Small Mammals Mark Peyton, Ruth Passernig, Robert Parmenter.
What Drives Fire Frequency, Intensity, and Spread (focused on the Rocky Mountains) Aka: Fuels vs. Climate Bottom up or Top down Local vs Regional.
Fire, birds, bears and trees Conservation and restoration of whitebark pine ecosystems.
Updated Cover Type Map of Cloquet Forestry Center For Continuous Forest Inventory.
Restoring whitebark pine ecosystems in the face of climate change pine Bob Keane, USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Fire Sciences Laboratory.
The 21 st Century Wildland Firefighting Triangle.
Mapping Forest Burn Severity Using Non Anniversary Date Satellite Images By: Blake Cobb Renewable Resources Department with Dr. Ramesh Sivanpillai Department.
JOINT FIRE SCIENCE PROGRAM 2015 FUNDING CALL October 9, 2014.
NASA BAER Project: Improving Post-Fire Remediation Through Hydrological Modeling NASA Applied Science Program Applied Sciences Program - Wildfires.
Mapping Burn Severity of the Marking Pen Prescribed Burn in the Seminoe Mountains using pre- and post-fire Landsat Thematic Mapper images Erik Collier1.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
(Part 3) Climate change, forests and fire in the Sierra Nevada, California: implications for current and future resource management Hugh Safford Regional.
By: Bryanna Marler The Grand Canyon  OARS 
Assessing the climate impacts of land cover and land management using an eddy flux tower cluster in New England Earth Systems Research Center Institute.
Quantifying Urbanization with Landsat Imagery in Rochester, Minnesota
Wildfire: Past Trends and Future Threats
Assessment of Current Field Plots and LiDAR ‘Virtual’ Plots as Guides to Classification Procedures for Multitemporal Analysis of Historic and Current Landsat.
Understanding Wildfires as Pollution in Northern Saskatchewan
Cold Springs Fire Project
Hawks Aloft, Inc. Fire Avian Monitoring for Jemez Collaborative Landscape Forest Restoration Project
Orin J. Hutchinson1 with Dr. Ramesh Sivanpillai2
Funding: National Park Service, U.S.G.S.
National seminar on ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN EASTERN INDIA
FIRES IN RIPARIAN AREAS AND WETLANDS
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests is shown for the southwestern United States. Red dots indicate location of.
Species Diversity Comparison North and South Slopes
Impacts in Western Mountains
ESRM 501 5/7/07 Natural Disturbance Doug Sprugel.
Prediction of Channel Response Areas due to Wildfire Disturbance using GIS and TauDEM Karen Williams GIS in Water Resources.
Developing fire regimes and modeling fire restoration for abating the altered fire regime threat at scale Scott Simon, The Nature Conservancy of Arkansas.
The effects of Canopy Cover on Herbaceous Vegetation
Angela Gee, US Forest Service July 22, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Wildfire Effects on Forest Cover in Ponderosa Pine Forest Bollinger, Justin J.1,2, Malone, Sparkle L.1, Battaglia, Michael.1, Fornwalt, Paula1 1 USFS, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. 80526 2 Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. 80526 Introduction Fire is an essential component of ecosystem structure and function. Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) dominated forest historically had two major fire regimes: Low elevation forest (1600-2200m) were maintained by high frequency, low to moderate severity summer fires every 5 to 20 years (Figure 1a). High elevation (2200-2800m) forest were maintained by mixed severity fire every 30 to 40 years (Figure 1b). Fire suppression in ponderosa pine dominated forests have led to higher fuel loads and increases in forest cover. Considering that wildfire size and severity is likely to increase into the future with drier climate, It is important that we understand how wildfire effects ponderosa pine forests. The objective of this research is to understand wildfire effects on forest cover. Questions How does forest cover change following wildfire? How does burn severity influence forest cover? Methods Accuracy Assessment: Figure 4. Accuracy for the pre-fire forest layer was 97% with a kappa value of 0.74. We mapped pre and post fire forest cover in the High Park fire (Figure 3). Randomly generated 1000 points. Points were classified as forested or non-forested based on NAIP imagery and compared to the forest layers (Figures 4-5). Figure 3. Supervised classification of aerial imagery (National Agriculture Imagery Program: NAIP) was used to identify live forested area within the High Park Fire. Figure 5. Accuracy for the post-fire forest layer was 92% with a kappa value of 0.40. Results How does forest cover change following wildfire? How does burn severity influence forest cover? Figure 1. (a.) The low elevation fire regime often maintained monospecific stands of ponderosa pine while the (b.) mixed severity fire regime is associated with mixed conifer forest. v a. b. Figure 6. Shows the Pre-Fire aerial imagery (NAIP). Figure 7. Shows the Post-Fire aerial imagery (NAIP). Figure 8. Comparison of pre and post fire forested area. Forest cover went from 84% to 63% postfire (Figures 6-8). Figure 2. Elevation (m) thresholds in the High Park fire. Low and high elevation ponderosa pine forest represent 40% and 35% of the study area, respectively (Figure 2). Figure 9. Burn severity map of the High Park Fire. (http://www.mtbs.gov). Figure 10. Relative cover for severity classes for the entire fire and estimates of forested area within each severity class. Relative Frequency (%) Unburned areas had the lowest pre fire forest cover. Post fire forest cover was greatest for low and moderately burned areas (Figures 9-10). Conclusions Wildfire reduced forest cover by 21% in ponderosa pine forest (Figure 8). Post fire forest cover was lowest for high severity areas (Figure 9). Low pre-fire forest cover was associated with low burn severity. Acknowledgements: This research was funded in part by the USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station and directly builds upon an ongoing USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station National Fire Plan Study (RMRS-NFP-13-16-FWE-43), which is improving our understanding of forest recovery from wildfire.