Mr. Nepimach Czech Ecological Institute

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BULGARIAN COMPETENT AUTHORITIES IN THE FIELD OF IPPC Kalin Iliev Ministry of Environment and Water Bulgaria.
Advertisements

Consolidation of he Environmental Monitoring System in Albania (CEMSA) An EU-funded project managed by the Delegation of the European Commission to Albania.
Substantive environmental provisions Prof. Gyula Bándi.
Hellenic Ministry for the Environment, Spatial Planning and Public Works Greek Experience on the Implementation of EPER REPORTING IN GREECE Η ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ.
Grupowa Oczyszczalnia Ścieków Łódzkiej Aglomeracji Miejskiej Fot: U. Czapla Practical aspects of compliance with the Integrated Permit requirements based.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
The IPPC Directive and EPER Iksan van der Putte. Objectives of IPPC (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) To prevent or minimise emissions To.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INVENTORY SYSTEM IN THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS Belarus has signed UNFCCC in June, 1992 Ratified in May, 2000.
Audit of Public Procurement
Workshop, 12/3/2004 Banska Bystrica – SLOVAC REPUBLIC “INTEGRATED LICENCE PROCEDURE (Greek case)” Katerina Iakovidou-Anastasiadou Hellenic Ministry for.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
PRTR-online survey. Questions – Items Question 3 – Item 2.
Experience with an introduction of IPPC Directive in an AC IMPEL member country Czech Republic Czech Enviromental Inspectorate.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
EPER reporting process in Hungary with emphasis on the experiences Edina Gampel Counsellor National Inspectorate for Environment, Nature and Water Budapest,
Directive on the protection of the environment through criminal law Anna Karamat European Commission DG Environment Unit A.2 ‘Infringements’
The IPPC Directive and its implementation Alexandre Paquot European Commission Environment Directorate-General Phare Capacity.
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
MINIMUM CRITERIA Project Manager Marianne Lindström, Bulgaria SYKE, Expert Services, Environmental Management Division.
From EPER to E-PRTR EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.
Compilation of emission inventories The situation in the Netherlands Special Session of the UNCEEA on Climate Change (New York, 25 June afternoon)
Access to Information and Public Participation in Developing and Operating PRTR Systems Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Programme October 15-16, 2007.
Slovak Environmental Inspectorate Procedure of issuing the permits in the Slovak Republic.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Bulgaria.
The conception of Information System on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IS IPPC) Ing. Blanka Kapustová, PhD. Slovak Environmental Agency Centre.
Challenges of developing national capacity for PRTR systems in Central and Eastern Europe Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Program June 2004.
Preparation of future ENI CBC programmes - State of Play Vanessa De Bruyn (DG DEVCO) 3 December 2012.
Environmental Impact Assessment in the Slovak republic.
Capacity Building of Kazakhstan Aarhus Centres in Providing Access to and Exchange of Environmental Information Olga Melnik, Information and Analysis Center.
UNECE PRTR Protocol EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.
The legal background for implementing the IPPC, EPER, and PRTR Protocol Requirements Orsolya Adamovics Department for Conservation of Environment Ministry.
Industry environmental self- monitoring and reporting UK experience with reference to the Pollution Inventory Dr Ian Whitwell The Environment Agency of.
Offsite transfer of waste EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Bristol,19 March 2008 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the WG.
Iuliana CHIDU European integration counsellor Ministry of Environment and Water Management Prague - CZECH REPUBLIC April 2005 DIRECTIVE 96/61/EC.
How to start with the implementation of IPPC Directive Czech Republic Czech Environmetal Inspectorate.
Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental Law Phare Twinning Project CZ03/IB/EN/01 MONITORING Mr. Jan Prášek IPPC Agency.
| Folie | Folie 2 Reporting according to pollution registers Experiences in Austria Mag. Daniela Wappel.
Developing PRTR Systems in Europe : EPER, E-PRTR and the PRTR Protocol Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Programme October 15, 2007.
1 Short overview of the implementation of IPPC, LCP, Seveso II, Waste Landfill and Incineration directives Short overview of the implementation of IPPC,
UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE EMISSION DATA REPORTING UNDER LRTAP Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections: Oct. 2004,
ECENA Training on LCP, Seveso II and E- PRTR, March, 2008, Bristol, UK Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development National Environmental.
CROATIA Country Report IPPC Directive: implementation, problems, constraints, open questions,… Anita Pokrovac Patekar, B. Sc. Pharm. Ministry of Environmental.
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Czech experience - Use of BREFs and national BAT notes, role of IPPC Agency, Czech TWG Multi-Country Workshop June 8th,
Current status of PRTR in the Republic of Moldova.
Achievements in IPPC Directive Implementation: problems and constraints Albania Ministry of Environment 3 rd BERCEN Exchange Programme for the Environmental.
The EU and Access to Environmental Information Unit D4 European Commission, Directorate General for the Environment 1.
INTERNATIONAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAW OCTOBER 29, 2012.
1 Review of the IPPC Directive and related legislation Second Meeting Of Working Group E On Priority Substances 17 October 2007 Filip FRANCOIS – DG ENV.
Aarhus Convention and its Protocol on PRTRs: tools to promote environmental democracy Maryna Yanush Secretariat of the Aarhus Convention and PRTR Protocol.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental Law Phare Twinning Project CZ03/IB/EN/01 1 The IPPC Directive Introduction to the philosophy Rob Kramers.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment and Climate Change.
Introduction to the philosophy
The Italian PRTR Andrea Gagna
Inspection and enforcement approach
MONITORING Mr. Jan Prášek IPPC Agency.
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/ES of the European Parliament and Council from October 23rd 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water.
INTEGRATED PERMITTING PROCEDURE IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
A Race to the Bottom A Context for the Madness
Support in the implementation of the REFIT actions for ELD phase 2
OECD Chief Statistician and Director, Statistics Directorate
E-PRTR Regulation PRTR Protocol
Aleksandra Antonowicz Green Federation GAJA/CCB
IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing
Hungarian Association of NGOs for Development and Humanitarian Aid
EPER European Pollutant Emission Register
Quality aspects of EPER
Presentation transcript:

Mr. Nepimach Czech Ecological Institute IRZ Mr. Nepimach Czech Ecological Institute

Integrated Pollution Register – international context (1) OECD Recommendation on implementation of Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Declaration from Rio de Janeiro and Agenda 21 Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (Protocol on PRTR)

Integrated Pollution Register – international context (2) Aarhus Convention Decision of European Commission on European Pollutant Emission Register (EPER) Decision of European Commission on E-PRTR

Integrated Pollution Register – aims (1) The state has every moment available relevant and credible information about environment pollution. Expert and wide public has available easily accessible credible information about environment pollution.

Integrated Pollution Register – aims(2) Required subjects can fulfil their reporting duties in an effective, simple and transparent way. Data from IRZ serve for fulfilling of the Czech Republic’s obligation as a member state of the European Union concerning reporting into the EPER and followingly to the E-PRTR.

Integrated Pollution Register – legal regulations Act no. 76/2002 Coll., on integrated pollution prevention and control, on Integrated Pollution Register and amendment of some laws (Act on integrated pollution) Government Order no. 368/2003 Coll., on Integrated Pollution Register Executive Decree no. 572/2004 Coll., which sets the form and way of keeping background necessary for reporting into the Integrated Pollution Register

Act no. 76/2002 Coll. (1) Basic terms (§ 2) Establishment of Integrated Pollution Register (§ 21) Reporting duties (§ 22) Changes in reporting of same data according to the special laws (§ 23)

Act no. 76/2002 Coll.(2) Requirement to co-operate with the MoE in preparation of the IRZ implementation and authorisation to ensure unity of the information system in the area of environment (§ 24) Evidence keeping and data archiving (§ 25) Making public data from the IRZ and ensuring of international obligations (§26)

Government Order no. 368/2003 Coll. Definition of reported pollutant, reported unit and threshold (§ 1) Definition of reported thresholds for emissions into the air, water, soil and in transfers (§ 1) Way of estimation and finding out of reported pollutants (§ 2) Way and form of data reporting into the IRZ (§ 3) Measure to ensure unity of information system in the field of environment (§ 4)

Government Order no. 368/2003 Coll. - Annexes Annex no. 1 and 2 – List of pollutants (72 and 88 pollutants) Annex no. 3 – determining of the way of finding out and evaluation of reported pollutants (measurement, calculation, expert estimation) Annex no. 4 – data required for reporting into the Integrated Pollution Register Annex no. 5 – installation category and determination of emission sources –NOSE-P codes

Executive Decree no. 572/2004 Coll. Form and way of keeping evidence of background materials necessary for reporting into the IRZ The user of registered pollutant prepares reporting for IRZ from the evidence. Example of the evidence sheet for a registered pollutant– Annex no. 1 Data about fulfilment of integrated permit conditions– for installations according to the Annex no. 1 of the Act on integrated pollution

Integrated Pollution Register - terms Emissions – release of substances, dissemination of vibration and noise, heat or other forms of non-ionisation radiation into the environment Transfer (out of location) – transfer of pollutants or waste meant for disposal or use and pollutants in waste water meant for treatment outside of the installation boundaries Reporting threshold – amount of pollutants in emission or transfers from one site from one calendar year set in the Annex no.1 and 2 to the GO no. 368/2003 Coll.

Integrated Pollution Register - pollutants Annex no. 1 to GO no. 368/2003 Coll. – 72 pollutants – For the purposes of reporting to the IRZ for the year 2004 and following years. Last reporting accord. To this annex will be for the year in which the protocol PRTR will come into effect for the Czech Republic. Annex no. 2 to GO no. 368/2003 Coll.– 88 pollutants- it will be reported first accord. to this annex for the year which would follow the year when the PRTR Protocol becomes binding for the Czech Republic.

IRZ – Time Schedule The user of registered pollutant is obliged report to the Ministry of Environment data about emissions and transfers by 15 February each year for the previous year. First obligation to report data to the IRZ for the year 2004 is set for by 15 February 2005 Making public of data from the IRZ always by 30.09. Of the calendar year on www.irz.cz First report to the EPER June 2006 for the year 2004

Organisation, administration and operation(1) Creator and guarantee for the IRZ – the MoE Establishes and maintain IRZ (§ 29 letter i), Decides on prolongation of deadlines for reporting to the IRZ (§ 22 par. 4), Is authorised to ask for co-operation from other subjects within the interconnection of evidences and IRZ (§ 24 par. (1)), Makes public and publishes data reported into the IRZ (§ 26 par. 1), makes available and passes on information from the IRZ for other state authorities (§ 26 par. 2), Ensures forwarding of data from the IRZ in line with international obligations (§ 26 par. 3).

Organisation, administration and operation (2) Operator – Czech Ecol. Institute runs IRZ runs web site www.irz.cz Prepares background documents for fulfilment of reporting duty into the EPER, accord. International obligations make public information from the IRZ, always on 30.09 of a calendar year

The Role of the CEI within the IRZ System Checks fulfilment of duties set by the Act no. 76/2002 Coll. (§ 34) Imposes fines according to the § 37 for: - not fulfilling the reporting duty - not adding data within a set time period - stating incorrect data - not keeping operational evidence Decides about interrupting or stopping of procedure to impose a fine