Launch Vehicle Economics: Worked Examples

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparative Assessment of Human Missions to Mars Damon F. Landau Ph. D. Preliminary Exam September 13, 2005.
Advertisements

M. R. Tetlow and C.J. Doolan School on Mechanical Engineering
Ares V RFI Point of Departure Information Package
Introduction Over the past 20 years there have been numerous attempts to develop a new RLV All failed or prematurely canceled All share a common issue:
Launch Vehicles. LAUNCH SYSTEM CONCEPTS SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT MAIN VEHICLE PRIMARY LIQUID OR SOLID ROCKET PROPELLANT.
Architecture Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
HLV Industry Day Hybrid Launch Vehicle Phase I: Concept Development & Demonstration Planning Mr. Bob Hickman Aerospace Corporation Space and Missile Systems.
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS Single and Multi-Stage Rockets September 9, 2014 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida Institute.
Principles of Propulsion and its Application in Space Launchers Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uwe Apel Hochschule Bremen REVA Seminar1.
Minimalist Human Mars Mission Surface infrastructure discussion July 26 th, 2008.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lunar Lander Preliminary propulsion system selection and design analysis Thursday, January 22, 2009 Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion.
THE FUTURE PLANS OF NASA FOR HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT; MISSIONS, LAUNCH VEHICLES.
Spacecraft Design and Sizing Dr Andrew Ketsdever MAE 5595 Lesson 14.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Catherine Frey Week 4: February 8 th, 2007 Propulsion Group, Transfer Vehicle Group Transfer Vehicle Combustion Chamber.
Preliminary Rocket Design Objectives: 1. Comprehend a preliminary sizing example for a rocket 2. Explain basic trade-offs in rocket design.
Rockets 101 AIAA – March 2009 Theory of Rockets Dr. Eric Besnard California State University, Long Beach Project Director, California Launch Vehicle Education.
A Comparison of Nuclear Thermal to Nuclear Electric Propulsion for Interplanetary Missions Mike Osenar Mentor: LtCol Lawrence.
Propulsion Engineering Research Center NASA Technology Roadmap: Launch Propulsion Systems Robert J. Santoro The Propulsion Engineering Research Center.
CARLOS CEDEÑO DSES /04/2008 Reliability of the Three Main Engines of Space Shuttle.
1 AAE 450 Spring 2008 Stephen Bluestone March 20, 2008 Propulsion Final Presentation Slides 1.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Stephanie Morris 3/27/08 Propulsion Final Slides.
Lesson 3 History of Rockets. Early Rockets It is unknown when the first rockets were developed. The Chinese made the first solid propellant rockets between.
How Do They Work? By: Sam Houff Fuel Rockets have lots of fuel The fuel weighs twenty times the orbiter. The fuel is used up quickly.
Rockets Tuesday: Rocketry Wednesday: Meet in my room 601: hydrogen demo and Quiz over rocketry. Thursday: Satellites and Orbital Mechanics Friday: Satellites,
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Nicole Wilcox March 20 th, 2008 Propulsion Engine Performance Characteristics Breakdown Propellant and Pressurant Final Slides Propulsion.
Comprehend why the shuttle was developed Comprehend the space shuttle’s main features Comprehend the shuttle’s legacy The Space Shuttle Program.
Ryan Mayes Duarte Ho Jason Laing Bryan Giglio. Requirements  Overall: Launch 10,000 mt of cargo (including crew vehicle) per year Work with a $5M fixed.
Constellation Program Overview Mark Geyer Constellation Program Office October 2006.
Current Need Aging space shuttle fleet’s retirement is imminent If the ISS is going to continue operation there needs to be a replacement to get humans.
1 © 2006 Brandon Owens, Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology An Engineering Systems Analysis of Space Station Assembly &
Team PM8 Eventus Slide 1. Commercial spaceflight has seen increased activity as more privately owned companies invest in the venture. To avoid a catastrophic.
Preparing for a Wind Lidar Venture Class Mission Discussion at Lidar Working Group Meeting Bar Harbor, ME August 24 – 26, 2010 Dr. Wayman Baker 1.
Advanced Space Exploration LEO Propellant Depot: Space Transportation Impedance Matching Space Access 2010 April 8-10, 2010 Dallas Bienhoff Manager, In-Space.
Use of Lunar Volatiles in Chemical and Nuclear-Thermal Rockets John F Santarius April 30, 1999 Lecture 41, Part 2 Resources from Space NEEP 533/ Geology.
Introduction to the Altair Project
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lunar Lander Main Engine Thaddaeus Halsmer Thursday, February 12, 2009 Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
SPACE TECHNOLOGY & APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL FORUM (STAIF -98) Conference on Next Generation Launch Vehicles E5 - Cost & Operations A NOVEL METHODOLOGY.
IRNCLAM – InteRNational CisLunar Ascension Module Brian Anderson ASTE /11/23.
What Makes Up the Space Shuttle? The space shuttle is the most complex machine ever created by human beings. The first shuttle was launched on April 12,
SPACE SHUTTLE PROGRAM Space Shuttle Business Office NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas Presenter Date Page 1 Space Shuttle Program Flight and Ground.
Roadmap for Long Term Sustainable Space Exploration and Habitation Defining the Functional Requirements for Early Phase of Space Habitation AIAA 2015-????
Lesson 1: Welcome to Mission 1! Your journey to explore space.
LEO Propellant Depot: A Commercial Opportunity? LEAG Private Sector Involvement October 1 - 5, 2007 Houston, Texas LEAG Private Sector Involvement October.
Rocket Performance Principles of Space Systems Design U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND Parametric Design The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I.
Thortek - Economics of Launch Vehicles - 18 Slides 1 Economics of Launch Vehicles & Two Configurations for Tremendous Cost Reductions AIAA
Preliminary Cost Analysis Principles of Space Systems Design U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND Preliminary Cost Analysis Cost Sources Vehicle-level Costing.
Launch Structure Challenge - Background Humans landed on the moon in 1969 – Apollo 11 space flight. In 2003, NASA started a new program (Ares) to send.
Orbital Aggregation & Space Infrastructure Systems (OASIS) Background Develop robust and cost effective concepts in support of future space commercialization.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP March 2, 2011 NES: Engineering Design Challenge: Spacecraft Structures Presented by: Kristy Hill.
Propulsion Economic Considerations for Next Generation Space Launch by Chris Y. Taylor 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit.
A “Back of the Envelope” Look at Space Launch Vehicle Costs by Chris Y. Taylor Jupiter Research & Development 2004 AIAA Houston ATS NASA/JSC April 16,
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP October 17, 2011 Engineering Design Challenge: Spacecraft Structures Presented by: Kristy Hill.
Illinois Space Society Dan Regan Tech Meeting.
In Defense of External Tanks
Callisto Mission LaRC Option
Economics of Separated Ascent Stage Launch Vehicles
Rockets – The Space Shuttle
Propellant Depot Bernard Kutter United Launch Alliance
Stephan Shurn 28 February 2008 Propulsion Thrust Vector Control
Space Grant Symposium Presentation
Steven Hiu (“CJ”) 02/07/2008 Structural Analysis Model Analysis Team Function Code Structural Sizing & Optimization AAE 450 Spring 2008.
Space Travel Present & Future
Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
Propulsion – Attitude Control Casey Kirchner
Nicole Wilcox March 20th, 2008 Propulsion Engine Performance Characteristics Breakdown Propellant and Pressurant Final Slides AAE 450 Spring 2008 Propulsion.
Section 5: Lecture 3 The Optimum Rocket Nozzle
Rockets The Rocket Equations LabRat Scientific © 2018.
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Presentation transcript:

Launch Vehicle Economics: Worked Examples By Chris Y. Taylor 2006 AIAA Houston ATS NASA/JSC May 19, 2006

c = R Γ c = specific cost ($/lb.) = Launch Cost/Payload Mass   R = payload mass ratio = Structure Mass/Payload Mass Γ = structure cost ($/lb.) = Launch Cost/Structure Mass

+ Γrisk + Γpropellant + (Γnr/a)) c = R ( Γvehicle + Γops + Γrisk + Γpropellant + (Γnr/a)) Γvehicle = Cost of Vehicle Hardware   Fops = Cost of Operations Γrisk = Cost of Risk Γpropellant = Cost of Propellant (Γnr/a) = Amortized Non-recurring Costs

Launch Costs

Amortized Non-Recurring Cost (Γ nr/a) Γnr = non-recurring costs $20,000 < Γnr < $120,000 (assuming R&D only)   a = amortization factor  flight rate = 27 (10 yr. payback, 4 yr. r&d , flight rate of 27/6 yr, 0% interest & inflation) $750 < (Γ nr/a)< $4500

Reduce Cost through Lean Operation and Good Management

Reduce Cost through Evolutionary Design

Selected Bibliography Griffen M.D. and Claybaugh, W.R., “The Cost of Access to Space”, JBIS vol. 47 pp 119-122, 1994   Whitehead, J.C., “Launch Vehicle Cost: A Low Tech Analysis”, AIAA paper 2000-3140, 2000 Kalitventzeff, B., “Various Optimization Methods for Preliminary Cost and Mass Distribution Assessment for Multistage Rocket Vehicles”, JBIS vol. 20, pp 177-183, 1965 Carton, D.S., and Kalitventzeff, B., “Effect of Engine, Tank, and Propellant Specific Cost on Single-Stage Recoverable Booster Economics,” JBIS vol. 20, pp 183-196, 1965 Wertz, J.R., “Economic Model of Reusable vs. Expendable Launch Vehicles”, presented IAF Congress, Reo de Janeiro, Brazil, Oct. 2-6, 2000 Worden, S., “Perspectives on Space Future”, presented 2003 NIAC meeting, Nov. 6, 2003, http://www.niac.usra.edu/files /library/fellows_mtg/nov03_mtg/pdf/Worden_Simon.pdf Griffen, M.D., “Heavy Lift Launch for Lunar Exploration”, presented U. of Wisconsin, Nov. 9, 2001 Chang, I.S., “Overview of World Space Launches”, Journal of Prop. and Power, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp 853-866, Sept.-Oct. 2000 Claybaugh, W. R., Economics of Space Transportation AIAA Short Course, 2002 World Space Congress, Houston TX

Reduce Cost through Evolutionary Design Griffen, M.D., “Heavy Lift Launch for Lunar Exploration”, presented U. of Wisconsin, April 11, 1999

Amortized Non-Recurring Cost (Γ nr/a) Γnr = non-recurring costs $20,000 < Γnr < $120,000 (assuming R&D only)   a = amortization factor  flight rate = 27 (10 yr. payback, 4 yr. r&d , flight rate of 27/6 yr, 0% interest & inflation) $750 < (Γ nr/a)< $4500

Development Cost Breakdown (Γ nr/a) = (Σ (Γnr,i)(mi/mstructure))/a Total development cost is the sum of many smaller development costs. Lesson: Develop as little of the vehicle as possible.

Using Identical Stages for Reduced Development Cost Trimese Bimese Image from: THE BIMESE CONCEPT: A STUDY OF MISSION AND ECONOMIC OPTIONS by Dr. John R. Olds and Jeffrey Tooley, 1999

RocketCost.xls (beta) http://www.jupiter-measurement.com/research/rocketcost.xls

Bimese vs. Normal 2 Stage INPUTS: 10,000 lb. payload, Isp = 450s, Stage Propellant Fraction = 0.875, ΔV = 30,000 ft/s, reusable (50 flights), $2,000/lb. vehicle costs, Baseline Design R&D = $40,000/lb., Bimese Design R&D = $50,000/lb., a = 27

Bimese vs. Normal 2 Stage INPUTS: 10,000 lb. payload, Isp = 450s, Baseline Prop. Fraction = 0.875, Tank Prop. Fraction = 0.95, Tanked Bimese Prop. Fraction = 0.85 ΔV = 30,000 ft/s, reusable (50 flights), $2,000/lb. vehicle costs, Baseline Design R&D = $40,000/lb., Bimese Design R&D = $50,000/lb., E.T. design & hardware costs = 1/3 normal, a = 27

Quadmese + ET? Hans Multhopp’s Shuttle Design, Unknown Citation, Oct., 1969.

Can you have an N-mese? Flock Space Launch Architecture By Allan Goff, Novatia Labs, Folsom CA

Conclusions A “Back of The Napkin” Cost Model for conceptual launch vehicle design is useful and fun! Try this at home. Download my RocketCost spreadsheet beta. Let me know if you find any errors. www.jupiter-measurement.com/research/rocketcost.xls Amortized development cost is really important for economical space access. Don’t spend $$$ to develop more than you have to. “An engineer is someone who can do for one dollar what any idiot can do with two.”

Selected Bibliography Griffen M.D. and Claybaugh, W.R., “The Cost of Access to Space”, JBIS vol. 47 pp 119-122, 1994   Whitehead, J.C., “Launch Vehicle Cost: A Low Tech Analysis”, AIAA paper 2000-3140, 2000 Kalitventzeff, B., “Various Optimization Methods for Preliminary Cost and Mass Distribution Assessment for Multistage Rocket Vehicles”, JBIS vol. 20, pp 177-183, 1965 Carton, D.S., and Kalitventzeff, B., “Effect of Engine, Tank, and Propellant Specific Cost on Single-Stage Recoverable Booster Economics,” JBIS vol. 20, pp 183-196, 1965 Wertz, J.R., “Economic Model of Reusable vs. Expendable Launch Vehicles”, presented IAF Congress, Reo de Janeiro, Brazil, Oct. 2-6, 2000 Worden, S., “Perspectives on Space Future”, presented 2003 NIAC meeting, Nov. 6, 2003, http://www.niac.usra.edu/files /library/fellows_mtg/nov03_mtg/pdf/Worden_Simon.pdf Griffen, M.D., “Heavy Lift Launch for Lunar Exploration”, presented U. of Wisconsin, Nov. 9, 2001, http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep533/FALL2001/lecture29.pdf Chang, I.S., “Overview of World Space Launches”, Journal of Prop. and Power, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp 853-866, Sept.-Oct. 2000 Claybaugh, W. R., Economics of Space Transportation AIAA Short Course, 2002 World Space Congress, Houston TX