Hickory Public Schools 2013-14 Accountability Update - Math Shawn Clemons Director of Accountability September 19, 2014

The goal is to transform DATA into INFORMATION and Data is meaningless. The goal is to transform DATA into INFORMATION and INFORMATION into ACTION that directly affects student learning.

District Subgroups: Grades 9-12 All Asian Black Hispanic 2+ Races White EDS LEP SWD AIG HCAM X HHS HPS

State AMO Targets Met: 2013-14 # of Targets # Targets Met % Targets Met 2012-13 Targets Met Jenkins 27 100% (33 / 33) 100% Longview 25 17 68.0% (20 / 29) 69.0% Oakwood 31 29 93.5% (27 / 29) 93.1% Southwest 15 60.0% (21 / 27) 77.8% Viewmont 35 30 85.7% (35 / 39) 89.7% Grandview 46 36 78.3% (45 / 47) 95.7% Northview 52 48 92.3% (50 / 50) 100% HCAM 23 14 60.9% (12 / 18) 66.7% HHS 73 58 79.5% (60 / 72) 83.3% HPS 140 103 73.6% (118 / 138) 85.5%

Opportunities for Growth: AMO Targets NOT Met Reading: Grades 3-8 All, Asian, Black, Hispanic, EDS Math: Grades 3-8 All, Asian, Black, Hispanic, Multi-Racial, EDS Science: Grades 5 and 8 Asian, Black, Hispanic, EDS

Opportunities for Growth: AMO Targets NOT Met Reading: Grades 9-12 All, Black, Hispanic, EDS Reading Participation: SWD Math: Grades 9-12 All, Asian, Black, Hispanic, EDS Science: Grade 11 All, Black, Hispanic, White, EDS, AIG Reading Participation - SWD. 32 out of 36 (89%) students had successfully passed English II by their 10th grade year. Needed three more students to have successfully passed English II by their 10th grade year.

Opportunities for Growth: AMO Targets NOT Met ACT Performance: Grade 11 All, Hispanic EDS ACT Math (benchmark readiness score = 17) 50 of 242 (20.7%) met benchmark score. 42 of 124 (33.9%) White students met benchmark. 2 of 46 (4.3%) Hispanic students met benchmark. 4 of 55 (7.3%) Black students met benchmark. WorkKeys Performance: Grade 12 All Students

Some Things to Ponder... What are some trends you see in the data? Does your school data reflect district trends? How will you begin conversations around the data with your staff?

Grade 7 Math The graph below shows how the same group of students performed in grade 6 (2012-13) and grade 7 (2013-14). 2013-14 Performance 23 out of 62 Hispanic students proficient (17 @ level 4/5) 12 out of 68 Black students proficient (11 @ level 4/5) 100 out of 159 White students proficient (88 @ level 4/5) 1 out of 35 SWD proficient (1 @ level 4/5) 57 out of 202 EDS students proficient (42 @ level 4/5) 1 out of 18 LEP students proficient (1 @ level 4/5)

Grade 7 Math: 2013-14 Data Subgroup # Tested # CCR % Proficient All 325 132 40.6% 153 47.1% Black 68 11 16.2% 12 17.6% Hispanic 62 17 27.4% 23 37.1% White 159 88 55.3% 100 62.9% 2+ Race 24 10 41.7% 50.0%

Grade 8 Math The graph below shows how the same group of students performed in grade 7 (2012-13) and grade 8 (2013-14). 2013-14 Performance 21 out of 71 Hispanic students proficient (20 @ level 4/5) 16 out of 89 Black students proficient (9 @ level 4/5) 102 out of 164 White students proficient (95 @ level 4/5) 4 out of 30 SWD students proficient (3 @ level 4/5) 15 out of 215 EDs students proficient (41 @ level 4/5) Asian and Hispanic students declined in performance from 2012-13 7 out of 16 Asian students proficient in 2012-13; 5 out of 15 students proficient in 2013-14 23 out of 69 Hispanic students proficient in 2012-13; 21 out of 71 Hispanic students proficient in 2013-14

Grade 8 Math: 2013-14 Data Subgroup # Tested # CCR % Proficient All 357 132 37.0% 153 42.9% Black 89 9 10.1% 16 18.0% Hispanic 71 20 28.2% 21 29.6% White 164 95 57.9% 102 62.2% 2+ Race 18 4 22.2% 50.0%

For 2013-14, 36 out of 81 (28 @ level 4 or 5) Hispanic students were proficient; 30 out of 122 (17 @ level 4 or 5) Black students were proficient; 177 out of 255 (153 @ level 4 or 5) White students were proficient; 100 out of 276 (70 @ level 4 or 5) EDs students were proficient; 10 out of 57 (6 @ level 4 or 5) SWD proficient

Math I: 2013-14 Data Subgroup # Tested # CCR % Proficient All 497 218 43.9% 266 53.5% Black 122 17 13.9% 30 24.6% Hispanic 81 28 34.6% 36 44.4% White 255 153 60.0% 177 69.4% 2+ Race 21 9 42.9% 11 52.4%

2013-14 Data 10 out of 12 Asian Students graduated 54 out of 67 Black students graduated 21 out of 27 (77.8%) Black Males graduated 33 out of 40 (82.5%) Black females graduated 42 out of 52 Hispanic students graduated 24 out of 27 (88.9%) Hispanic males graduated 18 out of 25 (72%) Hispanic females graduated 11 out of 18 Multi-racial students graduated 118 out of 130 White student graduated 46 out of 52 (86.5%) White males graduated 72 out of 78 (92.3%) White females graduated 5 out of 12 LEP students graduated 111 out of 143 EDS graduated 15 out of 22 SWD graduated Several groups of students did not show an increase in the 4-year CGR LEP cohort is a small group of students - 12/15 in 2012-13; 5/12 in 2013-14 Multi-racial - 6/8 in 2012-13; 11/18 in 2013-14

Students must have a minimum composite score of 17 to reach the ACT benchmark There was an overall decline in the percent of students meeting the minimum composite score 2013-14 data 4 out of 6 Asian students met the benchmark 17 out of 54 Black students met the benchmark 14 out of 46 Hispanic students met the benchmark 3 out of 10 Multi-racial students met the benchmark 89 out of 123 White students met the benchmark 33 out of 113 EDS met the benchmark 6 out of 26 SWD met the benchmark

Math Course Rigor - the graduating students who successfully complete Math I, II and III.

What is your plan? What trends do you see? Are trends consistent across all grade spans? If so, is that a positive, or an opportunity for growth/change? What is your plan?