HIRF Regualtion Jean-Christophe LAMY 15/12/2015 MR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE Submission July 2007 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 Overview of FCC ET FNPRM ISM Band Spectrum.
Advertisements

Role , Responsibility and achievements of SARI 145 Working Group
International Telecommunication Union Seminar on Impact of Electromagnetic Field Emissions Kampala, Uganda, 3-5 September 2003 ITU-T activities in EMF.
Paolo Gemma, Senior Expert, Huawei
Agenda Introduction Advisory Circular Changes Consultant Selection Procedures Contract Format and Provisions Methods of Contracting and Allowable Costs.
Implementation of ICAO Type Ia Recorder in JAR-OPS 1 Presentation to EQSC Hoffdorpp 3 September 2002.
MAJOR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS
CENTRAL CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION (CAGE CODES) DFARS Case 2003-D040 DFARS Parts 204, 212, 213 and 252 are amended to remove policy on Central Contractor.
1 30/31 January 2013EASA/Estonian CAA Rulemaking Workshop From national to EU rules - Continuing Airworthiness Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager.
Helicopter Hoist Operations JAR-OPS 3
JAA/FAA 20th Annual JAA/FAA International Conference 1 Repair Data Acceptance Presented by W. Schulze-Marmeling.
Functional Check Flights Presented by Wally Istchenko Chief Flight Test Transport Canada Functional Check Flight Symposium February 8-9, 2011 Vancouver,
MODEL IMPLEMENTING IDERA REGULATION SUMMARY POWERPOINT FIRST EDITION NOVEMBER 2014.
Fuel Tank Safety Briefing
Aviation Maintenance Management
GRRF Request: Include a cross reference to R10 in R78 Purpose: Ensure Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) does not affect electronic brake modules in a.
Electronic Flight Bag (EFB)
TCCA Aircraft Certification
3 – 5 June Update on EASA FSTDs related matters 2008 US – Europe International Aviation Safety Conference.
08 June 2006Portland; Oregon; USAPeter Corbeeel Reducing the risk of smoke and fire in transport airplanes: related EASA rulemaking actions Peter Corbeel.
© Obelis s.a CODE OF CONDUCT of Authorised Representative services under the Council Directive 93/42/EEC, Directive 98/79/EC and Council Directive.
EASA Airborne Separation Assistance Systems (ASAS) Certification
Doc.: IEEE /1291r1 Report September 2014 Rich Kennedy, MediaTekSlide 1 IEEE /15 Regulatory SC Athens Closing Report Date: Authors:
By: Carol Martineau, Acting Assistant Manager, Aircraft Maintenance Division, AFS-301 Date: June 7, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration ASA Conference.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Ali Bahrami, FAA; Martin Eley, TCCA; Yves Morier, EASA Date: June 5, 2008 “Global Safety Management:
1 EMF ASSESSMENT BY MEASUREMENT (IVORIAN CASE ) GUY-MICHEL KOUAKOU Head of standardization service VICE-CHAIR OF STUDY GROUP 5.
European Commission International Civil Aviation Organization Status of industry standards for GNSS CAR/SAM ATN/GNSS Seminar Varadero, Cuba, 6 to 9 May.
Regulatory Reform Program Proposed Design Approval Rules CASR Parts 21 and 146 Ian Kearsley Manager Engineering Support Section This presentation is.
Electronic Flight Bag (EFB)
1 11 December 2012E&M Sub-SSCC EASA Rulemaking Update (Continuing Airworthiness) Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager Rulemaking Directorate EASA.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Certification Standards for New Technologies June 9, 2005 Certification Standards for New Technologies Presentation to:
Presented to: Transport Airplane Metallic and Composite Structures Working Group and Airworthiness Authorities By: Walt Sippel and Mike Gruber Date: Sept.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By:T Fazio (FAA)/ C Probst (EASA) Date: 7 June 2006 “Global Aviation Safety Processes: Refining, Reinforcing,
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
By: FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Field Operations, ACO-100 Date: July 29-30, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Airport Privatization Pilot Program.
Doc.: IEEE November06-RR-TAG_Liaison_Report.ppt _RR-TAG_802.22_Liaison_Report_November06 Submission November 2006.
Cargo Strategic Action Plan Prepared by: Cargo Strategic Action Group Air Carrier Maintenance Branch, AFS-330.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems. What is a UAS? What is a DRONE?
NOAA Aviation Safety Board Meeting May 16, 2006 Lieutenant Commander Debora Barr NOAA Aviation Safety Program.
Doc.: IEEE /1417r0 Submission November 2012 Rich Kennedy, Research In MotionSlide 1 IEEE Regulatory SC San Antonio Closing Report Date:
17/03/2016 Summary of FCC’s RF Exposure Proceeding Presented By: Bill Belt, TIA 1GSC-9, Seoul SOURCE:TIA TITLE:Summary of FCC’s RF Exposure Proceeding.
Gdansk International Air & Space Law Conference November 2013 Authority and Organisation Requirements “effective management systems for authorities and.
Good Laboratory Practice - general information Pirkko Puranen Senior Inspector, Ph.D. Inspectorate.
Changes to Grandfathered Equipment Recent Developments from discussions with EASA and the FAA Mark Barker 2 nd March 2016.
AFTERMATH AND ACTIONS TAKEN On 20 October 2004, the Transportation Safety Board of Canada issued Safety Advisory A (Verification of Cargo Weights)
IEEE NPEC SC2 Equipment Qualification Electromagnetic Compatibility Compliance Type Test-Design Considerations- Installation and Mitigation Standard/Guidance.
Understanding Product Liability Risks Associated with Special Conditions in Civil Aviation Design Approvals Michael J. Dreikorn, Ed.D. 10th Annual McGill.
HIRF Regualtion Jean-Christophe LAMY 15/12/2015 MR
FCC Regulations for Spread Spectrum Devices
Safeguards- Feedback on Safeguards ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
EMF ASSESSMENT BY MESEAREMENTS AND CALCULATION (IVORIAN CASE)
Review of Part C Lisa Snyder, Task Force Member IESBA CAG Meeting
AIRWORTHINESS OF AIRCRAFT
Installation of Non-Required Equipment
Communications Regulatory Authority
RR-TAG Liaison Report September 2008 IEEE
Workshop for Licensing and Operations
RNAV-RNP CERTIFICATION SUMMARY RNAV-RNP EVOLUTION RNAV-RNP CERTIFICATION SUMMARY2 On-Board Navigation Monitoring 2016.
European Aviation Safety Agency
RR-TAG Liaison Report September 2008 IEEE
IEEE /15 Regulatory SC Athens Closing Report
UniKL MIAT ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION
ICAO SAFETY INITIATIVES Certification of Aerodromes
What type of radiation are VHF and UHF radio signals?
Informal document GRE Rev.1
RR-TAG Liaison Report Mar07 IEEE
International Civil Aviation Organization
May 2018 HSAC.
DFS Regulatory Update Date: Authors: May 2005 May 2005
ETSI BRAN Update (IEEE Co-Existence Workshop)
Presentation transcript:

HIRF Regualtion Jean-Christophe LAMY 15/12/2015 MR 05.002

INTRODUCTION Origin? Why Effect on Systems? Composite Material HIRF: Human (Radars, Antennas) Why Effect on Systems? Composite Material Critical Computers

HIRF (High Intensity Radiation Field)

Frequency Band (10 kHz-40GHz)

HIRF Regulation (History) Before 1988 in Europe NO Regulation for HIRF Protection Only concern at Equipment level (Equipment qualification RTCA/DO160-B sec 20)

HIRF Regulation (History) After 1988 in Europe (from A320 TypeCertificate) With Introduction of „super“ critical systems (FADEC, FBW) and EFIS HIRF requirements introduced via Special Conditions (CRI/SC) CRI: Certification Review Item SC : Special Condition

HIRF Regulation (History) Requirement for Critical System Level A system not perturbated when exposed to External Certification Envrionment Requirement for Essential System Level B/C systems not perturbated when exposed to External Normal Environment

HIRF Regulation (History) After 1988 in USA HIRF requirements introduced via Special Conditions (Issue Paper/SC) Level A system not perturbated when exposed to External Certification I (Certification) or level A equipment not pertubated when exposed to 100V/m, Cat W DO160 sec20) Level B/C NO requirements

HIRF Regulation (History) In early 90’ JAA were presently developing in co-operation with the FAA, a regulatory project for HIRF (cordinated JAA/FAA Electromagnetic Effects Harmonisation Working Group). The objective of the project is the issuance of an NPA (Notice of Proposed Amendment) in parallel with an FAA NPRM leading to a final regulation and associated advisory material and Users Guide. The EEHWG adopted a set of HIRF environment levels in November 1998

HIRF JAA/EASA Policy INT POLs JAA has temporary adopted EEHWG activity with INT POLs (INT POL25/2, 23/1, 27&29/1) with: External HIRF Environments (Certification, Normal, Severe) Set of requirements (Critical, Essentials)

Definition of the Regulatory HIRF Environments This environment is based on the available data representing all authorised transmitters in Western Europe and the United States. Certification HIRF Environment Normal HIRF Environment FREQUENCY FIELD STRENGTH (V/m) PEAK AVERAGE 10 kHz – 500 kHz 20 20 500 kHz - 2 MHz 30 30 2 MHz - 30 MHz 100 100 30 MHz – 100 MHz 10 10 100 MHz – 200 MHz 30 10 200 MHz – 400 MHz 10 10 400 MHz - 1 GHz 700 40 1 GHz - 2 GHz 1,300 160 2 GHz - 4 GHz 3,000 120 4 GHz - 6 GHz 3,000 160 6 GHz - 8 GHz 400 170 8 GHz - 12 GHz 1,230 230 12 GHz - 18 GHz 730 190 18 GHz - 40 GHz 600 150 FREQUENCY FIELD STRENGTH (V/m) PEAK AVERAGE 10 kHz - 2 MHz 50 50 2 MHz - 30 MHz 100 100 30 MHz - 100 MHz 50 50 100 MHz – 400 MHz 100 100 400 MHz – 700 MHz 700 50 700 MHz - 1 GHz 700 100 1 GHz - 2 GHz 2,000 200 2 GHz - 6 GHz 3,000 200 6 GHz - 8 GHz 1,000 200 8 GHz - 12 GHz 3,000 300 12 GHz - 18 GHz 2,000 200 18 GHz - 40 GHz 600 200

Definition of the Regulatory HIRF Environments Severe HIRF Environment FREQUENCY FIELD STRENGTH (V/m) PEAK AVERAGE 10 kHz - 100 kHz 150 150 100 kHz - 400 MHz 200 200 400 MHz – 700 MHz 730 200 700 MHz - 1 GHz 1400 240 1 GHz - 2 GHz 5,000 250 2 GHz - 4 GHz 6,000 490 4 GHz - 6 GHz 7,000 400 6 GHz - 8 GHz 1,100 170 8 GHz - 12 GHz 5,000 330 12 GHz - 18 GHz 2,200 330 18 GHz - 40 GHz 1,000 420

HIRF - Requirements  Critical systems must function normally when the aircraft is exposed to the normal HIRF environment Critical systems must be designed and installed such that to ensure their critical functions when the aircraft is exposed to the certification HIRF environment Essential systems, equipment providing essential function are not affected when exposed to DO 160 Cat R/T NB: Non-essential systems do not have regulatory constraints for HIRF

B or C (ESSENTIAL SYSTEM) ENVIRONMENT CERTIFICATION LEVEL CERTIFICATION NORMAL EQUIPMENT LEVEL A (CRITICAL SYSTEM) Function must not be adversely affected during and after exposure to HIRF. Any system interruptions should be evaluated to assure continued performance of the aircraft function and should be approved by the cognisant aviation certification authority. Affected systems must automatically recover upon removal of HIRF effects, unless this conflicts with other operational or functional requirements of that system. Systems must not be adversely affected during an after aircraft exposure to HIRF. As required by the equipment qualification procedures. B or C (ESSENTIAL SYSTEM) No requirement Equipment must not be adversely affected during and after exposure to the defined test level

Methods of Compliance (ED 107) Level A system

Methods of Compliance (ED 107) Level A system (classical Method for Radiated Susceptibility): A) ESTABLISH ATTENUATION CURVES TESTS ON SYSTEM/EQUIPMENT

Methods of Compliance (ED 107) PHASE A): GENERIC ATTENUATION CURVES (100MHz-18GHz) or LOW LEVEL TESTS (LLSF)

Methods of Compliance (ED 107) PHASE B: The Category level = f (Ext Env * ATT curves) + Margin Use of Categories of DO 160 Section 20

Generic Attenuation Curve

Less Classical Method  Test on Aircraft level with real threat Similarity Approach (reuse of data of similar system with similar location on similar Aircraft Futur development: HIRF-SE project (virtual environment)

Methods of Compliance (ED 107) Level B/C systems: Level B system: Equipment Test DO 160 section 20 Cat R (150 V/m peak) or Normal HIRF Environment + Attenuation DO 160 section 20 Cat D, E, F, G Level C system: Equipment Test DO 160 section 20 Cat T (5V/m average)

Methods of Compliance (ED 107) DO 160 section 20 Categories

Regulatory References HIRF (advisory) AC/ACJs AC/AMC20-158 Certification of Systems for HIRF Effects USER‘S GUIDE ED-107A/ARP5583A HIRF User‘s Guide ED14/DO160 Section 20 HIRF

Latest HIRF Regulation FAR 23.1307, 25.1317, 27/29.1317 published in September 2007 (adoption of HIRF NPRM) and associated AC 20-158 CS 25.1317 July 2015 and AMC 20-158 (23.1307, 27/29.1317 published in futur CS Adts) Both Regulations are now harmonized

Applicable HIRF Regulation for new TC Large A/C 25.1317 (+ AMC 20-158 for guidance) General Aviation + Rotorcaft HIRF/SC (+ED 107A for guidance) (23.1307 and 27/29.1317 + AMC 20-158 released in the near futur)

Applicable HIRF Regulation for Changes/STC (installation/modification of susceptible systems) A/C certified before 1988 - Dedicated HIRF Special Condition/Interpretative Material based on latest INT POL 25/2, 23/1 or 27&29/1) (Authority Request) or - Elect to comply with latest regulation (Applicant’s Request) 25.1317 (+ AMC 20-158 for guidance) (or 23.1307, 27/29.1317 when new CSs released ) A/C certified after 1988 - Use of HIRF Special Condition of the TCDS or - Elect to comply with latest 25.1317 + AMC 20-158 for guidance(or 23.1307, 27/29.1317 once CSs released) (Applicant’s Request, if HIRF SC not based on latest INT POLs)