CBM beam pipe current status

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
Lauri A. Wendland: Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle flow algorithm at CMS, cHarged08, Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
Status of calorimeter simulations Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
Sergey Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow STS CAD model. GSI, STS mechanics: Conceptual CAD model development Sergey Belogurov ITEP, Moscow Engineer: Sergey.
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Zhijun Liang,Song-Ming Wang,Dong liu, Rachid Mazini Academia Sinica 8/28/20151 TWiki page.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Simulations with event pile up in MVD 1. Improvement of the MVD-digitiser 2. General simulations with pile up 3. Open charm reconstruction Christina Dritsa.
CALORIMETER system for the CBM detector Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow) CBM Collaboration meeting, October 2004.
Simulations of the double funnel construction for LET. Comparison with a single funnel The aim was to optimise the double funnel configuration to give.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Feasibility studies of open charm reconstruction with pile up 1. General simulations with pile up 2. Open charm reconstruction Christina Dritsa Outline:
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Electron pair analysis for high multiplicity events in nucleus- nucleus collisions A.Baldin, E.Baldina, V.Pozdnyakov LHE JINR, Dubna JINR-GSI meeting November.
Ivan Smiljanić Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia Energy resolution and scale requirements for luminosity measurement.
S. Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting, Split, CBM beam pipe and integration inside the Magnet Status report Sergey Belogurov,
Standalone FLES Package for Event Reconstruction and Selection in CBM DPG Mainz, 21 March 2012 I. Kisel 1,2, I. Kulakov 1, M. Zyzak 1 (for the CBM.
Optimization of the Silicon Tracking System (STS) layout and beam pipe configuration for the CBM experiment. Andrey Chernogorov, Sergey Belogurov, ITEP,
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
V.Petracek TU Prague, UNI Heidelberg GSI Detection of D +/- hadronic 3-body decays in the CBM experiment ● D +/- K  B. R. 
1 Open charm simulations ( D +, D 0,  + c ) Sts geometry: 2MAPS +6strip (Strasbourg geo) or 2M2H4S (D+ and D - at 25AGeV); TOOLS: signal (D +  K - 
D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Dipanwita Dutta Much Segmentation Study: A Flexible Scheme.
“Vertexig and tracking ” Entirely based on works and results by: S. Rossegger, R. Shahoyan, A. Mastroserio, C. Terrevoli Outline: Comparison Fast simulation.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
Performance simulations with a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon tracking for CBM Number of integration components Ladders106.
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with PHENIX at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Stony Brook University HotQuarks 2006 – May 18, 2006.
Evgeny Kryshen (PNPI) Mikhail Ryzhinskiy (SPbSPU) Vladimir Nikulin (PNPI) Detailed geometry of MUCH detector in cbmroot Outline Motivation Realistic module.
Start and Vertex Detector W. Boeglin, A.Klein Current Design: 3300 scintillating fibers 1mm diameter 3 double layers (1 axial, 2 stereo) cylindrical geometry.
High-resolution, fast and radiation-hard silicon tracking station CBM collaboration meeting March 2005 STS working group.
Muon detection in the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 1 Ivan Kisel 1 Anna Kiseleva 3 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für.
20/12/2011Christina Anna Dritsa1 The model: Input Charge generation The charge of the cluster is taken by random sampling of the experimental distribution.
CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.
1 Nick Sinev, ALCPG March 2011, Eugene, Oregon Investigation into Vertex Detector Resolution N. B. Sinev University of Oregon, Eugene.
Vertex detector update 1 Oct Y. Sugimoto KEK.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Review of Micromegas Tracking Detectors for CLAS12 – May 7, 2009 Reviewers: Madhu Dixit, Mac Mestayer Presentations covered the following topics: –detector.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Ring finding efficiencies and RICH event display Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna X CBM collaboration.
J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Neutron Identification with ECAL  Sergey Kiselev, ITEP Moscow, for the ECAL group  Motivation  Input info  Signal parameters  Preshower – 1 GeV/c.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
LIT participation LIT participation Ivanov V.V. Laboratory of Information Technologies Meeting on proposal of the setup preparation for external beams.
Simulation / reconstruction with GEMs at DAC A.Zinchenko, A.Kapishin, V.Vasendina for the collaboration VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna,
Feasibility of the detection of D 0 mesons in the NA61/SHINE experiment: Vertex detector for NA61/SHINE P. Staszel and Yasir Ali Jagiellonian University.
Multi-Strange Hyperons Triggering at SIS 100
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
Technical Specifications
Updates on vertex detector
Status Report Fenfen An
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Charles F. Maguire Vanderbilt University
HARPO Analysis.
Simulation results for the upgraded RICH detector in the HADES experiment. Semen Lebedev1,3, Jürgen Friese2, Claudia Höhne1, Tobias Kunz2, Jochen Markert4.
IDEA Detector Simulation Status
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
The LHC collider in Geneva
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Feasibility of   γγ study with ECAL
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Study of dE/dx Performance in TPC at CEPC
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Background rejection in P326 (NA48/3)
Presentation transcript:

CBM beam pipe current status Andrey Chernogorov, Sergey Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow Outline The main idea. “Pipe” = “Window”+”Tube”. Balance between measurable particles (window) and ions (tube) Studied configurations Results for UrQMD central events at 25 AGeV Results for UrQMD central events at 8 AGeV Stereo angle effects on STS performance Effects of the junction between STS and RICH sections Conclusions FRRC session. 12 December 2010, Obnisk

Studied configurations Any configuration has a weld 1x10 mm Some of “Ideal ” configurations. Effects: cylinder-cone; Be-Al. Al: window – scaling from VELO, cone – “simple” manufacturing. “Realistic” configurations. Effects of bellows, width of “Tube”. 1.6º configuration fits to ladders of S. Igolkin without cutting the central rib. Any configuration has a weld 1x10 mm A.Chernogorov, S.Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow FRRC session. Obnisk, 12.12.2010

Results for UrQMD central events at 25 AGeV window welding Range distribution Figure of merit: integrated range in the pipe: IR=Σli·qi2· ne li – range of a particle inside the pipe qi - its charge ne – relative electron density Total ionization losses and number of d-electrons are roughly proportional to IR Cylinder is optimal with MF, cone – without MF (The same for 8 AGeV). No contradiction with the conclusions of HERAb and LHCb. A.Chernogorov, S.Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow FRRC session. Obnisk, 12.12.2010

Results for UrQMD central events at 25 AGeV Clear trends for “ideal” configurations, for “real” ones no big difference! A.Chernogorov, S.Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow FRRC session. Obnisk, 12.12.2010

Results for UrQMD central events at 25 AGeV Comparison of Al and Be cones 30%/7% No pipe /c No pipe 30-50% /c A.Chernogorov, S.Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow FRRC session. Obnisk, 12.12.2010

Results for UrQMD central events at 25 AGeV Clear trends for “ideal” configurations, for “real” ones more narrow seems slightly better. Vertex resolution much worse than expected from multiple scattering and not indicative. Effects of wrong hits pickup in track-finder Thanks to I. Vassiliev for the basic analysis routine A.Chernogorov, S.Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow FRRC session. Obnisk, 12.12.2010

Results for UrQMD central events at 8 AGeV 1 Much softer conditions for tracker at SIS-100! STS layout should not be the same as for SIS-300 A.Chernogorov, S.Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow FRRC session. Obnisk, 12.12.2010

Results for UrQMD central events at 8 AGeV STS with given layout works perfectly with any beampipe. As any optimistic conclusion should be double checked. Probably for SIS-100, STS layout may be simplified and made cheaper. However, taking into account realistic STS simulation may change the answer! A.Chernogorov, S.Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow FRRC session. Obnisk, 12.12.2010

Results for UrQMD central events at 8 AGeV Only S/B and mass resolution are somewhat sensitive to Al beampipe A.Chernogorov, S.Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow FRRC session. Obnisk, 12.12.2010

Stereo angle effects on STS performance Big number of fakes is a big problem for track finding, especially for extending the algorithm to the segments with missed points. We looked at sensors with smaller stereo angles…. SIS-300 A.Chernogorov, S.Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow FRRC session. Obnisk, 12.12.2010

Stereo angle effects on STS performance SIS-100 For both SIS 100 and SIS 300, stereo angle of 6 ° is the best for track finding. However improvement is paid by S/B ratio in K/L reconstruction. Momentum resolution becomes worse bellow 6° A.Chernogorov, S.Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow FRRC session. Obnisk, 12.12.2010

Flange/window effects on RICH Default cbmroot geometry: 1-st section of pipe with Be window h0.1mm on the end with flange 2.0x2.5cm on the end with a weld 2.5x0.2cm on the end A.Chernogorov, S.Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow FRRC session. Obnisk, 12.12.2010

Flange/window effects on RICH The influence of the flange is almost imperceptible. There is a slight decrease of parameters when using Be window, while passing 20 or more ions. In general, when the number of ions no more than 30, the configuration of the window can be used. A.Chernogorov, S.Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow FRRC session. Obnisk, 12.12.2010

Conclusions - Influence of shape and material of the beampipe on the STS performance is studied. Pipe is considered as a composition of “window” and “tube” - For 25 AGeV central events the effects of beampipe are the most prominent in reconstruction efficiency for secondary tracks, ghost probability, CPU time, reconstruction efficiency for secondary particles, Signal to Background, Mass resolution - For 8 AGeV only S/B and mass resolution are somewhat sensitive to Al beampipe. It should be checked with more realistic STS In the presence of MF the best “tube” is narrow cylinder (no ions are taken into account) Both Be and Al options are feasible. Be provides higher buckling SF and thinner window. Decrease of the stereo angle may help to reduce number of fakes and improve track finding performance, however care should be taken of the S/B ratio in particle reconstruction - The influence of the flange is almost imperceptible. When the number of ions no more than 30, the configuration of the window can be used. A.Chernogorov, S.Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow FRRC session. Obnisk, 12.12.2010