Measurement of the Neutron Spin Asymmetry A1n using HMS+SHMS at 12 GeV

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Advertisements

Introduction Glasgow’s NPE research Group uses high precision electromagnetic probes to study the subatomic structure of matter. Alongside this we are.
Target Fragmentation studies at JLab M.Osipenko in collaboration with L. Trentadue and F. Ceccopieri, May 20,SIR2005, JLab, Newport News, VA CLAS Collaboration.
Jin Huang PhD Candidate, MIT For MENU 2010 May 31, Williamsburg.
1 First Measurement of the Structure Function b 1 on Tensor Polarized Deuteron Target at HERMES A.Nagaitsev Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna.
MeAsurement of F 2 n /F 2 p, d/u RAtios and A=3 EMC Effect in Deep Inelastic Electron Scattering Off the Tritium and Helium MirrOr Nuclei J. Gomez for.
Measurement of neutron spin asymmetry A 1 n in the valence quark region using the Solenoid Nilanga Liyanage University of Virginia.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 1  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation.
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction: Polarisation Transfer & Cross-Section Measurements.
Working Group C: Hadronic Final States David Milstead The University of Liverpool Review of Experiments 27 experiment and 11 theory contributions.
A High Precision Measurement of the Deuteron Spin-Structure Function Ratio g 1 /F 1  Motivation  Proposed Experiment  Expeced Results Co:spokespersons:
Spin-Flavor Decomposition J. P. Chen, Jefferson Lab PVSA Workshop, April 26-27, 2007, Brookhaven National Lab  Polarized Inclusive DIS,  u/u and  d/d.
Zhongbo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory QCD structure of the nucleon and spin physics Lecture 5 & 6: TMD factorization and phenomenology HUGS 2015,
Duality: Recent and Future Results Ioana Niculescu James Madison University Hall C “Summer” Workshop.
Future Physics at JLab Andrew Puckett LANL medium energy physics internal review 12/14/
X. Zheng, August 2010, Jefferson Lab PAC36 1/21 Measurement of the Neutron Spin Asymmetry A 1 n using HMS+SHMS at 12 GeV Physics Motivation A 1 n measurements.
General Discussion some general remarks some questions.
Xiaochao Zheng, International Workshop on Positrons at JLab 1/64 C 3q Measurement Using Polarized e + /e - Beams at JLab – Introduction — Standard Model.
Nucleon Form Factors and the BLAST Experiment at MIT-Bates
Jump to first page Quark-Hadron Duality Science Driving the 12 GeV Upgrade Cynthia Keppel for Jefferson Lab PAC 23.
1 Probing Spin and Flavor Structures of the Nucleon with Hadron Beams Flavor and spin structures of the nucleons –Overview and recent results Future prospects.
Measuring the Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 Timothy Holmstrom College of William and Mary For the Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration.
Daniel S. Carman Page 1 Hadron Sep , 2015 Daniel S. Carman Jefferson Laboratory N* Spectrum & Structure Analysis of CLAS Data  CLAS12 N*
X. Zheng, June 2010, JLab Hall A/C Polarized Target Workshop 1/20 Measurement of the Neutron Spin Asymmetry A 1 n using HMS+SHMS at 12 GeV – Physics Motivation.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility PAC-25, January 17, 2004, 1 Baldin Sum Rule Hall C: E Q 2 -evolution of GDH integral Hall A: E94-010,

Spin Structure of the neutron (3He) in the resonance region Patricia Solvignon Temple University, Philadelphia For the JLAB Hall A and E Collaborations.
JLab, October 31, 2008 WACS in 12 GeV era 1 GPDs Wide-Angle Compton Scattering pi-0 photo-production in 12 GeV era B. Wojtsekhowski Outline WACS and other.
Tensor and Flavor-singlet Axial Charges and Their Scale Dependencies Hanxin He China Institute of Atomic Energy.
JLab PAC33, January 16, 2008 Polarization transfer in WACS 1  p   p Polarization transfer in Wide-Angle Compton Scattering Proposal D. Hamilton,
Marc Vanderhaeghen 1 Introduction LEPP16 Marc Vanderhaeghen LEPP16 Workshop Kupferberg, Mainz, April 4-7, 2016 New Vistas in Low-Energy Precision Physics.
Envisioned PbWO4 detector Wide-Angle Compton Scattering at JLab-12 GeV with a neutral-particle detector With much input from B. Wojtsekhowski and P. Kroll.
1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.
In the SM to the first order x: variable relevant to the nucleon internal structure Q 2 : Four-momentum transfer squared between the electron and the target.
1 E Measuring the Neutron g 2 and d 2 at 12 GeV A cross section measurement on a polarized 3 He target in Hall C Directly measure the Q 2 dependence.
Chen-Ning Yang Tsung-Dao Lee Chien-Shiung Wu In 1972, PVDIS result from SLAC E122 was consistent with sin 2 q W =1/4, confirmed the Standard Model prediction;
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
EIC NAS review Charge-2 What are the capabilities of other facilities, existing and planned, domestic and abroad, to address the science opportunities.
Flavor decomposition at LO
Electroweak physics at an EIC
Introduction to pQCD and TMD physics
P. Solvignon, Duality Workshop
Parton to Hadron Transition in Nuclear Physics
Spin Structure of the Nucleon
Explore the new QCD frontier: strong color fields in nuclei
Probing Quark – Gluon correlations in the neutron Precision measurements of d2n and g2n Brad Sawatzky for the E Collaboration.
EIC NAS review Charge-2 What are the capabilities of other facilities, existing and planned, domestic and abroad, to address the science opportunities.
Probing Quark – Gluon correlations in the neutron Precision measurements of d2n and g2n Brad Sawatzky for the E Collaboration.
E Measuring the Neutron g2 and d2 at 12 GeV
The Need to Extend the Studies of N* Structure
Weak probe of the nucleon in electron scattering
Higher twist effects in polarized experiments
Wide Angle Compton Scattering
Gordon Cates, Xiaochao Zheng, Yuxiang Zhao LOI
Precision Measurement of η Radiative Decay Width via Primakoff Effect
Deep Inelastic Parity Robert Michaels, JLab Electroweak Physics
Can We Learn Quark Orbital Motion from SSAs?
Study of Strange Quark in the Nucleon with Neutrino Scattering
Large-X PDFs in the Drell-Yan Process
Katarzyna Kowalik (LBNL) For the STAR Collaboration
Duality in Pion Electroproduction (E00-108) …
Today’s topics; New AN and ANN results at s = 6.9 GeV
Spin Duality on the Neutron (3He)
Duality in 12 GeV Era: Projected Results from E
Scaling Study of the L-T Separated p(e,e’π+)n Cross Section at Large Q2 Tanja Horn Jefferson Lab APS/DNP meeting 2007 DNP07 October 2007.
Duality in Nuclei: The EMC Effect
Proposal for an Experiment: Photoproduction of Neutral Kaons on Deuterium Spokespersons: D. M. Manley (Kent State University) W. J. Briscoe (The George.
Deeply Virtual Scattering
Parity – Violating Neutron Density Measurements : PREX, C-REX
The Helicity Structure of the Nucleon from Lepton Nucleon Scattering
Presentation transcript:

Measurement of the Neutron Spin Asymmetry A1n using HMS+SHMS at 12 GeV Xiaochao Zheng Univ. of Virginia June 17, 2010 Physics Motivation A1n measurements at JLab 6 GeV in Hall A in 2001 Proposal for the A1n measurement with HMS+SHMS (2010 vs. 2006 versions) Summary

Standard Model of Particle Physics (Strong Interaction Sector) Success of the Standard Model QCD tested in the high energy (perturbative) region Major Challenges within the Standard Model Understand and test QCD in extreme conditions (RHIC, LHC) Understand and test QCD in “strong” interaction region (non- perturbative) Understand the nucleon structure, how quarks and gluons form the nucleon's mass, momentum, and spin energy (GeV) (~1/distance) aS

Data vs. Theory – How do we test QCD? For most cases, QCD cannot predict (be used to calculate) the value of structure functions because of their non-perturbative nature. However, there are a couple of exceptions: F2p/F2n and d/u at large x A1p, A1n , or Du/u and Dd/d at large x Virtual photon asymmetry: 𝐴 1 = σ 1 2 − σ 3 2 σ 1 2 + σ 3 2 𝐴 1 = 𝑔 1 − γ 2 𝑔 2 𝐹 1 ≈ 𝑔 1 𝐹 1 .at large Q2 γ 2 = 𝑄 2 ν 2 = 4 𝑀 2 𝑥 2 𝑄 2 At large Q2, A1 has only weak-dependence on Q2 (g1 and F1 follow the same LO and NLO evolutions, but not in higher orders or higher twists).

Why Large x? At large x, valence quarks dominate, easier to model; Less contribution from q-qbar sea and gluons — a relatively clean region to study the nucleon structure; To understand the nucleon spin, high x is a good place to start with.

Predictions for A1 and Dq/q at large x ∣ 𝑝 ↑ = 1 2 ∣ 𝑢 ↑ 𝑢𝑑 00 + 1 18 ∣ 𝑢 ↑ 𝑢𝑑 10 − 1 3 ∣ 𝑢 ↓ 𝑢𝑑 11 − 1 3 ∣ 𝑑 ↑ 𝑢𝑢 10 − 2 3 ∣ 𝑑 ↓ 𝑢𝑢 11 The only place QCD can make absolute predictions for structure functions.

The 6 GeV Hall A Measurement (21 PAC days, 2001) HHC not valid quark OAM? X. Zheng et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 012004 (2004); Phys. Rev. C 70, 065207 (2004)

Polarized DIS and Nucleon Spin Structure 𝑔 1 𝑥 = 1 2 Σ 𝑒 𝑖 2 𝑞 𝑖 ↑ 𝑥 − 𝑞 𝑖 ↓ 𝑥 = 1 2 Σ 𝑒 𝑖 2 Δ 𝑞 𝑖 𝑥 H. Avakian, S. Brodsky, A. Deur, F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett.99:082001(2007) Figure credit: A. Deur (DIS only)

Polarized DIS and Nucleon Spin Structure 𝑔 1 𝑥 = 1 2 Σ 𝑒 𝑖 2 𝑞 𝑖 ↑ 𝑥 − 𝑞 𝑖 ↓ 𝑥 = 1 2 Σ 𝑒 𝑖 2 Δ 𝑞 𝑖 𝑥 H. Avakian, S. Brodsky, A. Deur, F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett.99:082001(2007) Figure credit: A. Deur (DIS only) The JLab Hall A data were quoted by the 2007 NSAC long range plan as one of the “most important accomplishments since the 2002 LRP”; Extensions of these measurements are flag-ship experiments for JLab 11 GeV.

Original Proposal for PAC-30 (Conditionally approved) Measured A1n in DIS from using 3 𝐻𝑒 𝑒 ,𝑒′ 3 𝐻𝑒 ≈ 𝑛 12 GeV polarized e- beam, Pbeam=80% (dP/P=1% Compton, Moller) Polarized 3He target, hybrid pumping, 40cm, 14 atm @ 50oC, PTarg=50% (dP/P = 3%) — (GEn E02-013 has achieved 55% in beam) HMS+SHMS to detect e', measure both All and A: Total: 1908h (79 days) + Target Installation Will reach DA1n=±0.071(stat) ±0.032(syst) at x=0.77

Improvements on the Polarized 3He Target (2010) Will use the same design as GEN-II (11 GeV): use of alkali-hybrid mixtures to increase the spin-exchange efficiency; use of narrow-lined high-power diode lasers; study of polarimetries for both 3He and alkali-metal vapor and their densities to improve understanding of the target performance; use of convection to overcome beam and other depolarization effects; metal-based target chamber to resist radiations and avoid cell rupture; Goal: a 60-cm long target chamber, 12 amg density, up to 60uA beam with 60% polarization Overall, provide a factor of 8 improvement in luminosity! allow the use of less beam time to achieve higher precision (now set statistical uncertainty = systematic at x=0.77) added resonance measurements (with little extra beam time)

Kinematics Production (DIS and resonance) 104:1 p rejection is needed Production (DIS and resonance) Elastic e-3He(ll) and D(1232) () at low Q2 to check PbPt and beam helicity:

From 3He to Neutron S, S', D, D isobar in 3He wavefunction: Phys. Rev. C65, 064317 (2002) 𝐴 1 𝑛 = 𝐹 2 3He 𝑃 𝑛 𝐹 2 𝑛 1+ 0.056 𝑃 𝑛 𝐴 1 3He −2 𝐹 2 𝑝 𝐹 2 3He 𝑃 𝑝 𝐴 1 𝑝 1− 0.014 2 𝑃 𝑝  Other Inputs: F2p, F2D – NMC fits and MRST/CTEQ Uncertainty on Pp expected to reduce by factor of 4 from Hall A Ax and Az measurements; R(x,Q2) – R1998, PLB 452, 194 (1999) EMC for F23He, F2D Acta Phys.Polon. B27, 1407 (1996) (nucl-th/9603021) A1p – from fit to world data (at large x also consistent with CLAS12 expected results) Phys. Rev. C 70, 065207 (2004) dominant for high x 𝑃 𝑛 =0.86 +0.036 −0.020 , 𝑃 𝑝 =−0.028 +0.009 −0.004

Projected A1n Uncertainties DIS Resonance

Expected Results

Expected Results

Beam Time Request Production: 684 hours Commissioning: 3 days if not including the target, longer if include target. Elastic; D(1232); Reference Cell (N2 run) Configuration changes; Beam pass change; Moller; Target polarimetry; Total: 843h (35 days) + Target Installation, ~45% of our 2006 request

Expected Results Combined results from Hall A (neutron) and B (proton) 11 GeV experiments

Complementarity with the Hall A BigBite Proposal The current version of Hall A proposal uses the BigBite spectrometer, will provide DIS data up to x=0.71 with a 8.8 GeV beam, with smaller uncertainties than this proposal. It is unknown yet whether it will work for 11 GeV; Even if BigBite works for 11 GeV, it will be limited by systematics at x=0.77. And The physics of A1n at large x is important enough that it's worth more than one measurement; A combination of the Hall A and C measurement will allow the study of the Q2-dependence of A1n up to x=0.71. The use of HMS+SHMS (close spectrometers) will allow clean measurements of A1n with less systematics than open spectrometers. As a result, reliable and fast online and/or offline data analysis will be possible, allowing fast turn-out of physics results. condition of PAC30

Summary Will measure A1n up to x=0.77 in DIS, test of CQM, pQCD and the role of quark OAM; Wide Q2 coverage allows the study of Q2-dependence up to x=0.55; Requires: pol3He target in Hall C + SHMS + HMS w/ 104:1 p rejection; Compare to the 2006 version: Added resonance data to test quark-hadron duality; Recent development in the target allows significant reduction of the beam time and increased physics outcome. Beam time request: 35 days total (not including target commissioning) Complementary to the Hall A BigBite proposal, Use of HMS/SHMS spectrometers allows clean studies of A1n and fast offline (even online) analysis; Will combine with CLAS12 proton data to extract Dq/q; provide further tests of predictions.

Frontiers of Nuclear Science “Building on the foundation of the recent past, nuclear science is focused on three broad but highly related research frontiers: (1) QCD and its implications and predictions for the state of matter in the early universe, quark confinement, the role of gluons, and the structure of the proton and neutron; (2) the structure of atomic nuclei and nuclear astrophysics, which addresses the origin of the elements, the structure and limits of nuclei, and the evolution of the cosmos; and (3) developing a New Standard Model of nature's fundamental interactions, and understanding its implications for the origin of matter and the properties of neutrinos and nuclei.”

Extra slides

Major Challenges to the Standard Model Higgs mechanism yet to be tested (observed); Cannot explain the observed non-zero mass of n's; Does not include gravity, neither does it explain dark matter/energy; Requires too many parameters; Conceptually, there is always “room” for New Physics. Parity violation in lepton/electron scattering can help to test the Standard Model by looking for “signs” of new physics.

Nucleon Spin Structure in the Valence Quark Region

Polarized DIS and Nucleon Spin Structure 𝑔 1 𝑥 = 1 2 Σ 𝑒 𝑖 2 𝑞 𝑖 ↑ 𝑥 − 𝑞 𝑖 ↓ 𝑥 = 1 2 Σ 𝑒 𝑖 2 Δ 𝑞 𝑖 𝑥 H. Avakian, S. Brodsky, A. Deur, F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett.99:082001(2007) extracted from A1 data Figure credit: A. Deur (DIS only) Will pQCD predictions (with quark OAM) work?

A1n in the Valence Quark Region at JLab 11 GeV Hall C: PR12-06-110: conditionally approved Hall A PR12-06-122: approved Hall A+SOLID: to be proposed To be rated August 2010

A1p at 11 GeV