IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission July 2004 Steve Shellhammer, Intel CorporationSlide 1 IEEE Wireless Coexistence TAG Steve Shellhammer
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0006r0 Submission March 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Intel CorporationSlide 1 What is a CA document? Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /372r0 Submission July 2001 Jim Lansford, Tim Blaney, Mobilian CorporationSlide 1 IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group Tuesday.
Doc.: IEEE COEX 02/018r0 Submission May 2002 Jim Lansford, Mobilian CorporationSlide 1 IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group Jim Lansford
Doc.: IEEE COEX-01/001r0 Submission May 2001 Jim Lansford, Mobilian CorporationSlide 1 IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Group Discussion Jim Lansford Chair,
Doc.: IEEE /353r0 Submission July 2001 Jim Lansford, Tim Blaney, Mobilian CorporationSlide 1 IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group Tuesday.
Doc.: IEEE COEX-01/010r0 Submission November 2001 Jim Lansford, Mobilian CorporationSlide 1 IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group November Plenary.
Doc.: IEEE COEX 02/020r0 Submission May 2002 Jim Lansford, Mobilian CorporationSlide 1 IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group Jim Lansford
1 Introduction to IEEE Standardization Hang Liu. 2 IEEE Standard Association [1] Standards Activities Board CSMA/CD Ethernet Token Passing.
Doc.: IEEE COEX 02/016r1 Submission May 2002 Jim Lansford, Mobilian CorporationSlide 1 IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group Update Jim Lansford
Doc.: IEEE /1084r00 Submission September 2015 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide WG Chair comments to TGah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /012r0 Submission March 2003 Jim Lansford, MobilianSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Coexistence TAG Submission Title: March 2003 SEC Meeting.
Doc.: IEEE COEX 02/023r1 Submission July 2002 Jim Lansford, Mobilian CorporationSlide 1 IEEE 802 Coexistence Study Group Agenda for Wednesday Review:Problem.
Doc.: IEEE /0020r2 Submission July 2008 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Wireless Coexistence TAG Overview Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE 802.RR-02/050 Submission March 2002 Vic Hayes, Agere SystemsSlide 1 SEC Closing meeting March 2002 Agenda item 4.6 Reply Comment to FCC.
Doc.: IEEE COEX-01/014r0 Submission July 2001 Jim Lansford, Mobilian, Tim Blaney, CommceptsSlide 1 IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence TAG Proposal Jim Lansford.
Doc.: IEEE /012r0 Submission November 2002 Jim Lansford, MobilianSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Coexistence TAG Submission Title: Operating Rules.
Doc.: IEEE COEX-01/004r0 Submission July 2001 Jim Lansford, Mobilian CorporationSlide 1 IEEE Coexistence Study Group Recommendations to create a Coexistence.
Doc.: IEEE /146r0 Submission November 1999 Robert F. Heile, GTESlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /009r0 Submission March 2003 Jim Lansford, MobilianSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Coexistence TAG Submission Title: March 2003 working.
Doc.: IEEE /262r1 Submission July 2002 Dr. John R. Barr, MotorolaSlide 1 Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
TGn Chair’s Status Update
IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence BoF Wednesday Meeting
IEEE Coexistence Study Group
IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks™
IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group November Plenary Meeting
Project: IEEE P Coexistence TAG
Submission Title: [TG3 Opening Report 18Sep00]
Wireless Coexistence TAG Overview
Project: IEEE P Coexistence TAG
Proposed Update to Motion Templates & Other Issues
IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence TAG Proposal
Publicity Committee /.15 Brian Mathews, PC Chair
<month year> doc.: IEEE /271r0 September, 2000
IEEE Wireless Coexistence TAG
TGn Overview Portland, Oregon, US July 2004
Submission Title: [WG-TG3 closing Report May02]
IEEE Coexistence Study Group
EC Monday Meeting Report November 10, 2003
IEEE RR-TAG Annual Subgroup Review
802.21Voting Membership Process
Wireless Coexistence TAG Overview
IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Group Discussion
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group Tuesday Meeting
Submission Title: [WG-TG3 closing Report Jan02]
TGn Chair’s Status Update
May Liaison Report Date: Authors: May 2009
May 2002 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) Submission Title: Liaison Report, May 2002 Date Submitted:
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Brief Overview of Draft Approval.
IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks
IEEE 802 2nd Vice Chair last name at ieee dot org
TGn Chair’s Status Update
IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks
IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks
IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group Thursday Meeting
What is a CA document? Date: Authors: March 2005 March 2005
IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Group Discussion
IEEE 802 2nd Vice Chair last name at ieee dot org
November 2018 Opening Report
IEEE 802 2nd Vice Chair last name at ieee dot org
Submission Title: [WG-TG3 closing Report Jan02]
TV White Space Coexistence Plan
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT SERVICES DCN:
Submission Title: [WG-TG3 closing Report July02]
IEEE P Wireless Personal Area Network
Task Group N Schedule March 15, 2004
P802.11j Sponsor Ballot Procedure 10
Liaison Report Date: Authors: January 2011
IEEE Wireless Coexistence TAG
Presentation transcript:

IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group Update 1 July 2018 doc.: IEEE COEX-02/015 May 2002 IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group Update Jim Lansford Jim.Lansford@mobilian.com (405) 377-6170 Sydney Interim Meeting Monday evening Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation Jim Lansford, Mobilian

Update for Sydney meeting May 2002 Update for Sydney meeting SEC conference calls held between meetings Refine mission statement Discussion of goals for anticipated TAG Definition of Coexistence Goals for Sydney meeting Broader feedback Further refinement of mission statement and goals Finalize mission statement and charter Proposed definition of coexistence Start work on organization and voting rules Prep for Vancouver plenary Meets Monday PM @ 6:30 (w/TG2), Wed @1-3 Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation

Tasks the SG/TAG needs to accomplish May 2002 Tasks the SG/TAG needs to accomplish Develop Mission Statement (SG ongoing) Statement of purpose (Recommend to ExCom how IEEE 802 should address coexistence in existing and future specs) (SG ongoing) Definition of coexistence (TAG) Summary of current standards where coexistence is an issue (TAG) Recommendations to SEC (SG July Plenary) Summary and report (SG July Plenary) Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation

May 2002 Mission Statement (Based on feedback from 1 May conference call) The IEEE 802 Coexistence Technical Advisory Group (TAG) has the following missions: The COEX TAG develops and maintains the IEEE 802 policy for establishing coexistence between Standards. The COEX TAG develops and maintains guidelines for the communications industry to foster coexistence. The COEX TAG evaluates the coexistence issues between IEEE 802 PARs and Draft Standards, and makes recommendations to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee. Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation

Coexistence Definition 1 July 2018 doc.: IEEE COEX-02/015 May 2002 Coexistence Definition Coexistence: The ability of one system to perform a task in a given shared environment where other systems have an ability to perform their tasks and may or may not be using the same set of rules. Coexistence is quantified by degradation (simulated or measured) under a set of usage model assumptions, which must be defined for coexisting systems Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation Jim Lansford, Mobilian

Q&A #1 Will this group try to “quantify” coexistence? May 2002 Q&A #1 Will this group try to “quantify” coexistence? Not likely – coexistence depends on so many variables (geometry, power, etc.) that defining a number that says whether you have achieved it or not isn’t practical. What will this group do then? We currently don’t have a policy for addressing coexistence; that’s first. This policy will address the ground rules for analyzing the degradation two systems cause to each other (or pairs of systems for multiple standards). Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation

Q&A #2 How would this work? May 2002 Q&A #2 How would this work? The TAG first defines policy. For example, the policy might be to say a WG needs to pick five usage models and determine the degradation due to a set of other approved standards, pairwise. We want to examine most likely scenarios, not corner cases, which may give pathological results. So how would you know if two systems “coexist”? The TAG is an advisory group to SEC; analysis using the usage models would be used by WGs and SEC to make informed decisions. This is a similar concept to the FCC’s OET. So the answer is that the TAG procedures will either convince voters that a Recommended Practice is needed, or that a draft has no coexistence issues and can proceed to further balloting. Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation

Q&A #3 Does the TAG play a role other than formulating policy? May 2002 Q&A #3 Does the TAG play a role other than formulating policy? Possibly. The current thinking is that the COEX TAG develops a definition of coexistence and a policy to guide WG’s analysis of coexistence. Beyond that, the TAG may be called upon to help resolve coexistence conflicts by writing an independent report when a draft is submitted to SEC, but this has not been agreed upon. What about participation and voting? A TAG is governed by the same attendance and voting rules as WG’s, but the specifics are not finalized. Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation

Proposed Operation May 2002 The Coexistence TAG is responsible for defining the meaning of coexistence within the IEEE 802 context. The Coexistence TAG will develop the guidelines by which WGs establish whether a given TG coexists. Uses official definition Uses usage models Uses modeling and/or measurements Recommends creation of a TG to develop a Recommended Practice, if needed (a la 802.15.2) The Coexistence TAG will publish guidelines by which the industry can evaluate coexistence. The Coexistence TAG is responsible for reviewing all proposed wireless PARs Like FCC/OET, evaluates PARs and highlights those that may require a Recommended Practice Summary report to be voted on by TAG Summary report presented to SEC SEC members take this summary under advisement This TAG is responsible for generating a final review report of the Draft Standard prior to Sponsor Ballot TAG should begin work when the first WG ballot is published Preliminary report should be issued to SEC within 40 days Must be voted on by TAG Must be ratified by SEC SEC can require creation of a TG to write Recommended Practice Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation