Primary MCQ Course Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
13 th Airway Management Course 14 th March 2011 course evaluation and candidate feed back.
Advertisements

Airway Management Course 20 th February 2008 course evaluation and candidate feed back.
ICT for Development Presentation Assignment
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation September 2010 Mean score, maximum being 5.
College Algebra Course Redesign Southeast Missouri State University.
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation May Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar graphs.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: 9-10 January 2012 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates: 38 1: very poor.
2008 Faculty of Medicine Curriculum Retreat Teaching Tips: What has proven to be effective pedagogic techniques for myself? Sally Chan Professor, The Nethersole.
Powerpoint Presentation 1. The topic of the presentation meets the requirements of the assignment. (/5) 1. The topic of the presentation meets the requirements.
Faculty Curriculum Retreat 2008 Department of Physiology Faculty of Medicine P.S. LEUNG Teaching Tips: What has proven to be effective pedagogic techniques.
1 Learning from each other. 28-Jun-15Sandra Windeatt, Online Services, UNN2 What I used to do.
Dr. Brad Harrington, ©2009 MB 110: Human Resource Management Course Evaluations Prof. Brad Harrington Boston College.
Using Qualtrics for Midterm Course Evaluations Heather Urry Psychology.
Dr Christine Edmead FHEA  What is flipping?  Why might you want to flip your classroom?  How do we flip the classroom?
PLANNING YOUR EPQ How to write a great research paper – Cambridge Uni.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 15: Capacity development and training on Maternity.
Final FRCA VIVA Course Evaluation 9 th and 10 th June 2009.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: April 2009 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates:22 1: very poor 2:
Mental Health First Aid Wales Comments from course participants Over 13,000 people throughout Wales have been trained so far. 1.
SINC LS1 Evaluation Results. Learn Session 1 Learning Session 1 5. What worked best for our team during this Learning Session # 1 was : being able.
14 th Airway Management Course 11 th October 2011 course evaluation and candidate feed back.
April 8, 2004Washington University Teaching Center Self-Evaluation as an Instructor; Course Redesign Regina Frey, Director Washington University Teaching.
SDI IDC Boosting your score Preparing a Classroom Lesson.
Final FRCA VIVA Course Evaluation 11 th and 12 th June 2009.
Final FRCA SOE Course Evaluation Course 1 : June 1 st – 2 nd 2015.
Airway Management Course 11 th March 2009 course evaluation and candidate feed back.
For many beginning teachers thinking about teaching means For many beginning teachers thinking about teaching means thinking about how to execute a captivating.
Y axis represents number of candidates Airway Management Course For ODPs: 28 th March 2012 Course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates:
Patrik Hultberg Kalamazoo College
Final FRCA SAQ/MCQ Course Evaluation Feb Mean score represented on bar charts 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: April 2010 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates: 36 1: very poor 2:
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation September Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar.
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation May 2010 Mean score, maximum being 5.
Final FRCA VIVA Course Evaluation November 2009.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: 26&27 April 2012 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates: 37 1: very poor 2:
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: 6-7 January 2009 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates:30 1: very poor 2:
Final FRCA VIVA Course Evaluation 25 th and 26 th November 2009.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: April 2009 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates:28 1: very poor 2:
Final FRCA VIVA Course Evaluation June 2012.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: December 2009 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates: 29 1: very poor.
Final FRCA SOE Course Evaluation 17 th & 18 th June 2013.
Active Learning in the Third Year Statistical Physics Module at the University of the Witwatersrand Jonathan Keartland School of Physics, University of.
The presentation Mr Harbron Year 12 Enhancement Coordinator and EPQ Centre Coordinator.
The Exam 40% of your grade Marked out of 80 Every 2 marks are 1% of your overall GCSE PE grade Lets get as many as possible and not drop silly marks!!!
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: December 2009 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates:30 1: very poor.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: September 2010 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates: 33 1: very poor.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: 5-6 January 2012 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates: 34 1: very poor 2:
GCSE Spanish Monday 20 th and Monday 27 th January 2014 GCSE SPANISH WRITING Support Days.
Do you feel there should be a prerequisite for this module concerning the knowledge level? The result of evaluation forms.
Creating Assessments that Engage Students & Staff Professor Jon Green.
Module name & code Evaluation survey. How to use Zappers A 60-second training course. You will be using the handsets to give your feedback on the module.
109 Wardens Survey – 16/17 Season End of Season Get Together –
Understanding Standards: An overview of course assessment
Four day shadowing programme
y axis represents number of candidates
Credit Risk Skills Workshop Training Evaluation Report
y axis represents number of candidates
Primary FRCA MCQ course evaluation February 2015
Final FRCA SAQ/MCQ Course Evaluation
Final FRCA SOE Course Evaluation
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation
The Exam 40% of your grade Marked out of 80
Basic Statistics Psychologists Marc Brysbaert for Book Tour
Written feedback from attendees of Health Insurance Seminar on Dev
Team Project Showcase Presentation: 15 to 20 minutes Peer evaluation
Graphs & Charts.
Presentation.
List/ Name/ Identify You will give information as individual words, facts or points. Use the number of marks as a guide to the number of examples.
Topic Scotland and the impact of the Great
Mark Hornshaw University of Notre Dame Australia School of Business
Presentation transcript:

Primary MCQ Course Evaluation January 2011 Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar graphs. Total no. candidates: 30 Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day1 :19th Jan 2011 Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day 2 :20th Jan 2011 Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day 3:21st Jan 2011 Mean score, maximum being 5

Overall value of the course 1= waste of money/time, 5 being excellent y axis represents number of candidates

Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluation 1: very poor 2: poor 3: Satisfactory 4: good 5: excellent y axis represents number of candidates

Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluation 1: very poor 2: poor 3: Satisfactory 4: good 5: excellent y axis represents number of candidates

Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluation Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day1: Physiology 1 Good quality questions, broad range of topics Physics 1 and 2 Excellent. Good. Difficult subject. Good explanation of physics. Good. Difficult subject. Good method of yellow question on slides being correct. Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day 1 Physiology1 Good presentation - good to have questions on same slides Very important topic like statistics was given. Spoke a little fast at times. Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day 1 Primary FRCA Enthusiastic. Very good and useful. Controversial answers. It's okay to say your not sure Appreciate that you handled a very difficult subject for us. Physiology 3 Excellent very good explanations. Some questions were controversial. Easy to follow excellent. Unfortunately was at end of the day tiredness took over, otherewise excellent. God explanations. Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day 2: Pharmacology 1 Very good. Engaging. Good cover of basic pharmacology - encouraging marks. Very good pitched at the right level, kept the session flowing. Interesting explanations. Good. Very good. Pharmacology 2 Would have liked more time with discussion etc. interesting and relevant. Good Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day 2 Physiology 4 Very good and knowledgeable and approachable. Very good. The best slides - very good a format to adopt throughout the course. Very comprehensive and clear. Brilliant the best lecture, excellent delivery, interaction with audience, brilliant slides at presentation. Very good! Clear and concise. Obviously takes pride in his teaching! Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day 2 Pharmacology 3 Alright. Good rapport with group. Spoke too fast. Good. Pharmacology 4 Very clear. Also good useful slides, very. Brilliant slide content - very informative clear presentation. Excellent well prepared. Very clear. Very good. Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day 2 Physics 3 Very good And knowledgeable. Very good! Very good explanations. Very good really helpful. Also very good - good explanation of complex questions. Excellent explanations. Good explanations very clever man! Very good interactive. Most enjoyable and helpful session so far. Excellent! Very good explanations. Good intention. Very good. Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day 3 Physics 3, Physiology 4 & Test paper Very good explanations. Great helpful, useful. Very good explanations. Well presented, good balance of knowledge and MCQ's presented. Very good. A bit quick but detailed answers provided. Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Comments Presentation could be given in printouts on the last day. Really enjoyed the course for many reasons, well organised, great venue, positive attitude, Non threatening learning environment, met some nice people, discovered where the gaps are and ideal time to have this course because time to revise weak areas. Very helpful for finding out my areas of weakness! Thank you. Mean score, maximum being 5