CDM Study Stan But October 19, 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

1 CDM Study October 19, 2011 Stan But Manager, Economics & Load Forecasting.
New Paradigms for Measuring Savings
1 Proposal Defining The Purpose Preparation Components of Proposals.
Economic Criteria for Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Region Public Utility Law Seminar DeAnn Walker August 3, 2012.
Compare and Contrast ELCC Methodologies Across CPUC Proceedings
Economic Impact of Poor Power Quality on Industry Nepal Adopted from The Internet for Educational Purpose Sudaryatno Sudirham October 2003.
Big Sandy Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Coincident Peak Load Forecasting Methodology Prepared for June 3, 2010 Meeting with Division of Public Utilities.
Regional Technical Forum End-use Load Shape Business Case Project Project Initiation Meeting Portland, OR March 5, 2012.
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
Foundation Working Group Meeting #3 FWG Members Experiences with De-identifying Information for Disclosure to Third Parties June 17, 2015.
Integration of Variable Generation Task Force Preliminary Conclusions and Actions.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Performance Targets for the Customer Interconnection Process January, 2008.
Electricity Distributors Conservation and Demand Management RP
1 Road Weather Management Performance Metrics Development: An Update Chris Cluett, Leon Osborne, Arthur Handman, Jeff Jenq ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting.
2013 Cost of Service Orientation Session Conservation and Demand Management – Review of Updated CDM Guidelines (EB ) July 9, 2012 Viive Sawler.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
Task Group on development of e-Government indicators (TGEG) 2008 Global Event on Measuring the Information Society Report on e-Government indicators 2008.
Grayson Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Modernization and Reengineering of the Census of Governments Presented at the State Data Center Annual Training Conference Lisa Blumerman Governments Division.
Transmission Planning at the California ISO September 10, 2015.
Washington’s Water Use Efficiency Rule May Require Increased Coordination for Many Utilities Dan Sander, P.E. Senior Engineer.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
Oregon Population Forecast Program Rulemaking Advisory Committee (RAC) Population Research Center (PRC)
September 21, 2005 ICF Consulting RGGI Electricity Sector Modeling Results Updated Reference, RGGI Package and Sensitivities.
1 UFE Workshop Sponsored by COPS October 19, 2004.
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
June 2008 Windsor-Essex Electrical Service Needs and Solutions.
Licking Valley Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by : East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study David Corbus - Project Manager Matt Schuerger (Consultant) National Wind Technology Center NREL Golden,
Sixth Power Plan A Public Utility Point of View Bill Gaines, Director, Tacoma Public Utilities Craig Smith, Assistant General Manager, Snohomish PUD Northwest.
Demand Forecast Deviations Working Group Presented to: Stakeholder Advisory Committee Presented by: Pat Doran January 24, 2007.
How The Regional Technical Forum Supports PNW Energy Efficiency Programs January 5, 2010.
ERCOT Transmission Planning Process Overview and Recommendations November 6, 2002.
Exterior LED Area Lights
Draft Seventh Power Plan Meets RTF. Key Finding: Least Cost Resource Strategies Rely on Conservation and Demand Response to Meet Nearly All Forecast Growth.
Hybrid Forecast for Resource Adequacy Analysis with recommendations Massoud Jourabchi April
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2013 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EIPC Roll-Up Powerflow Model Zach Smith Director,
Formation of a Market Analysis Subcommittee Charlie Grist and Jennifer Light RTF Policy Advisory Committee February 19, 2016.
FORECASTED ENERGY CONSUMPTON AND PEAK DEMAND FOR MARYLAND Summer Reliability Status Conference State of Maryland Public Service Commission May 10, 2004.
© 2005 San Diego Gas and Electric Company and Southern California Gas Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved Water Energy Nexus Calculator.
MASON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Bond Committee Meeting #1 August 9, 2016.
United Nations Statistics Division
Business for Health Business Skills for Private Medical Practices
Presenter: Dave Torres, Senior Product Manager, Forecast 5 Analytics
LNBA Subgroup: Avoided Transmission Value
Agenda Summary of performance Q2 & Q3
Stakeholder Consultation Workshop on Compensation Cost Benchmarking Study May 30, 2011.
NYSICA 2016Membership survey
2007/2008 Consolidated Annual Municipal Performance Report prepared in terms of Section 47 of the Municipal Systems Act.
EnMS Management Review
The Ontario Energy Board and Demand-Side Management
2017 Llano Estacado Regional Water Plan Planning Group Meeting
Capital Project / Infrastructure Renewal – Making the Business Case
/ California Energy Demand (CED) 2011 Revised Electricity and Natural Gas Forecast February 3, 2012 Chris.
Welcome to the Winter 2004 Provincial Council Meeting
CDM Study Stan But October 19, 2011
Comprehensive Rate Study & Cost Allocation Analysis
Stakeholder Consultation Workshop on Compensation Cost Benchmarking Study May 30, 2011.
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
Fees Chishala Kateka, IESBA Member and Fees Working Group Chair
3 Year Plans for Energy Efficiency: lessons learned and forging forward Christina Halfpenny Director, Energy Efficiency Division
Global Insight’s Corporate Mission
United Nations Statistics Division
Unemployment Insurance Integrity Performance Measures
City Council Work Session
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Commonwealth of Virginia
Presentation transcript:

CDM Study Stan But October 19, 2011 Manager, Economics & Load Forecasting October 19, 2011

Agenda OEB Directive Stakeholder Recommendations CDM Study Objectives Study Findings Preliminary CDM Impacts for 2011-2013 Summary

OEB Directive In its Decision with Reasons for EB-2010-0002, the Board noted the following: “there does not appear to be a broadly accepted methodology in place to identify reasonably anticipated effects of any CDM program on the throughput of the respective distribution or transmission systems.” “For the purposes of establishing credible load forecasts, much more acuity than is currently available is needed.” The Board accepted Hydro One’s CDM estimates used in the load forecast, but directed Hydro One to “work with the OPA in devising a robust, effective and accurate means of measuring the expected impacts of CDM programs.”

Stakeholder Recommendations Hydro One held two stakeholder consultations in February and March 2011 Below is a summary of recommendations from the above sessions: An in-house study prepared by Hydro One staff instead of an external study by consultant A review of CDM categories and methodologies to incorporate the CDM impacts into the load forecast used by utilities in other jurisdictions CDM categories should be comprehensive and can be tracked Hydro One should work closely with the OPA to better define and measure CDM impacts for use in its load forecast CDM impacts should be presented by customer class

CDM Study Objectives Objective 1: Develop a robust methodology to forecast CDM impacts using comprehensive and well-defined categories Objective 2: Develop a methodology to incorporate the CDM impacts into Hydro One’s load forecast

Study Findings Literature Review Utilities reviewed: British Columbia, New York and California as recommended by stakeholders Other major utilities in North America with CDM experience Tools used: web-search and personal communication

Study Findings Load Forecast Survey A web-based survey was sent to about 100 utilities/organizations in North America and 41 responses were received The literature review and the survey provided a list of well-defined and comprehensive CDM categories: Programs initiated by the utility Program initiated by other organizations Building codes and appliance efficiency standards Rate structures Increased conservation effect

Study Findings Load Forecast Survey (Contd…) Three methods are commonly used to incorporate CDM impacts in the load forecast: Method 1: Forecast using actual load (without any CDM adjustment) Method 2: Forecast CDM impacts as an explanatory variable on the right hand side of the econometric equation Method 3: Add back historical CDM impacts to the actual load and then forecast forward

Study Findings Review of load forecast methodologies for incorporating CDM in the load forecast Hydro One undertook a review of the three methods to evaluate the advantages and challenges associated with each method The review results suggested that: Method 3 is the most robust, technically sound and efficient and it produces reliable and accurate load forecasts Method 3 addresses the OEB directive to apply a methodology that is less primitive and that provides more acuity Hydro One has adopted Method 3

Study Findings Alignment with the OPA

Study Findings Alignment with the OPA (Contd…) Hydro One worked closely with the OPA to better understand the savings assumptions used in their current conservation forecast Step 1 Obtain detailed savings assumptions for each CDM category Step 2 Determine Hydro One specific annual CDM savings by sector Step 3 Derive monthly CDM savings using Hydro One specific load shapes Step 4 Derive CDM savings by rate class

Preliminary CDM Impacts for 2011-2013

Summary The literature review provided a list of well-defined and comprehensive categories The survey results helped Hydro One better understand the methodologies used by utilities to incorporate CDM impacts into the load forecast The comparative review of methodologies helped identify an effective and efficient method to incorporate CDM in the load forecast Hydro One worked closely with the OPA to derive CDM forecast specific to Hydro One Hydro One believes that the CDM study incorporates all recommendations from stakeholders and meets the Board’s Directive

Thank You