Single Line Tethered Glider

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WRIGHT STUFF.
Advertisements

Single Line Tethered Glider
Introduction to Structural Design
9.2 Maneuverability Important when: – Station keeping – UNREP – Docking – “Dodging incoming...” Predicted by: – Equations of Motion – Tank Models Verified.
Gliding.
1992B1. A kg solid rubber ball is attached to the end of an 0
Elastic Launch Glider SOSI 2012 Matt Chalker
SOSI 2013 CeAnn Chalker Matthew Chalker
Guidelines Presentation. Aircraft Aim & Judging The aircraft needs to transport the mirror segments of the ESO European Extremely Large Telescope, being.
M.E. 462 Capstone Design I.U.P.U.I. Spring 2007 Bishop Steering: 1970 Lotus Europa Front Axle Re-design Aaron Emmons Phil Palmer Brad Holtsclaw Adam Spindler.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
Mod 6: Technical Skills II
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
Simple Machines: More Practice. Inclined Plane Simple Machines: More Practice.
Mechanical Work: More Practice. Gravitational Potential Energy: More Practice.
CLARKSON UNIVERSITY Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering Introduction to AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES Ratan Jha (CAMP 364, ,
Kyle Ball Matthew Douglas William Charlock Single Line Tethered Glider Jon Erbelding Paul Grossi Sajid Subhani 9/9/2013 Problem Definition Presentation.
Lesson 2-2a Principles of Flight
Single Line Tethered Glider Team P14462 Sub-System Level Design Review Jon Erbelding Paul Grossi Sajid Subhani Kyle Ball Matthew Douglas William Charlock.
Single Line Tethered Glider
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design ReviewP14462 Single Line Tethered Glider Team P14462 Sub-System Level Design Review Jon Erbelding Paul Grossi Sajid Subhani.
Nonaxial Wind Turbines A New Class of Wind Turbines By Mike Fallwell.
Replicating the 1903 Wright Flyer
Detailed Design Review Tethered Glider P /10/
Introduction to Structural Design © 2010 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Civil Engineering and Architecture Architecture has recorded the great ideas of the.
AP Physics B I.E Circular Motion and Rotation. I.E.1 Uniform Circular Motion.
Voice of the Engineer R15901: AIRBORNE WIND ENERGY BASE STATION.
Solar Electric Boat Drive train System Design Review
UAV TEAM STATUS REPORT #2 Kenneth Jermstead Michael Midkiff Ethan Pratt Ignacio Santos John Plank April
R15901: airborne wind energy plane
First-Year Engineering Program Advanced Energy Vehicle System Analysis 3 Reference:  AEV Lab Manual  System Analysis 3 Grading Guidelines.
MSD 1 WEEK 6 SYSTEM DESIGN REVIEW Team Rochester Institute of Technology College of Engineering P /2/
Tethered Glider - Base Station Group P16462 Sarah Collmus Laura Arciniegas Kevin Collins Aleksandr Kim Michael Ostaszewski Kevin Larkin Sukmin Lee Design.
Subsystem Level Design Review.  Project Review  System Level Changes ◦ Tail Dragger ◦ Airfoil Change and Discussion  Subsystem Selection ◦ Fuselage.
MSD1 WEEK 3 REVIEW By: Group P AGENDA  About Team P15462  Underlying Mission  Existing Systems  Project Background  Problem Statement  Deliverables.
Solar Panel Concepts Covered: Energy Transfer, Static/Kinetic Friction, Motor and Solar Panel Efficiency. Equations: F= ma, Solar Efficiency = Power Output/
Tethered Glider P14462 Project Review
MSD 1 WEEK 3 REVIEW Team Rochester Institute of Technology College of Engineering P154629/11/
MSD 1 WEEK 6 SYSTEM DESIGN REVIEW Team Rochester Institute of Technology College of Engineering P /2/
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
Corp. Vilém Marek.  Replaced F-4 Phantom II  Designed as an air superiority fighter and a long- range naval interceptor  First fly in 1970  First.
RIT MAV System Review (P08121) Dr. Jeffrey Kozak – Faculty Guide Michael Reeder – Team Leader Kevin Hand – Lead Engineer Todd Fernandez – ME.
Transportation Unit 3 - Flight. Introduction Fixed Wing Heavier than air, atmospheric transportation vehicles sustain flight by utilizing the scientific.
Windmill lab 2017.
P Tethered Glider ACKNOWLEDGMENTS INTRODUCTION TEAM MEMBERS
Auto Tow Conversion Course
Centripetal Acceleration
Single Line Tethered Glider
SOSI 2012 Matt Chalker Elastic Launch Glider SOSI 2012 Matt Chalker
C.K.PITAHAWAL COLLEGE OF ENGG. AND TECH.
Uniform Circular Motion
MSD 1 Week 6 System design Review
F-18 Hornet and F-18 Super Hornet
Provide, Tethered, Continuous, Recorded Flight
Presentation on Optical Computing
FINAL REVIEW UAV AIRFRAME B
PROPULSION PDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
c/Maj Christopher Greves
A ball of mass M is attached to a string of length R and negligible mass. The ball moves clockwise in a vertical circle, as shown above. When the ball.
Warm Up: Please take out your Centripetal Motion notes
Structures and Weights Preliminary Design Review
2017 University of Waterloo E62 Clean Snowmobile
Boom Supersonic 11/11/17 Agenda
AP 1 Energy practice.
Frog What angle is the frog jumping at? Why does this make sense?
Final Project Review -Senior Design 2
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
PROPULSION QDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
ANGLE-of-ATTACK Proprietary Software Systems, Inc.
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006
Presentation transcript:

Single Line Tethered Glider Sub-System Level Design Review Team P14462 Kyle Ball Matthew Douglas William Charlock Jon Erbelding Paul Grossi Sajid Subhani

Industrial Engineer - Team Lead Team Introduction Team Member Major Sajid Subhani Industrial Engineer - Team Lead Paul Grossi Mechanical Engineer Matt Douglas Jon Erbelding Kyle Ball Bill Charlock

Agenda Project Description Review Engineering Requirements Review Functional Decomposition Review Top 3 Concepts from Last Review Concept Feasibility Glider Analysis and Feasibility Base Station Analysis and Feasibility Project Planning Work Breakdown Structure

Project Description Review Glider Tether Base Station Goal: Design, build, and test a tethered, small-scale, human-controlled glider. Critical Project Objectives: Maintain maximum tension on the tether Sustaining horizontal and vertical flight paths Measure and record tether tension and position Understand the influential parameters for sustained, tethered, unpowered flight Operator w/ controller

Engineering Requirements

Functional Decomposition

Review of Top 3 System Concepts 3 Single Axis Load Cell IMU with Single Axis Load Cell 2 Potentiometers with Single Axis Load Cell

Glider Analysis

Choosing the Glider Bixler v1.1 EPO Foam Phoenix 2000 EPO Foam Wing span: 1.4 [m] Chord length: 0.2 [m] Mass: 0.65 [kg] Middle mounted propeller Wing span: 2 [m] Chord length: 0.3 [m] Mass: 0.98 [kg] Front mounted propeller

Choosing the Glider The smaller Bixler glider creates less tension for a larger operating range Able to operate with an affordable load cell

Flight Orientation

Flight Orientation

Flight Analysis Wind Speed: ~ 11 mph

Flight Analysis Wind Speed: ~ 22 mph

Flight Analysis Wind Speed: ~ 44 mph

Qualitative DOE Tension must be less than 5000 [N] (1100 lbs) Slower wind speed: lower tension Larger flight path radius: lower tension Beta angle peaks: ~ 94-95° Tension peaks: ~ 20 [m] tether length

Quantitative DOE [Describe how will pick our flight configuration for experiment] Inputs Maximum allowable tension Observed wind speed Outputs Beta angle Tether length Flight path radius

Bridle and Tether Setup Maximum allowable stress for Bixler glider: 30 Mpa Bridle attached at two points on the fuselage causes structural failure at the wing root with 180 MPa

Proposed Tether and Bridle Design

Ideal Bridle Location Analysis

Wing Stress Analysis

Wing Stress Analysis Maximum stress: 15 MPa

Fuselage Stress Analysis

Tether and Bridle Configuration

Base Station Analysis and Feasibility

2 Potentiometers and Single-Axis Load Cell

3 Single-Axis Load Cells

Project Planning

Project Planning

Work Breakdown Structure (10-12) Paul: Jon: Kyle: Matt: Saj: Bill:

Questions?